Ilium is the most common site of pelvic Ewing’s sarcoma (ES). Resection of the ilium and iliosacral joint causes pelvic disruption. However, the outcomes of resection and reconstruction are not well described. In this study, we report patients’ outcomes after resection of the ilium and iliosacral ES and reconstruction with a tibial strut allograft. Medical files of 43 patients with ilium and iliosacral ES who underwent surgical resection and reconstruction with a tibial strut allograft between January 2010 and October 2021 were reviewed. The lesions were classified into four resection zones: I1, I2, I3, and I4, based on the extent of resection. Functional outcomes, oncological outcomes, and surgical complications for each resection zone were of interest. Functional outcomes were assessed using a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS).Aims
Methods
Resection of a primary sarcoma of the diaphysis
of a long bone creates a large defect. The biological options for reconstruction
include the use of a vascularised and non-vascularised fibular autograft. The purpose of the present study was to compare these methods
of reconstruction. Between 1985 and 2007, 53 patients (26 male and 27 female) underwent
biological reconstruction of a diaphyseal defect after resection
of a primary sarcoma. Their mean age was 20.7 years (3.6 to 62.4).
Of these, 26 (49 %) had a vascularised and 27 (51 %) a non-vascularised
fibular autograft. Either method could have been used for any patient in
the study. The mean follow-up was 52 months (12 to 259). Oncological,
surgical and functional outcome were evaluated. Kaplan–Meier analysis
was performed for graft survival with major complication as the
end point. At final follow-up, eight patients had died of disease. Primary
union was achieved in 40 patients (75%); 22 (42%) with a vascularised
fibular autograft and 18 (34%) a non-vascularised (p = 0.167). A
total of 32 patients (60%) required revision surgery. Kaplan–Meier
analysis revealed a mean survival without complication of 36 months
(0.06 to 107.3, Both groups seem to be reliable biological methods of reconstructing
a diaphyseal bone defect. Vascularised autografts require more revisions
mainly due to problems with wound healing in distal sites of tumour,
such as the foot. Cite this article:
