In a prospective study between August 2002 and August 2005, we studied the quantitative clinical and radiological outcome 36 months after percutaneous vertebroplasty for intractable type-II osteoporotic
We investigated the safety and efficacy of treating osteoporotic
We present the clinical and radiological results of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of 58
We evaluated the impact of lumbar instrumented
circumferential fusion on the development of adjacent level vertebral
compression fractures (VCFs). Instrumented posterior lumbar interbody
fusion (PLIF) has become a popular procedure for degenerative lumbar
spine disease. The immediate rigidity produced by PLIF may cause
more stress and lead to greater risk of adjacent VCFs. However,
few studies have investigated the relationship between PLIF and
the development of subsequent adjacent level VCFs. Between January 2005 and December 2009, a total of 1936 patients
were enrolled. Of these 224 patients had a new VCF and the incidence
was statistically analysed with other covariants. In total 150 (11.1%)
of 1348 patients developed new VCFs with PLIF, with 108 (72%) cases
at adjacent segment. Of 588 patients, 74 (12.5%) developed new subsequent
VCFs with conventional posterolateral fusion (PLF), with 37 (50%)
patients at an adjacent level. Short-segment fusion, female and
age older than 65 years also increased the development of new adjacent
VCFs in patients undergoing PLIF. In the osteoporotic patient, more
rigid fusion and a higher stress gradient after PLIF will cause
a higher adjacent VCF rate. Cite this article:
This study prospectively compared the efficacy of kyphoplasty using a Jack vertebral dilator and balloon kyphoplasty to treat osteoporotic compression fractures between T10 and L5. Between 2004 and 2009, two groups of 55 patients each underwent vertebral dilator kyphoplasty and balloon kyphoplasty, respectively. Pain, function, the Cobb angle, and the anterior and middle height of the vertebral body were assessed before and after operation. Leakage of bone cement was recorded. The post-operative change in the Cobb angle was significantly greater in the dilator kyphoplasty group than in the balloon kyphoplasty group (−9.51° ( These findings suggest that vertebral dilator kyphoplasty can facilitate better correction of kyphotic deformity and may ultimately be a safer procedure in reducing leakage of bone cement.
This is a prospective randomised study comparing
the clinical and radiological outcomes of uni- and bipedicular balloon
kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression
fractures. A total of 44 patients were randomised to undergo either
uni- or bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty. Self-reported clinical
assessment using the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris
Disability questionnaire and a visual analogue score for pain was undertaken
pre-operatively, and at three and twelve months post-operatively.
The vertebral height and kyphotic angle were measured from pre-
and post-operative radiographs. Total operating time and the incidence
of cement leakage was recorded for each group. Both uni- and bipedicular kyphoplasty groups showed significant
within-group improvements in all clinical outcomes at three months
and twelve months after surgery. However, there were no significant
differences between the groups in all clinical and radiological
outcomes. Operating time was longer in the bipedicular group (p <
0.001). The incidence of cement leakage was not significantly different
in the two groups (p = 0.09). A unipedicular technique yielded similar clinical and radiological
outcomes as bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty, while reducing the
length of the operation. We therefore encourage the use of a unipedicular
approach as the preferred surgical technique for the treatment of
osteoporotic
Objectives. Although vertebroplasty is very effective for relieving acute pain from an osteoporotic
Introduction.
