Aims. Continuous local antibiotic perfusion (CLAP) has recently attracted attention as a new drug delivery system for orthopaedic infections. CLAP is a direct continuous infusion of high-concentration gentamicin (1,200 μg/ml) into the bone marrow. As it is a new system, its influence on the bone marrow is unknown. This study aimed to examine the effects of high-concentration antibiotics on human bone tissue-derived cells. Methods. Cells were isolated from the bone tissue grafts collected from six patients using the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator system, and exposed to different gentamicin concentrations. Live cells rate, apoptosis rate, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, expression of osteoblast-related genes, mineralization potential, and restoration of cell viability and ALP activity were examined by in vitro studies. Results. The live cells rate (the ratio of total number of cells in the well plate to the absorbance-measured number of live cells) was significantly decreased at ≥ 500 μg/ml of gentamicin on day 14; apoptosis rate was significantly increased at ≥ 750 μg/ml, and ALP activity was significantly decreased at ≥ 750 μg/ml. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction results showed no significant decrease in the ALP and activating transcription factor 4 transcript levels at ≥ 1,000 μg/ml on day 7. Mineralization potential was significantly decreased at all concentrations. Restoration of cell viability was significantly decreased at 750 and 1,000 μg/ml on day 21 and at 500 μg/ml on day 28, and ALP activity was significantly decreased at 500 μg/ml on day 28. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that the exposure concentration and duration of antibiotic administration during CLAP could affect cell functions. However, further in vivo studies are needed to determine the optimal dose in a clinical setting. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(3):91–100

Aim. The aim of the present work was (i) to survey the situation of healthcare regarding the use of antibiotics in orthopaedics and trauma surgery in Germany, (ii) to determine which empiric antibiotic regimens are preferred in the treatment of periprosthethic joint infections (PJI) and (iii) to evaluate the hypothetical antibiotic adequacy of the applied empirical antibiotic therapy regimens based on a patient collective of a German university hospital. Method. A survey on empirical and prophylactic antibiotic therapy was conducted at German university and occupational health clinics (BG clinics), each in the specialties of orthopedics and trauma surgery. A total of 71 clinics were contacted by email. The questionnaire sent included open-ended questions on systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in primary hip arthroplasty; a distinction was made between hip arthroplasty due to femoral fractures and elective hip arthroplasty. In addition, the empirical antibiotic therapy used in PJIs was surveyed. To determine the success rate of prophylaxis and therapy according to sensitivity to the antibiotics applied, the survey results were compared with previously published data on antimicrobial treatment in n=81 PJI patients treated in our department between 2017 and 2020. Results. In 93.2% (elective) and 88.6% (fracture care) of the hospitals, 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins are administered perioperatively for infection prophylaxis in primary hip arthroplasty. In contrast, empiric antibiotic treatment for PJI showed a clearly inhomogeneous therapeutic picture. Monotherapy with an aminopenicillin/betalactamase inhibitor is most frequently used (38.7%); 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins are second most frequently used as monotherapy (18.2%). In addition, dual combination therapies have become established, mostly aminopenicillin/betalactamase inhibitor or 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins, whose administration is supplemented with another antibiotic. The most common combination in PJI is aminopenicillin/betalactamase inhibitor + vancomycin (11.4%). The most widely used therapy (monotherapy with aminopenicillin/betalactamase inhibitor) would have covered 69.0% of PJI patients. Monotherapy with 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins would have been susceptible to 57.8% of PJI patients. In contrast, a combination of vancomycin + 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins would have been most effective, with an efficacy of 91.5% according to the resistograms, but this was used by only two hospitals. Conclusions. Empirical antibiotic therapy for the treatment of PJI is applied in more than half of the clinics with a single broad-spectrum beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotic. This discrepancy between the everyday care in the clinics and the administration of clearly more effective combination therapies underlines the need for recommendation guidelines

The recently published Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens In Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial found no benefit in extending antibiotic prophylaxis from 24 hours to five days after endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower limb bone tumours. PARITY is the first randomized controlled trial in orthopaedic oncology and is a huge step forward in understanding antibiotic prophylaxis. However, significant gaps remain, including questions around antibiotic choice, particularly in the UK, where cephalosporins are avoided due to concerns of Clostridioides difficile infection. We present a review of the evidence for antibiotic choice, dosing, and timing, and a brief description of PARITY, its implication for practice, and the remaining gaps in our understanding. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(8):850–856

Aims. The duration of systemic antibiotic treatment following first-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is contentious. Our philosophy is to perform an aggressive debridement, and to use a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics in cement beads and systemic prophylactic antibiotics alone. The aim of this study was to assess the success of this philosophy in the management of PJI of the hip using our two-stage protocol. Methods. The study involved a retrospective review of our prospectively collected database from which we identified all patients who underwent an intended two-stage revision for PJI of the hip. All patients had a diagnosis of PJI according to the major criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2013, a minimum five-year follow-up, and were assessed using the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool. The outcomes were grouped into ‘successful’ or ‘unsuccessful’. Results. A total of 299 two-stage revision THAs in 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 258 (86%) proceeded to second-stage surgery. Their mean age was 68.1 years (28 to 92). The median follow-up was 10.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 6.3 to 15.0). A 91% success rate was seen in those patients who underwent reimplantation, decreasing to 86% when including those who did not proceed to reimplantation. The median duration of postoperative systemic antibiotics following the first stage was five days (IQR 5 to 9). There was no significant difference in outcome between those patients who were treated with antibiotics for ≤ 48 hours (p = 0.961) or ≤ five days (p = 0.376) compared with those who were treated with longer courses. Greater success rates were seen for Gram-positive PJIs (87%) than for Gram-negative (84%) and mixed-Gram PJIs (72%; p = 0.098). Conclusion. Aggressive surgical debridement with a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics at the time of first-stage revision surgery for PJI of the hip, without prolonged systemic antibiotics, provides a high rate of success, responsible antibiotic stewardship, and reduced hospital costs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(5):511–517

Aims. Prophylactic antibiotic regimens for elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty vary widely across hospitals and trusts in the UK. This study aimed to identify antibiotic prophylaxis regimens currently in use for elective primary arthroplasty across the UK, establish variations in antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and their impact on the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the first-year post-index procedure, and evaluate adherence to current international consensus guidance. Methods. The guidelines for the primary and alternative recommended prophylactic antibiotic regimens in clean orthopaedic surgery (primary arthroplasty) for 109 hospitals and trusts across the UK were sought by searching each trust and hospital’s website (intranet webpages), and by using the MicroGuide app. The mean cost of each antibiotic regimen was calculated using price data from the British National Formulary (BNF). Regimens were then compared to the 2018 Philadelphia Consensus Guidance, to evaluate adherence to international guidance. Results. The primary choice and dosing of the prophylactic antimicrobial regimens varied widely. The two most used regimens were combined teicoplanin and gentamicin, and cefuroxime followed by two or three doses of cefuroxime eight-hourly, recommended by 24 centres (22.02%) each. The alternative choice and dosing of the prophylactic antimicrobial regimen also varied widely across the 83 centres with data available. Prophylaxis regimens across some centres fail to cover the likeliest causes of surgical site infection (SSI). Five centres (4.59%) recommend co-amoxiclav, which confers no Staphylococcus coverage, while 33 centres (30.28%) recommend cefuroxime, which confers no Enterococcus coverage. Limited adherence to 2018 Philadelphia Consensus Guidance was observed, with 67 centres (61.50%) not including a cephalosporin in their guidance. Conclusion. This analysis of guidance on antimicrobial prophylaxis in primary arthroplasty across 109 hospitals and trusts in the UK has identified widespread variation in primary and alternative antimicrobial regimens currently recommended. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(10):742–749

