Due to shorter hospital stays and faster patient rehabilitation Unicompartmental Knee Replacements (UKR) are now considered more cost effective than Total Knee Joint Replacements (TKJR). Obesity however, has long been thought of as a relative contraindication to UKR due to an unproven theoretical concern of early loosening. This study is a retrospective review of patient reported outcome scores and revision rates of all UKR with recorded BMI performed by the Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB) from January 2011 and September 2021. Patient reported outcome scores were taken preoperatively, at 6 months, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years post operatively. These included WOMAC, Oxford, HAAS, UCLA, WHOQOL, normality, pain and patient satisfaction. 873 patients had functional scores recorded at 5 years and 164 patients had scores recorded at 10 years. Further sub-group analysis was performed based on patient BMI of <25, 25–30, 30–35 and >35. Revision data was available for 2377 UKRs performed in Christchurch during this period. Both obese (BMI >30) and non-obese (BMI <30) patients had significantly improved post-operative scores compared to preoperative. Pre-operatively obese patients had significantly lower functional scores except for pain and UCLA. All functional scores were lower in obese patients at 5 years but this did not meet minimum clinical difference. At 10 years, there was significantly lower HAAS, satisfaction and WOMAC scores for obese patients but no difference in Oxford, normality, WHOQOL, UCLA and pain scores. There was no significant difference in the improvement from pre-operative scores between obese and non-obese patients. All cause revision rate for obese patients at 10 years was 0.69 per 100 observed component years compared to 0.76 in non-obese. This was not statistically significant. Our study proves that UKR is an excellent option in obese patients with post-operative improvement in functional scores and 10 year survivorship equivalent to non-obese patients

The purpose of this study is to assess the long term results of combined ACL reconstruction and unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR). These patients have been selected for this combined operation due to their combination of instability symptoms from an absent ACL and unicompartmental arthritis.

Retrospective review of 44 combined UKR and ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon. Surgeries included both medial and lateral UKR combined with either revision ACL reconstruction or primary ACL reconstruction. Patient reported outcomes were obtained preoperatively, at one year, 5 years and 10 years. Revision rate was followed up over 13 years for a mean of 7.4 years post-surgery.

The average Oxford score at one year was 43 with an average increase from pre-operation to 1 year post operation of 15. For the 7 patients with 10 year follow up average oxford score was 42 at 1 year, 43 at 5 years and 45 at 10 years.

There were 5 reoperations. 2 for revision to total knee arthroplasty and 1 for an exchange of bearing due to wear. The other 2 were the addition of another UKR. For those requiring reoperation the average time was 8 years.

Younger more active patients presenting with ACL deficiency causing instability and unicompartmental arthritis are a difficult group to manage. Combining UKR and ACL reconstruction has scant evidence in regard to long term follow up but is a viable option for this select group. This paper has one of the largest cohorts with a reasonable follow up averaging 7.4 years and a revision rate of 11 percent.

Combined unilateral knee replacements and ACL reconstruction can be a successful operation for patients with ACL rupture causing instability and unicompartmental arthritis.

Unicompartmental knee replacements (unis) offer an early option for the treatment of osteoarthritis. However there is no standard method for measuring the wear of unis in the laboratory. Most knee simulators are designed for TKA, for which there is an ISO standard. This study is about a wear method for unis, applied to a novel unicompartmental knee replacement (design by PSW). It has a metal-backed UHMWPE femoral component to articulate against a monoblock metallic tibial component. The advantage is reduced resection of strong bone from the proximal tibia for more durable fixation. The femoral component resurfaces the distal end of the femur to a flexion arc of only 42°, the area of cartilage loss in early OA (Fig. 1). We compared this novel bearing couple to the same design but with the usual arrangement of femoral metal and tibial plastic. Our hypothesis was that the wear of the reversed materials would be comparable to conventional and within the range of TKR bearings.

