761 cases in 613 patients with minimal two years follow-up had both metal ion levels and quality pelvis X-ray identified in our database and are included in this study. The UCLA activity score, femoral shaft angle, body mass index, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, combined range of motion (CROM), diagnosis, age, implant brand, gender, AIA, bearing size, and duration of implantation were analyzed to determine the potential risk factors for elevated metal ion levels with use of uni- and multi-variable logistic regression models. A safe zone for hip resurfacing (RAIL: Relative Acetabular Inclination Limit) was calculated based on implant size and AIA on AP pelvis X-ray. For AIA below the RAIL, there were no adverse wear failures or dislocations, and only 1% of cases with ion levels above 10 μg/L. We have not found a lower limit of AIA where failures occurred. Other than high inclination angle and small bearing size, female gender was the only other factor that correlated with high ion levels in the multivariate analysis. We have described the robust “safe zone” for acetabular component position based on metal ion levels in a large patient cohort for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Our study suggests that adverse wear failures with hip resurfacing may be highly predictable and avoidable. If the AIA is below the RAIL, rare dislocations are also prevented

Introduction. Pelvic flexion and extension in different body positions can affect acetabular orientation after total hip arthroplasty, and this may predispose patients to dislocation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional acetabular component position in total hip replacement patients during standing and sitting. We hypothesize that patients with degenerative lumbar disease will have less pelvic extension from standing to sitting, compared to patients with a normal lumbar spine or single level spine disease. Methods. A prospective cohort of 20 patients with primary unilateral THR underwent spine-to-ankle standing and sitting lateral radiographs that included the lumbar spine and pelvis using EOS imaging. Patients were an average age of 58 ± 12 years and 6 patients were female. Patients had (1) normal lumbar spines or single level degeneration, (2) multilevel degenerative disc disease or (3) scoliosis. We measured acetabular anteversion (cup relative to the horizontal), sacral slope angle (superior endplate of S1 relative to the horizontal), and lumbar lordosis angles (superior endplates of L1 and S1). We calculated the absolute difference in acetabular anteversion and the absolute difference in lumbar lordosis during standing and sitting (Figure 1). Results. Nine patients had normal lumbar spines or scoliosis, and 11 patients had multilevel disc disease. The median change in cup anteversion for normal and scoliosis patients was 29° degrees (range 11° to 41°) compared to 21° degrees (range 1° to 34°) for multilevel disc disease patients (p=0.03). There was a positive correlation between the change in cup anteversion and the change in lumbar lordosis (p=0.01; Figure 2). From standing to sitting, cup anteversion always increased and lumbar lordosis always decreased. Conclusions. The change in cup anteversion from standing to sitting was variable in patients with normal, degenerative, and scoliosis lumbar spines. Patients with degenerative disc disease have less pelvic extension, and thus less acetabular anteversion in the sitting position compared to normal spines. This may increase their risk of posterior dislocation

Introduction. Acetabular component position is an important determinant of stability, wear and impingement following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Its optimum position and size in direct anterior approach (DAA) THA has not been clearly described in previous studies. Our aim was to study the evolution of the same with reference to stability and impingement as a part of a single surgeon's learning curve. Methods. Clinical and radiographic records of first 300 consecutive DAA THAs performed by a single surgeon from April 2009 to April 2011 were reviewed from a prospective database at a single center. Radiographic analysis was done by two observers to determine acetabular inclination and anteversion on 6 week postoperative standing radiographs. Native femoral head size, measured on preoperative radiographs after adjusting for magnification, was used to calculate the native acetabular cup size. The study population was divided into three groups; Group A– 1. st. 100 DAA THA cases, Group B – 2. nd. 100 and Group C – 3. rd. 100 corresponding to the use of intraoperative anterior stability assessment (Group B and C) and change in the cup size strategy (Group C). The incidence of instability and psoas impingement (PI) –related groin pain at 2 year follow-up was determined for the three groups. Statistical analysis was done to see if there were differences in these clinical and radiographic outcome measures in the three groups. Results. Mean values for abduction were similar in all the groups. Mean anteversion was significantly lower in Group B [12.5° (± 3.3°)] and C [13.6 °(± 2.3°)] as compared to group A [24.3°(± 7.5°)]. The difference between the implanted cup size and calculated native cup size was significantly higher in Group A [5.2(± 2.1) mm] and group B [5.8 (± 2.60 mm] as compared to group C [1.4 (± 1.4) mm] (Figure 1). There were 2 anterior dislocations in group A with none in the other groups. The incidence of PI-related groin pain was higher in group B (12%) as compared to group A (2%) and group C (2%). For PI related groin pain, an arthroscopic psoas release was performed in 3 patients and cup revision in 1 patient. Discussion. For optimum anterior stability, the target cup anteversion is lower in the DAA. Increasing the cup size makes the use of large heads possible. However, the implanted cup size should be as close to the native cup size with DAA THA to avoid anterior overhang (psoas impingement) or posterior overhang (cup-neck impingement and anterior instability)

