AIM. Failure of a primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is associated with poor functional outcomes even after revision surgery. The aim of this study is to identify early predictors for failure, so that it may aid in recognition of at-risk patients. METHOD. An observational study was conducted of 623 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon over a 72 month period. Patient and procedure related parameters including age, gender, BMI, time to surgery, graft size, fixation methods, meniscal and chondral injuries, meniscal surgery, radiological parameters and post-operative IKDC scores. Logistic regression modeling was employed to identify those factors which were statistically significant for failure. RESULTS. We identified 14 patients who experienced failure of their ACL graft. The causes for failure included trauma (9), infection (2), arthrofibrosis (1), biological (1) and recurrent instability (1). Univariate analysis established a significant relationship between age at time of injury (p<0.001), BMI (p=0.001), time to index procedure (p<0.001), screw length (p=0.04) and early post-operative IKDC score (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated all factors stated except screw length to be important for predicting failure for ACL reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS. The rate of graft failure is lower than has been those quoted in the literature. We have identified those patients who are at high risk of rupturing a reconstructed primary ACL graft. Careful monitoring and functional modification of high-risk patients may be indicated to prevent failure. This study identifies predictive factors of failed ACL reconstruction. Age at time of injury, BMI, time to surgery, post-operative IKDC scores were found to be associated with failure

Introduction. Numerous types of graft can be used for revision of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The goal of our studies was to analyze mid term outcomes of revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions conducted by means of ipsilateral bone -patellar tendon -bone (B-PT-B) transplant. Materials and methods. We conducted a retrospective study on a consecutive series of 44 patients. All patients were operated on by the same senior surgeon in our institution between 2003 and 2009. All patients had undergone a first ACL reconstruction with B-PT-B transplant. They all had ACL revision under arthroscopic assistance and by means of ipsilateral B-PT-B transplant after a minimum of 18 months after primary surgery. At time of ACL revision, the mean patients age was 28 years (range, 17–49 years). The average postoperative follow up after revision was 55 months (range, 12–88 months). We had no patient lost to follow up. All patients were evaluated by an independent observer using IKDC scoring system and KT 2000. Results. The postoperative IKDC score averaged 78.2 (range, 41,4–97,7). 10 patients (22.7%) had their knee graded A, 25 patients (56.8%) grade B, 8 patients (18.2%) grade C and one patient (2.3%) grade D. The post operative maxi manual differential KT 2000 averaged 1,52 mm (range, −1mm/12mm). The identified aetiologies for poor clinical outcomes were menisectomy in the first ACL reconstruction (p<0.01) and articular cartilage lesions (ICRS grade III and IV) found during ACL revision. In most cases, return to sport activities was achieved but not at the same level. We had no specific complication after second harvesting of the patellar tendon. Discussion. The type of graft used in revision of ACL reconstructions is a controversy. In the literature, many studies reported the results of revision of ACL reconstructions but with poor methodology and few data for every type of graft. In our study, we found clinical results comparable to those classically reported in the literature. Clinical evaluation showed good control of the laxity and no specific patellar tendon complication. Conclusion. The clinical results of revision of ACL reconstructions is lower than in primary surgery. We did not noticed specific patellar tendon complication after second harvesting of BPTB transplant. The revision of ACL reconstruction with ipsilateral BPTB transplant showed good clinical results and good control of the anteroposterior laxity