Aims. Medial humeral epicondyle fractures (MHEFs) are common elbow fractures in children. Open reduction should be performed in patients with MHEF who have entrapped intra-articular fragments as well as displacement. However, following open reduction, transposition of the ulnar nerve is disputed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the need for ulnar nerve exploration and transposition. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. The clinical data of patients who underwent surgical treatment of MHEF in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2022 were collected. The patients were allocated to either transposition or non-transposition groups. Data for sex, age, cause of fracture, duration of follow-up, Papavasiliou and Crawford classification, injury-to-surgery time, preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, intraoperative exploration of ulnar nerve injury, surgical incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, complications, persistent ulnar neuropathy, and elbow joint function were analyzed. Binary logistic regression analysis was used for statistical analysis. Results. A total of 124 patients were followed up, 50 in the ulnar nerve transposition group and 74 in the non-transposition group. There were significant differences in ulnar nerve injury (p = 0.009), incision length (p < 0.001), and blood loss (p = 0.003) between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.012) were risk factors for postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms. In addition, ulnar nerve transposition did not affect the occurrence of postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.468). Conclusion. Ulnar nerve transposition did not improve clinical outcomes. It is recommended that the ulnar nerve should not be transposed when treating MHEF operatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(2):212–218

We evaluated the morphological changes to the ulnar nerve of both elbows in the cubital tunnel by sonography in a total of 237 children, of whom 117 were aged between six and seven years, 66 between eight and nine years, and 54 between ten and 11 years. We first scanned longitudinally in the extended elbow and then transversely at the medial epicondyle with the elbow extended to 0°. We repeated the scans with the elbow flexed at 45°, 90°, and 120°. There were no significant differences in the area of the ulnar nerve, but the diameter increased as the elbow moved from extension to flexion in all groups. More importantly, the ulnar nerve was subluxated anteriorly on to the medial epicondyle by 1.5% to 1.9% in extended elbows, by 5.9% to 7.9% in those flexed to 45°, by 40.0% to 44% in those flexed to 90°, and by 57.4% to 58.1% in those flexed to 120°, depending on the age group. Sonography clearly and accurately showed the ulnar nerve and was useful for localising the nerve before placing a medial pin. Because the ulnar nerve may translate anteriorly onto the medial epicondyle when the elbow is flexed to 90° or more, it should never be overlooked during percutaneous medial pinning

We conducted an anatomical study to determine the best technique for transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) for the treatment of proximal ulnar nerve injuries. The AIN, ulnar nerve, and associated branches were dissected in 24 cadaver arms. The number of branches of the AIN and length available for transfer were measured. The nerve was divided just proximal to its termination in pronator quadratus and transferred to the ulnar nerve through the shortest available route. Separation of the deep and superficial branches of the ulnar nerve by blunt dissection alone, was also assessed. The mean number of AIN branches was 4.8 (3 to 8) and the mean length of the nerve available for transfer was 72 mm (41 to 106). The transferred nerve reached the ulnar nerve most distally when placed dorsal to flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). We therefore conclude that the AIN should be passed dorsal to FDP, and that the deep and superficial branches of the ulnar nerve require approximately 30 mm of blunt dissection and 20 mm of sharp dissection from the point of bifurcation to the site of the anastomosis. The use of this technique for transfer of the AIN should improve the outcome for patients with proximal ulnar nerve injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:789–94

The transfer of part of the ulnar nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve, first described by Oberlin, can restore flexion of the elbow following brachial plexus injury. In this study we evaluated the additional benefits and effectiveness of quantitative electrodiagnosis to select a donor fascicle. Eight patients who had undergone transfer of a simple fascicle of the ulnar nerve to the motor branch of the musculocutaneous nerve were evaluated. In two early patients electrodiagnosis had not been used. In the remaining six patients, however, all fascicles of the ulnar nerve were separated and electrodiagnosis was performed after stimulation with a commercially available electromyographic system. In these procedures, recording electrodes were placed in flexor carpi ulnaris and the first dorsal interosseous. A single fascicle in the flexor carpi ulnaris in which a high amplitude had been recorded was selected as a donor and transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve. In the two patients who had not undergone electrodiagnosis, the recovery of biceps proved insufficient for normal use. Conversely, in the six patients in whom quantitative electrodiagnosis was used, elbow flexion recovered to an M4 level. Quantitative intra-operative electrodiagnosis is an effective method of selecting a favourable donor fascicle during the Oberlin procedure. Moreover, fascicles showing a high-amplitude in reading flexor carpi ulnaris are donor nerves that can restore normal elbow flexion without intrinsic loss

