Introduction. In daily clinical practice, progression of spinal fusion is typically monitored during clinical follow-up using conventional radiography and Computed Tomography scans. However, recent research has demonstrated the potential of implant load monitoring to assess posterolateral spinal fusion in an in-vivo sheep model. The question arises to whether such a strain sensing system could be used to monitor bone fusion following lumbar interbody fusion surgery, where the intervertebral space is supported by a cage. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test human cadaveric lumbar spines in two states: after a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure combined with a pedicle-screw-rod-construct (PSR) and subsequently after simulating bone fusion. The study hypothesized that the load on the posterior instrumentation decreases as the segment stiffens due to simulated fusion. Method. A TLIF procedure with PSR was performed on eight human cadaveric spines at level L4-L5. Strain sensors were attached bilaterally to the rods to derive implant load changes during unconstrained flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) loads up to ±7.5Nm. The specimens were retested after simulating bone fusion between vertebrae L4-L5. In addition, the range of motion (ROM) was measured during each loading mode. Result. The ROM decreased in the simulated bone fusion state in all loading directions (p≤0.002). In both states, the measured strain on the posterior instrumentation was highest during LB motion. Furthermore, the sensors detected a significant decrease in the load induced rod strain (p≤0.002) between TLIF+PSR and simulated bone fusion state in LB. Conclusion. Implant load measured via rod strain sensors can be used to monitor the progression of fusion after a TLIF procedure when measured during LB of the lumbar spine. However, further research is needed to investigate the influence of daily loading scenarios expected in-vivo on the overall change in implant load

Introduction and Objective. Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF, TLIF) represent the most popular techniques in performing an interbody fusion amongst spine surgeons. Pseudarthrosis, cage migration, subsidence or infection can occur, with subsequent failed surgery, persistent pain and patient’ bad quality of life. The goal of revision fusion surgery is to correct any previous technical errors avoiding surgical complications. The most safe and effective way is to choose a naive approach to the disc. Therefore, the anterior approach represents a suitable technique as a salvage operation. The aim of this study is to underline the technical advantages of the anterior retroperitoneal approach as a salvage procedure in failed PLIF/TLIF analyzing a series of 32 consecutive patients. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients’ data in patients who underwent ALIF as a salvage procedure after failed PLIF/TLIF between April 2014 to December 2019. We recorded all peri-operative data. In all patients the index level was exposed with a minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach. Results. Thirty-two patients (average age: 46.4 years, median age 46.5, ranging from 21 to 74 years hold- 16 male and 16 female) underwent salvage ALIF procedure after failed PLIF/TLIF were included in the study. A minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine was performed in all patients. In 6 cases (18.7%) (2 infection and 4 pseudarthrosis after stand-alone IF) only anterior revision surgery was performed. A posterior approach was necessary in 26 cases (81.3%). In most of cases (26/32, 81%) the posterior instrumentation was overpowered by the anterior cage without a previous revision. Three (9%) intraoperative minor complications after anterior approach were recorded: 1 dural tear, 1 ALIF cage subsidence and 1 small peritoneal tear. None vascular injuries occurred. Most of patients (90.6%) experienced an improvement of their clinical condition and at the last follow-up no mechanical complication occurred. Conclusions. According to our results, we can suggest that a favourable clinical outcome can firstly depend from technical reasons an then from radiological results. The removal of the mobilized cage, the accurate endplate and disc space preparation and the cage implant eliminate the primary source of pain reducing significantly the axial pain, helping to realise an optimal bony surface for fusion and enhancing primary stability. The powerful disc distraction given by the anterior approach allows inserting large and lordotic cages improving the optimal segmental lordosis restoration

Background and Aims. Transforaminal epidurals (TFEs) have been widely used as a treatment for lumbar radicular pain since its introduction by Krempen and Smith in 1974. 1. Originally used as a diagnostic tool, it is now becoming increasingly recognised as a definitive treatment. 2. This study investigates the use of TFEs by a single surgeon over 4 years. We hoped that the study would add to our understanding and the discussion of the actual benefit of therapeutic steroid and local anaesthetic injections by this route. 3. . Methods and Results. A total of 181 patients were identified. At injection 10mls 0.25% Marcaine and 40mg Depomedrone was injected under fluoroscopic guidance. Clinic notes and MRI reports for all patients were reviewed. Of the 176 patients included in the study, 127 showed a symptomatic improvement. Of these patients, 59 proceeded to surgical decompression. For 50 patients, TFE was the definitive treatment. 13 patients were offered but declined surgery. 5 patients were too frail to proceed to surgery. 49 patients showed no symptomatic improvement. Of this group, 34 were deemed unsuitable for surgical intervention. 15 patients did proceed to surgery. Conclusions and Discussion. These results are comparable to other similar case series. Vad et al. 3. demonstrated that 78% of patients studied were satisfied with the outcome of TFE. Riew et al. 2. showed that 53% of their study group avoided surgery due to positive long term effect of TFE. The operative notes of the 15 patients who proceeded to surgery despite a negative TFE outcome are being reviewed and will be presented. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. None