Aim. The incidence of fractured neck of femur (FNOF) is increasing yearly. Many of these patients undergo hip hemiarthroplasty. High dose dual-antibiotic cement (HDDAC) has been shown to reduce rates of deep surgical site infection (SSI) when compared to the current standard low dose single-antibiotic cement (LDSAC) in a quasi-randomised controlled trial. Some concerns exist regarding the use of HDDAC and the development of resistance. We reviewed cases of infection in LDSAC and HDDAC bone cement with regard to causative organism and resistance profile. Method. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all hemiarthroplasties within our trust from April 2008 to December 2014. We identified all patients in this time period who acquired a deep SSI from the trust SSI surveillance database. The infecting organisms and susceptibility patterns were collated for each cement. Results. We identified 1941 hemiarthroplasties. There were 36 deep surgical site infections representing an infection rate of 3.1% in LDSAC patients and 1.2% in HDDAC patients. A wider variety of organisms were seen in the LDSAC compared to HDDAC. Staphylococcus epidermidis accounted for the majority of infections in both LDSAC and HDDAC patients. Infection with Corynebacterium species and Staphylococcus aureus was eliminated completely in HDDAC. There was minimal change in the proportion of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. A change in resistance was not demonstrated amongst infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. In Gram-positive bacteria, resistance to a number of antibiotics increased using HDDAC compared to LDSAC, most notably to clindamycin and gentamicin within the coagulase negative staphylococci. However, levels of resistance remained low to teicoplanin, vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and rifampicin. Conclusions. A lower infection rate was seen in HDDAC. Direct comparison demonstrated changes in resistance profiles caused by Gram-positive organisms. 24,000 patients undergo hip hemiarthroplasty annually. Extrapolating our results to this cohort would demonstrate 744 infections in LDSAC and 288 infections in HDDAC. Of these, resistance to both clindamycin and gentamicin would be seen in 180 patients with LDSAC and 177 patients with HDDAC. Overall, this review supports the continued use of HDDAC in FNOF patients. High dose dual antibiotic cement = Copal G+C, Heraeus Medical, UK. Low dose single antibiotic cement = Palacos R+G, Heraeus Medical, UK

Spondylodiscitis is a severe infectious disease of the vertebral column and the intervertebral disc space and may be complicated by an epidural abscess. A wide range of pathogens have been described as causative agents. Since several weeks of antibiotics are necessary for successful therapy detection of the causative pathogen is essential. Specific antibiotic therapy improves outcome and reduces antibiotic related complications. Antibiotic Stewardship (ABS) programs are bundled approaches aimed at improving antibiotic therapy. In 2012 an ABS program including weekly interdisciplinary clinical rounds and development of algorithms for diagnosis and therapy of patients with spondylodiscitis was established in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery in a University hospital. We evaluated the effects of ABS with regard to the appropriateness of specimen and pathogen detection and antibiotic therapy in patients with spondylodiscitis. We retrospectively analysed diagnostic procedures and pathogen detection of 100 patients that were hospitalized with spondylodiscitis and compared the data of patients that were treated before (2004–2011) and after introduction of ABS measures (2012–2014). After introduction the effect of ABS on antibiotic therapy was analysed. 100 patients with radiologically confirmed spondylodiscits were enrolled. The pre-ABS group (2004–2011) contained 58 patients. Of these no samples were taken for microbiological examination from 21 patients (36%) and from 8 patients (14%) only swabs were submitted for culture. Aspirates or tissue samples were taken from 22 patients (38%) and blood cultures from 18 patients (31%). Pathogen detection was successful in 18 patients (31%). After introduction of ABS in the beginning of 2012 aspirates or tissue samples were taken from 34 patients (81%) and blood cultures were taken from 34 patients (81%). Pathogen detection was successful in 26 patients (62%). The most commonly detected pathogens were Gram positive cocci (S.aureus, S. epidermidis, and streptococci) in 31 patients. Less common pathogens were found in 12 patients (Gram negative rods (8), fungi (3), Moraxella (1) and Propionibacterium (1). After introduction of ABS antibiotic therapy was changed in 18 of 20 patients (90%) after pathogen identification. In 50 % of cases the inappropriate empiric therapy was changed (MRSA, MRSE and Gram negative rods) and in 50 % broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy could be deescalated. ABS significantly improved the number and quality of samples, increased the number of blood cultures taken and doubled the pathogen detection rates in patients with spondylodiscitis leading to an improvement in antibiotic therapy in almost all patients with pathogen detection

This study aimed to evaluate the month-to-month prevalence of antibiotic dispensation in the 12 months before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to identify factors associated with antibiotic dispensation in the month immediately following the surgical procedure. In total, 4,115 THAs and TKAs performed between April 2013 and June 2019 from a state-wide arthroplasty referral centre were analysed. A cross-sectional study used data from an institutional arthroplasty registry, which was linked probabilistically to administrative dispensing data from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Multivariable logistic regression was carried out to identify patient and surgical risk factors for oral antibiotic dispensation. Oral antibiotics were dispensed in 18.3% of patients following primary TKA and 12.0% of patients following THA in the 30 days following discharge. During the year after discharge, 66.7% of TKA patients and 58.2% of THA patients were dispensed an antibiotic at some point. Patients with poor preoperative health status were more likely to have antibiotics dispensed in the month following THA or TKA. Older age, undergoing TKA rather than THA, obesity, inflammatory arthritis, and experiencing an in-hospital wound-related or other infectious complications were associated with increased antibiotic dispensation in the 30 days following discharge. A high rate of antibiotic dispensation in the 30 days following THA and TKA has been observed. Although resource constraints may limit routine wound review for all patients by a surgeon, a select cohort may benefit from timely specialist review postoperatively. Several risk factors identified in this study may aid in identifying appropriate candidates for such changes to follow-up care

Aims. Here we used a mature seven-day biofilm model of Staphylococcus aureus, exposed to antibiotics up to an additional seven days, to establish the effectiveness of either mechanical cleaning or antibiotics or non-contact induction heating, and which combinations could eradicate S. aureus in mature biofilms. Methods. Mature biofilms of S. aureus (ATCC 29213) were grown on titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) coupons for seven days and were subjected to the following treatments or their combinations: antibiotics, mechanical cleaning, or heat shock by induction heating of 60°C for one minute. Experiments were repeated at least five times. Results. In the untreated biofilm, growth up to 1.8×10. 11. colony-forming units (CFU)/cm. 2. was observed. Treatment with ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, vancomycin, cefuroxime, and amoxicillin all with rifampicin gave 6.0 log, 6.1 log, 1.4 log, 4.8 log, and 3.6 log reduction in CFU/cm. 2. , respectively. Mechanical cleaning alone resulted in 4.9 log reduction and induction heating in 7.3 log reduction. There was an additional effect of ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, and induction heating when used in combinations. There was no additional effect for mechanical cleaning. No bacterial growth could be detected after induction heating followed by seven days of ciprofloxacin with rifampicin. Conclusion. Mechanical cleaning, antibiotics, and non-contact induction heating reduced the bacterial load of mature S. aureus biofilms with approximately 5 log or more as a single treatment. The effect of mechanical cleaning on mature S. aureus biofilms was limited when used in combination with antibiotics and/or induction heating. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(9):629–638

