We have recently shown that waste heat from forced-air warming blankets can increase the temperature and concentration of airborne particles over the surgical site. The mechanism for the increased concentration of particles and their site of origin remained unclear. We therefore attempted to visualise the airflow in theatre over a simulated total knee replacement using neutral-buoyancy helium bubbles. Particles were created using a Rocket PS23 smoke machine positioned below the operating table, a potential area of contamination. The same theatre set-up, warming devices and controls were used as in our previous study. This demonstrated that waste heat from the poorly insulated forced-air warming blanket increased the air temperature on the surgical side of the drape by > 5°C. This created convection currents that rose against the downward unidirectional airflow, causing turbulence over the patient. The convection currents increased the particle concentration 1000-fold (2 174 000 particles/m³ for forced-air warming vs 1000 particles/m³ for radiant warming and 2000 particles/m³ for the control) by drawing potentially contaminated particles from below the operating table into the surgical site.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:407–10.

Patient warming significantly decreases the risk of surgical site infection. Recently there have been concerns that forced air warming may interfere with unidirectional airflow, potentially posing an increased risk of infection. Our null hypothesis was that forced air and radiant warming devices do not increase the temperature and the number of particles over the surgical site when compared with no warming device. A forced air warming device was compared with a radiant warming device and no warming device as a control. The temperature and number of particles were measured over the surgical site. The theatre was prepared as for a routine lower-limb arthroplasty operation, and the same volunteer was used throughout the study. Forced air warming resulted in a significant mean increase in the temperature (1.1°C vs 0.4°C, p < 0.0001) and number of particles (1038.2 vs 274.8, p = 0.0087) over the surgical site when compared with radiant warming, which raises concern as bacteria are known to require particles for transport

Aim. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the true operating room (OR) ventilation on the risk of revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR). Method. 40 orthopedic units were included during the period 2005 – 2015. The Unidirectional airflow (UDAF) systems were subdivided into small-area, low-volume, vertical UDAF (lvUDAF) (volume flow rate (VFR) (m. 3. /hour) <=10,000 and diffuser array size (DAS) (m. 2. ) <=10); large-area, high-volume, vertical UDAF (hvUDAF) (VFR >=10,000 and DAS >=10) and Horizontal UDAF (H-UDAF). The systems were compared to conventional, turbulent ventilation (CV) systems. The association between revision due to infection and OR ventilation was assessed using Cox regression models, with adjustments for sex, age, indication for surgery, ASA-classification, method of fixation, modularity of the components, duration of surgery, in addition to year of primary THA. All included THAs received systemic, antibiotic prophylaxis. Results. 51,292 primary THAs were eligible for assessment. 575 (1.1%) of these THAs had been revised due to infection. Compared to CV, there was similar risk of revision due to infection after THA performed in ORs with lvUDAF (RR=0.9, 95 % CI: 0.7–1.1) and with H-UDAF (RR=1.3, 95 % CI: 0.9–1.8). The risk of revision due to infection after THA performed in ORs with large-area hvUDAF-systems was lower (RR=0.8, 95% CI: 0.6–0.9, p=0.01) compared to CV. Conclusions. This study indicates that large-area, high-volume, vertical UDAF systems may be superior to conventional ventilation systems as a prophylactic measure against THA infection. This emphasizes the importance of assessing the big diversity of different ventilation systems when studying effect measures

The critical relationship between airborne microbiological contamination in an operating theatre and surgical site infection (SSI) is well known. The aim of this annotation is to explain the scientific basis of using settle plates to audit the quality of air, and to provide information about the practicalities of using them for the purposes of clinical audit. The microbiological quality of the air in most guidance is defined by volumetric sampling, but this method is difficult for surgical departments to use on a routine basis. Settle plate sampling, which mimics the mechanism of deposition of airborne microbes onto open wounds and sterile instruments, is a good alternative method of assessing the quality of the air. Current practice is not to sample the air in an operating theatre during surgery, but to rely on testing the engineering systems which deliver the clean air. This is, however, not good practice and microbiological testing should be carried out routinely during operations as part of clinical audit.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(9):887–891.

Introduction. Infection is disastrous in arthroplasty surgery and requires multidisciplinary treatment and debilitating revision surgery. Between 80-90% of bacterial wound contaminants originate from colony forming units (CFUs) present in operating room air, originating from bacteria shed by personnel present in the operating environment. Steps to reduce bacterial shedding should reduce wound contamination. These steps include the use of unidirectional laminar airflow systems and the introduction of theatre attire modelled on this principle (e.g. total body exhaust suits). Our unit introduced the use of the Stryker Sterishield Personal Protection System helmet used with laminar flow theatre systems. This study compares an enclosed helmet system used with standard gowns, with standard hood and mask attire. Method. 12 simulated hip arthroplasties were performed, six using disposable sterile impermeable gown, hood and mask and a further 6 using a Sterishield helmet and hood. Each 20 minute operation consisted of arm and head movements simulating movements during surgery. Air was sampled at wound level on a sterile draped operating table using a Casella slit sampler, sampling at 700l/minute. Samples were incubated on Blood agar for 48 hours at 37°c and the CFUs grown were counted. Results. Mean number of CFUs for the helmet was 9.33 with hood and mask attire having 49.16 CFUs (S. Ds 6.34 and 26.17; p value 0.0126). In all cases a coagulase negative staphylococcus was isolated. Conclusion. Although the sample size was small, we demonstrated a fivefold increase in the number of CFUs shed when using hood and mask attire compared to personal helmet and sterile hood. We conclude that the helmet system is superior to non-sterile hood and mask at reducing bacterial shedding by theatre personnel

Deep infection was identified as a serious complication in the earliest days of total hip arthroplasty. It was identified that airborne contamination in conventional operating theatres was the major contributing factor. As progress was made in improving the engineering of operating theatres, airborne contamination was reduced. Detailed studies were carried out relating airborne contamination to deep infection rates.

In a trial conducted by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC), it was found that the use of ultra-clean air (UCA) operating theatres was associated with a significant reduction in deep infection rates. Deep infection rates were further reduced by the use of a body exhaust system. The MRC trial also included a detailed microbiology study, which confirmed the relationship between airborne contamination and deep infection rates.

Recent observational evidence from joint registries has shown that in contemporary practice, infection rates remain a problem, and may be getting worse. Registry observations have also called into question the value of “laminar flow” operating theatres.

Observational evidence from joint registries provides very limited evidence on the efficacy of UCA operating theatres. Although there have been some changes in surgical practice in recent years, the conclusions of the MRC trial remain valid, and the use of UCA is essential in preventing deep infection.

There is evidence that if UCA operating theatres are not used correctly, they may have poor microbiological performance. Current UCA operating theatres have limitations, and further research is required to update them and improve their microbiological performance in contemporary practice.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1264–9.