The test was conducted on a 4-station Instron-Stanmore force-controlled knee simulator. Both specimen groups (n=4 each) were highly crosslinked UHWMPE stabilized with vitamin E. On each of the four stations, one uni system was mounted on the medial side and one on the lateral, as if a standard TKR was being tested. The ISO-14243-1 walking cycle force-control waveforms were applied for 5 million cycles (Mc) at 1Hz, but with the maximum flexion during the swing phase (usually 58°) curtailed to 35° to maintain the contact within the arc of the femoral component. In-vivo this implant would be inlaid into the distal medial femoral condyle and the articulating surface immediately transitions into native cartilage. In our test set-up there was no secondary surface as such. The reduced flexion occurred during the swing phase where compressive load was low and the effect on the wear would be negligible. Wear was measured gravimetrically at many intervals and corrected by the weight gain of extra two active soak controls per group.

After 5 Mc, the average rates of gravimetric weight loss from the UHMWPE femoral and tibial bearings were 4.73±0.266 mg/Mc and 3.07±0.388 mg/Mc, respectively (statistically significantly different, p=0.0007) (Fig. 2). No significant difference was found in wear between medial and lateral placement for specimens of the same type, although the medial side generally wore more. Although the plastic femorals of the reverse design wore more than the plastic tibials, the wear was still low at <5 mg/Mc. The range for typical TKRs using ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, tested under the same conditions in our laboratory has been 2.85–24.1 mg/Mc.

In summary, we adapted the ISO standard TKA wear test for the evaluation of unis, and in this case, a uni with reversed materials. Based on the wear results, this type of ‘early intervention’ design could therefore be a viable option, offering simplicity with less modular parts as well as load sharing with the native articular cartilage.

Introduction

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has seen renewed interest in recent years and is a viable option for patients with limited degenerative disease of the knee as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty. However, the minimally invasive UKA procedure is challenging, and accurate component alignment is vital to long-term survival. Robotic-assisted UKA allows for greater accuracy of component placement and dynamic intraoperative ligament balancing which may improve clinical patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical outcomes in a large, consecutive cohort of patients that underwent robotic-assisted UKA at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The study hypothesis was that robotic-assisted UKA improves patient outcomes by decreasing the rate of revision in comparison to conventional UKA.

The Oxford mobile bearing knee prosthesis (Zimmer Biomet Inc, Warsaw, Ind) is considered a good treatment option for isolated medial compartment knee arthrosis. From February 2001 until August 2016, 1719 primary Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement procedures were completed at our center by a group of seven surgeons. We undertook this study to examine the long-term survivorship of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement looking at survivorship and reasons for failure.

A retrospective consecutive case series review was completed, and all revisions and re-operations were identified. Conversion to total knee replacement (TKA) was considered a failure. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the 15-year survivorship of the group overall. We specifically looked at age, gender, BMI and surgeon caseload in addition to the reasons for failure. A statistical analysis was performed and differences in survivorship were compared for the variables listed. A logistic cox regression was performed to explore predictors of revision.

Overall 15-year survivorship was 89.9%. Female survivorship of 88.1% was statistically worse than the male group at 91.8% (p=0.018). Younger patients (75yrs of age (p= 0.036). There was a large range in surgical case load by individual surgeons (range 17–570 knees). There were no statistically significant differences in age, BMI, or gender when comparing the individual surgeon groups. There was a large range in 15-year survivorship between individual surgeons (range 78.3% – 95%). Overall the most common reason for revision was due to wear of the unreplaced portion of the knee (lateral and/or patella-femoral joint) followed by aseptic loosening, polyethylene dislocation, infection or persistent pain.

The 15-year survivorship results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement at our center compares favourably to other published series and large registry data series. We found a reduction in survivorship in female patients and younger patients (< 5 5yrs). There were also significant differences in survivorship based on the individual surgeon. A more selective patient approach yielded the best long-term survivorship and equivalent to that of total knee replacement. We therefore suggest using a more selective approach when choosing patients for a medial unicompartmental knee replacement with the Oxford mobile bearing prosthesis in order to enhance long-term survivorship.

