Purpose. Factors contributing to chronic postoperative pain (CPOP) are poorly defined in young people and developmental considerations are poorly understood. With over 5 million children undergoing surgery yearly and 25% of adults referred to chronic pain clinics identifying surgery as the antecedent, there is a need to elucidate factors that contribute to CPOP in young people. The present study includes patients undergoing hip preservation surgery at a children's hospital. Methods. The HOOS and the SF-12 Health Survey were administered to 614 patients prior to surgery with 422 patients completing follow-up data (6-months, 1-year, and 2-years post-surgery). Examining baseline characteristics for those who completed follow-up versus those who did not, the only significant difference was that patients with more than one surgery were less likely to complete follow-up measures. Pain, quality of life, and functioning across time were examined using SAS PROC TRAJ procedure, a mixture model that estimates a regression model for each discrete group within the population. Longitudinal pain trajectories were empirically grouped. Baseline preoperative characteristics of age, gender, preoperative pain, quality of life, functioning, and mental health that could potentially distinguish trajectory groups were examined. Results. A three trajectory model (low pain, pain improvement, and high pain) emerged indicating three different treatment responders. Pain trajectory groups did not differ significantly on gender, presurgical age, BMI, prior hip surgery, surgical type, joint congruence, or Tönnis grade. The pain trajectory groups differed significantly from each other on presurgical pain, pain chronicity, quality of life, and functioning. Those in the high pain group and pain improvement group endorsed having presurgical depression at significantly higher rates and lower presurgical quality of life compared to those in the low pain group (p<.01). Similarly, those in the high pain group reported significantly worse functioning prior to surgery compared to the pain improvement group (p<.0001) and those in the low pain group (p<.0001). Conclusions. Chronic pain is a common problem and surgery can be a trigger. There may be a subset of hip preservation surgery patients who are predisposed to chronic pain independent of hip health. The results demonstrate the need for preoperative screening prior to hip preservation surgery. A prospective, interventional study to identify patients at risk for a poor pain trajectory is underway. Significance. This is the largest study to date to examine longitudinal pain, quality of life, and functioning trajectories for adolescent and young adults undergoing hip preservation surgery. Chronic pain is a serious public health concern, with the United States spending $19 billion annually on pain-related disability. Identifying predictors of poor long-term outcomes in adolescents and young adult samples with postoperative pain may prevent the development of chronic pain into adulthood as well as inform presurgical preparation and postsurgical care

Aim. Diagnosis of clavicle osteomyelitis (OM) is often difficult with delayed treatment due to the lower incidence of this disease. The present study aimed to summarize clinical experience with clinical features and treatment of clavicle OM. Method. We systematically searched the Pubmed database to identify studies regarding clinical characteristics and management of clavicle OM from 1980 to 2016, with publication language limited to English. Effective data were collected and pooled for analysis. Results. Altogether 69 reports comprising 188 cases were included for analysis. The average age of included patients was 24.95 years, 57.98% of whom were younger than 20 years. According to different etiologies, 86 cases (45.74%) were categorized as infectious OM with 102 cases (54.26%) as noninfectious. Of all the 102 noninfectious OM, 62.13% were diagnosed as chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO). The female-to-male ratio of infectious clavicle OM was 1.09, with 3.43 of noninfectious clavicle OM. The most common and earliest clinical symptom was pain, which occurred in 86.81% of the patients. Positive rate of serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was the highest among serum inflammatory biomarkers reported (92.47%). Staphylococcus aureus (46.94%) was the most frequently detected pathogen among patients with infectious clavicle OM. A total of 50 patients received surgical interventions finally (42.37 %). The most frequently used antibiotic was cephalosporin. Most cases achieved favorable outcomes (89.91%). Conclusions. Clavicle OM, classified as infectious and noninfectious, mostly occurred in the young people and females. The most frequently identified clinical symptom was pain. Despite different treatment strategies, most patients could achieve favorable outcomes

The femur begins to bow anteriorly at the 200 mm level, but may bow earlier in smaller people. If the stem to be used is less than 200 mm, a straight stem can be used. If the stem is longer than 200 mm, it will perforate the anterior femoral cortex. I know this because I did this on a few occasions more than 20 years ago. To use a long straight stem, there are two techniques. One can either do a diaphyseal osteotomy or one can do a Wagner split (extended trochanteric osteotomy). Both of these will put the knee in some degree of hyperextension, probably insignificant in the elderly, but it may be of significance in the young. In very young people, therefore, it may be preferable to use a bowed stem to avoid this degree of recurvatum. There are two different concepts of loading. Diaphyseal osteotomy implies a proximal loading has been sought. The Wagner split ignores the proximal femur and seeks conical fixation in the diaphysis. There will be very little bone-bone contact between what remains of the attached femur and the detached anterior cortex so that it is important to ensure that the blood supply to the anterior cortex remains intact, preferably by using Wagner's technique, using a quarter-inch osteotome inserted through the vastus to crack the medial cortex. Current modularity is of two types. Distal modularity was attempted many years ago and was never successful. Proximal modularity, as for example, the S-ROM stem, implies various sizes of sleeves fit onto the stem to get a proximal canal fill. In mid-stem modularity, the distal stem wedges into the cone. It has to be driven into where it jams and this can be somewhat unpredictable. For this reason, the solid Wagner stem has been replaced by the mid-stem modular. Once the distal femur is solidly embedded, the proximal body is then selected for height and version. The proximal body is unsupported in the mid-stem modular and initially, few fractures were noted at the taper junction. Cold rolling, shot peening and taper strengthening seem to have solved these problems. There are a variety of types of osteotomy, which can be used for different deformities. With a mid-stem modular system, generally, all that needs to be done is a Wagner-type split and fixation is sought in the mid-diaphysis by conical reaming. No matter what stem is used, distal stability is necessary. This is achieved by flutes, which engage the endosteal cortex. The flutes alone must have sufficient rotational stability to overcome the service loads on the hip of 22 Nm. I divide revision into three categories. In type one, the isthmus is intact, i.e. the bone below the lesser trochanter so that a primary stem can be used. In type two, the isthmus is damaged, i.e. the bone below the lesser trochanter, so a long revision stem is required. In a type three, there is more than 70 mm of missing proximal femur. The Wagner stem may be able to handle this on its own, but most other stems are better supported with a structural allograft cemented to the stem. The reported long term results of mid-stem modular revision implants are good as in most, over 90% survivorship. The introduction of modularity appears to have overcome initial disadvantage of the Wagner stem, i.e. its unpredictability in terms of leg length

Background. Isolated fractures of the distal fourth or fifth metacarpal bones, known as boxer's fractures (BF), are the most common type of metacarpal fracture. Boxer's fractures received their name from one of their most common causes — punching an object with a closed fist. This injury has been described as “a tolerable fracture in an intolerable patient” (1) It occurs commonly during fistfights or from punching a hard object such as a wall. Greer and William demonstrated that it is usually an intentional injury and these patients were at increased risk for recurrent injury (2). Further work suggested that patients with such injuries had higher features of antisocial, self-defeating personality disorders, self harm and impulsive behaviour, compared with control groups (3). It has been suggested that all patients presenting with such an injury should have psychiatric assessment. The majority of studies in the literature have concentrated on adults and little has been reported on children and adolescents who present with such fractures. This study aims to assess aggression scores in young patients discharged with metacarpal fractures due to punching using a validated questionnaire and this abstract presents the interim analysis. Methodology. Following ethical permissions patients between 11 and 18 years of age, discharged with a metacarpal fracture caused by punching diagnosis codes S622, S623 or S624 and willing to complete an anonymous quetionnairre were included. All patients recieved an information sheet and for young people under 16 parental permission was sought. The Bus and Warren validated questionnaire was completed by post, in person or over the telephone. The questionnaire included subscales of physical aggression and anger scales as well as overall aggression scoring and patients were asked to complete all sections. Results. Twenty one patients who had metacarpal fractures due to punching have. completed the study to date. All were males aged between the age of 11 and 18. The physical aggression scores ranged from 13-39 with a mean of 27.5, median 31 and mode 33. Fifteen patients demonstrated high aggression scores. Six patients demonstrated average scores. Anger scores ranged from 7-31. Median 18.5, mode 13, median 20. Thirteen patients had high anger scores compared with their peers. Eight patients were within the average range. Overall aggression scores ranged from 66-133 with a mean of 100 and median of 100. Eleven patients demonstrated high scores and 5 were in the high average range. Discussion/Conclusions. The initial interim results of this study show that over half the patients had higher overall aggression levels than the normal population. The physical aggression subscale focussed on the use of physical force and 71% had high physical aggression levels. High scores in this subscale indicate a lack of ability to control urges toward physical aggression and this is often seen in children with attention deficit disorder. Anger scores may indicate a number of conduct disorders or abusive situations and in this study 62% had raised anger scores. This may be relevant in assessing children with punch injuries as they may benefit from assessment by the CAMS team for investigation and management of their anger and aggression issues which in turn may reduce recurrence of the injuries