Purpose of study. A recent audit in our institution showed that 40% of Lumbar spine X-rays ordered by General Practitioners were outside the Royal College of Radiology guidelines. Little in 1998 had commented that GPs requested Lumber Spine X-rays for psychosocial reasons. Methods. An online survey was conducted on . www.surveymonkey.com. among the local GPs to determine their practice and preferences in investigating low back pain. The 5 questions in the survey were “rating scale questions” on a scale of 1 and 10, where 1 = DISAgree and 10 = Agree. A request to participate in the survey was sent to all the local General Practitioners by e-mail. Results. 36 General Practitioners participated in the survey. Participants agreed that if there were no red flags and no significant neurological deficit they were satisfied in not requesting further investigations (6.03/10). They did not feel the need to order investigation just to reassure an anxious patient (5.31). In day to day practice they however were forced to request X-rays (6.72) though they preferred to request MRI scans (7.55). They also felt frustrated that MRI scans could not be directly ordered by GPs (6.69). Conclusion. This limited study demonstrates that General Practitioners “Do not investigate back pain just to reassure the patient but are frustrated that they are not able to directly request MRI scans for their patients. Increased efforts to educate the public and health professionals that a negative X-ray result of the lumbar spine is not reassuring should be matched by easy access to MRI scans

Purpose of study. The Royal College of Radiology (RCR) provides guideline criteria to order lumbar spine X-rays for back pain. An audit was undertaken in our hospital to see compliance with this guideline. Methods. 200 lumbar spine radiology requests received in the hospital radiology department from General Practitioners over a 12 month period were identified. These 200 requests and their corresponding radiology reports were retrospectively analyzed. Results. Out of the 200 patients 80 were male and 120 were female. 1 patient was < 18 years, 75 patients were between 18 and 55 years, 52 patients were between 55 and 70 and 72 patients were > 70 years of age. Only 125 patients satisfied the RCR criteria for requiring a Lumbar Spine X-ray. 104 of these 125 patients met the criteria only because of age (> 55). The remaining 21 had other criteria like history of malignancy, osteoporosis or trauma that required imaging. Of the 200 X-rays the only significant pathology that was identified from the report was osteoporotic fractures in 35 patients. The most commonest diagnostic report was spondylosis which was seen in 92 patients. Among the 75 patients between the age of 18 and 55 only 2 fulfilled the criteria for requiring a lumbar spine X-ray. Hence 73 (36.5%) X-rays were outside the criteria. Among the 52 patients between the ages of 55 and 70 only 6 had a criteria other than age. Conclusion. This limited study demonstrates the following two possibilities. More stricter adherence to guidelines in patients aged 18 to 55. In this study 73 (36.5%) X-rays could have been avoided by this method. We believe that there is a case for the college to increase the age related criteria from 55 to 70 to be at par with American guidelines. If this method was used an additional 46 (23%) X-rays could have been avoided

The lordosis distribution index (LDI) describes distribution of lumbar lordosis, measured as the % of lower lumbar lordosis (L4-S1) compared to global lordosis (L1-S1) with normal value 50–50%. Maldistributed LDI is associated with higher revision in short lumbar fusions, 4 vertebrae1. We hypothesise maldistributed LDI is also associated with mechanical failure in longer fusions. Retrospective review of 29 consecutive ASD patients, aged 55+, undergoing long lumbar fusion, 4 levels, with >3-years follow-up. LDI, pelvic incidence (PI) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured on pre- and post-op whole spine standing X-rays (Fig A and B). Patients were categorized according to their pelvic incidence (PI) and postoperative LDI: Normal (LDI 50 80), Hypolordotic (LDI < 50), or Hyperlordotic (LDI > 80) and assessed for failure rate compared to normal LDI and PI <60. Mean follow-up 4.5 years. 19 patients had mechanical failures including junctional failure and metalware fracture. PI >60o was associated with higher mechanical failure rates (Chi^2 p<0.05). Hypolordotic LDI was associated with 82% mechanical failure (Chi^2 p<0.001), Hyperlordotic 88% mechanical failure (Chi^2 p<0.001) and Normal 8% mechanical failure (Table 1). Maldistributed LDI, whether Hyperlordotic or Hypolordotic, correlated with 10× greater mechanical failure rate compared to Normal LDI in long fusions. LDI is a useful measurement that should be considered, especially in high PI patients