Abstract. Optimal acetabular component position in Total Hip Arthroplasty is vital for avoiding complications such as dislocation and impingement, Transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) have been shown to be a reliable landmark to guide optimum acetabular cup position. Reports of iliopsoas impingement caused by acetabular components exist. The Psoas fossa (PF) is not a well-regarded landmark for Component positioning. Our aim was to assess the relationship of the TAL and PF in relation to Acetabular Component positioning. A total of 22 cadavers were implanted on 4 occasions with the an uncemented acetabular component. Measurements were taken between the inner edge of TAL and the base of the acetabular component and the distance between the lower end of the PF and the most medial end of TAL. The distance between the edge of the acetabular component and TAL was a mean of 1.6cm (range 1.4–18cm). The distance between the medial end of TAL and the lowest part of PF was a mean of 1.cm (range 1,3–1.8cm) It was evident that the edge of PF was not aligned with TAL. Optimal acetabular component position is vital to the longevity and outcome following THA. TAL provides a landmark to guide acetabular component position. However we feel the PF is a better landmark to allow appropriate positioning of the acetabular component inside edge of the acetabulum inside the bone without exposure of the component rim and thus preventing iliopsoas impingement at the psoas notch and resultant groin pain

In 2021, Vigdorchik et al. published a large multicentre study validating their simple Hip-Spine Classification for determining patient-specific acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study was to apply this Hip-Spine Classification to a sample of Australian patients undergoing THA surgery to determine the local acetabular component positioning requirements. Additionally, we propose a modified algorithm for adjusting cup anteversion requirements. 790 patients who underwent THA surgery between January 2021 and June 2022 were assessed for anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPt) and sacral slope (SS) in standing and relaxed seated positions and categorized according to their spinal stiffness and flatback deformity. Spinal stiffness was measured using pelvic mobility (PM); the ΔSS between standing and relaxed seated. Flatback deformity was defined by APPt <-13° in standing. As in Vigdorchik et al., PM of <10° was considered a stiff spine. For our algorithm, PM of <20° indicated the need for increased cup anteversion. Using this approach, patient-specific cup anteversion is increased by 1° for every degree the patient's PM is <20°. According to the Vigdorchik simple Hip-Spine classification groups, we found: 73% Group 1A, 19% Group 1B, 5% Group 2A, and 3% Group 2B. Therefore, under this classification, 27% of Australian THA patients would have an elevated risk of dislocation due to spinal deformity and/or stiffness. Under our modified definition, 52% patients would require increased cup anteversion to address spinal stiffness. The Hip-Spine Classification is a simple algorithm that has been shown to indicate to surgeons when adjustments to acetabular cup anteversion are required to account for spinal stiffness or flatback deformity. We investigated this algorithm in an Australian population of patients undergoing THA and propose a modified approach: increasing cup anteversion by 1° for every degree the patient's PM is <20°

