Previously, we conducted a multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without remplissage. The end point for the randomized controlled trial was two years post-operative, providing support for the benefits of remplissage in the short term in reducing recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to compare the medium term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of patients previously randomized to have undergone isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) for the management of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. The rate of recurrent instability and instances of re-operation were examined. The original study was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial with two 1:1 parallel groups with recruitment undertaken between 2011 and 2017. For this medium-term study, participants were reached for a telephone follow-up in 2020 and asked a series of standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation or reoperation that had occurred on their shoulder for which they were randomized. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables. “Failure” was defined as occurrence of a dislocation. “Recurrent instability” was defined as the participant reporting a dislocation or two or more occurences of subluxation greater than one year post-operative. All analyses were undertaken based on intention-to-treat whereby their data was analyzed based on the group to which they were originally allocated. One-hundred and eight participants were randomized of which 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to final follow-up was 49.3 for the NO REMP group and 53.8 for the REMP group. The rates of re-dislocation or failure were 8% (4/52) in the REMP group at an average of 23.8 months post-operative versus 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP at an average of 16.5 months post-operative. The rates of recurrent instability were 10% (5/52) in the REMP group at an average of 24 months post-operative versus 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group at an average of 19.5 months post-operative. Survival curves were significantly different favouring REMP in both scenarios. Arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage is an effective procedure in the treatment of patients with an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%). Patients can expect favourable rates of recurrent instability when compared with isolated Bankart repair at medium term follw-up

The Latarjet procedure is a successful primary and revision option for anterior shoulder instability; however recent reports have highlighted varying complication rates. Our aim was to prospectively study clinical, functional and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure. 50 consecutive patients underwent a Latarjet coracoid transfer between 2006 and 2012. Mean age was 27 years (17–63), 48 were male. Pre-/post-operative imaging, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OISS), American Shoulder & Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Subjective Shoulder Value score (SSV) and clinical evaluation were documented. Mean follow up was 32 months (6–74). There were no dislocations or revision procedures. Subluxation occurred in one patient only. 95% of shoulders were subjectively graded “excellent” or “good;” 5% “fair;” and none as “poor”. The mean pre-op ASES was 58(50–66) and 95(92–98) post-operatively (p< 0.001). The mean pre-operative OISS was 19(18–22) and 43(41–45) post-operatively (p<0.001). The mean SSV increased from 46% to 89% (p < 0.001). 98% of patients considered their surgery to be “successful” and 95% would recommend the procedure to a friend. 82% returned to sport at their previous level. There were no infective or metalwork-related complications. Five experienced transient neurological symptoms all of which resolved within three months. These results suggest that the Latarjet procedure is safe and reliable with low complication rates

The Latarjet procedure is a successful primary and revision option for anterior shoulder instability; however recent reports have highlighted varying complication rates. Our aim was to prospectively study clinical, functional and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure. 50 consecutive patients underwent a Latarjet coracoid transfer between 2006 and 2012. Mean age was 27 years (17–63), 48 were male. Pre-/post-operative imaging, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OISS), American Shoulder & Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Subjective Shoulder Value score (SSV) and clinical evaluation were documented. Mean follow up was 32 months (6–74). There were no dislocations or revision procedures. Subluxation occurred in one patient only. 95% of shoulders were subjectively graded “excellent” or “good;” 5% “fair;” and none as “poor”. The mean pre-op ASES was 58(50–66) and 95(92–98) post-operatively(p<0.001). The mean pre-operative OISS was 19(18–22) and 43(41–45) post-operatively(p<0.001). The mean SSV increased from 46% to 89%(p < 0.001). 98% of patients considered their surgery to be “successful” and 95% would recommend the procedure to a friend. 82% returned to sport at their previous level. There were no infective or metalwork-related complications. 5 experienced transient neurological symptoms all of which resolved within 3 months. These results suggest that the Latarjet procedure is safe and reliable with low complication rates