Background. The advent of EOS imaging has offered clinicians the opportunity to image the whole skeleton in the anatomical standing position with a smaller radiation dose than standard spine roentgenograms. It is known as the fifth modality of imaging. Current NICE guidelines do not recommend EOS scans over x-rays citing: “The evidence indicated insufficient patient benefit in terms of radiation dose reduction and increased throughput to justify its cost”. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 103 adult and 103 paediatric EOS scans of standing whole spines including shoulders and pelvis for those undergoing investigation for spinal deformity in a tertiary spinal centre in the UK. We matched this against a retrospective control group of 103 adults and 103 children who underwent traditional roentgenograms whole spine imaging at the same centre during the same timeframe. We aimed to compare the average radiation dose of AP and lateral images between the two modalities. We utilised a validated lifetime risk of cancer calculator (. www.xrayrisk.com. ) to estimate the additional mean risk per study. Results. In the Adult EOS Group (AEG) the mean estimated effective dose of AP was 0.08 mSv (0.04–0.15) and Lateral 0.06 mSv (0.03–0.14). Conversely in the Adult Roentgenograms Group (ARG) the mean AP was 0.49 mSv (0.15–1.88) and Lateral was 0.29 mSv (0.07–1.20). In the Paediatric EOS Group (PEG): the mean dose of AP was 0.07 mSv (0.02–0.21) and Lateral 0.04 mSv (0.02–0.11). Conversely Paediatric Roentgenograms Group (PRG) had a mean dose in AP of 0.37 mSv (0.03–5.92) and in lateral of 0.17 mSv (0.03–0.44). The percentage differences were: ARG:AES AP 613%, ARG:AES Lat 483%, PPG:PEG AP 529%, PRG:PEG Lat 425%. Mean difference 513%. The additional lifetime cancer risk for AEG was 1 in 176056 for males and 1 in 138696 for females, compared to ARG 1 in 31596 for males and 1 in 24894 for females. In PEG that was 1 in 58207 for boys and 1 in 33367 for girls, compared to PRG 1 in 11860 for boys and 1 in 6797 in girls. Differences in additional lifetime risk of cancer per scan: ARG:AES Male 557%, Female 557%, PRG:PEG Male 491%, Females 491%. Conclusion. Standard plain film imaging of the whole spine requires approximately five-times higher doses of radiation compared to dual planar EOS scans. This carries a significant impact when considering the need for repeat imaging on additional lifetime malignancy risk in both children and adults. There is approximately 5-fold increase in risk of cancer for all groups with roentgenograms over EOS. We directly challenge the NICE guidance and recommend EOS dual planar imaging in favour of plane roentgenograms for investigation of spinal deformity

Background. Advice to stay active should be delivered to all patients with low back pain (LBP) without a serious underlying condition. However, some patients still believe that the avoidance of activities will help them to recover. These patients may be less likely to experience favourable outcomes. Purpose. To investigate how many patients consider LBP to be a signal to stop being active. Methods. This was a cross sectional study involving adults with LBP referred from general practices to the Spine Centre at Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Denmark. Patients who completed a routinely delivered electronic questionnaire prior to initial consultation were considered for inclusion. Patients were excluded if serious pathology was suspected. Included patients replied to additional socio-demographic questions, attitudes to spinal imaging, and beliefs about LBP. The question: ‘if pain is increasing, it is a warning signal to stop with my physical activities until pain is decreasing’ from 0 to 10. Scores of 0–5 were coded as ‘disagree’ and scores of 6–10 were coded as ‘agree’. Results. 826 consecutive patients were included during 2017. Mean age was 52.7 years (SD 13.8) and 458 (55.5%) were women. 749 (90.7%) had chronic LBP, the mean NPR was 5.2 (SD 2.5), and the mean RMDQ score was 14.0 (SD 4.9). 605 (73.2%) agreed that pain is a warning signal to stop being active and 727 (88.1%) considered MR scans and x-rays to be important for their recovery. Conclusion. Patients with LBP patients frequently hold erroneous beliefs that may be detrimental for recovery. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Background:. Outcome after traumatic spinal fracture is difficult to predict. Some patients have ongoing pain while others make a good recovery and there is therefore considerable debate as to which fractures should be treated operatively. Delayed operations for ongoing pain post fracture are more expensive with a longer recovery. The sagittal balance of the spine may predict patient outcomes post fracture. Aim:. Identify subjects with stable spine fractures not requiring acute fixation and compare their sagittal parameters measured on initial standing x-ray with whether or not they have ongoing pain. Methods:. A retrospective review was undertaken of patients presenting with a spine fracture to North Bristol Trust over a five year period. Sagittal parameters on initial standing x-rays were measured. The presence or absence of pain at last follow up was recorded. Results:. 399 fractures were identified. 100 were taken to theatre for acute fixation. Only 120 of those remaining had x-rays available which allowed full sagittal parameters to be measured. Clinical outcomes were available on 97 of these subjects. The measurement of pelvic incidence was not found to be significantly different in the two groups (p=0.218). The differences in pelvic tilt between those with and without pain was significant (p=0.004). Conclusion:. A lower pelvic tilt correlates with pain post fracture. Whether this is predictive of pain or not is unclear. Further investigation is indicated to examine the clinical outcomes and economic impact on subjects presenting with a fracture of the spine as well as the economic impact to the health service