With the increase in the elderly population, there is a dramatic increase in the number of spinal fusions. Spinal fusion is usually performed in cases of primary instability. However it is also performed to prevent iatrogenic instability created during surgical treatment of spinal stenosis in most cases. In literature, up to 75% of adjacent segment disease (ASD) can be seen according to the follow-up time. 1. Although ASD manifests itself with pathologies such as instability, foraminal stenosis, disc herniation or central stenosis. 1,2. There are several reports in the literature regarding lumbar percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic interventions for lumbar foraminal stenosis or disc herniations. However, to the best our knowledge, there is no report about the treatment of central stenosis in ASD. In this study, we aimed to investigate the short-term results of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompressive laminotomy (UBEDL) technique in ASD cases with symptomatic central or lateral recess stenosis. The number of patients participating in the prospective study was 8. The mean follow-up was 6.9 (ranged 6 to 11) months. The mean age of the patients was 68 (5m, 3F). The development of ASD time after fusion was 30.6 months(ranged 19 to 42). Mean fused segments were 3 (ranged 2 to 8). Preoperative instability was present in 2 of the patients which was proven by dynamic lumbar x-rays. Preoperative mean VAS-back score was 7.8, VAS Leg score was 5.6. The preoperative mean JOA (Japanese Orthopaedic Association) score was 11.25. At 6th month follow-up, the mean VAS back score of the patients was 1, and the VAS leg score was 0.5. This improvement was statistically significant (p = 0.11 and 0.016, respectively). The mean JOA score at the 6th month was 22.6 and it was also statistically significant comparing preoperative JOA score(p = 0.011). The preoperative mean dural sac area measured in MR was 0.50 cm2, and it was measured as 2.1 cm. 2. at po 6 months.(p = 0.012). There was no progress in any patient's instability during follow-up. In orthopedic surgery, when implant related problems develop in any region of body (pseudoarthrosis, infection, adjacent fracture, etc.), it is generally treated by using more implants in its final operation. This approach is also widely used in spinal surgery. 3. However, it carries more risk in terms of devoloping ASD, infection or another complications. In the literature, endoscopic procedures have almost always been used in the treatment of ventral pathologies which constitute only 10%. In ASD, disease devolops as characterized by wide facet joint arthrosis and hypertrophied ligamentum flavum in the cranial segment and it is mostly presented both lateral recess and santal stenosis symptoms (39%). In this study, we found that UBEDL provides successful results in the treatment of patients without no more muscle and ligament damage in ASD cases with spinal stenosis. One of the most important advantages of UBE is its ability to access both ventral and dorsal pathologies by minimally invasive endoscopic aproach. I think endoscopic decompression also plays an important role in the absence of additional instability at postoperatively in patients. UBE which has already been described in the literature given successful results in most of the spinal degenerative diseases besides it can also be used in the treatment of ASD. Studies with longer follow-up and higher patient numbers will provide more accurate results

Introduction. Augmentation of spinal fusion using bone grafts is largely mediated by the osteoinductive potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) that reside in cancellous bone. Iliac crest (IC) is a common autograft, but its use presents an increased risk for donor-site pain, morbidity and infection. Degenerative facet joints (FJ) harvested during facetectomy might servce as alternative local grafts. In this study, we conducted an intra-individual comparison of the osteogenic potential of MSC from both sources. Methods. IC and degenerative FJ were harvested from 8 consecutive patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery for spinal stenosis. MSC were isolated by collagenase digestion, selected by plastic adherence and minimally expanded for downstream assays. Clonogenic and osteogenic potential was evaluated by colony formation assays in control and osteogenic culture medium. Osteogenic properties, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP) induction, matrix mineralization and type I collagen mRNA and protein expression were characterized using quantitative histochemical staining and reverse transcription PCR. Spontaneous adipogenesis was analysed by adipocyte enumeration and gene expression analysis of adipogenic markers. Results. Average colony-forming efficiency in osteogenic medium was equal between IC (38±12%) and FJ (36±11%). Osteogenic potential at the clonal level was 55±26 and 68±17% for IC and FJ MSC, respectively. Clonogenic and osteogenic potential were significantly negatively associated with donor age. Osteogenic differentiation led to significant induction of ALP activity in IC (6-fold) and FJ (8-fold) MSC. Matrix mineralization quantified by Alizarin red staining was increased by osteogenic differentiation, yet similar between both MSC sources. Protein expression of type I collagen was enhanced during osteogenesis and significantly greater in IC MSC. Correspondingly, COL1A2 mRNA expression was higher in osteogenically differentiated MSC from IC. Adipocyte numbers showed significant differences between IC (63±60) and FJ (18±15) MSC under osteogenic conditions. Negative (GREM1) and positive (FABP4) adipogenic markers were not differentially expressed between sources. Conclusion. MSC from IC and degenerative FJ largely display similar clonogenic and osteogenic properties in vitro. Differences at the molecular level are not likely to impair the osteoinductive capacity of FJ MSC. Facetectomy samples are viable bone autografts for intervertebral spinal fusion