Purpose. This prospective, expertise-based randomized clinical trial compares arthroscopic to open shoulder stabilization by measuring the disease-specific quality of life outcome in patients with traumatic unidirectional anterior shoulder instability, and determining the incidence of recurrent instability at 2-years post-operatively. Method. One hundred and ninety-six patients were randomly allocated to arthroscopic (n=98) or open (n=98) repair using an expertise-based approach with a surgeon specializing in one type of surgery. Randomization was performed using computer-generation, variable block sizes and concealed envelopes. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years post-operatively. These outcomes included the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) Index quality of life outcome and the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) functional outcome. Both outcomes were measured on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100, where a higher score represents better quality of life or function. Recurrent instability was categorized as traumatic/atraumatic, and as a subluxation/dislocation. Analyses included ANOVA of repeated measures and independent t-tests. Bonferroni adjustments for pairwise contrasts were made for multiple comparisons. Chi-squared analyses were performed on recurrence. Statistical significance was reported at p < 0.05. Results. There were no statistically significant differences at baseline with respect to gender, involved dominant shoulders, age, WOSI or ASES scores. At 2-years post-operatively, 19 patients in the Open group and 14 patients in the Arthroscopic group were lost to follow-up. A comparison of the baseline characteristics of these lost to follow-up patients showed no statistically significant differences in WOSI and ASES scores, age, involved dominant shoulder, gender and presence of Hill Sachs lesions between the groups. Of the patients that completed 2-year follow-up, there was no difference in mean WOSI score between the two groups: Open = 85 (SD = 20; 95% CI = 81 89), Arthroscopic = 82 (SD = 20; 95% CI = 77 86), p = 0.31. The ASES score for the Open group at 2-years was 91 (SD = 13; 95% CI = 88 94) and 88 (SD = 16; 95% CI = 85 92) for the Arthroscopic group, p = 0.17. Recurrence rates at 2-years were statistically different with 11% in the Open (9/80) and 23% in the Arthroscopic (20/87) groups, p = 0.05. Conclusion. At 2-years post-operative follow-up, there was no difference in disease-specific quality of life between Open and Arthroscopic repair. Open repair had a significantly lower risk of recurrence

Purpose

To describe the geometric variables of the posterosuperior humeral-head (Hill-Sachs) lesion and analyze their relationship with patient clinical variables.

The Latarjet procedure is a well described method to stabilize anterior shoulder instability. There are concerns of high complication rates, one of these being a painful shoulder without instability due to screw irritation. The arthroscopic changes in the shoulder at time of screw removal compared to those pre-Latarjet have not been described in the literature. We conducted a retrospective review of arthroscopic videos between 2015 and 2022 of 17 patients at the time of their Latarjet screw removal and where available (n=13) compared them to arthroscopic findings at time of index Latarjet. Instability was an exclusion criterion. X-rays prior to screw removal were assessed independently by two observers blinded to patient details for lysis of the graft. Arthroscopic assessment of the anatomy and pathological changes were made by two shoulder surgeons via mutual consensus. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was analyzed as a measure for the inter-observer reliability for the radiographs. Our cohort had an average age of 21.5±7.7 years and an average period of 16.2±13.1 months between pre- and post-arthroscopy. At screw removal all patients had an inflamed subscapularis muscle with 88% associated musculotendinous tears and 59% had a pathological posterior labrum. Worsening in the condition of subscapularis muscle (93%), humeral (31%) and glenoid (31%) cartilage was found when compared to pre-Latarjet arthroscopes. Three failures of capsular repair were seen, two of these when only one anchor was used. X-ray review demonstrated 79% of patients had graft lysis. Excellent inter-rater reliability was observed with an ICC value of 0.82. Our results show a high rate of pathological change in the subscapularis muscle, glenoid labrum and articular cartilage in the stable but painful Latarjet. 79% of patients had graft lysis with prominent screws on X-ray

