Summary Statement. It is now possible to diagnose osteoporosis using incidental abdominal CT scans; applying this approach to fractures of the cervical spine demonstrates levels of osteoporosis in patients over 65. Introduction. Recently published data now makes it possible to screen for osteoporosis in patients who, in the course of their hospital stay, have had Computed Tomography (CT) scans of their abdomen for reasons other than direct imaging. This is as a result of CT derived bone mineral density (BMD) in the first lumbar vertebra (L1) being correlated BMD derived from Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans. The advantage of this is the reduction in both cost and radiation exposure. Although age has a detrimental effect on BMD, relatively few patients have formal DEXA studies. The aims of this study were to evaluate the utility of this new technique in a cohort of patients with acute fractures of the cervical spine and to compare relative values for BMD in patients aged over 65 with those aged under 65, and thus define the role of osteoporosis in these injuries. Methods & Patients. Following Institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective study of patients who presented to a level I trauma center with acute fractures of the cervical spine between 2010 and 2013; patients also had to have had a CT scan of their L1 vertebra either during the admission or within 6 months of their admission (for any other clinical reason). Using a picture archiving and communication (PACS) system, we generated regions of interest (ROI) of similar size in the body of L1 (excluding the cortex), in line with the publication by Pickhardt et al., and computed the mean values for Hounsfield units (HU). These values were compared against established threshold values which differentiate between osteoporosis and osteopenia; for a balanced sensitivity and specificity, <135 HU is the threshold and for 90% sensitivity a HU threshold of <160 HU is set. Comparisons were also performed between age stratified groups. Results. A total of 187 patients were reviewed for eligibility, 91 patients met the criteria with 53 patients aged 64 years or younger (range 23–64) and 38 patients aged above 65 years (range 65–98). In the younger cohort, 6/53 (11% were osteoporotic, using the lower threshold, while the higher threshold indicated 5/53 (17%) of patients under 65 years were osteoporotic; mean HU for the group was 195.8 (SD 43.3). In the older cohort, 24/38 (63%) were osteoporotic using the lower threshold, whereas 34/38 (89%) were osteoporotic using the higher threshold. Mean HU for the cohort aged over 65 years was 118.7 (SD 38.4). Age based comparison of the mean values, regardless of threshold, was statistically significant (p<0.001) in both cases. Discussion and Conclusions. This study demonstrates, for the first time in the cervical spine (including C2), the role of age related osteoporosis in acute fractures of the cervical spine. This new technique harnessing the presence of opportunistic CT scans of the abdomen saves on the extra cost and radiation exposure that may be associated with DEXA scanning. In younger patients, the higher threshold indicated 17% were osteoporotic – in the setting of an opportunistic scan, this may afford them the opportunity to commence prophylactic treatment to prevent future fractures. We believe these result have the potential to significantly impact future clinical practice

Summary Statement. Using abdominal CT scans to evaluate bone mineral density following acute fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine demonstrates significant levels of osteoporosis in older patients; this approach may help save on time and resources, and reduce unnecessary radiation exposure. Introduction. While a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with aging, relatively few patients have formal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to quantify the magnitude of bone loss, as they age. This loss of bone may predispose to fractures. Recent data, which correlates mean Hounsfield units (HU) in an area of the L1 vertebra with BMD, now makes it possible to screen for osteoporosis using incidental abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) scans to measure bone density. This innovation has the potential to reduce both cost and radiation exposure, and also make it easier to identify patients who may be at risk. The aims of this study were to evaluate the utility of this approach in patients with acute thoracic and lumbar spine fractures and to evaluate the impact of aging on BMD, using CT screening. Patients & Methods. Following institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective study of patients who presented to a level I trauma center with acute fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine between 2010 and 2013; patients also had to have had an abdominal (or L1) CT scan either during the admission or in the 6 months before or after their injury. Using a picture archiving and communication (PACS) system, we generated regions of interest (ROI) of similar size in the body of L1 (excluding the cortex) and computed mean values for HU. Values derived were compared against threshold values which differentiate between osteoporosis and osteopenia - for specificity of 90%, a threshold of 110 was set; for balanced sensitivity and specificity, a threshold of <135 HU was set and for 90% sensitivity a threshold of <160 HU was set. A student's t test was used to compare the age stratified mean HU (younger than 65yrs; 65yrs and older), while Fisher's exact test was used to perform aged stratified comparisons between the proportions of patients above and below the thresholds outlined (in each of the three threshold groups). Results. A total of 124 patients were evaluated, with 74 having thoracic and 50 having lumbar fractures. Among those with thoracic fractures, there were 33patients in the younger cohort, who also had a mean BMD of 196.51HU and 41 in the older cohort, who had mean BMD of 105.90HU (p<0.001). In patients with lumbar fractures, 27 patients were in the younger cohort, with mean BMD of 192.26HU and 23 patients in the older cohort with mean BMD of 114.31HU (p<0.001). At the threshold of 110 HU, set for specificity, the magnitude of difference between the age stratified cohorts was greater in the thoracic spine (p<0.001 vs. p=0.003). At the other thresholds: 135HU (balanced for sensitivity and specificity) and 160 HU (90% sensitivity), age of 65 years or older was significantly associated with reduction in CT derived measure of BMD (p<0.001 in all cases). Discussion. This study demonstrates the relative frequency of osteoporosis in acute fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine, and how this changes with age; it is also the first study to do this using opportunistic CT scans. There seems to be a strong association between a reduction in bone mineral density and advanced age, in patients presenting with acute fractures of the spine. This approach may save on the extra cost and additional radiation exposure that may be associated with DXA scanning; in addition, it may help provide clinicians and patients with an approach to monitor developing problems with BMD before it becomes clinically apparent, especially in younger patients

Objectives

The clinical utility of routine cross sectional imaging of the abdomen and pelvis in the screening and surveillance of patients with primary soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities for metastatic disease is controversial, based on its questionable yield paired with concerns regarding the risks of radiation exposure, cost, and morbidity resulting from false positive findings.