Background and Purpose of Study. The Valgus knee in total knee Arthroplasty, is considered a more demanding procedure, often with ligament balance a greater challenge than seen with neutral or Varus knees. It has also frequently been suggested that prostheses with higher levels of constraint be used to avoid late-onset instability. Various lateral release techniques have also been suggested in the literature. This study is aimed at assessing the outcomes of an unconstrained, rotating platform designed prosthesis, the LCS, using our technique, in the management of severe valgus deformity. Methods. 44 knees in 42 patients with a pre-operative valgus deformity of more than 10 degrees were included in our retrospective series. We analyzed the radiographs for the degree of correction, the angle of tibial tray implantation, and femoral implantation angle, tibial slope, as well as the presence (or degree) of lift off and any complications were noted. In this group, 7 had a Valgus deformity of greater than 25 degrees, with a mean Valgus deformity of 17,36 degrees. The mean age at operation was 65. Clinical and radiological analysis was done Pre-hospital discharge and again post-operatively 6 weeks. Results. The mean coronal alignment was corrected from 17,36 degrees to 5 degrees of Valgus post operatively. 2 knees were corrected past neutral to varus alignment. There was 1 case of bearing spin out experienced early on in the series. The mean tibial implant angle was 1,7 degrees from neutral. Lift off in the early post-operative X-rays was seen in 6 patients, however at 3 month follow up the knees appeared to be well balanced. There were no infections or revisions for wear, one re-operation for bearing dislocation, and no cases of loosening in our series. There were no cases of delayed instability. Patient satisfaction was 86 %. Conclusions. The rotating platform, mobile bearing prosthesis, using our technique, provided a reproducible correction of deformity in Valgus knees, a well-balanced knee, a low complication rate, and an excellent degree of patient satisfaction. NO DISCLOSURES

Valgus deformity is less common than varus. There is an associated bone deformity in many cases – dysplasia of the lateral femoral condyle. There are also soft tissue deformities, including tightness of the lateral soft tissues, and stretching of those on the medial side. Unlike varus, where the bone deformity is primarily tibial, in valgus knees it is most often femoral. There is both a distal and a posterior hypoplasia of the lateral femoral condyle. This results in a sloping joint line, and failure to correct this results in valgus malalignment. Posterior lateral bone loss also results in accidental internal rotation of the femoral component, which affects patellar tracking. Using the trans-epicondylar axis and Whiteside's line helps to position the femoral component in the correct rotation. Soft tissue balancing is more complex in the valgus knee. Releases are performed sequentially, depending on the particular combination of deformities. It is important to note whether the knee is tight in flexion, in extension, or both. Tightness in extension is the most common, and is corrected by release of the iliotibial band. Tightness in flexion as well as extension requires that the lateral collateral ligament +/− the popliteus tendon be released. Cruciate substituting designs are helpful in many cases, and in extreme deformity with medial stretching, a constrained or “total stabilised” design is needed. Patellar maltracking is common, and a lateral retinacular release may be needed. Beware of over-releasing the posterolateral corner, as excessive release may cause marked instability. Use the pie-crust technique of Insall

Management of a knee with valgus deformities has always been considered a major challenge. Total knee arthroplasty requires not only correction of this deformity but also meticulous soft tissue balancing and achievement of a balanced rectangular gap. Bony deformities such as hypoplastic lateral condyle, tibial bone loss, and malaligned/malpositioned patella also need to be addressed. In addition, external rotation of the tibia and adaptive metaphyseal remodeling offers a challenge in obtaining the correct rotational alignment of the components. Various techniques for soft tissue balancing have been described in the literature and use of different implant options reported. These options include use of cruciate retaining, sacrificing, substituting and constrained implants.

Deformity correction is a fundamental goal in total knee arthroplasty. Severe valgus deformities often present the surgeon with a complex challenge. These deformities are associated with abnormal bone anatomy, ligament laxity and soft tissue contractures. Distorted bone anatomy is due to bone loss on the lateral femoral condyle, especially posteriorly. To a lesser extent bone loss occurs from the lateral tibia plateau. The AP axis (Whiteside's Line) or epicondylar axis must be used as a rotational landmark in the severely valgus knee. Gap balancing techniques can be helpful in the severely valgus knee, but good extension balance must be obtained before setting femoral rotation with this technique. Coronal alignment is generally corrected to neutral or 2- to 3-degree overcorrection to mild mechanical varus to unload the attenuated medial ligaments.

The goal of soft tissue releases is to obtain rectangular flexion and extension gaps. Soft tissue releases involve the IT band, posterolateral corner/arcuate complex, posterior capsule, LCL, and popliteus tendon. Assessment of which structures is made and then releases are performed. In general, pie crust release of the IT band is sufficient for mild deformity. More severe deformities require release of the posterolateral corner / arcuate and posterior capsule. I prefer a pie crust technique, while Ranawat has described the use of electrocautery to perform these posterior/ posterolateral releases. In most cases the LCL is not released, however, this can be released from the lateral epicondyle, if necessary.