Recurrent anterior shoulder instability (RASI) is related to progressive bone loss on the glenoid and on the humeral head. Bone deficit magnitude is a well-recognized predictor of recurrence of instability after an arthroscopic Bankart surgery, but the best way to measure it is unknown. In this study, we want to determine which measurement method is the best predictor of recurrence of instability and function. For 10 years now, all patients undergoing surgery for RASI in 4 centers are included in a prospective study: the LUXE cohort. Patients with a pre-operative CT-scan and a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. ISIS score was used to stratify patients. WOSI and Quick-Dash questionnaires were used to characterise function. Bone defects were assessed using the Clock method, the Glenoid Ratio, the Humeral Ratio, the Glenoid Track method and the angle of engagement in the axial plane. A total of 262 patients are now included in the LUXE study. One hundred and three patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis with a majority of male (79%) and a mean age is 28 years old. The median number of dislocations prior to surgery was 6. Seventy patients had an arthroscopic Bankart repair and 33 patients underwent an open Latarjet procedure. The ISIS score for these groups were of 2.7 and 4.8 respectively (p<0.001). The mean bone defect on the glenoid was of 1h51 with the Clock method (range: 0h-4h48; SD=1h46) and of 9% for the glenoid ratio (0–37%, 10%). On the humeral side, the bone defect was of 1h59 (0h-4h08; 0h49) for the Humeral clock method, 15% (0–36%; 6%) with the ratio method and 71 degrees of external rotation (SD=30 degrees) with the angle of engagement measurement. On the combined evaluations, 53 patients presented an off-track lesion, with mean combined hours of 3h53 (SD= 2h13). The greatest correlation obtained was between the glenoid ratio and the glenoid clock method (r=0.919, p<0.001). Eighteen patients had a recurrence of shoulder dislocation after the initial surgery, leading to a recurrence rate of 23% in arthroscopic surgery versus six percent after a Latarjet (OR= 4.6, p=0.034). No bone defect was correlated to Latarjet failure. For the arthroscopic group, the risk of recurrence was related to a smaller angle of engagement of the Hill-Sachs (p=0.05), a smaller Humeral clock measurement (p=0.034) and a longer follow-up (p=0.006). No glenoid or combined measurements were correlated with arthroscopic procedure failure. Recurrence of dislocation was associated to worst function according to the WOSI (1036 vs 573, p=0.002) and DASH (32 vs 15, p=0.03). Even with lower ISIS score, arthroscopic procedures are still leading to high risk of recurrence in this “all comer” consecutive cohort study AND it is related to humeral side parameters. Recurrence is also affecting daily function and creating higher anxiety related to the shoulder

Anterior shoulder instability is associated with osseous defects of the glenoid and/or humeral head (Hill-Sachs lesions). These defects can contribute to the pathology of instability by engaging together. There is a need to continue to develop methods to preoperatively identify engaging Hill-Sachs lesions for determining appropriate surgical management. The objective was to created a working moveable 3D CT model that allows the user to move the shoulder joint into various positions to assess the relationship between the Hill-Sachs lesion and the anterior glenoid rim. This technique was applied to a cohort series of 14 patients with recurrent anterior dislocation: 4 patients had undergone osteoarticular allografting of Hill-Sachs lesions and 10 control patients had undergone CT scanning to quantify bone loss but had no treatment to address bony pathology. A biomechanical analysis was performed to rotate each 3D model using local coordinate systems through a functional range using an open-source 3D animation program, Blender (Amsterdam, Netherlands). A Hill-Sachs lesion was considered “dynamically” engaging if the angle between the lesion's long axis and anterior glenoid was parallel. In the classical vulnerable position of the shoulder (abduction=90, external rotation=0–135), none of the Hill-Sachs lesions aligned with the anterior glenoid in any of our patients (Figure 1). Therefore, we considered there to be a “low risk” of engagement in these critical positions, as the non-parallel orientation represents a lack of true articular arc mismatch and is unlikely to produce joint instability. We then expanded our search and simulated shoulder positions throughout a physiological range of motion for all groups and found that 100% of the allograft patients and 70% of the controls had positions producing alignment and were “high risk” of engagement (p = 0.18) (Table 1). We also found that the allograft group had a greater number of positions that would engage (mean 4 ± 1 positions of engagement) compared to our controls (mean 2 ± 2 positions of engagement, p = 0.06). We developed a 3D animated paradigm to dynamically and non-invasively visualize a patient's anatomy and determine the clinical significance of a Hill-Sachs lesion using open source software and CT images. The technique demonstrated in this series of patients showed multiple shoulder positions that align the Hill-Sachs and glenoid axes that do not necessarily meet the traditional definition of engagement. Identifying all shoulder positions at risk of “engaging”, in a broader physiological range, may have critical implications towards selecting the appropriate surgical management of bony defects. We do not claim to doubt the classic conceptual definition of engagement, but we merely introduce a technique that accounts for the dynamic component of shoulder motion, and in doing so, avoid limitations of a static criteria assumed traditional definition (like size and location of lesion). Further investigations are planned and will help to further validate the clinical utility of this method. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Currently there is no standard quantitative methodology for the description of Hill-Sachs defects (HSD), the size of which is important in planning surgical treatment for patients with anterior shoulder instability. The main purpose was to develop a simple imaging measurement to improve communication regarding HSDs. The secondary goal was to determine, using this new measurement, whether there was a significant difference in the size of HSDs in patients who underwent a Weber osteotomy (more invasive surgical intervention for those failing Bankart repair) compared with patients who underwent clinically successful arthroscopic Bankart repairs (the first surgical intervention for anterior shoulder instability). HSD volume was calculated with newly developed methodology using computed tomography in ten patients who required eleven Weber osteotomies and using magnetic resonance imaging in twenty-two patients who had clinically successful arthroscopic Bankart repairs. Within the Weber cohort, regression analysis was performed to determine correlation between HSD volume and each of height, maximum depth, and width. Student's t-test analysis was used to compare HSD volume between the Weber and Bankart cohorts. In the Weber cohort, there is a statistically significant correlation between the HSD Volume Ratio and the HSD Maximum Depth Ratio (R. 2. =0.83). The t-test comparison of mean HSD Volumes showed statistically significant (p<0.0015) larger HSD's in the Weber cohort than the Bankart cohort. HSD depth is a radiological indicator for HSD volume. This simple measurement may facilitate orthopaedic pre-operative planning for patients with severe recurrent anterior shoulder instability. In this preliminary study, patients who had Weber osteotomies after failed Bankart repairs had statistically significantly larger HSDs than patients with clinically successful Bankart repairs