Joint load correlates with knee OA incidence, symptoms, radiographic, morphologic and biological changes. Available load modifying therapies are clinically effective but have drawbacks. The KineSpringTM (Moximed Inc), an investigational device, is designed to reduce compartment loads while avoiding the limitations of current treatments. We compare load reductions of braces, HTO and KineSpringTM.

Literature review and experimental data provide compartment load changes for clinically effective knee braces and HTO. Simulated gait testing was completed on four cadaver knees with early-stage OA. Gait was simulated using a cadaver-based kinematic test system that applies motion and loading patterns dynamically to cadaver specimens. Medial and lateral compartment femoro-tibial pressures were measured throughout testing using thin film dynamic pressure sensors (Tekscan, Inc.) placed inframeniscally. Three conditions were tested: no treatment, applied valgus moments to simulate a valgus moment brace, and implanted KineSpring.

Sufficient clinical data exists to support the development of new and novel load modifying therapies for knee OA. Joint load reductions provided by HTO and valgus moment braces provide insight into clinically effective load reduction ranges. Opening wedge HTOs of 5° and 10° are reported to reduce average medial compartment load by 55 N (12 lbs) and 286 N (64 lbs), respectively1. Valgus braces were reported to reduce medial compartment loads an average of 97-280 N (22-63 lbs). From this data we propose a clinically effective load reduction range of 55 to 286N is a valid indicator of the likely clinical success for medial knee load reduction treatments.

Gait simulation was successfully completed in all specimens in all test configurations. The valgus moment brace reduced medial compartment load by 58 ±20 N but did not reach statistical significance. The Kinespring reduced medial compartment load by 129±64 N in comparison to the untreated case, a statistically significant reduction. Neither the KineSpring nor the valgus moment brace caused significant changes in the lateral compartment during stance.

All treatments reduced medial compartment loads. KineSpringTM reduces loads in what we determined to be the clinically effective range. Additional studies and clinical investigations are warranted to determine the ultimate effectiveness of this implant system.

Introduction

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has seen renewed interest in recent years and is a viable option for patients with limited degenerative disease of the knee as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty. However, the minimally invasive UKA procedure is challenging and accurate component alignment is vital to long-term survival. Robotic-assisted UKA allows for greater accuracy of component placement and dynamic intraoperative ligament balancing which may improve clinical patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes in a large, consecutive cohort of patients that underwent robotic-assisted UKA.

A number of studies suggest revision of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) to total knee replacement (TKR) is straightforward. We hypothesise that this is not always the case in terms of complexity, cost and clinical outcome.

We identified 23 consecutive patients revised from UKR to TKR by 2 consultant surgeons (2005–2008). These were matched by age, sex and comorbidity to a cohort of primary TKRs (42 patients) performed during the same period. Data were collected regarding demographics, cost (surgical time & implants) and 1 & 5-year follow-up of clinical outcome (OKS) and outpatients attended.

There was no statistically significant difference in cost of implants for revision UKR to TKR vs. primary TKR (p=0.08), however operative time was significantly higher in the revision group. One year mean OKS was significantly higher in the primary TKR group (mean 30 vs. 23 p=0.03), but 5-year follow up showed no significant difference (mean OKS 27 vs. 32 p=0.20). The revision group had statistically significantly greater number of follow-up appointments (mean 6 Vs. 2 p<0.0001).

Revision of UKR to TKR is not a universally straightforward procedure, carrying significant overall cost implications. Clinical outcomes, although significantly different at 1 year are almost the same at 5 years.