Good ligament balance can be obtained in most cases, however, some cases with severe medial ligament attenuation require additional ligament constraint such as a constrained condylar implant.

Deformity correction is a fundamental goal in total knee arthroplasty. Severe valgus deformities often present the surgeon with a complex challenge. These deformities are associated with abnormal bone anatomy, ligament laxity and soft tissue contractures. Distorted bone anatomy is due to bone loss on the lateral femoral condyle, especially posteriorly. To a lesser extent bone loss occurs from the lateral tibia plateau. The AP Axis (Whiteside's Line) or Epicondylar axis must be used as a rotational landmark in the severely valgus knee. Gap balancing techniques can be helpful in the severely valgus knee, but good extension balance must be obtained before setting femoral rotation with this technique. Coronal alignment is generally corrected to neutral or 2- to 3-degree overcorrection to mild mechanical varus to unload the attenuated medial ligaments.

The goal of soft tissue releases is to obtain rectangular flexion and extension gaps. Soft tissue releases involve the IT band, Posterolateral Corner/Arcuate Complex, Posterior Capsule, LCL, and Popliteus Tendon. Assessment of which structures is made and then releases are performed. In general Pie Crust release of the ITB is sufficient for mild deformity. More severe deformities require release of the Posterolateral Corner/Arcuate Complex and Posterior Capsule. I prefer a pie crust technique, while Ranawat has described the use of electrocautery to perform these posterior/ posterolateral releases. In most cases the LCL is not released, however, this can be released from the lateral epicondyle, if necessary.

Good ligament balance can be obtained in most cases, however, some cases with severe medial ligament attenuation require additional ligament constraint such as a constrained condylar implant.

Deformity correction is a fundamental goal in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Severe valgus deformities often present the surgeon with a complex challenge. These deformities are associated with abnormal bone anatomy, ligament laxity and soft tissue contractures. Distorted bone anatomy is due to bone loss on the lateral femoral condyle, especially posteriorly. To a lesser extent bone loss occurs from the lateral tibia plateau. The AP Axis (Whiteside's Line) or Epicondylar axis must be used as a rotational landmark in the severely valgus knee. Gap balancing techniques can be helpful in the severely valgus knee, but good extension balance must be obtained before setting femoral rotation with this technique. Coronal alignment is generally corrected to neutral or 2 to 3 degree overcorrection to mild mechanical varus to unload the attenuated medial ligaments.

The goal of soft tissue releases is to obtain rectangular flexion and extension gaps. Soft tissue releases involve the IT band, Posterolateral corner/Accurate Complex, Posterior Capsule, LCL, and Popliteus Tendon. Assessment of which structures is made and then releases are performed. In general Pie Crust release of the ITB is sufficient for mild deformity. More severe deformities require release of the Posterolateral corner/Accurate Complex and Posterior Capsule. I prefer a pie crust technique, while Ranawat has described the use of electrocautery to perform these posterior/ posterolateral releases. In most cases the LCL is not released, however, this can be released from the lateral epicondyle if necessary.

Good ligament balance can be obtained in most cases, however, some cases with severe medial ligament attenuation require additional ligament constraint such as a constrained condylar implant.

Objectives

The approach in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with severe valgus deformity is controversial. The lateral parapatellar approach has been proposed for several years, but surgical technique of this approach was unusual and difficult. Therefore, we have consistently been selected medial parapatellar approach (MPP) for all cases. In this study, we investigated the short term results of TKA for severe valgus deformity with MPP about clinical and radiographic assessment.

In arthritic knees with severe valgus deformity Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) can be performed through medial or lateral parapatellar approaches. Many orthopaedic surgeons are apprehensive of using the lateral parapatellar approach due to lack of familiarity and concerns about complications related to soft tissue coverage and vascularity of the patella and the overlying skin. However surgeons who use this approach report good outcomes and no added complications. The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes following TKA performed through a medial parapatellar approach with those performed through a lateral parapatellar approach in arthritic knees with severe valgus deformity.

We conducted a retrospective review of patients from two consultants using computer navigation for all their TKAs. All patients with severe valgus deformities (Ranawat 2 & 3 grades) operated on between January 2005 and December 2011 were included. 66 patients with 67 TKAs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients were group by approach; Medial = 34TKAs (34 patients) or Lateral = 33 TKAs (32 patients). Details were collected from patients' records, AP hip-knee-ankle (HKA) radiographs and computer navigation files. Outcome measures included lateral release rates, post-operative range of knee movements, long leg mechanical alignment measurements, post-operative Oxford scores at six weeks and one year, patient satisfaction and any complications. Comparisons were made between groups using t-tests.

