Background and Purpose:

The inability of intervertebral joints to resist perturbation due to laxity is traditionally measured in cadaveric specimens as their neutral zones (NZ). However in patients, quantitative fluoroscopic (QF) examinations substitute the Initial Attainment Rate for this. If these two measures correspond sufficiently, a clinical method for measuring segmental instability is possible. This study explored this by determining the criterion validity of the Initial Attainment Rate against the Dynamic NZ in an unloaded multilevel porcine spine.

Background. Almost 80% of people experience low back pain at least once in their life. A quarter suffers from Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain (NS-CLBP), where symptoms cannot be justified radiologically. There is evidence that imaging negatively impacts outcomes (increased painkillers and doctors' visits) in NS-CLBP patients. Despite clinical guidelines recommending against the use of imaging, healthcare practitioners and patients still request imaging to explain symptoms. Method. Qualitative, semi-structured interviews with NS-CLBP patients, physiotherapists, and doctors conducted using purposeful sampling of 6–11 people from each group. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. Validity was ensured by data triangulation with participants. Results. Interviews with 11 patients who had an MRI scan, 6 physiotherapists and 6 spine surgeons. Four main themes emerged from synthesis of findings across these three groups. Discussion. This study provides an insight of the lived experience of NS-CLBP among three different groups. It highlights the difference in expectation between healthcare provider and patients about how CLBP should be managed and the lack of coordination between primary and secondary healthcare services. Although patients seek imaging to explain NS-CLBP, they react to the results negatively. In accordance with fear avoidance model, participants reported fear avoidance behaviours and anxiety following MRI. That affect daily life activities and participation. Conclusion. This study highlights the need for early management of NS-CLBP patients in primary care. The psychosocial consequences of diagnosing by MRI are fear avoidance and anxiety. The current biomedical education to those patients may promotes these consequences. Conflict of interest. No conflicts of interest. Study fund. This research was supported through a PhD scholarship from Prince Sattam bin Abdul-Aziz University, Saudi Arabia, at the University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Healthcare interventions are under increasing scrutiny regarding cost-effectiveness and outcome measures have revolutionised clinical research. To identify all available outcome questionnaires designed for lowback, lumbar spine pathologies and to perform qualitative analysis of these questionnaires for their clinimetric properties. A comprehensive e-search on PUBMED & EMBASE for all available outcome measures and published review articles for lowback and lumbar spine pathologies was undertaken over a two month period (Nov-Dec 2009). Twenty-eight questionnaires were identified in total. These outcomes questionnaires were evaluated for clinimetric properties viz:-. Validity (content, construct & criterion validity). Reliability (internal consistency & reproducibility). Responsiveness and scored on a scale of 0-6 points. Eight outcomes questionnaires had satisfied all clinimetric domains in methodological evaluation (score 6/6). Oswestry disability index (ODI). Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ). Aberdeen lowback pain scale. Extended Aberdeen spine pain scale. Functional rating index. Core lowback pain outcome measure. Backpain functional scale. Maine-Seattle back questionnaire. Sixteen of these questionnaires scored =5 when evaluated for clinimetric domains. RMDQ had the highest number of published and validated translations followed by ODI. Criterion validity was not tested for NASS-AAOS lumbar spine questionnaire. 32%(9/28) of the outcome instruments have undergone methodological evaluation for =3 clinimetric properties. Clinicians should be cautious when choosing appropriate validated outcome measures when evaluating therapeutic/surgical intervention. We suggest use of few validated outcome measures with high clinimetric scores (=5/6) to be made mandatory when reporting clinical results