Barriers to the adoption of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) by new consultants could be explained by its higher revision rate, to which mal-positioned components contribute. The aim of this study was to determine whether robotic technology enables inexperienced surgeons to perform accurate UKAs when compared to current conventional methods

After randomisation, sixteen trainees who had never performed UKAs performed three medial UKAs (Corin Uniglide), one per week, on dry-bone simulators by either robotic (Sculptor RGA) or conventional methods. They were instructed to match a universal 3D-CT based pre-operative plan that would result from a UKA based on the conventional jigs and operating guide. The knees were laser scanned and software used to compare the planned and actual implant positions. Feedback was given to trainees between attempts. Translational and rotational positioning errors were measured in all six degrees of freedom for both components

At all attempts robotic medial UKAs were more accurate in both translational and rotational alignments for both components reaching statistical significance (p<0.005) at all attempts for rotational errors. Considering outliers, the maximum rotational errors of the robot group was 9° and 7° for the tibial and femoral components respectively. For the conventional group this reached 18° and 16° for the tibial and femoral components respectively

Robotic technology allows inexperienced surgeons to perform medial UKAs on dry bone models with acceptable accuracy and precision on their first attempt. Conventional jigs do not. The adoption of robotic technology might provide new consultants with the confidence to offer UKAs to their patients by limiting the inaccuracies inherent in conventional equipment.

Introduction

Despite the theoretical advantages of mobile bearings for lateral unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), the failure rate in the initial published series of the lateral Oxford UKR's was unacceptably high. The main cause of failure was early dislocation. In contrast, dislocations of bearings in medial UKR's are rare. The lateral compartment present a higher laxity in flexion than the medial. An adaptation of the lateral design by introducing a convex tibial component and biconcave bearing should tackle this difference in kinematics.

The risk of dislocation increased substantially if the lateral tibial joint line was elevated, quantified by the proximal tibial varus angle. This angle had a significant relationship to dislocation.

A recent kinematic study identified roughly 3 times as much posterior translation of the tibia during deep knee bend activities after lateral UKR compared to the normal knee, possibly also resulting in a higher incidence of bearing dislocation.

With the exception of dislocation, the overall early complication ratio in the initial published series of lateral Oxford UKR was also rather high compared to the last published series. Is there a learning curve?

Background

A commonly held belief amongst surgeons and patients is that progression of disease (arthritis) to other compartments is a major cause of early failure of UKRs.

Computer navigation has the potential to revolutionise orthopaedic surgery, although according to the latest 7^th Annual NJR Report, only 2% of the 5 800 unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) performed in 2009 were carried out using ‘image guidance.’ The report also states an average 3-year revision rate for UKRs of 6.5%. Previous NJR data has shown that this figure rises up to 12% for certain types of prosthesis. We suspect that a significant proportion of these revisions are due to failure secondary to component malpositioning. We therefore propose that the use of computer navigation enables a more accurate prosthesis placement, leading to a reduction in the revision rate for early failure secondary to component malpositioning. Our early results of one hundred consecutive computer navigated UKRs are presented and discussed.

Ninety-two patients having had one hundred consecutive computer navigated UKRs were reviewed both clinically and radiographically. The Smith & Nephew Accuris fixed-bearing modular prosthesis was used in all cases, with the ‘Brainlab’ navigation system. Pre-operative aim was neutral tibial cut with three degrees posterior slope. Post-operative component alignment was measured with PACs web measuring tools. Patients were scored clinically using the Oxford Knee Score.

Our patient cohort includes 54 male knees and 46 female knees. Average age is 66.6yrs. Average length of stay was 3.7 days, (range 2–7.) With respect to the tibial component, average alignment was 0.7° varus, and 2.32° posterior slope. All components were within the acceptable 3 degrees deviation. Functional scores are very satisfactory, with an overall patient satisfaction rate of 97%.

To date, only one UKR has required revision. This was due to ongoing medial pain due to medial overhang, not related to computer navigation. There was one superficial infection, with full resolution following a superficial surgical washout, debridement and antibiotics. Unlike complications reported in the NJR, we report no peri-prosthetic fractures or patella tendon injuries.