Objectives. This study is to compare the elution characteristics, antimicrobial activity, and mechanical properties of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) loaded with powder antibiotic, powder antibiotic with inert filler (xylitol), or liquid antibiotic, particularly focusing on vancomycin and amphotericin B. Methods. Cement specimens loaded with 2 g of vancomycin or amphotericin B powder (powder group), 2 g of antibiotic powder, and 2 g of xylitol (xylitol group) or 12 ml of antibiotic solution containing 2 g of antibiotic (liquid group) were tested. Results. Vancomycin elution was enhanced by 234% in the liquid group and by 12% in the xylitol group compared with the powder group. Amphotericin B elution was enhanced by 265% in the liquid group and by 65% in the xylitol group compared with the powder group. Based on the disk-diffusion assay, the eluate samples of vancomycin–loaded ALBC of the liquid group exhibited a significantly larger inhibitory zone than samples of the powder or xylitol group. Regarding the amphotericin B–loaded ALBCs, only the eluate samples of the liquid group exhibited a clear inhibitory zone which was not observed in either xylitol nor powder groups. The ultimate compressive strength was significantly reduced in specimens containing liquid antibiotics. Conclusions. Adding vancomycin or amphotericin B antibiotic powder in distilled water before mixing with bone cement can significantly improve the antibiotic-release efficacy than that by loading ALBC with the same dose of antibiotic powder. This simple, and effective method for preparation of ALBCs can significantly improve the antibiotic-release efficacy of ALBCs

Aims. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) when adequate methods of culture are used, and to evaluate the outcome in patients who were treated with antibiotics for a culture-negative PJI compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld. Methods. A multicentre observational study was undertaken: 1,553 acute and 1,556 chronic PJIs, diagnosed between 2013 and 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Culture-negative PJIs were diagnosed according to the Muskuloskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), International Consensus Meeting (ICM), and European Bone and Joint Society (EBJIS) definitions. The primary outcome was recurrent infection, and the secondary outcome was removal of the prosthetic components for any indication, both during a follow-up period of two years. Results. None of the acute PJIs and 70 of the chronic PJIs (4.7%) were culture-negative; a total of 36 culture-negative PJIs (51%) were treated with antibiotics, particularly those with histological signs of infection. After two years of follow-up, no recurrent infections occurred in patients in whom antibiotics were withheld. The requirement for removal of the components for any indication during follow-up was not significantly different in those who received antibiotics compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld (7.1% vs 2.9%; p = 0.431). Conclusion. When adequate methods of culture are used, the incidence of culture-negative PJIs is low. In patients with culture-negative PJI, antibiotic treatment can probably be withheld if there are no histological signs of infection. In all other patients, diagnostic efforts should be made to identify the causative microorganism by means of serology or molecular techniques. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):183–188

Aim. Local antibiotic treatment for bone and joint infections offers direct delivery of high concentrations of antibiotics with reduced systemic exposure and favourable safety profile. However, the possibility of prolonged release of antibiotics at sub-therapeutic levels creates concern about the possible development of antimicrobial resistance. We investigated patients with recurrent bone and joint infection for evidence of antimicrobial resistance emerging from the use of local antibiotics. Method. 125 patients with recurrent infection (prosthetic joint infection, fracture related infection and osteomyelitis) in the UK between 2007 and 2021 were identified. Electronic patient records (including operative notes, pathology results and prescriptions) were reviewed to extract site of infection, date of surgery, the use of local antibiotics, culture results, empiric and definitive antibiotic therapy. All antibiotic sensitivity results were recorded as sensitive, intermediate or resistant according to contemporary guidelines (BSAC and EUCAST). Results. Local antibiotics were used in 74/125 (59.2%) of patients. Agents used were Gentamicin 53/125 (42.4%), Tobramycin 18/125 (14.4%), and vancomycin in 19/125 (15.2%). Combined gentamicin and vancomycin usage was seen in 16/125 patients (12.8%). Gentamicin non-sensitivity was common in this cohort with frequent aminoglycoside use. At index procedure, a Gentamicin non-sensitive organism was cultured in 51/125 patients (40.8%). At re-operation this proportion was lower: 40/125 (32%). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of Gentamicin resistance at reoperation comparing patients who previously received local aminoglycosides with those who had not (21/71, 29.8% vs 19/54, 35.2% p=0.6, chi-squared test). In 48/125 (38.4%) of patients, the same species was isolated during the index and recurrence surgery. We identified 7 cases with new aminoglycoside resistance arising at the second procedure. In 2/7 – S. aureus and E. faecalis - aminoglycoside resistance was the only change in antimicrobial sensitivity. In 5/7, there were at least 2 additional changes in observed antimicrobial sensitivity. 3/74 (4%) of cases who initially received local aminoglycoside cultured organisms with aminoglycoside resistance at recurrence. 4/51 (7.8%) of those who did not receive local or systemic aminoglycoside at index surgery cultured resistant organisms (chi square 0.82; p=0.365). Conclusions. As a group, patients whose treatment for orthopaedic infection included local antibiotics did not exhibit higher rates of specific antimicrobial resistance compared with those not treated with local antibiotics. However we did identify cases where Gram positive bacteria developed aminoglycoside resistance regardless of their initial antimicrobial therapy. This should be considered in antimicrobial choice during surgery for recurrence