Acetabular cup positioning remains a real challenge and component malpositioning after total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to increased rates of dislocation and wear. It is a common cause for revision THA. A novel 3D imageless mini-optical navigation system was used during THA to provide accurate, intraoperative, real-time, and non-fluoroscopic data including component positioning to the surgeon. This retrospective comparative single surgeon and single approach study examined acetabular component positioning between traditional mini-posterolateral THA and mini-posterolateral THA using the 3D mini-optical navigation system. A retrospective chart review was conducted of 157 consecutive (78 3D mini-optical navigation and 79 traditional non-navigation methods) THAs performed by the senior author using a mini-posterolateral approach at an ambulatory surgery center and hospital setting. Two independent reviewers analyzed postoperative radiographs in a standardized fashion to measure acetabular component positioning. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiographic data were analyzed. These groups were found to have no statistical difference in age, gender, and BMI (Table I). There was no difference between groups in acetabular components in the Lewinnek safe zone, 31.2% vs 26.6% (p = 0.53). Cup anteversion within the safe zone did not differ, 35.1% vs 40.5% (p = 0.48); while cup inclination within the safe zone differed, with more in the navigation group, 77.9% vs 51.9% (p < 0.01). Change in leg length was significantly different with the navigation group's leg length at 1.9 ± 6.3, less than the traditional at 5.4 ± 7.0 (p < 0.01). There was no difference in mean change in offset between groups (4.5 ± 5.9 vs 6.2 ± 7.9, p = 0.12); navigation, traditional) (Table II). The 3D mini-optical navigation group did have significantly longer operative time (98.4 ± 17.5 vs 89.3 ± 15.5 p < 0.01). Use of the novel 3D Mini-optical Navigation System significantly improved cup inclination compared to traditional methods while increasing operative time. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Acetabular implant position is important for the stability, function, and long-term wear properties of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior studies of acetabular implant positioning have demonstrated a high percentage of outliers, even in experienced hip surgeons, when conventional instruments are used. Computer navigation is an attractive tool for use in (THA, as it has been shown to improve the precision of acetabular component placement and reduce the incidence of outliers. However, computer navigation with imageless, large-console systems is costly and often interrupts the surgeon's workflow, and thus, has not been widely adopted. Another method to improve acetabular component positioning during THA is the use of fluoroscopy with the direct anterior approach. Studies have demonstrated that the supine position of the patient during surgery facilitates the use of fluoroscopic guidance, thus improving acetabular component position. A handheld, accelerometer based navigation unit for use in total hip replacement has recently become available to assist the surgeon in positioning the acetabular component during anterior approach THA, potentially reducing the need for intraoperative fluoroscopic studies. We sought to compare the radiographic results of direct anterior THA performed with conventional instrumentation vs. handheld navigation to determine the accuracy of the navigation unit, and to see whether or not there was a reduction in the fluoroscopic time used during surgery. Furthermore, we timed the use of the navigation unit to see whether or not it required a substantial addition to surgical time. Our results demonstrate that a handheld navigation unit used during anterior approach THA had no difference with regard to acetabular cup positioning when compared to fluoroscopically assisted THA, but led to a reduction in the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy time

Background:. Numerous studies have reported the importance of acetabular component positioning in decreasing dislocation rates, the risk of liner fractures, and bearing surface wear in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The goal of improving acetabular component positioning has led to the development of computer-assisted surgical (CAS) techniques, and several studies have demonstrated improved results when compared to conventional, freehand methods. Recently, a computed tomography (CT)-based robotic surgery system has been developed (MAKO™ Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopaedic System, MAKO Surgical Corp., Fort Lauderdale, FLA, USA), with promising improvements in component alignment and surgical precision. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy in predicting the postoperative acetabular component position between the MAKO™ robotic navigation system and an imageless, CAS system (AchieveCAS, Smith and Nephew Inc., Memphis, TN, USA). Materials and Methods:. 30 THAs performed using the robotic navigation system (robotic cohort) were available for review, and compared to the most recent 30 THAs performed using the imageless, CAS system (CAS cohort). The final, intraoperative reading for acetabular abduction and anteversion provided by each navigation system was recorded following each THA. Einsel-Bild-Roentgen analysis was used to measure the acetabular component abduction and anteversion based on anteroposterior pelvis radiographs obtained at each patient's first, postoperative visit (Figure 1). Two observers, blinded to the treatment arms, independently measured all the acetabular components, and the results were assessed for inter-observer reliability. Comparing the difference between the final, intraoperative reading for both acetabular abduction and anteversion, and the radiographic alignment calculated using EBRA analysis, allowed assessment of the intraoperative predictive capability of each system, and accuracy in determining the postoperative acetabular component position. In addition, the number of acetabular components outside of the “safe zone” (40° + 10° of abduction, 15° + 10° of anteversion), as described by Lewinnek et al., was assessed. Lastly, the operative time for each surgery was recorded. Results:. In the robotic cohort, the mean, absolute difference between the intraoperative reading and the postoperative alignment was 4.3° + 2.3° for acetabular abduction, and 3.2° + 2.3° for acetabular anteversion. In comparison, in the CAS cohort, the mean, absolute difference was 3.7° + 2.8° for acetabular abduction (p = 0.4), and 3.8° + 2.7° for acetabular anteversion (p = 0.4). In both cohorts, all of the acetabular components were placed within 40° + 10° of abduction. In the robotic cohort, 27 of 30 components were placed within 15° + 10° of anteversion, versus 25 of 30 components in the CAS cohort (p = 0.7). The interobserver correlation coefficients for measurement of both the acetabular abduction and anteversion were good (p = 0.83 and 0.79, respectively). A statistically significant difference was appreciated between the two cohorts for operative times, with a mean operative time of 120.2 + 8.9 minutes in the robotic cohort (vs. 73.6 + 17.1 minutes in the CAS cohort, p < 0.01). Discussion:. This study demonstrates the robotic navigation system to require significantly increased operative times, while providing no significant advantage over the imageless, CAS system with regards to predicting the postoperative acetabular component position