Aims. Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) develop deposits in the spine
which may lead to
This study assesses whether balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) can safely restore height and correct deformity for cancer-related
To investigate and compare the biomechanical characteristics of Bipedicular versus Unipedicular Vertebroplasty in cadaveric vertebra. Cadaveric single level vertebra were used to evaluate Bipedicular versus Unipedicular Vertebroplasty as an intervention for
We compared decompression alone to decompression with fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The aim was to evaluate if five-year outcomes differed between the groups. The two-year results from the same trial revealed no differences. The Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study was a multicentre randomized controlled trial with recruitment from September 2006 to February 2012. A total of 247 patients with one- or two-level central lumbar spinal stenosis, stratified by the presence of DS, were randomized to decompression alone or decompression with fusion. The five-year Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), visual analogue scales for back and leg pain, and patient-reported satisfaction, decreased pain, and increased walking distance. The reoperation rate was recorded.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion. The Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study (SSSS) was conducted between 2006 and 2012 at five public and two private hospitals. Six centres participated in this two-year MRI follow-up. We randomized 222 patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two adjacent levels into two groups, decompression alone and decompression with fusion. The presence or absence of a preoperative spondylolisthesis was noted. A new stenosis on two-year MRI was used as the primary outcome, defined as a dural sac cross-sectional area ≤ 75 mm2 at the operated level (restenosis) and/or at the level above (proximal adjacent level stenosis).Aims
Methods
To develop and internally validate a preoperative clinical prediction model for acute adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF) after vertebral augmentation to support preoperative decision-making, named the after vertebral augmentation (AVA) score. In this prognostic study, a multicentre, retrospective single-level vertebral augmentation cohort of 377 patients from six Japanese hospitals was used to derive an AVF prediction model. Backward stepwise selection (p < 0.05) was used to select preoperative clinical and imaging predictors for acute AVF after vertebral augmentation for up to one month, from 14 predictors. We assigned a score to each selected variable based on the regression coefficient and developed the AVA scoring system. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity for each cut-off, area under the curve (AUC), and calibration as diagnostic performance. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping to correct the optimism.Aims
Methods
Introduction/Aims. An increased mortality associated with hip fractures has been recognized, but the impact of
The optimal timing of percutaneous vertebroplasty
as treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
(OVCFs) is still unclear. With the position of vertebroplasty having
been challenged by recent placebo-controlled studies, appropriate
timing gains importance. We investigated the relationship between the onset of symptoms
– the time from fracture – and the efficacy of vertebroplasty in
115 patients with 216 painful subacute or chronic OVCFs (mean time
from fracture 6.0 months ( It was found that there was an immediate and sustainable improvement
in the level of back pain and HRQoL after vertebroplasty, which
was independent of the time from fracture. Greater time from fracture
was associated with neither worse pre-operative conditions nor increased
vertebral deformity, nor with the presence of an intravertebral cleft. We conclude that vertebroplasty can be safely undertaken at an
appropriate moment between two and 12 months following the onset
of symptoms of an OVCF.
Hypovitaminosis D has been identified as a common
risk factor for fragility fractures and poor fracture healing. Epidemiological
data on vitamin D deficiency have been gathered in various populations,
but the association between vertebral fragility fractures and hypovitaminosis
D, especially in males, remains unclear. The purpose of this study
was to evaluate serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH D) in
patients presenting with vertebral fragility fractures and to determine
whether patients with a vertebral fracture were at greater risk
of hypovitaminosis D than a control population. Furthermore, we
studied the seasonal variations in the serum vitamin D levels of
tested patients in order to clarify the relationship between other
known risk factors for osteoporosis and vitamin D levels. We measured
the serum 25-OH D levels of 246 patients admitted with vertebral
fractures (105 men, 141 female, mean age 69 years, Cite this article:
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
(VCFs) are an increasing public health problem. Recently, randomised
controlled trials on the use of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in
the treatment of these fractures have been published, but no definitive conclusions
have been reached on the role of these interventions. The major
problem encountered when trying to perform a meta-analysis of the
available studies for the use of cementoplasty in patients with
a VCF is that conservative management has not been standardised.
Forms of conservative treatment commonly used in these patients
include bed rest, analgesic medication, physiotherapy and bracing. In this review, we report the best evidence available on the
conservative care of patients with osteoporotic VCFs and associated
back pain, focusing on the role of the most commonly used spinal
orthoses. Although orthoses are used for the management of these patients,
to date, there has been only one randomised controlled trial published
evaluating their value. Until the best conservative management for
patients with VCFs is defined and standardised, no conclusions can
be drawn on the superiority or otherwise of cementoplasty techniques
over conservative management.