Various studies have demonstrated that the necessity for reversal of Warfarin through the use of Vitamin K (Vit K) in neck of femur fracture patients introduces increased duration of stay and poorer outcomes as measured by operative complications and mortality rate. One reason for this delay may be the time latency between admission and the clinicians decision to investigate the INR. In this study we aim to explore the different causes of latency which contribute to a delay to theatre and ascertain whether point of care testing may negate this. We carried out an audit of a cohort of neck of femur fracture patients between 2012 and 2015. Between September 2011 and September 2013, paper notes of 25 patients who were on warfarin at the time of sustaining a Neck of femur fracture (NOF) was obtained within Addenbrookes hospital archives. An additional 80 patients records from the year 2015 were retrieved from EPIC digital records. Time intervals were recorded as follows (from time of A&E assessment by Medical doctor); Interval to orthopaedic specialist assessment, Interval to first INR order, Interval to first INR result seen by specialist, Interval to first Vit K prescribed, Interval to first Vit K given, Interval to Second INR ordered, Interval to second INR seen by specialist, Interval to operation time (as determined by time of team briefing). Analysis of the time intervals as a proportion of total time elapsed between A&E assessment and Time to theatre was performed. Point of care (POC) testing of INR on admission to A&E was introduced and a symmetrical time period was analysed for the same intervals. The latency generated by time taken for a NOF to be assessed by an orthopaedic specialist occupied 8.60% of the total time, the interval between ordering and recording an INR value accounted for 7.96% of time to theatre, the interval between an INR being recorded and subsequently seen by a clinician accounted for 13.4% of time to theatre, the time between orthopaedic specialist assessment and prescription of Vit K took up 7.83% of the total time and the percentage time between Vit K prescription and administration was 12.3%. The time between the first dose of Vit K prescription and arriving at theatre accounted for 76.1% of latency and the time between viewing a second INR and time to theatre occupied 33% of the total time. Following introduction of POC INR testing, there was a statistically significant decrease in time taken for warfarin reversal and consequently a reduction between time of admission to time to theatres. NOF patients who are on warfarin at time of injury introduces complexity to surgical management and planning for theatre. In our audit we demonstrate that causes of delay are distributed throughout the pathway of care and there are several stages. POC INR testing represents an effective method of reducing this latency and improves patient outcome

INTRODUCTION. Warfarin remains the treatment of choice for the majority of patients with venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease or valve replacement unless contraindicated. Poor management of patients on warfarin often leads to delay in surgery, life threatening bleeding during or after operation and unnecessary delay in discharge from hospitals in United Kingdom. METHODS. We carried out a prospective study on patients who were on warfarin and underwent elective and emergency orthopaedic procedures during period of study- August 2007 to April 2008. All patients included in the study were identified from admission notes during period of study. All data regarding indications for warfarin, pre and post procedures INR, elective or emergency orthopaedic procedures and complications were collected using a standard proforma. RESULTS. 18 patients, 12 male and 6 female were included into the study. Patients' age ranged from 47-87 with mean of 76. The indications for warfarin therapy were atrial fibrillation in 12 patients, deep vein thrombosis in 5 patients and left ventricular aneurysm in 1 patient. 18 procedures, 10 elective and 8 emergency orthopaedic procedures were carried out during period of study. Elective procedures - 7 primary joint arthroplasty, 1 revision hip arthroplasty, 1 removal of metalwork and 1 metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. Emergency procedures - 4 hip hemiarthroplasty, 2 dynamic hip screw fixation, 1 external fixator application and 1 open reduction and internal fixation of ankle. All elective admission patients were pre-assessed in clinic prior to admission and were advised to stop warfarin based on their INR level. Patients with INR 2-3 had their warfarin stopped 4 days prior to surgery while patients with INR 3-4.5 had their warfarin stopped 5 days prior to surgery. This group of patients had their INR check on admission and ranged from 1.1-1.5. This group of patients had no reversal therapy and no cancellations were made to their operation. 8 emergency admission patients had INR of 1.4-4.7 on admission with mean of 2.7. 5 patients had reversal therapy while 3 patients had no reversal therapy. Pharmacological methods used to reduce the INR were fresh frozen plasma in 1 patient and Vitamin K in 4 other patients. 2 patients that received reversal therapy had operation on day 1, 2 on day 3 and 1 on day 5. 1 patient that had no reversal therapy was operated on day 1, 1 on day 3 and 1 on day 5. Patient that received no reversal therapy and operated on day 5 of admission died post-operatively from medical complications. Mean delay for patient that had reversal therapy was 2.2 days compared to 3 days in patient with no reversal therapy. All patients in this study had prophylactic low molecular weight heparin while off warfarin. Patients were recommenced on their normal dose of warfarin the day after their operation. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS. We conclude that patients on warfarin with INR 2-3 should have their warfarin stopped 4 days prior to surgery while patients with INR 3-4.5 should stop their warfarin 5 days prior to elective surgery. Trauma patients on warfarin requiring operation should have their INR reversed on admission to shorten delay in waiting time and improve outcomes

Newer irreversible oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban, a direct factor 10a inhibitor, are increasingly employed to prevent thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, and to manage venous thromboembolism (VTE). Unlike warfarin, these agents require no monitoring and involve infrequent dose adjustment. We report the case of a patient treated with rivaroxaban for AF. Patient presented with unprovoked sudden onset right shoulder pain which clinically resembled shoulder haemarthrosis. A single case was anonymised and retrospectively reviewed through examination of clinical and radiographic data. A 70 year old female with known AF presented to Accident and Emergency with sudden onset of right shoulder pain and limited movement, which developed over one hour. The pain was constant, localised to the shoulder and without trauma. Past medical history included severe aortic regurgitation and associated thoracic aortic aneurysm, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Observations were normal upon admission with no haemodynamic compromise or pyrexia. Examining the right shoulder demonstrated distension of shoulder joint capsule, tenderness and a reduced range of movement. Temperature and neurovascular status in the right arm were normal. Investigations upon admission included an INR of 1.2. An anteroposterior right shoulder radiograph showed no evidence of fracture. Patient was managed conservatively with simple oral analgesia. Importantly, rivaroxaban was withheld for 5 days and symptoms resolved. Warfarin therapy was subsequently commenced instead as treatment for AF. Patient was discharged one week later and seen in clinic two weeks post-discharge. A full recovery occurred and with a full range of movement in the right shoulder. In the UK, current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of factor 10a inhibitors, for prevention of stroke in AF patients, and following elective total hip and knee replacement operations to prevent VTE. In turn, rivaroxaban is increasingly prescribed as first line therapy. Whereas warfarin has a documented association with haemarthrosis, there is no primary literature evaluating the incidence of factor 10a therapy associated haemarthrosis. In our case, the unprovoked shoulder haemarthrosis resolved following rivaroxaban cessation. In comparison with warfarin, rivaroxaban is irreversible. With warfarin and a high INR, vitamin K can be used to reverse the anticoagulation. There is no equivalent for rivaroxaban. We suggest further studies into incidence of haemarthrosis associated with oral anticoagulant therapy be undertaken, and treating physicians be aware of such complication

Background and Aims. Many orthopaedic patients admitted to hospital who require urgent surgery are also on Warfarin. Patients with an INR>2 have an increased risk of bleeding complications during surgery; however delay to surgery due to a high INR has both clinical and financial implications. This audit evaluates whether the appropriate management for correction of INR is employed as per local guidelines and, if not, whether this results in significant delay to operative treatment. Methods. A retrospective and prospective audit was performed analysing all Orthopaedic trauma admissions admitted to University Hospital Aintree in a 5 month period. Only those solely on warfarin, who were not acutely bleeding and required surgery in <24 hours were included. Results. A sample of 17 patients was obtained of which only 35.3% had correct INR reversal as per local guidelines. Errors that occurred included 81.1% not being given further Vitamin K at reassessment, 18.2% given too much Vitamin K, 9.1% given too little Vitamin K, 18.2% given Octaplex incorrectly and 9.1% not given Octaplex when indicated. Only 1 patient had a delay to their surgery directly resulting from incorrect INR reversal (total time to surgery − 33 hours 45 minutes). Conclusion. Better education for clinical staff on the local policy for INR reversal in patients requiring urgent orthopaedic surgery is needed. Local policy guidelines have since been redesigned in light of these results and a completion audit cycle has been performed showing significant improvement with 50% of the patient sample given correct INR reversal

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently used as thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery. Varying levels of non-adherence (5% to 45%) with outpatient LMWH has been reported. Oral direct thrombin inhibitors have been recommended by industry due to ease of administration. We aim to audit the compliance rate with outpatient LMWH treatment following primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) in our district general hospital (DGH). Using the ORMIS computer system, we identified all primary THA performed in Monklands Hospital between July 2011 and August 2012. Patients’ case notes were analysed retrospectively, looking at operating surgeon's postoperative thromboprophylaxis instructions. We then conducted a telephone interview on patients discharged with outpatient LMWH to assess compliance. There were 58 primary THAs performed during the audit period. 33 patients were discharged on outpatient LMWH, whilst 15 patients and 3 patients were discharged on aspirin and warfarin respectively. Seven patients were excluded as their discharge prescriptions were missing. We successfully contacted 20 of the 33 patients discharged with outpatient LMWH. All respondents showed 100% compliance to the full course of treatment. 50% of patients self-administered; 30% were administered by district nurses and 20% by family members. 35% of patients preferred an oral tablet alternative, for its perceived ease of administration. Bruising and skin irritation were the reported problems in some patients, but these did not affect compliance. Contrary to the previous published non-adherence rates, the compliance rate with outpatient LMWH after THA was high in our DGH. The patient counseling, and family/district nurse involvement in may have contributed to this. However, our numbers of patients are low but data collection continues

Due to working time restrictions a full-shift cross-covering system is commonplace. As more than one surgeon is responsible for trauma admissions in a 24-hour period a complete handover is paramount to ensure continuity of care. The purpose of this audit was to determine whether the introduction of a formal handover/admission form would improve this continuity with regards to prescription of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hip fracture patients. In Stirling Royal Infirmary chemical VTE prophylaxis for hip fracture patients is 40mg enoxaparin at 6pm unless there is a contraindication. Over a 14-day period we prospectively documented the prescription of VTE prophylaxis and doses missed under the current admissions system. Following this a proforma was introduced that was to be exchanged at handover meetings. The proforma included patients' name/details, admission ward, and tasks to be completed during clerk-in, including VTE prophylaxis prescription. Tasks outstanding at handover had to be documented and completed by the subsequent doctor. Each form was signed and dated by the receiving doctor. We subsequently re-evaluated the prescription of VTE prophylaxis in hip fracture patients. Between 1/12/10-15/12/10, 23 patients were admitted with hip fracture. 12 had appropriate VTE prophylaxis, 6 missed one dose, 4 missed two, and 1 missed three all due to failure of prescription. Following the introduction of the proforma, 12 patients were admitted with hip fractures between 31/12/10-14/1/11. All were prescribed appropriate VTE prophylaxis and missed no doses. 1 patient was on warfarin and had enoxaparin prescribed but withheld until INR< 2.0. After the introduction of a handover form VTE prophylaxis prescription vastly improved. This proforma ensured that all elements of initial management were completed allowing for physician accountability, greater efficacy of handover and continuity of care

Objectives

We have increased the dose of tranexamic acid (TXA) in our enhanced total joint recovery protocol at our institution from 15 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg (maximum 2.5 g) as a single, intravenous (IV) dose. We report the clinical effect of this dosage change.