Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration plays a major role in low back pain which is the leading cause of disability. Current treatments in severe cases require surgical intervention often leading to adjacent segment degeneration. Injectable hydrogels have received much attention in recent years as scaffolds for seeding cells to replenish disc cellularity and restore disc properties and function. However, they generally present poor mechanical properties. In this study, we investigated several novel thermosensitive chitosan hydrogels for their ability to mimic the mechanical properties of the nucleus pulposus (NP) while being able to sustain the viability of NP cells, and retain proteoglycans. CH hydrogels were prepared by mixing the acidic chitosan solution (2% w/v) with various combinations of three gelling agents: sodium hydrogen carbonate (SHC) and/or beta-glycerophosphate (BGP) and/or phosphate buffer (PB) (either BGP0.4M, SHC0.075M-BGP0.1M, SHC0.075M-PB0.02M or SHC0.075M-PB0.04M). The gelation speed was assessed by following rheological properties within 1h at 37°C (strain 5% and 1Hz). The mechanical properties were characterized and compared with that of human NP tissues. Elastic properties of the hydrogels were studied by evaluating the secant modulus in unconfined compression. Equilibrium modulus was also measured, using an incremental stress-relaxation test 24h after gelation in unconfined compression (5% strain at 5%/s followed by 5min relaxation, five steps). Cells from bovine IVD were encapsulated in CH-based gels and maintained in culture for 14 days. Cytocompatibility was assessed by measuring cell viability, metabolism and DNA content. Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) synthesis (retained in the gel and released) was determined using DMMB assay. Finally injectability was tested using human cadaveric discs. Unconfined compression confirmed drastically enhanced mechanical properties compared to conventional CH-BGP hydrogels (secant Young modulus of 105 kPa for SHC0.075PB0.02 versus 3–6 kPa for BGP0.04). More importantly, SHC0.075PB0.02 and SHC0.075BGP0.1 hydrogels exhibited mechanical properties very similar to NP tissue. For instance, equilibrium modulus was 5.2±0.6 KPa for SHC0.075PB0.02 and 8±0.8 KPa for SHC0.075BGP0.1 compared to 6.1±1.7 KPa for human NP tissue. Rheological properties and gelation time (G′=G″ after less than 15 s at 37°C, and rapid increase of G') of these hydrogels also appear to be adapted to this application. Cell survival was greater than 80% in SHC0.075BGP0.1 and SHC0.075PB0.02 hydrogels. Cells encapsulated in the new formulations also showed significantly higher metabolic activity and DNA content after 14 days of incubation compared to cells encapsulated in BGP0.4 hydrogel. Cells encapsulated in SHC0.075BGP0.1 and SHC0.075PB0.02 produced significantly higher amounts of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) compared to cells encapsulated in SHC0.075PB0.04 and BGP0.4 hydrogels. The total amount of GAG was higher in SHC0.075BGP0.1 hydrogel compared to SHC0.075PB0.02. Interestingly, both the SHC0.075BGP0.1 and SHC0.075PB0.02 hydrogels retained similar amounts of GAG. Injectability through a 25G syringe, filling of nuclear clefts and good retention in human degenerated discs was demonstrated for SHC0.075PB0.02 hydrogel. SHC0.075BGP0.1 appears to be a particularly promising injectable scaffold for IVD repair by providing suitable structural environment for cell survival, ECM production and mechanical properties very similar to that of NP tissue

Neck pain can be caused by pressure on the spinal cord or nerve roots from bone or disc impingement. This can be treated by surgically decompressing the cervical spine, which involves excising the bone or disc that is impinging on the nerves or widening the spinal canal or neural foramen. Conventional practise is to fuse the adjacent intervertebral joint after surgery to prevent intervertebral motion and subsequent recompression of the spinal cord or nerve root. However fusion procedures cause physiological stress transfer to adjacent segments which may cause Adjacent Segment Degeneration (ASD), a rapid degeneration of the adjacent discs due to increased stress. ASD is more likely to occur in fusions of two or more levels than single level fusions and is more common where there is existing degeneration of the adjacent discs, which is not unusual in people over 30 years of age. Partial dynamic stabilisation, which generally involves a semi-rigid spinal fixation, allows a controlled amount of intervertebral motion (less than physiological, but more than fusion) to prevent increased stress on the adjacent segments (potentially preventing ASD) whilst still preventing neural recompression. Partial dynamic stabilisation is suitable for treating spinal instability after decompression as well as certain degenerative instabilities and chronic pain syndromes. Dynamic stabilisation and semi-rigid fixation systems for the spine are typically fixated posteriorly. However, choice of posterior surgical stabilisation techniques in the cervical spine is limited due to the size of the osseous material available for fixation and the close proximity of the neural structures and the vertebral artery. Posterior dynamic stabilisation systems for stabilisation of the lumbar spine often use the pedicle as an anchor point. Using the pedicle of the cervical spine as an anchor point is technically difficult because of its small size, angulation and proximity to neurovascular structures. Therefore, one of the main challenges to provide stabilisation in the cervical spine is the limitations of the anatomy. This presentation will introduce a novel spinal implant (patent pending) which is proposed for the cervical spine to provide partial dynamic stabilisation in the C3 to T1 region from a posterior approach. The implant is a single unit with a safe and technically simple insertion technique into the lateral masses. The implant uses a simple mechanism to allow limited intervertebral motion at each instrumented level. It is hoped that the simplicity of the device and removing the need to provide a bone graft anteriorly may reduce the cost of the procedure compared to traditional fusion and competing surgeries

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for radiculopathy and myelopathy has the complication of the development of adjacent segment degeneration. Furthermore, reoperations may be required to treat complications of fusion, such as non-union, graft collapse, or expulsion. Cervical disc arthroplasty lays claim to preserving cervical motion and reducing the risks of adjacent segment disease in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. We performed a prospective study in order to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty for single or two level disc disease with associated radiculopathy. Our study included a total of 26 patients. Each patient had cervical radiculopathy from nerve root compression due to degenerative disc disease at one or two levels. Diagnosis was made preoperatively on clinical examination and by means of MRI scanning. Each patient also had preoperative flexion and extension cervical spine x-rays in order to assess pre-operative range of neck movement. The outcomes of surgery were assessed prospectively. Range of motion at final follow-up was measured by flexion and extension view x-rays of the cervical spine. Clinical outcome was assessed by means of VAS scores for pain, SF12 for mental and physical health and the neck disability index (NDI). All complications were recorded. 14 of the patients had a follow-up for two years and the remaining 12 patients had a follow-up for one year. A Discovery disc arthoplasty by Scient'X was the implant used in all patients. A standard anterior cervical approach was used to achieve decompression and for the implantation of the prosthesis. On follow-up all patients had either maintenance or an improvement in the range of movement. There was no evidence of progression of degeneration in the segments adjacent to the arthroplasty prosthesis. Improvements in SF12, VAS, and NDI scores were seen from preoperative levels in 25 of the 26 patients. Complications included one patient with a horse voice post-operatively and one patient with minimal improvement of radicular symptoms. Post-operative MRI scanning demonstrated adequate decompression with this procedure and showed no evidence of progression of adjacent segment disease. There were no cases of implant subsidence or dislocations. We have found cervical disc arthroplasty to produce good clinical outcomes when used for single or two level cervical radiculopathy whilst maintaining neck motion with an acceptable complication rate. A longer follow-up is needed to further assess the risk of development of adjacent segment disease but we did not discover the development of adjacent segment disease in our study with a follow-up of upto 2 years

INTRODUCTION:. As a consequence from cervical arthroplasty, spine structural stiffness, loading and kinematics are changed, resulting in issues like adjacent segment degeneration and altered range of motion. However, complex anatomical structures and lack of adequate precision to study the facet joint (FJ) segmental motion in 3D have prevented proper quantitative analyses. In the current study, we investigate the innovative use of a local coordinate system on the surface of the superior articular process of the caudal vertebral body in order to analyze FJ segmental motion using CT-based 3D vertebral models in flexion/extension. METHODS:. CT images were obtained from six patients (2F/4M, mean age: 53 y.o.) with cervical degenerative disc disease in neutral, flexion and extension positions. CT data was used to create subject-specific surface mesh models of each vertebral body. From these, mean normal vectors were calculated for all FJ surfaces and posterior walls from C3/4 down to C6/7 (Fig. 1). The global coordinate system (x, y, z) corresponds to the CT scanner. Within this system, a new local coordinate system (u, v, w) was set on the centroid of each FJ surface (Fig. 1), where the u-, v-, and w- axes correspond to the normal-to-the-FJ, right-left and cranio-caudal directions, respectively. In flexion/extension, translations in mm were calculated as differences in the FJ centroid position and rotations were calculated in degrees as angular differences of the vector of the opposing surface in flexion/extension. Results are presented as mean ± SD. Differences within vertebral levels and left/right FJs were sought using 1- or 2-way ANOVA, respectively. RESULTS:. The flexion/extension segmental motion was described in its six degrees-of-freedom. Among the three translations, the largest movement was observed in the cranio-caudal direction (u = −0.22 ± 0.47 mm, v = 0.11 ± 0.89 mm, w = −2.06 ± 1.60 mm); while the three rotations about the (u, v, w) axes showed a dominant rotation about the v-axis (u = −0.41 ± 4.42°, v = −5.12 ± 5.61°, w = −0.01 ± 2.71°). Comparing translational and rotational motions by cervical level, movements at C6/7 were shown to be smaller than those at the other levels (p < 0.05) (Figs. 2, 3). There were no significant differences in the movement of the FJ between left and right sides (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION:. A key finding of this study was that along with the expected translation in the w-axis, there was rotation about the v-axis consistent with the overall neck flexion-to-extension motion. If the rotation about the v-axes were negligible, the FJ motion could be considered as a pure translation (sliding), but the data suggests otherwise. This finding supports the hypothesis of a rolling-sliding type of facet segmental motion that might be influenced by the facet surface curvature. Future studies will focus on analyses of the changes in FJ gap with motion and characterization of the facet surfaces' curvature and congruence. SIGNIFICANCE: An innovative look into flexion/extension motion from the FJ point of view describes FJ segmental motion as a sliding-rolling motion instead of the traditional concept of sliding-only mechanism