Background. Supine positioning during direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (DAA THA) facilitates use of fluoroscopy, which has been shown to improve acetabular component positioning on plane radiograph. This study aims to compare 2- dimensional intraoperative radiographic measurements of acetabular component position with RadLink to postoperative 3- dimensional SterEOS measurements. Methods. Intraoperative fluoroscopy and RadLink (El Segundo, CA) were used to measure acetabular cup position intraoperatively in 48 patients undergoing DAA THA. Cup position was measured on 6-week postoperative standing EOS images using 3D SterEOS software and compared to RadLink findings using Student's t-test. Safe-zone outliers were identified. We evaluated for measurement difference of > +/− 5 degrees. Results. RadLink acetabular cup abduction measurement (mean 43.0°) was not significantly different than 3D SterEOS in the anatomic plane (mean 42.6°, p = 0.50) or in the functional plane (mean 42.7°, p = 0.61) (Fig. 1–2). RadLink acetabular cup anteversion measurement (mean 17.9°) was significantly different than 3D SterEOS in both the anatomic plane (mean 20.6°, p = 0.022) and the functional plane (mean 21.2°, p = 0.002) (Fig. 3–4). RadLink identified two cups outside of the safe-zone. However, SterEOS identified 12 (anatomic plane) and 10 (functional plane) outside of the safe-zone (Fig. 5–7). In the functional plane, 58% of anteversion and 92% of abduction RadLink measurements were within +/− 5° of 3D SterEOS. Conclusion. Intraoperative fluoroscopic RadLink acetabular anteversion measurements are significantly different than 3D SterEOS measurements, while abduction measurements are similar. Significantly more acetabular cups are placed outside of the safe- zone when evaluated with 3D SterEOS versus RadLink

Introduction. Acetabular component position is considered a major factor affecting the etiology of hip dislocation. The ‘Lewinnek safe zone’ has been the most widely accepted range for component position to avoid hip dislocation, but recent studies suggest that this safe zone is outdated. We used a large prospective institutional registry to ask: 1) is there a ‘safe zone’ for acetabular component position, as measured on an anteroposterior radiograph, within which the risk of hip dislocation is low?, and 2) do other patient and implant factors affect the risk of hip dislocation?. Materials and Methods. From 2007 to 2012, 19,449 patients (22,097 hip procedures) were recorded in an IRB approved prospective total joint replacement registry. All patients who underwent primary THA were prospectively enrolled, of which 9,107 patients consented to participate in the registry. An adverse event survey (80% compliance) was used to identify patients who reported a dislocation event in the six months after hip replacement surgery. Postoperative AP radiographs of hips that dislocated were matched with AP radiographs of stable hips, and acetabular position was measured using Ein Bild Röntgen Analyse software. Dislocators in radiographic zones (± 5°, ± 10°, ± 15° boundaries) were counted for every 1° of anteversion and inclination angles. Results. The frequency of dislocation was 2.1% (147 of 7040 patients) over the six months following primary THA. No significant difference was found in the number of dislocated hips among the zones (Figure 1). Dislocators were significantly older (p=0.012) and less active (p=0.001) compared to nondislocators (Figure 2). Patients <50 years old (p=0.007) and patients ≥70 years old (p=0.019) had a two-fold higher risk of dislocation. Dislocators <50 years old were less active preoperatively than nondislocators (p=0.006). A trend suggested larger head sizes had a lower frequency of dislocation (Figure 3). Conclusions. Acetabular component position alone is not protective against instability. Age and activity level significantly affect the occurrence of dislocation after total hip replacement

Acetabular implant position is important for the stability, function, and long-term wear properties of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior studies of acetabular implant positioning have demonstrated a high percentage of outliers, even in experienced hip surgeons, when conventional instruments are used. Computer navigation is an attractive tool for use in THA, as it has been shown to improve the precision of acetabular component placement and reduce the incidence of outliers. However, computer navigation with imageless, large-console systems is costly and often interrupts the surgeon's workflow, and thus, has not been widely adopted. Another method to improve acetabular component positioning during THA is the use of fluoroscopy with the direct anterior approach. Studies have demonstrated that the supine position of the patient during surgery facilitates the use of fluoroscopic guidance, thus improving acetabular component position. A handheld, accelerometer-based navigation unit for use in total hip replacement has recently become available to assist the surgeon in positioning the acetabular component during anterior approach THA, potentially reducing the need for intra-operative fluoroscopic studies. We sought to compare the radiographic results of direct anterior THA performed with conventional instrumentation vs. handheld navigation to determine the accuracy of the navigation unit, and to see whether or not there was a reduction in the fluoroscopic time used during surgery. Furthermore, we timed the use of the navigation unit to see whether or not it required a substantial addition to surgical time. Our results demonstrate that a handheld navigation unit used during anterior approach THA had no difference with regard to acetabular cup positioning when compared to fluoroscopically assisted THA, but led to a reduction in the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy time