The total cohort had a mean age of 69 years [42–82] and mean BMI of 29 [19–46]. The two groups had comparable pre-operative Oxford scores (Medial 41[27–56], Lateral 44 [31–60]) and pre-operative valgus deformity measured on HKA radiographs (Medial 13° [10°–27.6°], Lateral 12° [6°–22°]). Three patients in the Medial group underwent intra-operative lateral patellar release to improve patellar tracking. Seven patients in the Lateral group had a lateral condyle osteotomy for soft tissue balancing (one bilateral). There was no statistically significant difference between groups at one year follow up for maximum flexion (Medial 100° [78°–122°], Lateral 100° [85°–125°], p=0.42), fixed flexion deformity (Medial 1.2° [0°–10°], Lateral 0.9° [0°–10°], p=0.31) or Oxford score (Medial 23 [12–37], Lateral 23 [16–41], p=0.49). Similarly there was no difference in the patient satisfaction rates between the two groups at one year follow up. However there was a statistically significant difference in the mean radiographic post-operative alignment angle measurement (Medial 1.8° valgus [4° varus to 10° valgus], Lateral 0.3° valgus [5° varus to 7° valgus], p=0.02). One patient in the Medial group had a revision to hinged knee prosthesis for post-operative instability. There was no wound breakdown or patellar avascular necrosis noted in either of the groups.

The lateral parapatellar approach resulted in slightly better valgus correction on radiographs taken six weeks post-operatively. We found no major complications in the Lateral parapatellar approach group. Specifically we did not encounter any difficulties in closing the deep soft tissue envelope around the knee and there were no cases of patellar avascular necrosis or skin necrosis. Hence we conclude that lateral parapatellar approach is a safe and reliable alternative to the medial parapatellar approach for correction of severe valgus deformity in TKA.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of limb alignment and component positioning after total knee arthroplasty(TKA) performed using fixed or individual distal femoral valgus correction angle(VCA)in valgus knees.

Introduction. Valgus deformity in an end stage osteoarthritic knee can be difficult to correct with no clear consensus on case management. Dependent on if the joint can be reduced and the degree of medial laxity or distension, a surgeon must use their discretion on the correct method for adequate lateral releases. Robotic assisted (RA) technology has been shown to have three dimensional (3D) cut accuracy which could assist with addressing these complex cases. The purpose of this work was to determine the number of soft tissue releases and component orientation of valgus cases performed with RA total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. This study was a retrospective chart review of 72 RATKA cases with valgus deformity pre-operatively performed by a single surgeon from July 2016 to December 2017. Initial and final 3D component alignment, knee balancing gaps, component size, and full or partial releases were collected intraoperatively. Post-operatively, radiographs, adverse events, WOMAC total and KOOS Jr scores were collected at 6 months, 1 year and 2 year post-operatively. Results. Pre-operatively, knee deformities ranged from reducible knees with less than 5mm of medial laxity to up to 12° with fixed flexion contracture. All knees were corrected within 2.5 degrees of mechanical neutral. Average femoral component position was 0.26. o. valgus, and 4.07. o. flexion. Average tibial component position was 0.37. o. valgus, and 2.96. o. slope, where all tibial components were placed in a neutral or valgus orientation. Flexion and extension gaps were within 2mm (mean 1mm) for all knees. Medial and lateral gaps were balanced 100% in extension and 93% in flexion. The average flexion gap was 18.3mm and the average extension gap was 18.7mm. For component size prediction, the surgeon achieved their planned within one size on the femur 93.8% and tibia 100% of the time. The surgeon upsized the femur in 6.2% of cases. Soft tissue releases were reported in one of the cases. At latest follow-up, radiographic evidence suggested well seated and well fixed components. Radiographs also indicated the patella components were tracking well within the trochlear groove. No revision and re-operation is reported. Mean WOMAC total scores were improved from 24±8.3 pre-op to 6.6±4.4 2-year post-op (p<0.01). Mean KOOS scores were improved from 46.8±9.7 pre-op to 88.4±13.5 2-year post-op (p<0.01). Discussion. In this retrospective case review, the surgeon was able to balance the knee with bone resections and avoid disturbing the soft tissue envelope in valgus knees with 1–12° of deformity. To achieve this balance, the femoral component was often adjusted in axial and valgus rotations. This allowed the surgeon to open lateral flexion and extension gaps. While this study has several limitations, RATKA for valgus knees should continue to be investigated. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Aims

The use of technology to assess balance and alignment during total knee surgery can provide an overload of numerical data to the surgeon. Meanwhile, this quantification holds the potential to clarify and guide the surgeon through the surgical decision process when selecting the appropriate bone recut or soft tissue adjustment when balancing a total knee. Therefore, this paper evaluates the potential of deploying supervised machine learning (ML) models to select a surgical correction based on patient-specific intra-operative assessments.