We set out to demonstrate the 10-year survivorship of the PFC sigma TKA in a young patient group.

Demographic and clinical outcome data were collected prospectively at 6 months, 18 months, 3 years, 5 years and 8-10 years post surgery.

The data were analysed using Kaplan Meier survival statistics with end point being regarded as death or revision for any reason.

203 patients were found to be ≤55 years at the time of surgery. Four patients required revision and four patients died. Another four patients moved away from the region and were excluded from the study.

A total of 224 knees in 199 patients (101 male and 98 females.) 168 patients had a diagnosis of Osteoarthritis and 28 with inflammatory arthritis. Average age 50.6 years range 28-55 years (median 51).

Ten-year survivorship in terms of revision 98.2% at ten years 95% confidence interval.

Our results demonstrate that the PFC Sigma knee has an excellent survival rate in young patients over the first 10 years.

TKR should not be withheld from patients on the basis of age.

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome from total knee replacement (TKR) in young versus old patients in terms of pain and functional outcome.

We used our arthroplasty database which recorded prospectively pain and American Knee Society scores at regular intervals over ten years after TKR. The procedures used a modern, cemented resurfacing type cruciate retaining prosthesis. A cohort of young patients (≤55 years) were identified. A control group of patients > 56 was identified, matching for ASA, body mass index and underlying condition. Change over time was analysed using a factorial repeated measures ANOVA test, which allowed for investigation of difference between groups.

40 Knees in 26 patients were identified. 2 patients died prior to follow up, 2 were revised within the study period. (1 for infection at 2 years and one for change of poly at 7 years) and a further 4 were lost to follow up. 7 knees could not be matched and were excluded. This left a study group of 24 young and 24 older knees.

Pain scores (p=0.025) and American Knee Society “Knee” (p<0.001) and “Function” (p<0.001) scores changed significantly over time. There were however no statistical differences over the 10 year period in pain (p=0.436) and knee performance (0.618) but overall function was higher throughout the period in the younger group (=0.004).

Knee replacement in younger patients produces similar outcomes in terms of pain and function compared with older patients and TKR should not be withheld purely on account of age.

The aims of this retrospective study were to compare the mid-term outcomes following revision total knee replacement (TKR) in 76 patients (81 knees) < 55 years of age with those of a matched group of primary TKRs based on age, BMI, gender and comorbid conditions. We report the activity levels, functional scores, rates of revision and complications. Compared with patients undergoing primary TKR, those undergoing revision TKR had less improvement in the mean Knee Society function scores (8.14 (–55 to +60) vs 23.3 points (–40 to +80), p < 0.001), a similar improvement in UCLA activity level (p = 0.52), and similar minor complication rates (16% vs 13%, p = 0.83) at a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (2 to 13.4). Further revision surgery was more common among revised TKRs (17% vs 5%, p = 0.02), with deep infection and instability being the most common reasons for failure. As many as one-third of patients aged < 55 years in the revision group had a complication or failure requiring further surgery.

Young patients undergoing revision TKR should be counselled that they can expect somewhat less improvement and a higher risk of complications than occur after primary TKR.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1657–62

Abstract