Introduction. Physical disruption of the extracellular matrix influences the mechanical and chemical environment of intervertebral disc cells. We hypothesise that this can explain degenerative changes such as focal proteoglycan loss, impaired cell-matrix binding, cell clustering, and increased activity of matrix-degrading enzymes. Methods. Disc tissue samples were removed surgically from 11 patients (aged 34–75 yrs) who had a painful but non-herniated disc. Each sample was divided into a pair of specimens (approximately 5mm. 3. ), which were cultured at 37°C under 5% CO. 2. One of each pair was allowed to swell, while the other was restrained by a perspex ring. Live-cell imaging was performed with a wide field microscope for 36 hrs. Specimens were then sectioned at 5 and 30 μm for histology and immunofluorescence using a confocal microscope. Antibodies were used to recognise free integrin receptor α5β1, matrix metalloprotease MMP-1, and denatured collagen types I-III. Proteoglycan content of the medium, analysed using the colorimetric DMMB assay, was used to assess tissue swelling and GAG loss. Constrained/unconstrained results were compared using matched-pair t-tests. Results. Time-lapse cinematography revealed small cell movements in unconstrained specimens, for up to 12 hrs. By 36 hrs, unconstrained (free swelling) samples showed greater: loss of GAG's (p<0.003), loss of integrin binding (p<0.02), synthesis of MMP-1 (p<0.03), and collagen denaturation (p<0.009). Cell clustering was evident in all tissues after 36 hrs. Conclusion. Swelling of disrupted disc tissue disturbs cell-matrix binding, increases matrix degradation, and allows increased proteoglycan loss. This sequence of events could follow disc injury or herniation in-vivo

Between January 1990 and December 2000 we carried out 226 SB Charité III disc replacements for lumbar disc degeneration in 160 patients. They were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 79 months (31 to 161) to determine the clinical and radiological outcome. The clinical results were collected by an independent observer, who was not involved in patient selection, treatment or follow-up, using a combination of outcome measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index. Pain was recorded using a visual analogue score, and the most recent radiographs were reviewed.

Survival of the device was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method and showed a cumulative survival of 35% at 156 months when radiological failure was taken as the endpoint. The mean improvement in the Oswestry disability index scores after disc replacement was 14% (6% to 21%) and the mean improvement in the pain score was 1.6 (0.46 to 2.73), both falling below the clinically significant threshold. Removal of the implant was required in 12 patients, four because of implant failure.

These poor results indicate that further use of this implant is not justified.