Introduction. Low serum Vitamin D (VitD) levels are often found in patients being investigated for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). VitD deficiency is associated with poor pre/post-operative functional scores and higher rate of complications. Studies report VitD as an important modifiable risk factor to improve outcomes post TKA. Aim. Aim of our study was 1) To examine the trajectory of VitD in TKA patients over 2 weeks, which included VitD sufficient and deficient patients who were supplemented orally or intramuscularly (IM) for comparision. 2) To compare early (2weeks) functional recovery in VitD sufficient and deficient patients. Material & Methods. We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing primary TKA by a single surgeon. Based on preoperative VitD levels (25OH VitD ≥30 being sufficient or <30 ng/mL being deficient) and means of supplementation(none, IM or Oral Injection Arachitol, Cholecalciferol IP 6,00,000 IU), we formed three groups: Group A (VitD sufficient, no supplementation); Group B (VitD deficient, IM supplementation); and Group C (VitD deficient, Oral supplementation). Study was approved by ethics committee. All patients gave informed consent and underwent TKA by same surgeon with uniform intra/post-operative protocols. VitD deficiency was supplemented orally/IM on the morning of surgery based on their randomization sequence. VitD levels (ng/mL) and outcome parameters of Flexion (degrees) and Timed up-and-go (TUG) test in seconds were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively on Day 3 and 14. 60 patients (20 per group) were enrolled. Demographics of all three groups were comparable. Results. VitD:. Group A:. Mean preoperative level of 42.3, fell to mean 40.4 by Day 3 (p < 0.001), and further to mean 38.9 by Day 14 (p<0.001). 6 and 4 patients became VitD deficient by Day 3 and Day 14 respectively. Group B:. Mean preoperative level of 21.5 rose to 31.2 by Day 3 (p=0.06), and further to 36.9 by Day 14 (p=0.001). 7 and 11 patients became sufficient by Day 3 and Day 14 respectively. Group C:. Mean preoperative level of 20.2 rose to mean 69.9 by Day 3 (p<0.001) and to a mean of 67.2 by Day 14 (p < 0.001). 19 and 20 patients became sufficient by Day 3 and Day 14 respectively. Outcome. Flexion:. Preoperative Flexion in Groups A, B, C was 133, 129 & 125 respectively (p=0.5). Day 3 Flexion was 88, 84 & 83 (p=0.2); Day 14 Flexion was 99, 90 & 95 (p=0.013) respectively. Posthoc Schaffe test showed statistical significance (p<0.05) only between Group A (99) and Group B (90) at Day 14. This indicated better flexion achieved in VitD sufficient patients at 2 weeks than in deficient patients with IM supplementation. TUG Test. was 17.1, 14.1 & 14.7 preoperatively in Groups A, B, C (p=0.5); on Day 3, it was 52.5, 62.6 & 58.2 (p=0.07); on Day 14, it was 33, 38.8 & 37.8 (p=0.2) respectively. Day 3 TUG time was longest (62.6) in Group B and shortest (52.5) in Group A indicating that IM supplemented patients had poor function compared to sufficient group though without statistical significance (p=0.07) with numbers available. Conclusion. We found that VitD deficient patients can be rapidly supplemented on the morning of surgery. High dose oral VitD increased levels by Day 3, whereas IM VitD increased levels only by Day 14 which remained significantly lesser than oral group. Interestingly, about 25% of VitD sufficient patients who were not supplemented, became deficient postoperatively. Flexion achieved on Day 14 was significantly better with VitD sufficiency, compared to deficient patients treated with IM VitD. Significance. VitD deficiency can be rapidly corrected by high dose oral supplementation on the morning of surgery. Also, TKA can deplete VitD and can make VitD sufficient patients deficient as early as Day 3 post surgery. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Aims

To evaluate whether low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) accelerates bone healing at osteotomy sites and promotes functional recovery after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO).

Aims

To compare rates of serious adverse events in patients undergoing revision knee arthroplasty with consideration of the indication for revision (urgent versus elective indications), and compare these with primary arthroplasty and re-revision arthroplasty.