The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of component positioning and incidence of peri-operative and 90-day post-operative complications following robotic arm-assisted and conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA). Three groups of patients were analyzed for this study: those that underwent conventional THA performed by Surgeon 1, conventional THA performed by Surgeon 2, or robotic arm-assisted THA performed by Surgeon 2. All patients underwent primary uncemented THA via a posterior approach. Patient characteristics, intra-operative data, and 90-day post-operative complications were collected. Post-operative standing pelvic radiographs were utilized to measure acetabular position and to identify post-operative complications. Acetabular component position measurements revealed substantially less variation in both inclination and anteversion in the Surgeon 2 – Robotic group. Nine patients had intra-operative cables placed for intra-operative calcar fracture in the Surgeon 1 group compared to one patient and three patients in Surgeon 2 – Robotic and Surgeon 2 – Traditional groups, respectively. Nine instances of femoral stems subsidence were identified in the Surgeon 1 group compared to one patient in Surgeon 2 – Traditional. There were four instances of dislocation in the Surgeon 1 group compared to one in the Surgeon 2 – Robotic group. Robotic arm-assisted THA decreases the variation in acetabular component positioning compared to conventional THA. However, the benefit of this is unclear as there is little difference in dislocation rate. This study may demonstrate additional value in CT-based implant planning as this cohort had the lowest incidence of femoral component complications

Introduction. The longevity of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is dependent on acetabular component position. We measured the reliability and accuracy of a CT-based navigation system to achieve the intended acetabular component position and orientation using three dimensional imaging. The purpose of the current study was to determine if the CT-guided robotic navigation system could accurately achieve the desired acetabular component position (center of rotation (COR)) and orientation (inclination and anteversion). The postoperative orientation and location of the components was determined in 20 patients undergoing THA using CT images, the gold standard for acetabular component orientation. Methods. Twenty primary unilateral THA patients were enrolled in this IRB-approved, prospective cohort study to assess the accuracy of the robotic navigation system. Pre- and post-operative CT exams were obtained and aligned 3D segmented models were used to measure the difference in center of rotation and orientation (anteversion and inclination). Patients with pre-existing implants, posttraumatic arthritis, contralateral hip arthroplasty, septic arthritis, or previous hip fracture were excluded. All patients underwent unilateral THA using robotic arm CT-guided navigation (RIO Makoplasty; MAKO Surgical Corp). Results. Mean age was 59.25 years (±8.65 years), 55% of patients were female (11/20). Root mean square (RMS) errors between the intended intraoperative and actual postoperative COR position was measured in the medial/lateral (M/L), superior/inferior (S/I), and anterior/posterior (A/P) directions to quantify the accuracy of the CT-based robotic navigation system. The error in COR was variable (Fig. 4). The M/L distance error was 1.29 mm (SD: 1.18 mm; range: −2.61 – 1.13 mm). The S/I distance error was 1.81 mm (SD: 1.56 mm; range: −2.19 – 3.0 mm). The A/P distance error was 1.50 mm (SD: 1.50 mm; range: −3.53 – 2.23 mm). The mean difference between the intraoperative intended anteversion and postoperative actual anteversion was 2.2° ±1.6° with an RMS error of 2.73°. The mean difference in intraoperative intended inclination and postoperative actual inclination was 3.3° ± 1.7° with an RMS error of 3.71°. The robotic navigation system was more reliable in achieving the intended anteversion than intended inclination. The ICC for anteversion was 0.92 (95% CI 0.91–0.97), compared to ICC 0.74 (95% CI 0.49–0.89) for inclination. Conclusion. Our results suggest that CT-based navigation for THA is accurate for achieving intended cup center of rotation and both reliable and accurate in reproducing the intended cup orientation. Future research will focus on the use of a CT-based robotic navigation system to assist surgeons in the execution of a kinematic-based plan to eliminate impingement to reduce THA instability while maximizing range of motion