Our results demonstrate accurate prosthesis placement with the use of computer navigation. Furthermore, clinical scores are highly satisfactory. Our current revision rate is 1% at a mean of 27 months post-op. Although longer-term follow-up of our group is required, our results compare very favourably to statistics published in the NJR, (average 3-year revision rate 6.5%.) The only major differences appear to be the type of prosthesis used and the use of computer navigation. It is our proposal that computer navigation reduces the number of revisions required due to component malpositioning and subsequent failure. Furthermore, we believe that this challenging surgery is made easier with the use of computer navigation. We expect our longer-term results to show significant benefits of computer navigation over conventional techniques.

Purpose

To identify the incidence and reasons for revision of the Oxford prosthesis (OXF) in New Zealand.

There exists a variety of options for a medial compartment knee with osteoarthritis, specifically a unicompartmental knee, high tibial osteotomy, and total knee arthroplasty. This surgeon prefers a rotating platform posterior stabilised total knee to the unicompartmental knee. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in younger patients is being performed with increasing frequency. While UKA is a powerful marketing tool because of its minimally invasive nature and quality of knee function that is superior to the total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it has tremendous drawbacks. These include: the selection criteria is very specific and the number of patients that fit in that category is small, there is a steep learning curve for the surgeon to perfect the technique, higher failure due to wear and loss of fixation, and unexplained pain. Based on level 1 and 2 evidence available it is not justified to do more UKAs at present when the results of a TKA are so successful

Introduction. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA) has become a popular treatment alternative when one compartment of the knee is affected. Excellent intermediate results have been reported in association with the Miller-Galante unicompartmental implant. These excellent results are based on the development of the implants and the stringent patients selection. The functional cruciate ligaments has been a prerequisite for patients undergoing UKA. However, UKA can be one of the procedures in elderly patiants with deficient anterior cruciate ligaments(ACL) but with no symptoms of instability. The purpose of this report is to determine the clinical results after UKA in patients with ACL-deficient knees and compared those after UKA in ACL-intact knees. Patients and Methods. We identified 332 cases operated from May 2000 to April 2013 whose ACL were evaluated before the operation by MRI., and classified into ACL-deficient group and ACL-intact group. Fixed-bearing Miller-Galante Unicompartmental Knee System or Zimmer Unicompartmental High-Flex Knee Sytem was implanted in all patients. ACL-deficient group included 17 men and 68 women who had an average age of 79 years(range, 70–91 years) at the time of the operation. The underlying diagnosis was osteoarthritis for 77 knees and osteonecrosis for 8 knees. ACL-intact group included 49 men and 198 women who had an average age of 77 years(range, 60–88 years) at the time of the operation. The underlying diagnosis was osteoarthritis for 176 knees and osteonecrosis for 71 knees. Followup for ACL-deficient group was 3.5 years(1–8.8years), and 3.6years (1–13.2years) for ACL-intact group. Results. Japanese Orthopaedic Association score improved from 46.7points preoperatively to 76.5 points at the time of the latest followup in ACL deficient group, and 49.6 points to 81.5 points in ACL-intact group. 7 knees(8.2%) had a partial radiolucent line around the tibial component in ACL-deficient group, and 30 knees(12.6%) had a partial radiolucent line around the tibial component(30knees) or femoral component(one knee) in ACL-intact group, all of these radiolucent lines were <2mm in thickness and remained stable over time. Two knees(2.3%) in ACL-deficient group and five knees(2.0%) in ACL-intact group were revised because of progression of arthritis in the lateral tibiofemoral or patellofemoral components. All of the components in revised knees were well fixed and no polyethylene wear was seen at the time of revision. All of these results between two groups were not significantly different. Conclusion. Controversy exists about whether a functional ACL is necessary to achieve success with UKA. In classical indication, UKA should not be done in patients with symptoms of ACL instability. In elderly active patient with deficient ACL, we should prefer total knee arthroplasty. But UKA should judiciously be done in eldery patients with deficient ACL whose activity is low but with no symptoms of instability