Aims

To benchmark the radiation dose to patients during the course of treatment for a spinal deformity.

Aims

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the correction achieved using a convex pedicle screw technique and a low implant density achieved using periapical concave-sided screws and a high implant density. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcome between the two techniques.

Introduction. A common question posed by adolescents undergoing corrective scoliosis surgery is, “How much taller will I be after my operation?” This study aims to help answer this question, and quantify the gain in height that might be expected. Method. Retrospective data was collected on 68 consecutive surgeries for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Data collected includes age, gender, height, Cobb angle and curve type (Lenke / King classifications). All cases had AIS and were treated by posterior instrumented fusion. Exclusion criteria were neuromuscular/syndromic conditions, anterior approach or revision surgery. Post-operative X-rays were assessed between 1 week and 1 year after surgery. Results. The median age of the cohort was 15 years (range 12-17). There were 61 females and 7 males. Lenke type 1B was the most common curve (37%). All patients gained height post-operatively. The median gain in height, as a percentage of pre-operative height was 5.5% (range 0.5 – 21.4%). There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) between change in height and Lenke type (see figure). There was a progressive increase with a median gain in height in Lenke 1A of 3.4% up to 14.9% in a Lenke 6 curve. Surprisingly, this trend was not reproducible with the King's classification. There was no significant relationship of change in height with either gender or age, but the pre operative Cobb angle had a moderate correlation (r=-0.65, p<0.001) with the change in Cobb angle. In 44 patients who had x-rays at 6 months – 1 year, all showed continued growth. This was significantly greater (p=0.04) in the patients aged 12 and 13. Conclusion. This study provides useful information for patients undergoing AIS surgery as to expected height gain based on their pre-operative Lenke grade. King's classification however does not show a similar trend with change in height

Aims

Spinal fusion remains the gold standard in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. However, anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is gaining widespread interest, despite the limited data on its efficacy. The aim of our study was to determine the clinical efficacy of AVBT in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Aims

Intraoperative 3D navigation (ION) allows high accuracy to be achieved in spinal surgery, but poor workflow has prevented its widespread uptake. The technical demands on ION when used in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are higher than for other more established indications. Lean principles have been applied to industry and to health care with good effects. While ensuring optimal accuracy of instrumentation and safety, the implementation of ION and its associated productivity was evaluated in this study for AIS surgery in order to enhance the workflow of this technique. The aim was to optimize the use of ION by the application of lean principles in AIS surgery.

Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. To show that the spinous processes (SPs) increase in size with age. To investigate the incidence of SP abutment, relationship to disc degeneration and age related kyphosis. Describe patterns of SP neoarticulation in relation to back pain and intersegmental axial rotation and deformity. We reviewed 200 Abdominal CTs, CT myelograms and 100 standing x-rays (age 18-90 years). We measured SP size, interspinous gap, patterns of neoarticulation, disc height, lumbar lordosis and axial rotation. We compared symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. A 30-50% increase in SP size coupled combined with a loss of disc height leads to increasing rates of SP abutment after the age of 35 years. 30% of people over the age of 60 years have SP abutment. There is a 15 degree increase in standing lumbar kyphosis with age. Four patterns of SP neoarticulation are seen. Degenerative changes in the SP articulation increase by more than 80% in a symptomatic cohort. Oblique SP articulation is 2.5 times more likely in symptomatic individuals and associated with a rotational intersegmental deformity. Ageing is accompanied by SP enlargement and abutment, contributing to a loss of lumbar lordosis. Patterns of neoarticulation and degeneration appear associated with back pain and rotational deformity

