Unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis can be treated with either Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) or Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) and controversy remains as to which treatment is best.
Introduction. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with isolated medial osteoarthritis of the knee is nowadays a standard procedure with good results, especially with the minimally-invasive approach. However, the survival rate of the unicompartmental knee prostheses is inferior to that of total knee prostheses. Therefore, further studying of
Introduction. The options for the treatment of the young active patient with unicompartmental symptomatic osteoarthritis and pre-existing Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) deficiency are limited. Patients with ACL deficiency and end-stage medial compartment osteoarthritis are usually young and active. The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKA) is a well established treatment option in the management of symptomatic end-stage medial compartmental osteoarthritis, but a functionally intact ACL is a pre-requisite for its satisfactory outcome. If absent, high failure rates have been reported, primarily due to tibial loosening. Previously, we have reported results on a consecutive series of 15 such patients in whom the ACL was reconstructed and patients underwent a staged or simultaneous
Expectations of patients requiring knee arthroplasty surgery have become higher than in the past, with more strain being put on modern prostheses by fitter and younger patients. The objective of this study was to analyse the survivorship of primary knee arthroplasties at a minimum of ten years, with end points of revision and death. Patients who had a total (TKA) or unicompartmental (UKA) knee arthroplasty performed at a university teaching hospital were identified from the local arthroplasty database. Electronic and operative records were analysed to determine parameters including operative indication, subsequent revision surgery, and patient mortality. Results were collated and analysed using PASW software. A total of 1023 patients were recruited, with 566 (55%) female and 457 (45%) male. Minimum follow up was 10.1 years, with an average of 12.1 years (S.D 0.87). 64.9% of patients were alive at follow up, with an average age of 79.7 years (S.D 8.7). 92.8% were operated on for osteoarthritis (OA), 6.6% for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 0.6% for other indications. Kaplan–Meier analysis estimated survival of 94% (S.D 0.008) at eleven years, with no statistical difference found in survivorship of knees operated on for OA or RA. Similarly no statistical difference was found between survivorship of
Introduction. It is documented in the literature the very good results of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) when the standard accepted indications are followed. In our experience these indications can be extended to include post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA) with malunion secondary to tibial plateau fracture. We report our results concerning 15 UKAs in these particular situations. Material and methods. From 1985 to 2009, we performed 15 lateral UKAs in 15 patients for post traumatic OA secondary to malunion following a tibial plateau fracture. 7 were female and 8 male. The mean age of the patients at the time of the index procedure was 45±17 years and the mean delay from initial trauma was 5.4 years. The average follow-up was 108 months (range 12–265 months). Results. Twelve patients (12 over 15) were satisfied or very satisfied (80%). At follow up 2 had undergone a second operation: 1 osteosynthesis for patellar fracture and 1 conversion to TKA for progression of OA (at 13.7 years after UKA) and one remained unsatisfied. No revision surgery was necessary for wear or infection. The average femoral-tibial alignment was 4° valgus (range −6° to 8°). The mean IKS knee score was 95.3 points and mean IKS function score was 92 points. Discussion. Our results in the medium term are excellent. They support that the selection criteria for
To our knowledge in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) no study has specifically assessed the difference in outcome between matched gender groups. Previous unmatched gender studies have indicated more favourable results for women. Method. 2 groups of 40 of either sex was determined sufficient power for significant difference. These consecutively were matched with both the pre-operative clinical and radiological findings. Minimum follow up of 2 years, mean follow-up 5.9 years. Mean age at operation was 71 years. Results. In both groups, the mean IKS knee and function scores improved significantly (p< 0.001) post operatively. There were no significant differences were between the 2 groups. In both groups mean preoperative flexion was 130 degrees and remained unchanged at final follow-up. No significant differences in preoperative and postoperative axial alignment and in the number of radiolucent lines, between groups. With component size used there was a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the 2 groups. However the size of the femoral or tibial implant used was significantly related (p< 0.001) to patient height for both sexes. Radiolucent lines were more frequent on the tibial component, but were considered stable with none progressing. No revisions for component failure. 1 patient in each group developed lateral compartment degenerative change. Male group; one conversion to TKA for undiagnosed pain, three patients underwent reoperation without changing the implant. Female group; no implants were revised, and two patients required a reoperation. Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival rate of 93.46% (84.8; 100) for men and100% for women. The survival rate difference is not significant (p=0.28). Conclusion. These results suggest that there is no difference in outcome between sexes and that gender should not enter into the selection criteria for
Introduction. Minimally invasive implanted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) leads to excellent functional results. Due to the reduced intraoperative visibility it is difficult to remove extruded bone cement particles, as well as bone particles generated through the sawing. These loose third body particles are frequently found in minimally invasive implanted