Aims

The use of multimodal non-opioid analgesia in hip fractures, specifically acetaminophen combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), has been increasing. However, the effectiveness and safety of this approach remain unclear. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes among patients with hip fractures who preoperatively received either acetaminophen combined with NSAIDs, NSAIDs alone, or acetaminophen alone.

Introduction. There is a need for a standardised guideline to assist in optimal decision-making in diabetics who have acquired an ankle fracture. Through a critical analysis of the literature, a diagnostic and management algorithm that incorporates a quantitative scoring system is proposed and presented for consideration. Methods. Publications were identified by conducting a comprehensive keyword search of Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Search terms included “diabetes,” “ankle,” and “fracture”. Articles published in the English language that were pertinent to the topic were included. Manual search of the references in these relevant papers were also completed to further identify publications for potential inclusion. Publications and conferences not published in the English language or not pertinent to the topic in the above databases were excluded. Duplicate results that occurred in different databases were truncated to a single result. Results. A total of 352 results were revealed using the above methods. Of these, 59 articles met our inclusion criteria. 293 articles met our exclusion criteria. A further 9 articles were included after reviewing the included articles and their respective references. From these results, we propose a detailed diagnostic algorithm that may provide a systematic approach to a diabetic patient who presents with acute ankle pain, swelling, warmth, and/or redness. If a fracture is noted on plain radiographs, a proposed management algorithm and scoring system can be used to assist in deciding whether to proceed with primary open reduction, internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis/rigid fixation. This scoring system is based on factors acquired through history and examination. Major factors have been allocated a score of 2, which include: previous or coinciding history of Charcot arthropathy, peripheral neuropathy, insulin dependence with poor compliance, and a diabetic history of greater than 20 years. Minor factors have been allocated a score of 1, which include: age > 50, nephropathy, retinopathy, osteoporosis, vasculopathy, and presence of nutrition/diet deficiency. A score of greater than 7 suggests a primary limb-salvage arthrodesis/rigid fixation because of the likely poor outcome in a primary ORIF. A score of less than 7 suggests that an acceptable outcome will likely result with a primary ORIF. Discussion. Through the use of the AFDA algorithm and score, it will hopefully provide a standardised approach to diabetic ankle fractures and; a method of quantifying risks for both the patient and affected ankle joint, thus, allowing the surgeon to have confidence in achieving the best possible outcome. Although this score is based on a critical analysis of the current literature, further validation of both this algorithm and score is recommended. Once validated, the AFDA score in particular, can also potentially be used as a research tool for further follow-up and outcome studies on diabetic ankle fractures