Aims. Thresholds for operative eligibility based on body mass index (BMI) alone may restrict patient access to the benefits of arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between BMI and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to determine how many patients would have been denied improvements in PROMs if BMI cut-offs were to be implemented. Methods. A prospective cohort of 3,449 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. The following one-year PROMs were evaluated: hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) pain, HOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity, Veterans Rand-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS). Positive predictive values for failure to improve and the number of patients denied surgery in order to avoid a failed improvement were calculated for each PROM at different BMI cut-offs. Results. There was a trend to improved outcomes in terms of pain and function improvements with higher BMI. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. had median (Q1, Q3) HOOS pain improvements of 58 points (interquartile range (IQR) 41 to 70) and those with BMI 35 to 40 kg/m. 2. had median improvements of 55 (IQR 40 to 68). With a BMI cut-off of 30 kg/m. 2. , 21 patients would have been denied a meaningful improvement in HOOS pain score in order to avoid one failed improvement. At a 35 kg/m. 2. cut-off, 18 patients would be denied improvement, at a 40 kg/m. 2. cut-off 21 patients would be denied improvement, and at a 45 kg/m. 2. cut-off 21 patients would be denied improvement. Similar findings were observed for HOOS-PS, UCLA, and VR-12 scores. Conclusion. Patients with higher BMIs show greater improvements in PROMs. Using BMI alone to determine eligibility criteria did not improve the rate of clinically meaningful improvements. BMI thresholds prevent patients who may benefit the most from surgery from undergoing THA. Surgeons should consider PROMs improvements in determining eligibility for THA while balancing traditional metrics of preoperative risk stratification. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):683–692

Instability is a common indication for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, even after the initial revision, some patients continue to have recurrent dislocations. This study investigates those at risk for recurrent dislocation after revision THA for instability at a single institution. Between 2009 and 2019, 163 patients underwent revision THA for instability at a single institution. Thirty-three of these patients required re-revision THA due to recurrent dislocation. Cox proportional hazard models with death as a competing event were used to analyze risk factors, including prosthesis sizing and alignment. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to assess patient outcomes (Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical score, VR-12 mental score, Harris Hip Score, and hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement). Duration of follow-up until either re-revision or final follow-up was a mean of 45.3 ± 38.2 months. The 1-year cumulative incidence for recurrent dislocation after revision was 8.7%, which increased to 19.6% at 5 years and 32.9% at 10 years postoperatively. In the multivariable analysis, high ASA score [HR 2.71], being underweight (BMI<18 kg/m. 2. ) [HR 36.26] or overweight/obese (BMI>25 kg/m. 2. ) [HR 4.31], use of specialized liners [HR 5.51–10.71], lumbopelvic stiffness [HR 6.29], and postoperative abductor weakness [HR 7.20] were significant risk factors for recurrent dislocation. Increasing the cup size decreased the dislocation risk [HR 0.89]. The dual mobility construct did not affect the risk for recurrent dislocation in univariate or multivariable analyses. VR-12 physical and HHS (pain and function) scores improved postoperatively at midterm. Patients requiring revision THA for instability are at risk for recurrent dislocation. Higher ASA scores, abnormal BMI, use of special liners, lumbopelvic stiffness, and postoperative abductor weakness are significant risk factors for re-dislocation

Introduction. With the removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) inpatient-only list, understanding predictors of length of stay (LOS) after THA is critical. Thus, we aimed to determine the influence of patient- and procedure-related risk factors as predictors of >1-day LOS after THA. Methods. A prospective cohort of 5,281 patients underwent primary THA between January 2016 and April 2019. Risk factors increased LOS were categorized as patient-related (demographics, smoking status, baseline Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Mental Component Summary score [VR-12 MCS], Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI], surgical indication, baseline Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS] pain subscore and baseline HOOS physical function shortform (HOOS-PS), range of motion, and predicted discharge disposition) or procedure-related (hospital site, surgeon, approach, day of surgery, and surgery start time). By using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and internally-validated concordance probabilities (C-index) for discriminating a 1-day LOS from a >1-day LOS, we compared performance between a patient-related risk factors only model and a model containing both patient- and procedure-related risk factors. Results. A >1-day LOS was statistically significantly associated with older age (p<0.001), female sex (p<0.001), higher body mass index (BMI) (p<0.001), higher CCI (p<0.001), Medicare status (p=0.012), higher baseline HOOS-PS (P<0.001) and lower baseline VR-12 MCS scores (p<0.001). The C-index after 1,000 bootstrap iterations were 0.693 and 0.883 for patient-related and patient plus procedure-related factors, respectively. Upon addition of procedure-related risk factors to the model, the AIC decreased by approximately 1,100 units, indicating that procedure-related risk factors (especially hospital site and surgical approach) explain LOS more effectively than patient-related risk factors alone. Conclusions. Although patient-related risk factors provide substantial predictive value for LOS following THA, procedure-related risk factors (mainly hospital site and surgical approach) remain the main drivers of predicting LOS. These results can help clinicians select appropriate candidates for short-stay and outpatient THA

Introduction. Meaningful clinical improvement as demonstrated through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to evaluate success of total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures. This patient perspective can provide a full picture when used with clinical data to best evaluate surgical outcomes. Methods. All primary THA procedures reported to the American Joint Replacement Registry from 2012–2018 with linked pre-operative and 1-year post-operative functional or anatomical PROMs were included. The achievement of minimal clinically-important difference (MCID) was calculated using the distribution method. Logistic regression models with covariate adjustment for patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and body mass index (BMI) were constructed to identify associations with PROMs. Results were analyzed based on hospital size (small, medium and large) and teaching type (non-teaching, minor and major) based on the American Hospital Association Survey (2015). Results. There were 3,952 THA with pre-operative and 1-year post-operative PROMs. The five types of PROMs collected include: HOOS (n=731), HOOS Jr. (n=295), PROMIS-10 (n=1,074), SF-36 (n=976), VR-12 (1,262). The average age was 66.3±10.5 years, and the majority were female (54.7%). 53.1% of THA patients achieved MCID. Age and gender were statistically significant, while ASA score and BMI classification were not. As age increased by 1 year, the odds of achieving MCID increased 0.8% (OR 0.992, 95%CI 0.984, 0.999) and a minor versus major teaching hospital was 20.8% less likely to achieve MCID (p<0.04). While small hospital sizes had significantly fewer linked PROMs (6.5% of all linked PROMs), only 44.5% achieved MCID compared to medium (52.3%) and large (54.5%) hospitals (p<0.02). Conclusion. Older patient age, major teaching hospitals, and large hospitals achieved higher levels of MCID after THA. Identifying patients that are less likely to achieve MCID can aid physicians by determining patients at risk for poor outcomes, then guiding patient expectations and providing patient-centered care. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aims

Prior studies have identified that malseating of a modular dual mobility liner can occur, with previous reported incidences between 5.8% and 16.4%. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of malseating in dual mobility implants at our institution, assess for risk factors for liner malseating, and investigate whether liner malseating has any impact on clinical outcomes after surgery.

Aims

This study of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip aimed to: 1) characterize the contribution of the hip, spinopelvic complex, and lumbar spine when moving from the standing to the sitting position; 2) assess whether abnormal spinopelvic mobility is associated with worse symptoms; and 3) identify whether spinopelvic mobility can be predicted from static anatomical radiological parameters.