Aims. Smoking is associated with post-operative complications but smokers often under-report the amount they smoke. Our objective was to determine whether a urine dipstick test could be used as a substitute for quantitative cotinine assays to determine smoking status in patients. Patients and Methods. Between September 2013 and July 2014 we conducted a prospective cohort study in which 127 consecutive patients undergoing a planned foot and ankle arthrodesis or osteotomy were included. Patients self-reported their smoking status and were classified as: ‘never smoked’ (61 patients), ‘ex-smoker’ (46 patients), or ‘current smoker’ (20 patients). Urine samples were analysed with cotinine assays and cotinine dipstick tests. Results. There was a high degree of concordance between dipstick and assay results (Kappa coefficient = 0.842, p < 0.001). Compared with the quantitative assay, the dipstick had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 97.3%. Patients claiming to have stopped smoking just before surgery had the highest rate of disagreement between reported smoking status and urine testing. Conclusion. Urine cotinine dipstick testing is cheap, fast, reliable, and easy to use. It may be used in place of a quantitative assay as a screening tool for detecting patients who may be smoking. A positive test may be used as a trigger for further assessment and counselling. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1418–24

Introduction. Patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) have a significantly increased risk of both superficial wound infection and deep infection following arthroplasty. Debate continues as to whether treatment of pre-operative ASB reduces the risk of subsequent prosthetic joint infection. Patients/Materials & Methods. All arthroplasty units in Scotland were contacted by telephone and asked a standard series of questions regarding pre-operative urine testing in arthroplasty patients. A review of the literature was also performed. Results. All arthroplasty units in Scotland test all patients’ urine pre-operatively. 55% of clinics dipstick urine and send a midstream urine (MSU) sample if dipstick positive. 45% send an MSU without urine dipstick testing. All treat a positive MSU with oral antibiotics via the patient's GP practice. Discussion. Historically all arthroplasty patients have had urine testing as part of their routine pre-operative assessment, and this remains current British Hip Society guidance. Globally, antibiotic use is under increasing scrutiny. The evidence for treating pre-operative ASB with antibiotics appears to be lacking but this study suggests the majority of arthroplasty units continue to test for and treat ASB. Locally, this practice has been increasingly questioned by microbiologists and general practitioners. Irrespective of antibiotic treatment, we believe identifying patients with pre-operative ASB remains useful as ASB appears to represent a surrogate marker for immunocompromise. This allows patients to be warned of the increased infection risk and these patients may require altered peri-operative prophylactic antibiotic cover depending on local policy. Conclusion. Evidence for pre-operative antibiotic treatment of ASB is lacking but the majority of arthroplasty units continue this practice. Identification of pre-operative ASB is useful to identify increased infection risk and need for potential altered prophylactic antibiotic cover. We recommend formation of a consensus among arthroplasty surgeons to guide practice

Late infection is the most frequent complications after hemiarthroplasty. Urinary tract infections are the only distant septic focus considered to be a risk factor in the literature. We retrospectively reviewed 460 patients with hip fracture treated by hemiarthroplasy over a period of one year. Preoperative positive urine dipsticks and urine analysis have been looked at as causes for delay of surgery in absence of clinical manifestations of urinary tract infection. 367 patients were operated within 24 hours. 78 patients were delayed more than 78 hours. Urinary tract infection had the least contribution as a cause of delay. 99 patients had preoperative urinary tract infection and 57 patients had postoperative wound infection. Of these with postoperative surgical site infection, 31 patients did not show any evidence of preoperative urinary tract infection, 23 patients had preoperative urinary tract infection, two had leg ulcer and one had chest infection. 13 patients had chronic urinary tract infection and five patients had the same causative organism in urine & wound. The most common organisms of urinary infection are E. Coli, mixed growth, Enteroccocus Faecalis, Pseudomonas and others. The most causative organism of the postoperative surgical site infection are Staph aureus including MRSA, mixed growth including Staph. Epidermidis, Enteroccocus Faecalis and others There is no direct significant correlation between preoperative urinary tract infection and surgical site infection. We recommend that preoperative urinary tract infection should be treated as a matter of urgency but it should not delay hip fracture surgery unless it is causing symptoms

Introduction. Pre-operative urine screening is accepted practice during pre-operative assessment in elective orthopaedic practice. There is no evidence surrounding the benefits, effects or clinical outcomes of such a practice. Methods. A series of 558 patients undergoing elective admission were recruited during pre-assessment for surgery and were screened for UTIs according to a pre-existing trust protocol. All patients had their urine dipstick tested and positive samples were sent for culture and microscopy. Patients with a positive urine culture were treated prior to surgery and were admitted to the elective centre where strict infection control methods were implemented. The patients were followed up after their surgery and divided into three clinical groups: uneventful surgery; Suspected wound infection; Confirmed wound infection. Results. 85% of dipsticks tested were positive, while only 7% of the urine samples were culture positive. Over 36% of patients with a pre-operative urinary tract infection showed some form of post-operative delayed wound healing or confirmed infection, versus 16% in the other sub-group, giving a relative risk of wound complications of 2:1. There was also an increase in confirmed infection in oozing wounds; 53% positive wound swabs versus 37% in those without a cultured urinary tract infection. A chi-squared analysis yielded a value of 6.07, giving a p value <0.02. There is therefore a statistically significant correlation between a positive urine culture and poor surgical outcome. Conclusion. Pre-operative urine screening and culture has a demonstrable correlation with post-operative surgical outcome. In the light of this study pre-operative urine culture should be mandatory for all pre-operative orthopaedic patients. It should be recognised that patients who present to pre-admission with a UTI are a high risk subgroup for wound infection post-operatively and this should be taken into account when consenting patients for surgery

Objectives

To review the systemic impact of smoking on bone healing as evidenced within the orthopaedic literature.

Whether patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria should be investigated and treated before elective hip and knee replacement is controversial, although it is a widespread practice. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study with urine analyses before surgery and three days post-operatively. Patients with symptomatic urinary infections or an indwelling catheter were excluded. Post-discharge surveillance included questionnaires to patients and general practitioners at three months. Among 510 patients (309 women and 201 men), with a median age of 69 years (16 to 97) undergoing lower limb joint replacements (290 hips and 220 knees), 182 (36%) had pre-operative asymptomatic bacteriuria, mostly due to Escherichia coli, and 181 (35%) had white cells in the urine. Most patients (95%) received a single intravenous peri-operative dose (1.5 g) of cefuroxime as prophylaxis. On the third post-operative day urinary analysis identified white cells in 99 samples (19%) and bacteriuria in 208 (41%). Pathogens in the cultures on the third post-operative day were different from those in the pre-operative samples in 260 patients (51%). Only 25 patients (5%) developed a symptomatic urinary infection during their stay or in a subsequent three-month follow-up period, and two thirds of organisms identified were unrelated to those found during the admission. All symptomatic infections were successfully treated with oral antibiotics with no perceived effect on the joint replacement.

We conclude that testing and treating asymptomatic urinary tract colonisation before joint replacement is unnecessary.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:390–4.