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty is considered to be one of the most successful orthopaedic interventions. Acetabular component positioning has been shown to affect dislocation rates, component impingement, bearing surface wear rates, and need for revision surgery. The safe zones of acetabular component positioning have previously been described by Lewinnek et al. as 5 to 25 degrees of cup version and 30 to 50 degrees of inclination. Callanan et al. later modified the inclination to 30 to 45 degrees. Our aim was to assess whether THA via robotic assisted posterior approach (PA) improves acetabular component positioning compared to fluoroscopic guided anterior approach THA (AA). Methods. Subjects. This study is a matched-pair case-control study using prospectively collected data from THAs done between January 2012 and December 2013. Patients who underwent primary THA using the PA or AA by the senior surgeons (MH and JAR) were included in the study. Ninety-six patients (of 176; 55%) underwent AA and 80 (of 176; 45%) underwent PA THAs. The matching process was performed by an observer blinded to the radiographic outcomes (EK). Patients were matched for sex and BMI +− 8 units. Seventy-nine patients who had AAs were manually matched to 79 patients who had PAs. Surgical Techniques. For the AA THAs, the patient is supine and the approach is performed through a modified smith Peterson approach. Acetabular cup positioning is assessed intraoperatively with fluoroscopy. For the PA THAs, the patient in the lateral position using the posterior approach. Acetabular cup positioning was guided by the MAKO robotic hip system using preoperative CT scans of the involved hip. Radiographic Measurements. The radiographic measurements were done manually using a standardized technique by two observers blinded to the type of arthroplasty performed. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to test user dependent variability. Means were used for final calculations. Statistical Analysis. The average cup inclination and anteversion angles were calculated. Calculation of the number of hips that were in the safe zones of Lewinnek (inclination, 30°–50°; anteversion, 5°–25°) and Callanan (inclination, 30°–45°; anteversion, 5°–25°) regarding inclination, anteversion, and a combination of both were done for both groups. Independent t-tests were performed to compare both groups for sex, BMI, and inclination and anteversion angles. Fisher's exact test was used to compare both groups regarding the number of hips in the safe zones of Lewinnek and Callanan. Relative risk and absolute risk reduction were calculated. Results. There was no significant difference in BMI between the two groups. Intraobserver agreement was found to be .92 and 0.82 for inclination and anteversion, respectively. Compared to fluoroscopic guided THAs, THAs performed with robot assistance were found to be more often in the safe zone of Lewinnek (90% vs. 75%, p=0.02, RR 0.40 [0.19–0.85] p=0.01). This pattern was observed in the zone of Callanan and approached statistical significance (80% vs. 68%, p=0.11, RR 0.64 [0.37–1.10] p=0.11). Conclusion. Compared to fluoroscopic assisted THA, robot assisted THAs are more likely to be within the safe zone of Callanan and Lewinnek

Acetabular implant position is important for the stability, function, and long-term wear properties of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior studies of acetabular implant positioning have demonstrated a high percentage of outliers, even for experienced hip surgeons, when conventional instruments are used. Computer navigation is an attractive tool for use in THA, as it has been shown to improve the precision of acetabular component placement and reduce the incidence of outliers. However, computer navigation with imageless, large-console systems is costly and often interrupts the surgeon's workflow, and thus has not been widely adopted. Another method to improve acetabular component positioning during THA is the use of fluoroscopy with the direct anterior approach. Studies have demonstrated that the supine position of the patient during surgery facilitates the use of fluoroscopic guidance, thus improving acetabular component position. A handheld, accelerometer based navigation unit for use in total hip replacement has recently become available to assist the surgeon in positioning the acetabular component during anterior approach THA, potentially reducing the need for intra-operative fluoroscopic studies. We sought to compare the radiographic results of direct anterior THA performed with conventional instrumentation vs. handheld navigation to determine the accuracy of the navigation unit, and to see whether or not there was a reduction in the fluoroscopic time used during surgery. Furthermore, we timed the use of the navigation unit to see whether or not it required a substantial addition to surgical time. Our results demonstrate that a handheld navigation unit used during anterior approach THA had no difference with regard to acetabular cup positioning when compared to fluoroscopically assisted THA, but led to a reduction in the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy time