While no one would argue the necessary role for the medical management of patients with early knee arthritis, significant controversy remains regarding the ideal treatment for a patient with bone-on-bone osteoarthritis who could equally be treated with a high tibial osteotomy, a unicompartmental total knee, potentially a patello-femoral replacement if dealing with isolated patello-femoral disease or lastly, a complete total knee replacement. While clearly to date there has not been consensus on this issue, a review of the arguments, both pro and con, should be used as a guide to the surgeon in making this clinical judgment. Many ardent supporters of unicompartmental knee replacements espouse one of the principle benefits of the uni knee as much greater patient satisfaction. Unfortunately, what is never taken into account is the pre-selection bias that occurs in this patient population. Patients with the most minimal amount of arthritis and those with the greatest range of motion are pre-selected to undergo a unicompartmental knee replacement compared to the more advanced arthritic knee with mal-alignment and more significant pre-operative disability that will undergo a total knee replacement. Additionally the sources of data to draw the conclusions must be carefully analysed. We must avoid using data from small series with unblinded patients performed by surgeons expert in the technique. Instead registry data, with its broad based applicability, is a much more logical source of information. Of significance, when over 27,000 patients were assessed regarding satisfaction following knee surgery; there was no difference in proportions of satisfied patients whether they had a total knee or a unicompartmental knee. Once again large prospective cohort data in the form of arthroplasty registries strongly favors total knee arthroplasty over unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry demonstrated higher revision rates with uni's as compared with total knee replacements. In the Australian Joint Replacement Registry the cumulative 11 year percent revision rate for primary total knee replacements is 6.1% and for unicompartmental knee replacements is 16.3%. The 10 year cumulative percent revision rate for patella femoral replacements 29.9% and lastly bicompartmental replacements are at 10.3% after only 3 years. Higher failure rates in unicompartmental knee replacements seen in Australia has correlated to a significant decrease in the number of uni's being performed, which peaked at 14.6% in 2003 and in 2012 has reduced to 9.0%. There is a direct correlation to age, with younger patients having a significantly higher percentage of revision following unicompartmental knee replacements (25% failure rate at 11 years if less than 55 years old). There is also tremendous variability in the success rate of the uni in the Australian Registry depending on the implant design (5 year cumulative revision rate range 5.0% to 18.9%), which is simply not seen in the total knee replacement population (5 year cumulative revision rate range 1.6% to 7.7%). While one can perform the philosophical exercise of debating the merits of a total knee versus unicompartmental knee, the evidence is overwhelming that in the hands of the masses a total knee replacement patient will have equal satisfaction to a unicompartmental patient, and will enjoy a much lower probability of revision in the short term and in the long term

To resurface or not to resurface the patella… that is the question. It all comes down to where you practice. It is controversial in that there is a risk of possible complications from resurfacing versus the potential for simply having complaints of pain which may supposedly arise from the anterior knee stemming from the unresurfaced patella. The evolution of more favorable anatomic femoral component designs which are very friendly to the patellofemoral articulation have resulted in lower patella resurfacing complications. The insertion of appropriately externally rotated tibial and femoral components, if not reducing anterior knee pain, have certainly minimised the risk of resurfaced patella complications. Also, with current surgical techniques of component insertion, the lateral release rate is extremely low, thus avoiding the possibility of avascularity developing in the resurfaced patella. This complication will almost completely be eliminated if the patella thickness is kept greater than 13 mm after patella resection. In my experience, patella complications from the resurfaced patella are extremely rare. Many unicompartmental knees require re-operation because of the development of progressive patellofemoral arthritis. Re-operation from anterior knee pain from progressive arthritis from the unresurfaced patella has given inferior results. Overall, meta-analysis data demonstrates decreased satisfaction, increased anterior knee pain and higher early revision rates in the unresurfaced group. National joint registries, especially the Australian registry support routine resurfacing; complications are low and outcomes are improved. Even though there exists controversy as to whether the patella should be resurfaced or not, there is an overwhelming consensus in the U.S. that there is little downfall nowadays with respect to resurfacing the patella

