Atypical cartilaginous tumours are usually treated
by curettage. The purpose of this study was to show that radiofrequency
ablation was an effective
Introduction. Primary bone tumours of the distal radius are rare, while it remains the third commonest site for primary lesions and recurrences of Giant Cell Tumours (GCT). The functional demands on the hand make reconstruction of the wrist joint following the excision of distal radius, particularly challenging. Methods. A single-centre retrospective study, reporting the functional and oncological outcomes of six patients (4 males, 2 females - mean age of 53 (22 to 79)) who underwent a custom-made endoprosthetic replacement of the distal radius with arthrodesis at our institution, during 1999 - 2010. Five patients were diagnosed with primary bone sarcoma of the distal radius (4 GCTs, 1 osteosarcoma) and another had a metastatic lesion from a primary renal cell carcinoma. The diagnosis was confirmed by needle biopsy in all cases. We assessed the patients' functional outcomes using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society scoring system (MSTS) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). Results. The mean follow-up was 3 years (up to 9.5 years). One patient died of unrelated medical causes, age 89, and one patient succumbed to renal carcinoma, age 53 (9.5 and 4 years post-operatively). All prostheses remained clinically and radiologically stable. One-year radiographs confirmed bone remodelling and osseointegration at the bone-prosthesis interface. There were no cases of local recurrence, metastases, infection or wound complications post-operatively. The mean functional outcome scores were: MSTS 73% (71 to 78), TESS 75% (73 to 79). Pain-free hand movements were restored in all cases. Discussion. Reconstruction options include curettage with/without grafting or cementing, ulna translocation, autografts (vascularised or non-vascularised ⊞/⊟ arthrodesis), allografts, custom-made megaprostheses. Custom-made endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal radius with wrist arthrodesis following bone tumour resection represents a viable and versatile treatment option. Satisfactory outcomes are achieved with acceptable risks and functional outcomes; especially when considering the nature of the diagnosis and
Aim. We investigated low grade intramedullary chondrosarcomas to see if curettage and cementation remains a strong
We describe a consecutive series of five patients with bone or soft-tissue sarcomas of the elbow and intra-articular extension treated by complex soft tissue, allograft bone and prosthetic joint replacement after wide extra-articular
We report the results of the treatment of nine children with an aneurysmal bone cyst of the distal fibula (seven cysts were juxtaphyseal, and two metaphyseal). The mean age of the children was 10 years and 3 months (7 years and 4 months to 12 years and 9 months). All had open physes. All cysts were active and in seven cases substituted and expanded the entire width of the bone (type-2 lesions). The mean longitudinal extension was 5.7 cm (3 to 10). The presenting symptoms were pain, swelling and pathological fracture. Moderate fibular shortening was evident in one patient. In six patients curettage was performed, using phenol as adjuvant in three. Three with juxtaphyseal lesions underwent resection. A graft from the contralateral fibula (one case) and allografts (two cases) were positioned at the edge of the physis for reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 11.6 years (3.1 to 27.5). There was no recurrence. At the final follow-up there was no significant difference in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores (excellent/good in all cases) and in growth disturbance, alignment, stability and bone reconstitution, but in the resection group the number of operations, including removal of hardware, complications (two minor) and time of immobilisation/orthosis, were increased. Movement of the ankle was restricted in one patient. The potential risks in the management of these lesions include recurrence, physeal injury, instability of the ankle and hardware and graft complications. Although resection is effective it should be reserved for aggressive or recurrent juxtaphyseal lesions.