Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 40 - 40
1 Jan 2019
Choudhury A Ejindu V Hing C
Full Access

A risk factor for patellofemoral instability is trochlear dysplasia. Trochleoplasty is a surgical procedure used to reshape the trochlear groove to improve patellar stability. This study seeks to compare pre-op MRI measurements and post operative MRI measurements for patients who have undergone trochleoplasty in correlation with their clinical outcomes scores. Data was collected from a database of patients known to have trochlear dysplasia who underwent trochleoplasty. Radiological Data was collected pre-op and subsequent post op MRI data collected included TT-TG, Patella Tilt, IS, sulcus angle. Data score sheets pre-op and post op trochleoplasty completed by patients were also collected. 10 patients had pre and post op MRI's documented. 80%(8/10) females and 20%(2/10) males, average age of 30 years old (range 23 – 32 years old). Average MRI pre-op scores: IS ratio: 1.2, Patella tilt: 24.14, sulcus angle 160.13, and TT-TG distance of 16.94. 1 year average MRI post-op scores: IS ratio: 1.28, Patella tilt 15.56, sulcus angle 148.66 and TT-TG distance 16.78. 1 year post op Kujala and Norwich instability scores patient reported improved stability, function and confidence post op compared to pre-op. Subjective and objective scores reflected an improvement of stability. MRI demonstrated a deeper trochlear groove post-operatively which should provide resistance against lateral patella movement and patellar dislocations. TT-TG pre and post op remained constant. Pre op and post op Kujala scores reflected improved function. The Norwich instability scores pre and post op reflected satisfaction of treatment. There are not a lot of studies published on trochleoplasty. Based on this study it is clear that patients with patellofemoral instability with severe trochlear dysplasia will benefit from trochleoplasty. The sample size of the data analysis was only 10. However it reflected that function 1 year post procedure remained stable


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 63 - 63
1 Dec 2020
Debnath A Dalal S Setia P Guro R Kotwal RS Chandratreya AP
Full Access

Introduction. Recurrent patellar dislocation is often reported in bilateral knees in young active individuals. The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) tear is the attributable cause behind many of them and warrants reconstruction of the ligament to stabilize the patellofemoral joint. Besides, trochleoplasty and Fulkerson's osteotomy are some other procedures that are performed to treat this problem. This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with single-stage bilateral realignment procedures vs staged procedures. Methods. It was a retrospective matched cohort study with prospectively collected data. A total of 36 patients (mean age-26.9 years, range 13 years to 47 years) with recurrent patellar dislocations, who underwent a surgical correction in both the knees, were divided into two matched groups (age, sex, follow-up, and type of procedure). Among them, 18 patients had surgeries in one knee done at least six months later than the other knee. The remaining 18 patients had surgical interventions for both knees done in a single stage. Lysholm, Kujala, Tegner, and subjective knee scores of both groups were compared and analyzed. The rate of complications and return to the theatre were noted in both groups. Results. With a mean follow-up of 7.3 years (2.0 years to 12.3 years), there was a significant improvement in PROMS observed in both the groups (p<0.05). No significant difference could be found between the two groups in terms of the Lysholm, Kujala, and subjective knee scores (p> 0.05). The rate of complication and the re-operation rate was comparable in both the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion. The outcomes of staged vs simultaneous surgeries for bilateral patellofemoral instability are comparable. Our results indicate that simultaneous bilateral surgical correction is safe. This can potentially be an option to reduce the surgical cost and perioperative morbidity. However, careful selection of cases, choice of the patient, and the scope of rehabilitation facilities are some of the other factors that should be considered