Coracoid fractures during screw insertion and graft osteolysis are serious concerns with standard screw fixation techniques in Latarjet procedure. This study tends to evaluate the outcome of mini open Latarjet using Arthrex mini-plate for coracoids graft fixation. We did retrospective analysis of 30 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart's repair. A low profile wedge plate (Arthrex) with two low profile screws was used for fixation of the coracoid graft. CT analysis was performed at final follow up to see graft union and results were evaluated using American shoulder and elbow score (ASES) and Western Ontario shoulder instability score (WOSIS). Mean follow up time was 24 months. Postoperatively, mean forward elevation was 162.8 degrees and external rotation was 44.6 degrees. All patients returned to their previous occupation. None reported to be having any recurrent subluxation post-surgery. The mean ASES score was 92.5 while the mean WOSIS score was 76.84%. Only one patient had screw backing out from the plate. There was no case of coracoid graft osteolysis. The mini-open Latarjet procedure with graft fixation with Arthrex mini-plate provides satisfactory outcome and stabilization in patients who present with dramatic bone loss and failed soft tissue reconstruction. It not only ensures early rehabilitation but also minimum loss of external rotation. The only drawback is the relatively high cost of the implant

The Hill-Sachs lesion is a bony defect of the humeral head that occurs in association with anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. Hill-Sachs lesions are common, with an incidence approaching nearly 100% in the setting of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. However, the indications for surgical management are very limited, with less than 10% of anterior instability patients considered for treatment of the Hill-Sachs lesion. Of utmost importance is addressing bone loss on the anterior-inferior glenoid, which is highly successful at preventing recurrence of instability even with humeral bone loss. In the rare situation where the Hill-Sachs lesion may continue to engage the glenoid, surgical management is indicated. Surgical strategies are variable, including debridement, arthroscopic remplissage, allograft transplantation, surface replacement, and arthroplasty. Given that the population with these defects is typically comprised of young and athletic patients, biologic solutions are most likely to be associated with decades of sustainable joint preservation, function, and stability. The first priority is maximizing the treatment of anterior instability on the glenoid side. Then, small lesions of less than 10% are ignored without consequence. Lesions involving 10–20% of the humeral head are treated with arthroscopic remplissage (defect filled with repair of capsule and infraspinatus). Lesions greater than 20% that extend beyond the glenoid tract are managed with fresh osteochondral allografts to biologically restore the humeral head. Lesions great than 40% are most commonly associated with advanced arthritis and deformity of the humeral articular surface and are therefore treated with a humeral head replacement. This treatment algorithm maximises our ability to stabilise and preserve the glenohumeral joint

The classic Hill-Sachs lesion is a compression or impression fracture of the humeral head in occurrence with anterior glenohumeral instability. The true incidence is unknown but clearly increases with recurrent instability episodes. Recent peer-reviewed literature has highlighted the importance of addressing “significant” humeral and glenoid bone defects in the management of glenohumeral instability. Quantification of the “significance” of a Hill-Sachs lesion with regard to location, size, and depth in relation to the glenoid has helped guide indications for surgical management. Options for managing Hill-Sachs lesions include both humeral-sided techniques (soft tissue, bone, and/or prosthetic techniques) and also glenoid-sided techniques (bone transfers to increase glenoid width). The majority of significant acute or chronic Hill-Sachs lesions can be effectively managed without prosthetic replacement. Is a prosthetic surface replacement ever indicated for the management of Hill-Sachs lesions? The peer-reviewed literature is sparse with the outcomes of this treatment, and significant consideration must be given to both the age of the patient and the need for such management when other effective non-prosthetic options exist. In a patient with more than half of the humeral head involved after instability episodes (perhaps seizure or polytrauma patients), metallic surface replacement arthroplasty may be an option that could require less involved post-operative care while restoring range of motion and stability