Introduction. Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper extremity. Despite this, only a few studies have assessed the outcome of ulnar nerve decompression. The objectives of the study were to review the pre-operative symptoms, nerve conduction studies, the co-morbidities, operative procedures undertaken and the post-operative outcomes; and investigate and ascertain prognostic factors particularly in cases of persistence of symptoms after the surgery. Methods. We reviewed the case notes of ulnar nerve decompressions surgery performed over a period of six year period. A structured proforma was created to document the demographics, patient complaints, method of decompression, per-operative findings and symptom status at the last follow up. Outcome grading was recorded as completely relieved, improved, unchanged or worse. Analysis of data was carried out using the SPSS software (Version 16.0; Illinois). The significance level was set at 5%. Results. 136 ulnar nerve decompressions formed the study group. Minimum follow-up was three months. Numbness and paresthesia in ulnar distribution were the two most common presenting symptoms (96%). The cause of compression was identified as idiopathic in 58.2%; flexor carpi ulnaris aponeurosis in 36.7% and Arcade of Stuthers in 5.1% extremities. The outcome was satisfactory in 85.2% of patients. No obvious association was demonstrated between the outcome of surgery and duration of symptoms, presence of co-morbidities or the type of surgery performed. Interestingly out of 12 patients who got worse or had no improvement, nine (75%) had either normal nerve conduction studies or none done pre-operatively. Conclusion. This is the largest review of outcomes after ulnar nerve decompressions at elbow. The study showed that good results (85.2%) of ulnar nerve decompression at elbow in majority of patients regardless of level of surgeon's experience or procedure undertaken

Ulnar compression neuritis at the elbow level, known as the cubital syndrome, is one of the most common nerve entrapment syndromes. There are many treatment alternatives, such as conservative treatment, submuscular transposition, simple facial release, medial epicondylectomy and anterior subcutaneous transposition. The aim of the present study is to suggest the intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for the cubital syndrome treatment. With the technique based on flaps creation by “Z” lengthening of the flexorpronator muscules, the ulnar nerve is transferred in a well vascularizated area. Between 1992 and 2001, 76 patients were treated by anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. It was possible to follow up 27 patients, 19 males and 8 females. During the re-examination, the rough and thin grasping, the improved objective and subjective sings, as well as the return to the previous vocation, were reported. We make comparison with the international bibliography and correlation of the results to the age of the patients. We recommend the anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for the cubital tunnel syndrome treatment, which is technically demanding, but provides a satisfactory functional outcome

Introduction Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second commonest upper limb nerve entrapment syndrome. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the Agee endoscopic system in ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow. This is the first report of its use in the elbow. Methods Six preserved cadaveric elbow specimens were used. One surgeon performed the endoscopic releases via a three centimetre longitudinal incision between the medial epicondyle and olecranon. All six specimens were examined independently with loupe magnification. This was done by extending the original incision to 20 cm. The ulnar nerve was assessed with regard to adequate decompression. The branching of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, as well as the presevation of these branches after the endoscopic procedure, was also studied. Results In all six specimens, the arcade of Struthers, the cubital tunnel retinaculum, and the flexor carpiulnaris aponeurosis were completely divided. There were an average of three motor branches to flexor carpiulnaris at a mean position of 21 mm distal to the medial epicondyle. Most of these were on the radial side of the nerve. The ulnar nerve was also found to give one to two sensory branches, at a mean position of nine millimetres proximal to the medial epicondyle. All the motor and sensory branches were found to be intact after the endoscopic procedure. Conclusions This study shows that the Agee endoscopic system is both safe and effective. It is a relatively simple procedure but cadaveric practice is recommended to obtain familiarity with the technique and the endoscopic view of the anatomy

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the correlation between the occurance of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and frontal and saggital angular insertion of the medial pin in pediatric type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using a crossed-pin configuration. Method: Among 164 patients with type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures, treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using a crossed-pin configuration while the elbow was in hyperflexion, between 1999 and 2003, ninety patients (54 male and 36 female, mean age 6.1 years) with complete clinical and radiological records and follow-up period of at least 6 months were included the study. Frontal humerus-pin angle (FHPA) was the angle between the long axis of humerus and the axis of the medial pin measured on an anteroposterior radiograph. Saggital humerus-pin angle (SHPA) was the angle between the long axis of humerus and the axis of the medial pin measured on a lateral radiograph and expressed as a positive value if the medial pin direction was anteroposterior and as a negative value if the direction was posteroanterior. All the mesurements were made by the same observer blinded to the clinical records of the patients. Results: Postoperative ulnar nerve injury was observed in 18 patients. The ulnar nerve injury group and control group were similar with respect to age and gender. Mean FHPA was 36.6 and 33.8 degrees in ulnar nerve injury and control groups respectively (p=0.270). Mean SHPA was 12.1 and 1.6 degrees in ulnar nerve injury and control groups respectively, and the difference was significant (p=0.001). All the patients with ulnar nerve injury had complete recovery within 3 months following surgery. Conclusion: There are several methods to avoid iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury in supracondylar fractures such as insertion of two or three lateral pins, insertion of the medial pin while the elbow is less than 90 degrees of flexion. The findings of this retrospective study revealed that there was a considerable correlation between the occurence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury and sagittal angular insertion of the medial pin. We suggest that if a crossed-pin figuration is desired, it is better to insert the medial pin neutral or posteroanterior direction in the sagittal plane if the elbow is in hyperflexion

Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow injury in children, usually sustained from a fall on the outstretched hand. Iatrogenic ulnarnerve injury is not uncommon following cross K wiring. NNH is the number of cases needed to treat in order to have one adverse outcome. A systemic review was undertaken to calculate relative risks, risk difference and number needed to harm following management of supracon-dylar fractures with cross or lateral K wires. It was found that there was one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every twenty-seven cases that were managed with crossed K wires. The aim of this study was to calculate the number of cross K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus that would need to be performed for one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury to occur. Iatrogenic ulnarnerve injury is not uncommon following cross K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus. To date there are no clinical trials showing the benefit of cross K wiring over lateral K wiring in the management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. If it can be confirmed that lateral K wiring is as effective as crossed K wiring, iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury can be avoided. A systematic review of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries following management of supracondylar fractures was conducted. The databases MEDLINE 1966 – present, EMBASE 1980 – present, CINAHL 1982 – present, CDSR, and DARE were searched along with a meticulous search of the Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics from 1998 to 2004. Of the two hundred and forty-eight papers identified, only thirty-six met the inclusion criteria. The papers where both lateral crossed K wires were used as treatment were identified for calculating relative rates, risk difference and number needed to harm. NNH was 7.69. When a sensitivity analysis removing two studies that had five subjects or fewer and a 100% ulnar nerve injury rate was peformed, the NNH was 27.7. In other words, there was one iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every twenty-seven cases that were managed with crossed K wires

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term results of the surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome by comparing the in-situ decompression and release of the ulnar nerve with or without partial medial epicondylectomy and the anterior transposition and release respectively. Material and Method: From 1991 since 2008, 119 patients, (81 men and 38 women) with an average age of 51(13–72 years) years were treated surgically for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. The average duration of symptoms before surgery was 15 months (2–48 months). Preoperatively 2 patients were grade I, 52 patients were grade IIA, 31 patients were IIB and 34 were grade III according to the modified McGowan score. We performed in-situ decompression of the ulnar nerve in 35 patients, release with partial medial epicon-dylectomy in 44 patients and release with anterior transposition of the nerve in 40 patients. 17 patients were lost to follow-up. 108 patients were clinically assessed. Comparing the results among different surgical procedures, an improvement of at least one McGowan grade was obtained in 26 of 30 patients treated with simple decompression, in 29 of 35 patients treated with release and anterior transposition of the nerve and in 38 of 43 patients treated with release and medial epicondylectomy. The results of this study show that the possibility for complete recovery is inversely related to the initial neuropathy grade. Partial medial epicondylectomy is a valuable surgical procedure for treating grade I to IIB ulnar neuropathy because is an anatomic method with minimal nerve manipulation preserving regional blood supply

Aim: The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate reasonable routine transposition of the ulnar nerve in bicondylar humeral fractures. Material and method: From 1996 to 2007 112 bicondylar fractures were operated. 88 pateints (47 women and 41 men) were followed up for average 56 months. Average age was 48 (14–80) years. Open fractures were 17. Fractures were distributed by the AO classification as follows: type C1.2 – 16, C1.3 – 10, C2.1 – 22, C2.2 – 7, C2.3 – 3, C3.1 – 17, C3.2 – 8 and C3.3 -5. All fractures were operated by the AO method with dorsal approach, osteotomy of the olecranon (83 fractures) and fixation with 2 plates. In 47 cases the ulnar nerve was routinely anteriorly transposed and for the rest 41 patients transposition was not done. Results: From 47 patients with routine anterior transposition 7 had Mc Gowan I dysfunction that was resolved in 3 months. From 41 patients without transposition 9 had a type Mc Gowan I dysfunction. There was no statistical significance between the two groups. (p> 0,05). However, 12 to 18 months later 3 patients from the group without transposition with type C1.3, C3.1 and C3.3 fractures returned with late postoperative nerve palsy Mc Gowan II and III. They were treated by neurolysis and transposition. Conclusion: Routine anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is not reasonable in every type of bicondylar humeral fractures. The type of the bicondylar fracture defines whether the nerve transposition is reasonable or not. In low bycondilar humeral fractures and type C3 fractures the nerve transposition is obligatory