Recent reports about the excellent clinical results of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA; also known as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty), by the minimally invasive approach, have encouraged the adoption of the surgical technique. However, friction between metallic prosthetic components resulting from polyethylene wear may result in the development of metallosis and the use of metal implants has become a huge issue in the worlds recently. Here, we report a case in which a patient underwent UKA and developed metallosis in soft tissues and bone adjacent to an implanted artificial joint three years postoperatively

Purpose. We may consider total knee arthroplasty on one knee and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on another knee when the patient has different grade osteoarthritis on one knee and opposite knee. Both total knee and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty had been reported as excellent clinical results, but there can be different results and different preference if the same patient undergo operation of simulataneous total knee and unicompartmental knee. We performed total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and pretend to report results of the clinical and radiological results and rationale of the operation. Materials and Methods. From Marth 2007 to February 2014, 23 patients, 46 knees that underwent total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on knees with different osteoarthritis grade in same person enrolled in this study(Fig. 1). The mean age was 64.4 years old(range:55–75) and mean follow-up period was 25.1 months(range:13–72). Results. The tibiofemoral angle changed from 4.0 of varus to 5.4 of valgus in the total knee arthroplasty, and from 0.5 of valgus to 3.8 of valgus in the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The mechanical axis deviation changed from varus 28.35mm to varus 3.68mm in the total knee arthroplasty, and from 16.42 to 8.81 in the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The average Hospital for Special Surgery Knee-Rating Scale(HSS) improved from 55.1 preoperatively to 93.4 at last follow-up in the total knee arthroplasty, and from 65.2 to 95.2 in the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The average WOMAC Score improved from 61.6 preoperatively to 18.0 at last follow-up in the total knee arthroplasty, and from 55.4 to 16.2 in the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. For patient preference, 5 patients(22%) preferred the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and 6 patients(26%) preferred the total knee arthroplasty, and 12 patients felt no difference between two knees. 20 patients(87%) reported being ‘very satisfied’ or ‘satisfied’ in the total knee arthroplasty, and 18 patients(79%) reported in the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. We underwent 1 case complication of tibial implant loosening and varus malalignment. So, we converted total knee arthroplasty about 3 months later(Fig. 2). Conclusions. Total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in same person showed satisfactory clinical and radiological results. There was no difference in preference site and postoperative range of motion showed more regainment on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. More complications were demonstrated in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in same person seems to be a good option when the both knee have different osteoarthritis grade

The evidence to help the surgeon decide on the merits of which type of replacement to offer their patients is steadily mounting and comes from large datasets such as joint registries. There are many advantages of UKR vs TKR such as satisfaction, function, recovery, morbidity, mortality and cost but there is one major disadvantage. All registries show a higher failure rate with UKRs. Registries show that there are more excellent and fewer poor Patient Reported Outcome Measure Scores (PROMS) with UKR compared to TKR and the higher revision rate is in major part due to the threshold of revision. For instance, 60% of UKR are revised vs 10% of TKR with an Oxford score that is worse post-operation than pre-operation. Ease of revision with UKR is a major determinant of the higher revision rate. The real issue with UKR relates to usage. Most surgeons perform very few UKR on young patients with early arthritis viewing the procedure as a pre-TKR. Low surgeon volume equates to high revision rate in the national registries. Surgeons should either abandon UKR or do an adequate number to ensure success. Surgeons can improve their results by increasing their usage of UKR. The Unicompartmental Knee National Joint Registry (UKNJR) data shows that the optimal usage of the mobile UKR is between 20 and 50% of replacements. Fixed bearing usage is optimal at 20% but not higher. The other major advantage concerns the lower mortality rate with UKR. At 90 days it is less than half that of TKR and even at 8 years it is 10% less. For every 10 UKRs performed rather than TKR then one life is saved at 8 years. There is very little evidence suggesting that bi-UKR is necessary certainly with the mobile UKR. There is evidence, however that patellofemoral joint problems are a problem with fixed bearing UKR in the second decade