Background. Inpatient physiotherapy is routinely provided after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery to enhance recovery prior to discharge. However, the provision of outpatient physiotherapy is variable in the UK, and the longer-term benefits of outpatient physiotherapy are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of group-based outpatient physiotherapy after TKR. Methods. Patients listed for primary TKR were recruited prior to surgery. Patients who decided not to participate were asked about their reasons for non-participation. Patients were randomised to attend a newly developed post-operative physiotherapy class plus usual care or usual care alone. Patients allocated to the intervention group were invited to attend a weekly one-hour physiotherapy class, starting at 6 weeks after surgery and running over 6 consecutive weeks. The group classes were run by two physiotherapists within an outpatient gym, and involved task-orientated and individualised exercises. Classes ran on a rolling system, allowing new patients to join each week. Participants completed an evaluation questionnaire after the final class. Outcomes assessment was by questionnaire prior to surgery and 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. Outcomes related to function, pain, balance, self-efficacy, participation, quality of life and resource use. Results. 46/124 patients consented to participate (37% recruitment rate). Frequent reasons for non-participation were related to travelling distance, transportation, and time commitments. 17/23 patients randomised to the intervention group attended the exercise classes. Most (15) patients were very satisfied with the range of exercises on offer. The task-orientated and individual exercises were given average usefulness ratings of 9.6/10 and 9.5/10, respectively. Retention of participants was acceptable; 2 patients were withdrawn from the intervention group and 2 patients from the usual care group. Questionnaire return rates were high in the intervention group (91% at 6 months post-operative) but lower in the usual care group (65% at 6 months post-operative). Conclusion. This study highlights the importance of conducting feasibility work for a RCT. Collecting data on reasons for non-participation provided valuable information on barriers to participation in a trial with this population. The intervention was well attended, and feedback was positive. Questionnaire completion was lower in the usual care group, highlighting the need for additional strategies to improve data collection. Findings from this feasibility study have informed the design of a multi-centre RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a group-based outpatient physiotherapy intervention following TKR

Telemedicine is the delivery of healthcare from a remote location using integrated computer/communication technology. This systematic review aims to explore evidence for telemedicine in orthopaedics to determine its advantages, validity, effectiveness and utilisation particularly during our current pandemic where patient contact is limited. Databases of PubMed, Scopus and CINHAL were systematically searched and articles were included if they involved any form of telephone or video consultation in an orthopaedic population. Findings were synthesised into four themes: patient/clinician satisfaction, accuracy and validity of examination, safety and patient outcomes and cost effectiveness. Quality assessment was undertaken using Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. Twenty studies were included consisting of nine RCTs across numerous orthopaedic subspecialties including fracture care, elective orthopaedics and oncology. Studies revealed high patient satisfaction with telemedicine for convenience, less waiting and travelling time. Telemedicine was cost effective particularly if patients had to travel long distances, required hospital transport or time off work. No clinically significant differences were found in patient examination nor measurement of patient reported outcome measures. Telemedicine was reported to be a safe method of consultation. However, studies were of variable methodological quality with selection bias. In conclusion, evidence suggests that telemedicine in orthopaedics can be safe, cost effective, valid in clinical assessment with high patient/clinician satisfaction. Further work with high quality RCTs is required to elucidate long term outcomes. This systematic review presents up-to-date evidence on the use of telemedicine and provides data for organisations considering its use in the current COVID-19 pandemic and beyond