1. A case of compression of the deep branch of the ulnar nerve is described. 2. Anatomical evidence is presented that the reason for the special liability of the deep branch to be compressed by ganglia in this region is its relationship to a ligamentous band which passes from the pisiform bone to the hamate superficial to the deep branch of the ulnar nerve. 3. This band, though constant, has not been well recognised

1. Three cases of Colles's fracture complicated by ulnar nerve paralysis are described. 2. Observation at operation in two cases and studies in a cadaver demonstrated a close relationship of the ulnar nerve to a fracture line at the lower end of the radius when the distal fragment is displaced dorsally and radially. It is surprising that this injury has not been observed and commented on previously

Twenty-two patients with ulnar nerve palsy at the elbow, confirmed by electromyography, were treated by a night splint which prevented flexion of the elbow beyond 60 degrees. The splint was worn all night regularly for at least six months. At a mean follow-up of 11.3 months, 17 patients had clinical and electromyographic assessment and five were contacted by telephone. There was improvement in the symptoms in every patient, including three who had failed to respond to surgical decompression. There was electromyographic improvement in 16 of the 17 patients re-examined at follow-up. The mean improvement in motor nerve conduction velocity was 6.5 m/s and in sensory nerve conduction velocity 9.5 m/s. The efficacy of this treatment suggests that nocturnal elbow flexion is an important cause of ulnar nerve lesions at the elbow

The purpose of this study was to identify aetiological that may determine prognosis in ulnar nerve lesions and to evaluate the role of non-operative treatment. 148 consecutive patients (100 male) with 170 electrophysiologically proven (by nerve conduction and electromyography) ulnar nerve lesions were identified from the departmental records. Patient details, symptoms, known aetiology and treatment profile were recorded. Each patient was then contacted by telephone and/or questionnaire 1–6 (median 3. 8) years following electrodiagnosis to determine clinical progress and outcome. In patients with sensory symptoms alone or non-progressive painless motor symptoms, non-operative treatment was commenced. This involved advice on activity modifications and protection with a tubipad bandage or night spin. 12. 9% and 8. 8% of lesions were due to injury and intra-operative pressure respectively. Other causes included deformity and/or synovitis from arthritis of the elbow, repeated pressure, medial epicondylitis and benign space occupying lesions. 58. 2% were idiopathic with no clinical aetiological factor. 22 patients had expected bilateral lesions whereas 15 had contralateral lesions that were not symptomatic. 89. 4% and 4. 7% of lesions occurred at the elbow and wrist respectively. 83% of patients received non-operative first line treatment. 21% of these required operative intervention following further clinical and electrophysiological assessment. Partial or complete recovery occurred in 80%, 67% and 52% of the intra-operative, idiopathic and injury cases respectively (P< 0. 05). We conclude lesions of the ulnar nerve predominate in males and can be treated non-operatively providing clinical and electrophysiological monitoring is possible. Bilaterality is not uncommon and should be excluded. Lesions due to injury have a worse prognosis than those caused by direct continuous or repeated pressure or where no aetiological factor exists

Introduction: Crossed K-wires provide a stable fixation for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children but are associated with a risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury (≈5%). There is reluctance by many surgeons to use the medial approach and crossed K-wires because of the liability of ulnar nerve injury. Aim: To assess the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury using the mini medial incision to reduce and stabilise displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children with crossed K-wires. Methods: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 26 children with closed Wilkins type IIB and III supracondylar fractures of the humerus, without vascular deficit, between January 1999 and April 2007. Mean age was 5.5 years (2.5–11 years). All were treated with open reduction and crossed K-wire fixation using a mini medial incision (5cm). Our modification is that we do not expose the fracture site or the ulnar nerve. It is a ‘feel’ rather than ‘see’ approach. The medial K-wire is placed under direct vision. All patients had early and late (4 months) post-operative ulnar nerve assessment. Patient outcome was assessed clinically using Flynn’s classification and radiologically using the metaphyseal-diaphyseal and humerocapitellar angles. Mean length of follow-up was 5 months (4–8 months). Results: There was no post-operative ulnar nerve injury. Clinically and radiologically there were 23 excellent and 3 good results. Conclusions: The mini medial incision is simple. It provides an excellent view for correct medial pin entry; hence it reduces the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Crossed K-wires provide a stable and reliable fixation