Aims. Antibiotic prophylaxis involving timely administration of appropriately dosed antibiotic is considered effective to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Cephalosporins provide effective prophylaxis, although evidence regarding the optimal timing and dosage of prophylactic antibiotics is inconclusive. The aim of this study is to examine the association between cephalosporin prophylaxis dose, timing, and duration, and the risk of SSI after THA/TKA. Methods. A prospective multicentre cohort study was undertaken in consenting adults with osteoarthritis undergoing elective primary TKA/THA at one of 19 high-volume Australian public/private hospitals. Data were collected prior to and for one-year post surgery. Logistic regression was undertaken to explore associations between dose, timing, and duration of cephalosporin prophylaxis and SSI. Data were analyzed for 1,838 participants. There were 264 SSI comprising 63 deep SSI (defined as requiring intravenous antibiotics, readmission, or reoperation) and 161 superficial SSI (defined as requiring oral antibiotics) experienced by 249 (13.6%) participants within 365 days of surgery. Results. In adjusted modelling, factors associated with a significant reduction in any SSI and deep SSI included: correct weight-adjusted dose (any SSI; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 0.99); p = 0.045); commencing preoperative cephalosporin within 60 minutes (any SSI, aOR 0.56 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.89); p = 0.012; deep SSI, aOR 0.29 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.59); p < 0.001) or 60 minutes or longer prior to skin incision (aOR 0.35 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.70); p = 0.004; deep SSI, AOR 0.27 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.83); p = 0.022), compared to at or after skin incision. Other factors significantly associated with an increased risk of any SSI, but not deep SSI alone, were receiving a non-cephalosporin antibiotic preoperatively (aOR 1.35 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.81); p = 0.044) and changing cephalosporin dose (aOR 1.76 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.57); p = 0.002). There was no difference in risk of any or deep SSI between the duration of prophylaxis less than or in excess of 24 hours. Conclusion. Ensuring adequate, weight-adjusted dosing and early, preoperative delivery of prophylactic antibiotics may reduce the risk of SSI in THA/TKA, whereas the duration of prophylaxis beyond 24 hours is unnecessary. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(3):252–260

Surgical site infections following orthopaedic surgery are a serious complication associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Intra-wound antibiotic powder may be able to provide infection prophylaxis locally with less systemic adverse effects, and promising results have been reported in systematic reviews of its use in spine surgery. This study aims to analyse the efficacy and adverse effect profile of intra-wound antibiotics in reducing surgical site infections in orthopaedic surgery for traumatic pelvic and lower limb fractures. A systematic review was conducted for studies reporting on the incidence of surgical site infections following administration of intra-wound antibiotic powder in pelvic and lower limb trauma surgery. Randomised controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies were included. A meta-analysis was conducted for deep surgical site infections. Seven studies were included in the systematic review including six retrospective case-control studies and one randomised controlled trial. Results of the meta-analysis suggest a potential 23% reduction in the odds of developing a deep surgical site infection in patients treated with intra-operative antibiotic powder compared with those managed with intravenous antibiotics alone (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.52 – 1.13), although the results did not reach statistical significance. Notable selective bias against intra-wound antibiotics and suboptimal study design were found in the retrospective studies, however the randomised controlled trial reported a significant reduction in deep surgical site infections with intra-wound vancomycin powder. There were no reports of systemic adverse outcomes and minimal risk of wound complications with the use of intra-wound antibiotics. This review suggests the use of intra-wound antibiotic powder in pelvic and lower limb trauma surgery may reduce the incidence of deep surgical site infections. Further powered studies including randomised controlled trials are required to confirm the results highlighted in this study