The Hill-Sachs lesion is a bony defect of the humeral head that occurs in association with anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. Hill-Sachs lesions are common, with an incidence approaching nearly 100% in the setting of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. However, the indications for surgical management are very limited, with less than 10% of anterior instability patients considered for treatment of the Hill-Sachs lesion. Of utmost importance is addressing bone loss on the anterior-inferior glenoid, which is highly successful at preventing recurrence of instability even with humeral bone loss. In the rare situation where the Hill-Sachs lesion may continue to engage the glenoid, surgical management is indicated. Surgical strategies are variable, including debridement, arthroscopic remplissage, allograft transplantation, surface replacement, and arthroplasty. Given that the population with these defects is typically comprised of young and athletic patients, biologic solutions are most likely to be associated with decades of sustainable joint preservation, function, and stability. The first priority is maximising the treatment of anterior instability on the glenoid side. Then, small lesions of less than 10% are ignored without consequence. Lesions involving 10–20% of the humeral head are treated with arthroscopic remplissage (defect filled with repair of capsule and infraspinatus). Lesions greater than 20% that extend beyond the glenoid tract are managed with fresh osteochondral allografts to biologically restore the humeral head. Lesions great than 40% are most commonly associated with advanced arthritis and deformity of the humeral articular surface and are therefore treated with a humeral head replacement. This treatment algorithm maximises our ability to stabilise and preserve the glenohumeral joint

The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the outcome following arthroscopic Bankart repair using two types of suture anchors, absorbable and non-absorbable. Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder, seen between April 2000 and June 2003 in a single unit, were considered for inclusion in the study. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively using a subjective patient related outcome measurement tool (Oxford instability score), a visual analogue scale for pain and instability (VAS Pain and VAS instability) and a quality of life questionnaire (SF-12). The incidence of recurrent instability and the level of sporting ability were recorded. Patients were randomised to undergo surgical repair with either non-absorbable or absorbable anchors. 130 patients were included in the study. 6 patients were lost to follow-up and 124 patients (95%) completed the study. Both types of anchors were highly effective. There were no differences in the rate of recurrence or any of the scores between the two. Four patients in the non-absorbable group and 3 in the absorbable group experienced further episodes of dislocation after a traumatic event. The rate of redislocation in the whole series was therefore, 5.6%. In addition, 4 patients, all of them in the absorbable group (4%) described ongoing symptoms of instability but no true dislocations. 85% of the patients have returned to their previous level of sporting activity. There are no differences in the outcome of Arthroscopic Bankart repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable anchors. Both are highly effective, showing a redislocation rate of 5.6%

Introduction. The aim of the study was to compare and contrast the clinical outcome of conversion of practice of a shoulder surgeon from open to arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Patients and Methods. Comparison of a cohort consecutive series of 24 patients treated by open stabilisation and a prospective consecutive cohort series of 30 patients treated by arthroscopic stabilisation. Clinical outcomes were assessed with Oxford Shoulder Score Instability (OSS-I) and a Patient Satisfaction Survey at a minimum of 1 year follow up. The operation time as well as cost analysis were also evaluated. Results. The average OSS-I for open stabilisation was 39.6 (range 19-48) as compared to 39.8 (range 23-48) with the arthroscopic group and these scores did not show a statistically significant difference. Both cohorts were pleased with the clinical outcome and were happy to recommend the procedure to others. No complications in either group were seen. Operative time and costs were significantly more in the open group, even taking into account initial learning curve of the arthroscopic method. All arthroscopic procedures were performed as day-cases compared to over-night stays for the open group also providing better use of hospital resources and cost savings. Conclusion. After appropriate surgical training, the conversion from open to arthroscopic stabilisation can be performed without affecting clinical outcome or patient satisfaction. This study provides surgeons with confidence to change methods to gain the advantages of the arthroscopic procedure, which included reduced theatre time, day case surgery and earlier return to work and sport