Introduction/Aim. Numerous lumbo-pelvic reconstruction methods based on posterior construct and anterior cages have been proposed for cases involving total sacrectomy and lumbar vertebrectomy. These constructs create long lever arms and generate high cantilever forces across the lumbo-sacral junction resulting in implant failure or breakage. Biomechanical studies have shown that placing implants anterior to lumbo-sacral pivot point provide a more effective moment arm to resist flexion force and improve the ultimate strength of the construct. As a result more emphasis is placed on screws in the pelvis. We report a new and novel technique that allows for the placement of a pelvic ring construct to augment the posterior construct in a lumbo-pelvic reconstruction. Method. In the prone position, two contoured hard rods are passed along the inner table of the pelvis under the iliac muscle from a minor posterior approach. The rods are connected to the posterior lumbo-pelvic construct with T-junction clamps. The patient is turned supine and the anterior ends of the rods are connected to a sub-cutaneously placed hard rod along the anterior abdominal wall with T-junction clamps. This in turn is fixed to the AIIS (anterior inferior iliac spine) with two poly axial screws. The whole construct resembles an oblong ring. Results. At six months she is mobilising independently with a frame and X-rays show no failure of construct or implant. Conclusion. The construct is technically less morbid and bio-mechanically sound to effectively neutralise the flexion to a greater degree than previous constructs described in the literature. It shares and tolerates the flexion moments at the lumbo-pelvic junction by its anterior placement to the sacral pivot point

To analyse the pain distribution in the acute and chronic phase following thoracolumbar fractures. Prospective observational study. 39 patients with fractures between T11 and L2, with no neurological deficit, were treated conservatively. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. All had X-rays and MR imaging (whole spine) at post-injury and one-year follow-up. The patients documented their pain distribution using pain drawing, along with 10 other domains of pain and functional outcomes for a period over 12 months. The pain distribution was analysed. The association of distal pain distribution to - other associated injury, resultant kyphosis, Pre-existing or increase in disc degeneration at the lower non-injured disc levels – were analysed and reviewed. The most common site of the pain distribution in both the acute (90%) and chronic phase (97%) was distal to the fracture (regions - iliac crest, lumbosacral junction and buttock). Factors mentioned above that could be related to distal pain distribution did not show any significant correlation (P>0.5) with different domains of pain outcome. Some of the commonly believed reasons for distal pain distribution like resultant kyphosis and associated disc/facet pathologies were not supported by our study findings. The distal pain distribution corresponds to the scelerotomal referred pain mapping, which could be the probable explanation. Thoracolumbar pathologies could be the source of pain in patients complaining of low back symptoms. Distal pain distribution of spine pathologies should not be attributed as functional

Purpose. Posterior lumbar fusion using minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques are reported to minimise postoperative pain, soft tissue damage and length of hospital stay when compared to the traditional open procedure. Methods. This is a review of patients who underwent MIS for posterolateral lumbar fusion in a single practice over a 2-year period. Results. Twenty-eight patients underwent this procedure. The median age was 57 (range 34-80). Male:female ratio was 1:1. The most common symptom was radicular pain (n=26). Two patients had back pain without radicular symptoms. Primary degenerative spondylolisthesis was seen in 22 patients and post-laminectomy spondylolisthesis in 3 patients. Transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) with pedicle screw fixation was the commonest procedure (20) while the rest had pedicle screw fixation and inter-transverse fusion. Along with fusion, nerve root decompression alone was performed in 19, while 5 had decompression of the central spinal canal. Intra-operative navigation was used to assist screw placement in 5 patients. The typical hospital stay was 3 days. All but two patients were mobilised the same or the following day. Twenty-one patients with radiculopathy (80%) reported improvement in VAS at 6-months. One patient suffered irreversible nerve root injury (L5). Significant pedicle breach without nerve injury by a screw was seen in one patient. Conclusion. Minimally invasive TLIF and pedicle screw fixation lumbar degenerative condition is a safe procedure with complications comparable to traditional open techniques. Minimal muscle dissection and soft tissue damage allows for earlier ambulation and reduced hospital stay. The procedure however required longer operative time and increased exposure to intra-operative x-rays