We present a series of 114 patients with microbiologically-proven chronically-infected total hip replacement, treated between 1991 and 2004 by a two-stage exchange procedure with antibiotic-loaded cement, but without the use of a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy. The mean follow-up for all patients was 74 months (2 to 175) with all surviving patients having a minimum follow-up of two years. Infection was successfully eradicated in 100 patients (87.7%), a rate which is similar to that reported by others, but where prolonged adjuvant antibiotic therapy has been used. Using the technique described, a prolonged course of systemic antibiotics does not appear to be essential and the high cost of the administration of antibiotics can be avoided

Despite the routine use of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative infection following fracture surgery remains a persistent issue with substantial morbidity. The use of additional local antibiotic prophylaxis may have a protective effect and some orthopaedic surgeons have adopted their use in recent years, despite limited evidence of its beneficial effect. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current literature regarding the effect of prophylactic local antibiotics on the rate of infection in fracture surgery in both open and closed fractures. A comprehensive search of Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed was performed. Cohort studies were eligible if they investigated the effect on infection rate of additional local antibiotic prophylaxis compared with systemic prophylaxis alone following fracture surgery. The data were pooled in a meta-analysis. In total, four randomized controlled trials and 11 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 6161 fractures from various anatomical locations were eligible for inclusion. The majority of the included studies were Level 3 evidence and had a moderate risk of bias. When all fractures were pooled, the risk of infection was significantly reduced when local antibiotics were applied compared with the control group receiving systemic prophylaxis only (OR = 0.39; 95%CI: 0.26 to 0.53, P < 0.001). In particular, there was a significant reduction in deep infections (OR = 0.59; 95%CI: 0.38 to 0.91, P = 0.017). The beneficial effect of local antibiotics for preventing total infection was seen in both open fractures (OR = 0.35; 95%CI: 0.23 to 0.53, P < 0.001) and closed fractures (OR = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.35 to 0.95, P = 0.029) when analyzed separately. This meta-analysis suggests a significant risk reduction for postoperative infection following fracture surgery when local antibiotics were added to standard systemic prophylaxis, with a protective effect present in both open and closed fractures

Aims. The management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging. The correct antibiotic management remains elusive due to differences in epidemiology and resistance between countries, and reports in the literature. Before the efficacy of surgical treatment is investigated, it is crucial to analyze the bacterial strains causing PJI, especially for patients in whom no organisms are grown. Methods. A review of all revision TKAs which were undertaken between 2006 and 2018 in a tertiary referral centre was performed, including all those meeting the consensus criteria for PJI, in which organisms were identified. Using a cluster analysis, three chronological time periods were created. We then evaluated the antibiotic resistance of the identified bacteria between these three clusters and the effectiveness of our antibiotic regime. Results. We identified 129 PJIs with 161 culture identified bacteria in 97 patients. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were identified in 46.6% cultures, followed by Staphylococcus aureus in 19.8%. The overall resistance to antibiotics did not increase significantly during the study period (p = 0.454). However, CNS resistance to teicoplanin (p < 0.001), fosfomycin (p = 0.016), and tetracycline (p = 0.014) increased significantly. Vancomycin had an 84.4% overall sensitivity and 100% CNS sensitivity and was the most effective agent. Conclusion. Although we were unable to show an overall increase in antibiotic resistance in organisms that cause PJI after TKA during the study period, this was not true for CNS. It is concerning that resistance of CNS to new antibiotics, but not vancomycin, has increased in a little more than a decade. Our findings suggest that referral centres should continuously monitor their bacteriological analyses, as these have significant implications for prophylactic treatment in both primary arthroplasty and revision arthroplasty for PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):171–176

