Introduction. Metaphyseal cones with cemented stems are frequently used in revision total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). However, if the diaphysis has been previously violated (as in revision of a failed stemmed implant), the resultant sclerotic canal can impair cemented stem fixation, which is vital for cone ingrowth and long-term fixation. We report the outcomes of our novel solution to this problem, in which impaction grafting and a cemented stem in the diaphysis was combined with an uncemented metaphyseal cone for revision TKAs with severely compromised bone. Methods. A metaphyseal cone was combined with diaphyseal impaction grafting and cemented stems in a novel fashion for 35 revision TKAs. Mean age at revision TKA was 70 years, with 63% being male. Patients had a mean of 4 prior knee arthroplasty procedures. Indications for the revision with this construct were aseptic loosening (80%) and
Seven stiff total knee arthroplasties are presented
to illustrate the roles of: 1) manipulation under general anesthesia;
2) multiple concurrent diagnoses in addition to stiffness; 3) extra-articular
pathology; 4) pain as part of the stiffness triad (pain and limits
to flexion or extension); 5) component internal rotation; 6) multifactorial
etiology; and 7) surgical exposure in this challenging clinical
problem.
A soft-tissue defect over an infected total knee
replacement (TKR) presents a difficult technical problem that can
be treated with a gastrocnemius flap, which is rotated over the
defect during the first-stage of a revision procedure. This facilitates
wound healing and the safe introduction of a prosthesis at the second
stage. We describe the outcome at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years
(1 to 10) in 24 patients with an infected TKR who underwent this procedure.
A total of 22 (92%) eventually obtained a satisfactory result. The
mean Knee Society score improved from 53 pre-operatively to 103
at the latest follow-up (p <
0.001). The mean Western Ontario
and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index and Short-Form 12
score also improved significantly (p <
0.001). This form of treatment can be used reliably and safely to treat
many of these complex cases where control of infection, retention
of the components and acceptable functional recovery are the primary
goals. Cite this article: