Background:. The Lateral Intercondylar Ridge (LIR) gained notoriety with arthroscopic trans-tibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction where it was mistakenly used to position the ‘over the top’ guide resulting in graft malposition. With anatomic ACL reconstruction some surgeons use the same ridge to define the anterior margin of the ACL femoral insertion in order to guide graft placement. However there is debate about whether this ridge is a consistent and reliable anatomical structure. The aim of our study was to identify whether the LIR is a consistent anatomical structure and to define its relationship with the femoral ACL insertion. Methods:. In the first part, we studied 23 dry bone specimens. Using a digital microscribe, we created a 3D model of the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle to evaluate whether there was an identifiable bony ridge. In the second part, we studied 7 cadaveric specimens with soft tissues intact. The soft tissues were dissected to identify the femoral ACL insertion. A 3D reconstruction of the femoral insertion and the surface allowed us to define the relationship between the LIR and the ACL insertion. Results:. All specimens (23 dry bones; 7 intact soft tissues) had a defined ridge on the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle. The ridge extends from the apex point of the lateral intercondylar notch, where the posterior condyle meets the femoral shaft, and extends obliquely to the articular margin. The mean distance from the midpoint of the posterior condylar articular margin was 10.1 mm. The ridge was consistently located just anterior to the femoral ACL insertion. Conclusion:. This study shows that the LIR is a consistent anatomical structure that defines the anterior margin of the femoral ACL insertion. This supports its use as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction surgery. Abstract 28

Background:. The term ‘resident's ridge’ originated from trans-tibial ACL reconstruction where a bony ridge on the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle was mistakenly thought to represent the posterior articular margin of the condyle. This was then mistakenly used to position the ‘over the top’ guide resulting in graft malposition. With anatomical anteromedial ACL reconstruction some surgeons use the same ridge to define the anterior margin of the ACL femoral insertion in order to guide graft placement. However there is debate about whether this ridge is a consistent and reliable anatomical structure. There are no anatomical studies that define the features of the ‘resident's ridge’. Therefore, our aim was to identify whether the ‘resident's ridge’ is a consistent anatomical structure in non-operated human cadaveric femoral specimens. Methods:. Using a digital microscribe, we mapped the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle in cadaveric human femora denuded of soft tissue. This technique creates an exact 3D model of surfaces and from this we evaluated whether there was an identifiable bony ‘residents ridge’. 23 cadaveric specimens were used. Results:. All 23 specimens had a defined identifiable ridge on the medial surface of the lateral femoral condyle. When viewed anatomically, the proximal extent of the ridge lies at the superior junction of the articular margin and the femoral shaft. From this point, the ridge forms an oblique line travelling proximal-to-distal and anterior-to-posterior to a point approximately 30–40% anterior to the posterior articular margin. The ridge therefore divides the medial surface into anterior 2/3. rd. and posterior 1/3. rd. when viewed anatomically. Conclusion:. This study shows that the “resident's ridge” is a consistent anatomical structure that defines the anterior margin of the ACL insertion. This therefore supports its use as a landmark for femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction surgery

The Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) is the main restraining force against lateral patellar displacement. It is often disrupted following patellar subluxation or dislocation. MPFL reconstruction is frequently performed when conservative management fails and the patient experiences recurrent patellar dislocation. Various MPFL reconstruction procedures have been described in the literature and reported outcomes are encouraging. This study analyses the radiographic outcomes following MPFL reconstruction. From January 2006 to January 2011, 76 consecutive patients (80 knees) with patellar recurrent dislocation underwent medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in three large teaching hospitals. Mean follow-up was 31.8 months (range, 13–72). Semitendinosus and gracilis autografts were used for the reconstruction and all procedures were carried out by the senior authors (WL, BR, CW, MB). Plain radiographs (Anteroposterior (AP), Lateral and Skyline) performed preoperatively and postoperatively were used to compare the sulcus angle, congruence angle, lateral patellofemoral angle, trochlear dysplasia (Dejour classification), trochlear boss height and patellar height (Caton-Deschamps ratio). Plain radiographs (Lateral) performed postoperatively were used to evaluate the femoral tunnel placement used for MPFL reconstruction. The sulcus angle improved from 143.2° (122.9–157.7) to 139.3° (115.7–154.6) and the congruence angle improved from 26.7° (−17.5–82.6) to 0.26° (−35.3–7.8). The lateral patellofemoral angle was 7.99° (3.2–19.2) preoperatively and 9.02° (3.2–18.2) postoperatively. The Caton-Deschamps ratio was 1.2 (1.0–1.5) preoperatively and 1.0 (0.8–1.1) postoperatively. Using the Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia, all preoperative radiographs were considered to be grade C or D and all postoperative radiographs were considered to be grade A or B. Trochlear boss height was 5.9mm (1.8–11.6) preoperatively and 4.7mm (1.6–6.9) postoperatively. 59% of the femoral tunnels were considered to be in a good position on postoperative radiographs. This study displayed a significant improvement in postoperative radiographic parameters, demonstrating the importance of anatomic restoration when performing MPFL reconstruction

Summary Statement. ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon autograft was quantitatively evaluated using a robotic testing system. Biomechanical results on joint stability and graft function support its use as an alternative to the hamstrings. Introduction. Recently, a number of surgeons have chosen the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft as an alternative autograft over the hamstrings tendon for ACL reconstruction because its bone-to-bone healing on one side, large size, and preservation of lateral and rotatory knee function could lead to fewer post-operative complications. However, there have been little or no biomechanical studies that quantitatively evaluate knee function after reconstruction using a QT autograft. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the function of a reconstructed knee with a QT autograft and compare the results with a quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis (QSTG) tendon autograft on the same knee. Methods. Ten human cadaveric knees (57.4 ± 4.2 years of age) were tested using a robotic/UFS testing system in 4 knee states: intact, ACL-deficient, and after ACL reconstruction with both QT and QSTG autografts. Reconstructions were performed in randomised order using posterolateral femoral tunnel placement. The knee kinematics in each state were measured at 5 flexion angles (full extension, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90°) under 3 externally applied loading conditions: (1) 134 N anterior tibial load (ATL), (2) 134 N ATL with 200 N axial compression, and combined rotatory (CR) load of 10 Nm valgus and 5 Nm internal tibial torque (at 15° and 30°). Based on the established procedure, knee kinematics and in-situ forces were obtained using the principle of superposition. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare anterior tibial translation (ATT) and in-situ forces between the knee states at each flexion angle, with a Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. Results. Under the ATL, the ATT was found to be restored to within 1.1 mm of the intact knee for both reconstructions (P > 0.05). The in-situ forces in the grafts were also not significantly different from those in the intact ACL except in deep flexion (P < 0.05 at 90° for both grafts). With added axial compression, both reconstructions could still restore the ATT to within 2.4 mm of the intact joint at all flexion angles, and the in-situ forces in both grafts were within 25 N of the intact ACL at 15°, 30°, and 60° (P > 0.05). Under the CR load, knee kinematics and in-situ forces in the grafts were not significantly different from the intact ACL at any tested angle (P > 0.05). Further, no significant differences could be detected between the reconstructions under any experimental condition (P > 0.05). Discussion/Conclusion. ACL reconstruction with a QT autograft was found to restore knee function close to levels of the intact knee and similar to those reconstructed with a QSTG autograft. These results support clinical findings suggesting the QT autograft as a viable alternative for ACL reconstruction