Aim. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the current evidence for or against this up-and-coming treatment modality. Method. A comprehensive literature search in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Exclusion criteria included patients < 18 years of age, follow-up <11 months, and a score < 6 on the National Institute of Health quality assessment tool. Results. 15 articles, encompassing 631 PJIs in 626 patients, were included in the final analysis, all level IV case series. The quality of many studies was impeded by a retrospective design (14/15), a relative small study population (10 out of 15 studies had less than 50 patients), selection bias, and remarkable heterogeneity in terms of catheter type, antibiotic type, dose and duration of IA antibiotics and techniques of surgical revision. 347 were chronic infections, 66 acute infections and 218 unknown. The majority was treated with single-stage revision with adjuvant IA antibiotic infusion (499/631, 79.1%). The remaining PJIs were treated with stand-alone IA antibiotic infusion (77/631, 12.2%), DAIR with adjuvant IA antibiotic infusion (36/631, 5.7%) or two-stage revision with adjuvant IA antibiotic infusion (19/631, 3.0%). Mean duration of IA antibiotic infusion was 19 days (range 3–50), although most patients received a combination of both IA and systemic (IV or PO) antibiotics. An overall failure rate (defined as failures of infection eradication/total PJIs) of approximately 11% was found. The use of IA antibiotic infusion as a stand-alone treatment was associated with a higher failure rate. In total 117 complications occurred in 631 cases (18.5%). Of these, 71 were non-catheter-related (60.7%) and 46 were catheter-related (39.3%). The most common catheter-related complications were premature loss of the catheter (18/46), developing a fistula (5/46), and elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels (12/46). Conclusions. Due to the lack of comparative studies the (added) benefit of IA antibiotic infusion in the treatment of PJI remains uncertain. From a theoretical point of view it seems likely that is should not be used as a stand-alone treatment. A prospective randomized controlled trial using a well-described infusion protocol is needed to see if the potential benefits justify the increased costs, labour and catheter-related complications of this treatment modality

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(3):124–126.

Aims. Dead space management is an important element in the surgical management of chronic osteomyelitis and can be addressed with the use of a biodegradable local antibiotic carrier. We present the clinical and radiographic outcomes in two different biodegradable antibiotic carriers used in the management of chronic osteomyelitis. Method. A single centre series reviewed between 2006–2017. The initial cohort (2006–2010) of 180 cases (Group A) had a calcium sulphate carrier containing tobramycin (Osteoset. ®. T, Wright Medical). The second cohort (2013–1017) of 162 cases (Group B) had a biphasic calcium sulphate, nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite carrier containing gentamicin (Cerament. TM. G, Bonesupport AB). All cases were Cierny-Mader Grade III and IV and had a minimum of one-year clinical follow-up. Clinical outcomes reviewed included infection recurrence rate, wound leak, and subsequent fracture involving the treated segment. All cases with a minimum one-year radiographic follow-up were reviewed and bone void filling was assessed as percentage filling on the final follow-up radiograph to the nearest five percent increment. Results. Mean follow-up in Group A was 4.2 years (range 1.3–10.5 years) and in Group B it was 1.8 years (1–4.7 years). Group A had a significantly higher rate of infection recurrence (19/180 (10.6%) Vs. 7/163 (4.4%) p=0.030), wound leak (33/180 (18.3.%) Vs. 16/162 (9.9%) p=0.026) and subsequent fracture rate (11/180 (6.1%) Vs. 3/162 (1.9%) p=0.047) compared to Group B. Of the cases with a minimum of one-year radiographic follow-up Group A had 96 cases (mean follow-up 3.3 years, range 1.0–10.5 years) and Group B had 137 cases (mean follow-up 1.6 years, range 1.0–4.7 years). The mean bone void healing in Group B was significantly better than Group A (74.0% Vs. 41.7%, p <0.00001). Conclusions. Cerament. TM. G has significantly better bone healing compared to a calcium sulphate carrier and was associated with a lower rate of recurrent infection, wound leak and subsequent fracture risk