Problem. Total hip replacement (THA) is among the most common and highest total spend elective operations in the United States. However, up to 7% of patients have 90-day complications after surgery, most frequently joint dislocation that is related to poor acetabular component positioning. These complications lead to patient morbidity and mortality, as well as significant cost to the health system. As such, surgeons and hospitals value navigation technology, but existing solutions including robotics and optical navigation are costly, time-consuming, and complex to learn, resulting in limited uptake globally. Solution. Augmented reality represents a navigation solution that is rapid, accurate, intuitive, easy to learn, and does not require large and costly equipment in the operating room. In addition to providing cutting edge technology to specialty orthopedic centers, augmented reality is a very attractive solution for lower volume and smaller operative settings such as ambulatory surgery centers that cannot justify purchases of large capital equipment navigation systems. Product. HipInsight™ is an augmented reality solution for navigation of the acetabular component in THA. HipInsight is a navigation solution that includes preoperative, cloud based surgical planning based on patient imaging and surgeon preference of implants as well as intraoperative guidance for placement of the acetabular component. Once the patient specific surgical plan is generated on the cloud-based planning system, holograms showing the optimal planned position of the acetabular component are exported in holographic format to a Microsoft HoloLens 2™, which the surgeon wears during placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. The pelvis is registered using the HipXpert™ mechanical registration device, which takes 2–3 minutes to dock in the operating room. The surgeon then is able to view the patient's anatomy and optimal placement of the acetabular component under the skin in augmented reality. The surgeon then aligns the real cup impactor with the augmented reality projection of the cup impactor resulting in precise placement of the cup. Timescales. HipInsight was FDA cleared on January 28, 2021 for intraoperative use for placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. The first case was performed in February 2021, and the product was launched to a select group of orthopedic surgeons in March 2021. Funding. HipInsight has been self-funded to date, and is beginning to engage in discussions to raise capital for a rapidly scaling commercial launch

Background. Acetabulum positioning affects dislocation rates, component impingement, bearing surface wear rates, and need for revision surgery. Novel techniques purport to improve the accuracy and precision of acetabular component position, but may come have significant learning curves. Our aim was to assess whether adopting robotic or fluoroscopic techniques improve acetabulum positioning compared to manual THA during the learning curve. Methods. Three types of THAs were compared in this retrospective cohort: 1) the first 100 fluoroscopically guided direct anterior THAs (fluoroscopic anterior, FA) done by a posterior surgeon learning the anterior approach, 2) the first 100 robotic assisted posterior THAs done by a surgeon learning robotic assisted surgery (robotic posterior, RP) and 3) the last 100 manual posterior THAs done by each surgeon (total 200 THAs) prior to adoption of novel techniques (manual posterior, MP). Component position was measured on plain radiographs. Radiographic measurements were done by two blinded observers. The percentage of hips within the surgeons' target zone (inclination 30°–50°, anteversion 10°–30°) was calculated, along with the percentage within the safe zone of Lewinnek (inclination 30°–50°; anteversion 5°–25°) and Callanan (inclination 30°–45°; anteversion 5°–25°). Relative risk and absolute risk reduction were calculated. Variances (square of the SDs) were used to describe the variability of cup position. Results. 76% of MP THAs were within the surgeons' target zone compared with 84% of FA THAs and 97% of RP THAs. This difference was statistically significant, associated with a relative risk reduction of 87% (RR 0.13 [0.04–0.40], p<.01, ARR 21%, NNT 5) for RP compared to MP THAs. Compared to FA THAs, RP THAs were associated with a relative risk reduction of 81% (RR 0.19 [0.06–0.62], p<.01, ARR 13%, NNT 8). Variances were lower for acetabulum inclination and anteversion in RP THAs (14.0 and 19.5) as compared to the MP (37.5 and 56.3) and FA (24.5 and 54.6) groups. These differences were statistically significant (P<.01). Conclusion. Adoption of robotic techniques delivers significant and immediate improvement in the precision of acetabular component positioning during the learning curve. While fluoroscopy has been shown to be beneficial with experience, a learning curve exists before precision improves significantly

Total hip replacement is among the most successful interventions in medicine and has been termed “The Operation of the Century”. Most major problems have been solved including femoral fixation, acetabular fixation, and wear. With a success rate of over 95% at 10 years in both hip and knee arthroplasty in a number of studies, the question remains as to whether the current status quo is optimal or acceptable. The literature, however, reports are from centers that represent optimised results and registry data, including the Medicare database, indicates that substantial short-term problems persist. The major issue is the variability in the performance of the procedure. The inability to consistently position components, particularly the acetabular component, results in major problems including instability and limb length discrepancy. A report by Malchau, et al. reveals that even among the best surgeons, optimal acetabular component positioning is only achieved 50% of the time. The penalty for missing the target is increased incidence of instability, increased wear rate, and diminished function due to restricted motion. Complications are related to position and a major potential explanation is the impact of patient position. Traditional imaging presents a two-dimensional rather than three-dimensional view of the patient and the patient is in a supine, non-functional position at the time that imaging is performed. Adverse events attributed to malposition, however, occur in functional positions and there is evidence that the orientation of the pelvis changes from the supine position at which imaging is performed. This topic has been studied extensively on three continents and the consensus is that the pelvis shifts on the order of 30–40 degrees from the supine to standing and sitting and furthermore, the acetabular component position changes proportionally with the rotation of the pelvis that occurs. How do we incorporate this information into imaging arthroplasty patients? This would require imaging the entire body, acquiring AP and lateral images simultaneously so that 3D imaging can be performed, performing imaging in a functional position (standing or sitting) and optimally at a lower radiation dose since these patients have repeated images and therefore a cumulative radiation dose over their lifetime. This technology was FDA approved for use in the hip and knee in 2011 and pilot studies have been performed at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis to validate the number of the hip and knee arthroplasty applications. In conclusion, weightbearing and rotation have substantial impact on the standard measurements obtained before and after hip and knee arthroplasty. These differences in measurements between supine, sitting, and standing as well as correction for rotation may explain the lack of a stronger correlation between component position and a variety of complications that are observed such as variability in wear rates as well as instability. In knee arthroplasty, the change in mechanical axis that occurs from restoring all of patients to a neutral mechanical axis may explain some of the persistent pain and dissatisfaction that has been recently been reported at a relatively high percentage of knee arthroplasty patients. Because of the numerous potential clinical implications of three-dimensional weightbearing imaging, it is likely that the future of arthroplasty imaging will focus on functional three-dimensional imaging of the patient