Introduction. Antegrade K wiring of the fifth metacarpal for treatment of displaced metacarpal neck fractures is a well recognized surgical procedure. However it is not without complication and injury to the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve has been reported in up to 15% of cases. Methods. We performed a cadaver study to determine the proximity of this nerve to the K wire insertion point at the base of the fifth metacarpal. K wires were percutaneously inserted under image intensification in sixteen cadaver hands and advanced into the head of the metacarpal. Wires were then cut and bent outside the skin. This was then followed by meticulous dissection of the ulnar nerve from proximal to distal. A number of measurements were taken to identify the distance from the insertion point of the K wire to each branch of this nerve. Results. The distance from the insertion point at the base of the fifth metacarpal to the dorsal component of the nerve averaged 5.6 mm (range 1mm–12mm) and from the volar component was 6 mm (range 1mm–10mm). The heel of the wire was touching the nerve in five cases. Conclusion. Our findings highlight the importance of making a small incision and bluntly dissecting to bone at the base of the fifth metacarpal to protect the nerve. In addition, use of a tissue protector is vital when drilling the 2mm hole at the base of the fifth metacarpal. We have confirmed that the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve is vulnerable during insertion of an antegrade intramedullary K wire for treatment of neck of fifth metacarpal fractures

1. A case of compression of the deep palmar branch of the ulnar nerve by an accessory abductor minimi digiti muscle is described. 2. The morphology of abnormal muscles in the hypothenar region is discussed. 3. Five previously reported cases of ulnar nerve compression at the wrist by an anomalous muscle are reviewed. 4. When symptoms are produced by an anomalous hypothenar muscle, they seem to be related to the anatomical site of the muscle and the presence of muscle hypertrophy. Occupational factors may be important in producing this hypertrophy

The purpose of this study was to identify aetiological factors that may determine prognosis in ulnar nerve lesions at the elbow and to evaluate the role of non-operative treatment. One hundred and thirty consecutive patients (92 male) with 152 electrophysiologically proven (by nerve conduction and electromyography) ulnar nerve lesions at the elbow were identified from the departmental records. Patient details, symptoms, known aetiology and treatment profile were recorded. Each patient was then contacted by telephone and / or questionnaire between one and six years after electrodiagnosis to determine clinical progress and outcome. In patients with sensory symptoms alone or non-progressive painless motor symptoms, non-operative treatment was commenced. This involved advice on activity modification and protection with a tubipad bandage or night splint with continued clinical and electrophysiological surveillance. Sixty-one percent of lesions were idiopathic with no clinical aetiological factor. Defined causes included deformity and/or synovitis from arthritis of the elbow (11.2%), injudicious intra-operative pressure (9.2%), injury/trauma (8.5%) repeated pressure (4.1%), medial epicondylitis (2.9%) and benign space occupying lesions (2.9%). Twenty-two patients had expected bilateral lesions whereas 15 had contralateral lesions that were not symptomatic. Eighty-three percent of patients received non-operative first line treatment. Twenty-one percent of these required operative intervention (simple decompression) following further clinical and electrophysiological assessment. Partial or complete recovery occurred in 88%, 80%, 67% and 52% of the arthritis, intra-operative, idiopathic and injury cases respectively (P< 0.05). We conclude lesions of the ulnar nerve at the elbow predominate in males and the majority can be treated non-operatively providing clinical and electrophysiological monitoring is possible. Bilaterality is not uncommon and should be excluded. Lesions due to injury have a worse prognosis than those caused by arthritis of the elbow, direct continuous or repeated pressure or where no aetiological factor exists

Aim: To assess the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury using the mini medial incision to reduce and stabilise displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children with crossed K-wires. Methods: We performed a retrospective evaluation of 26 children with closed Wilkins type IIB and III supracondylar fractures of the humerus, without vascular deficit, between January 1999 and April 2007. Mean age was 5.5 years (2.5–11 years). All were treated with open reduction and crossed K-wire fixation using a mini medial incision (5cm). Our modification is that we do not expose the fracture site or the ulnar nerve. It is a “feel” rather than “see” approach. The medial K-wire is placed under direct vision. All patients had early and late (4 months) post-operative ulnar nerve assessment. Patient outcome was assessed clinically using Flynn’s classification and radiologically using the metaphyseal-diaphyseal and humerocapitellar angles. Mean length of follow-up was 5 months (4–8 months). Results: There was no post-operative ulnar nerve injury. Clinically and radiologically there were 23 excellent and 3 good results. Conclusions: The mini medial incision is simple. It provides an excellent view for correct medial pin entry; hence it reduces the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Crossed K-wires provide a stable and reliable fixation