Technological advancements in orthopaedic surgery have mainly focused on increasing precision during the operation however, there have been few developments in post-operative physiotherapy. We have developed a computer vision program using machine learning that can virtually measure the range of movement of a joint to track progress after surgery. This data can be used by physiotherapists to change patients’ exercise regimes with more objectively and help patients visualise the progress that they have made. In this study, we tested our program's reliability and validity to find a benchmark for future use on patients.

We compared 150 shoulder joint angles, measured using a goniometer, and those calculated by our program called ArmTracking in a group of 10 participants (5 males and 5 females). Reliability was tested using adjusted R squared and validity was tested using 95% limits of agreement. Our clinically acceptable limit of agreement was ± 10° for ArmTracking to be used interchangeably with goniometry.

ArmTracking showed excellent overall reliability of 97.1% when all shoulder movements were combined but there were lower scores for some movements like shoulder extension at 75.8%. There was moderate validity shown when all shoulder movements were combined at 9.6° overestimation and 18.3° underestimation.

Computer vision programs have a great potential to be used in telerehabilitation to collect useful information as patients carry out prescribed exercises at home. However, they need to be trained well for precise joint detections to reduce the range of errors in readings.

To validate the Modified Forgotten Joint Score (MFJS) as a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in hip and knee arthroplasty (THR/TKR) against the UK's gold standard Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS/OKS).

The MFJS is a new assessment tool devised to provide a greater discriminatory power, particularly in well performing patients. It measures an appealing concept; the ability of a patient to forget about their artificial joint in everyday life.

Postal questionnaires were sent out to 400 THR and TKR patients who were 1–2 years post-op. The data collected from the 212 returned questionnaires was analysed in relation to construct and content validity. 77 patients took part in a test-retest repeatability assessment.

The MFJS proved to have an increased discriminatory power in high-performing patients in comparison to the OHS and OKS, highlighted by its more normal frequency of distribution and reduced ceiling effects. 30.8% of patients (n=131) achieved excellent OHS/OKS scores of 42–48 this compared to just 7.69% of patients who achieved a proportionately equivalent MFJS score of 87.5–100. The MFJS proved to have an increased test-retest repeatability based upon its intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.97 compared to the Oxford's 0.85.

The MFJS provides a more sensitive tool in the assessment of well performing hip and knee arthroplasties in comparison to the OHS/OKS. The MFJS tests the concept of awareness of a prosthetic joint, rather than pain and function and therefore should be used as adjunct to the OKS/OHS.

Introduction

The objective of this study was to determine if a synthetic bone substitute would provide results similar to bone from osteoporotic femoral heads during in vitro testing with orthopaedic implants. If the synthetic material could produce results similar to those of the osteoporotic bone, it could reduce or eliminate the need for testing of implants on bone.

Introduction

Regenerative medicine is a rapidly expanding discipline. However due to a lack of validated outcome measures, clinical trials have been far few. This study aims to assess the validity, inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility of experimental fracture healing assessment on plain radiographies. This technique involves implantation of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) seeded constructs on only one side of the fracture after randomisation.

Introduction. Due to the commercial launch of newly developed ceramic-on-metal (COM) bearings, we compared the deformation and stresses in the liner with ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), metal-on-metal (MOM) as well as ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) bearings using a finite-element (FE)-model, analyzing a variety of head size and implant position. Liner deformation in terms of change in inner diameter as well as peak stresses were evaluated. Methods. The FE-model consisting of a commercial THR, the proximal femur and a section of the hemipelvis was created based on our previously published approach. Static load and muscle forces were applied according to the maximum load during gait. Polyethylene was modelled using a nonlinear definition with isotropic hardening, cobalt-chromium was modelled elastic-plastic and ceramic was modelled linear-elastic. Validity of the model was checked using an experimental setup with artificial bone and strain gauges located at the rim of the liner. Implant material (COM vs. COC vs. MOM vs. COP), head size (28 mm vs. 36 mm) and cup position (45° inclination/15° anteversion vs. 60° incl./0° antev.) were varied. Results. The experimental validation showed high correlation between strain measurements and FE-results. Liner deformation was evaluated by change in diameter at different levels. Change in head size had a high influence on cup deformation in COM, COC and MOM bearings, most possibly due to decreased liner thickness using bigger heads. Differences in MOM, COC and COM liner deformation were only in sub-micrometer range and not further evaluated. Evaluation of von Mises stress and minimum principal stress showed high differences between the bearing couples, implant positions and head sizes. COM liner stress was less sensitive to the steep cup position, but principal stress amounts were about ten times higher than in polyethylene liners. Thereby, MOM liners developed about 13 % less peak stress than COM. COC liners showed 11 % to 16 % higher stresses than COM. In accordance with published results, bigger head size correlated with lower principal stresses in the liner. Also, bigger heads were less sensitive to steep cup positions. Discussion. Deformation of the liner in total hip replacement has an important influence on lubrication, wear and clinical long-term success. The deformation occurring during intraoperative impaction and press-fit of the metal shell was not included in this study, hence the results are only valid considering the late postoperative phase when the implant is fully integrated in the bone. The FE-analysis showed no significant difference in liner deformation between COM, COC and MOM bearings. However, principal stresses were slightly higher in COM under the same conditions, but lower than COC

Aims

Outcome measures quantifying aspects of health in a precise, efficient, and user-friendly manner are in demand. Computer adaptive tests (CATs) may overcome the limitations of established fixed scales and be more adept at measuring outcomes in trauma. The primary objective of this review was to gain a comprehensive understanding of the psychometric properties of CATs compared with fixed-length scales in the assessment of outcome in patients who have suffered trauma of the upper limb. Study designs, outcome measures and methodological quality are defined, along with trends in investigation.

Objectives

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used to evaluate the outcome of treatment in patients with distal radial fractures. Which PROM to select is often based on assessment of measurement properties, such as validity and reliability. Measurement properties are assessed in clinimetric studies, and results are often reviewed without considering the methodological quality of these studies. Our aim was to systematically review the methodological quality of clinimetric studies that evaluated measurement properties of PROMs used in patients with distal radial fractures, and to make recommendations for the selection of PROMs based on the level of evidence of each individual measurement property.

Epidemiological studies enhance clinical practice in a number of ways. However, there are many methodological difficulties that need to be addressed in designing a study aimed at the collection and analysis of data concerning fractures and other injuries. Most can be managed and errors minimised if careful attention is given to the design and implementation of the research.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:863–7.