Background. Several recent reports have documented high frequency of malpositioned acetabular components, even amongst high volume arthroplasty surgeons. Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) has the potential to improve component positioning; however, to our knowledge there are no reports examining the learning curve during the adoption of robotic assisted THA. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to examine the learning curve of robotic assisted THA as measured by component position, operative time, intra-operative technical problems, and complications. Methods. The first 105 robotic-assisted THAs performed by a single surgeon with a posterior approach from June 2011 to August 2013 patients were divided into three groups based on the order of surgery. Group A was cases 1–35, group B 36–70 and group C 71–105. Component position, operative time, intra-operative technical problems, and intra-operative complications were recorded. Results. There was no significant difference between groups A, B, and C for BMI or age (Figure 1). Gender was different between groups with 20 males in group A, 9 in group B, and 16 in group C (p < 0.05). There was no difference for mean acetabular inclination, acetabular anteversion, or leg length discrepancy between groups as experience increased (p > 0.05) (Figure 2). The average operative time for groups A, B, and C was 79.8 ± 27 min, 63.2 ± 14.2 min, and 69.4 ± 16.3 min respectively (p = 0.02). The cumulative number of outliers was two for the Lewenick safe zone and six for the Callanan safe zone. Figure 3 displays acetabular component positioning in relation to previously documented safe zones for the three groups. The risk of having an acetabular component outside of Lewenick's safe zone was not different between groups (p = 0.60). The risk of having an acetabular component outside of Callanan's safe zone decreased after group A and was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Overall there were nine (9%) intra-operative technical problems and complications. In group A there were three complications: one loosened femoral array, one loosened pelvic array, and one cup that appeared erroneous according to the navigation system. In group B there was one femoral calcar fracture treated with a cerclage wire, one loosened femoral array, and one intra-operative delay. In group C there were three technical problems, all a loosened femoral array. There was no difference in the overall number of intra-operative complications between groups (p = 1.0). Conclusion. A learning curve was observed, as a decreased incidence of acetabular component outliers and decreased operative time were noted with increased experience. Satisfactory acetabular component positioning and leg length matching were found throughout the learning curve of robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty, with very few outliers in either category. Based on these findings, we conclude that there is a learning curve of approximately 35 cases in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty

There are numerous factors that influence total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability including surgical approach, soft-tissue tensioning, impingement, abductor status, and component positioning. A long-held tenet regarding acetabular component positioning is that cup inclination and anteversion of 40 ± 10 degrees and 15 ± 10 degrees, respectively, represents a “safe zone” as to minimise dislocation after primary THA. However, several studies have recently challenged that notion for individual patients. A study completed by Abdel et al. identified a cohort of 9784 primary THAs performed at a single institution with 206 THAs (2%) that subsequently dislocated. The authors determined that 58% of the dislocated THAs had their acetabular component within the safe zone for both acetabular inclination and anteversion. When looked at separately, 84% had their inclination within the safe zone (mean value of 44 ± 8 degrees), and 69% had their anteversion within the safe zone (mean value of 15 ± 9 degrees). As such, surgeons should take into account that cup positioning alone does not determine the risk of instability following THA, as there are a multitude of other factors that can contribute to dislocation. Hip stability is multifactorial and likely patient-specific, and must take into account bony and muscular anatomy, static and dynamic soft tissue balance and intraoperative tensioning, and the functional demand and rehabilitative efforts of the patient