The aim was to examine the descriptive epidemiology of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis, with respect to geography and time. We extracted all children with a diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis from the Clinical Practice Research Database between 1990 and 2014 (24 years). CPRD is the world's largest database of primary care, which encompasses 8% of the UK population. CPRD was linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, and a validation algorithm applied to maximise sensitivity and specificity of the cases finding methodology. Poisson confidence intervals were calculated, and poison regression used. 596 cases of SCFE were identified. The internal validation algorithm supported a SCFE diagnosis in 88% cases. The age and sex distribution of cases mirrored that in the literature, offering external validity to the cases identified. There was no significant change in the incidence of SCFE over the 24-year study period, with the overall incidence being 4.8 cases per 100,00 0–16 year olds. There was no significant geographic variation in SCFE within the UK. There was a positive association with rising socioeconomic deprivation (p<0.01). There was no seasonal variation in presentation. This study found no evidence to support the common belief that SCFE incidence is increasing, and for the first time demonstrated an association with socioeconomic deprivation. The results are important for considering the feasibility of intervention studies, and offer insights into the disease aetiology.
Torus fractures of the distal radius are the most common fractures in children. The NICE non-complex fracture guidelines recently concluded that bandaging was probably the optimal treatment for these injuries. However, across the UK current treatment varies widely due to a lack of evidence underpinning the guidelines. The Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial evaluates the effect of a soft bandage and immediate discharge compared with rigid immobilization. FORCE is a multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled equivalence trial. The primary outcome is the Wong-Baker FACES pain score at three days after randomization and the primary analysis of this outcome will use a multivariate linear regression model to compare the two groups. Secondary outcomes are measured at one and seven days, and three and six-weeks post-randomization and include the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity limb score, EuroQoL EQ-5D-Y, analgesia use, school absence, complications, and healthcare resource use. The planned statistical and health economic analyses for this trial are described here. The FORCE trial protocol has been published separately.Aims
Methods
Distal femoral physeal fractures in children have a high incidence of physeal arrest, occurring in a mean of 40% of cases. The underlying nature of the distal femoral physis may be the primary cause, but other factors have been postulated to contribute to the formation of a physeal bar. The purpose of this study was to assess the significance of contributing factors to physeal bar formation, in particular the use of percutaneous pins across the physis. We reviewed 55 patients with a median age of ten years (3 to 13), who had sustained displaced distal femoral physeal fractures. Most (40 of 55) were treated with percutaneous pinning after reduction, four were treated with screws and 11 with plaster. A total of 40 patients were assessed clinically and radiologically after skeletal maturity or at the time of formation of a bar. The remaining 15 were followed up for a minimum of two years. Formation of a physeal bar occurred in 12 (21.8%) patients, with the rate rising to 30.6% in patients with high-energy injuries compared with 5.3% in those with low-energy injuries. There was a significant trend for physeal arrest according to increasing severity using the Salter-Harris classification. Percutaneous smooth pins across the physis were not statistically associated with growth arrest.