Purpose of Study. To review the medium-term results of the Dynesys stabilisation system used in 113 consecutive patients with discogenic back pain. Methods and Results. 113 consecutive patients with discogenic back pain were treated with Dynesys as the sole intervention. Inclusion criteria included mri proven disc degeneration and an improvement in symptoms following an injection into the disc with local anaesthetic and steroid (spinal disc probing). Patients were followed up for a minimum of 5 years, with outcome measures including SF-36, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual pain analogue scores (VPAS). Additional factors reviewed included previous spinal operations, complications, loosening and revision rates with subsequent outcomes. Mean pre-operative ODI was 49.5, SF-36 was 37.6 and VPAS back pain was 60.9. At one year post operatively, these scores were 36.9, 49.4 and 39.8, at five years follow up, the scores were 33.3, 51.8 and 40.1 respectively. We note wide variations in our results. Several significant factors appear to contribute to the outcome of surgery. These include undergoing surgery before the age of 43, no more than 2-level disc degeneration, leg pain less than VPAS 4, and no previous spinal surgery. 19 patients had screw loosening evident on plain film x-rays (4 requiring removal), and 2 patients had screw breakages. 19 patients had implant removal for failure and 2 patients went on to have a fusion procedure. Discussion. Dynesys has a role in the treatment of discogenic back pain. Patient selection is important to outcome and we have identified several pre-operative factors that increase the likelihood of success. The effects are present at 1 year postoperatively and are maintained for at least 5 years. There is a significant screw loosening rate and our series had a 17% revision rate

There have been few reports regarding the efficacy of posterior instrumentation alone as surgical treatment for patients with pyogenic spondylitis, thus avoiding the morbidity of anterior surgery. We report the clinical outcomes of six patients with pyogenic spondylitis treated effectively with a single-stage posterior fusion without anterior debridement at a mean follow-up of 2.8 years (2 to 5). Haematological data, including white cell count and level of C-reactive protein, returned to normal in all patients at a mean of 8.2 weeks (7 to 9) after the posterior fusion. Rigid bony fusion between the infected vertebrae was observed in five patients at a mean of 6.3 months (4.5 to 8) post-operatively, with the remaining patient having partial union. Severe back pain was immediately reduced following surgery and the activities of daily living showed a marked improvement. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was detected as the causative organism in four patients.

Single-stage posterior fusion may be effective in patients with pyogenic spondylitis who have relatively minor bony destruction.

Diastematomyelia is a rare congenital abnormality of the spinal cord. This paper summarises more than 30 years’ experience of treating this condition. Data were collected retrospectively on 138 patients with diastematomyelia (34 males, 104 females) who were treated at our hospital from May 1978 to April 2010. A total of 106 patients had double dural tubes (type 1 diastematomyelia), and 32 patients had single dural tubes (type 2 diastematomyelia). Radiographs, CT myelography, and MRI showed characteristic kyphoscoliosis, widening of the interpedicle distance, and bony, cartilaginous, and fibrous septum. The incidences of symptoms including characteristic changes of the dorsal skin, neurological disorders, and congenital spinal or foot deformity were significantly higher in type 1 than in type 2. Surgery is more effective for patients with type 1 diastematomyelia; patients without surgery showed no improvement.

We present data relating to the Bryan disc arthroplasty for the treatment of cervical spondylosis in 46 patients.

Patients with either radiculopathy or myelopathy had a cervical discectomy followed by implantation of a cervical disc prosthesis. Patients were reviewed at six weeks, six months and one year and assessment included three outcome measures, a visual analogue scale (VAS), the short form 36 (SF-36) and the neck disability index (NDI). The results were categorised according to a modification of Odom’s criteria. Radiological evaluation, by an independent radiologist, sought evidence of movement, stability and subsidence of the prosthesis.

A highly significant difference was found for all three outcome measurements, comparing the pre-operative with the post-operative values: VAS (Z = 6.42, p < 0.0001), SF-36 (mental component) (Z = −5.02, p < 0.0001), SF-36 (physical component) (Z = −5.00, p < 0.0001) and NDI (Z = 7.03, p < 0.0001). The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis seems reliable and safe in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylosis.