Decreasing tissue damage and recovery time, while improving quality of life have been the focus of many approaches to total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we compared two approaches, a tissue-sparing superior capsulotomy percutaneously assisted approach (SP) and the traditional posterior approach (TR), to address the question of whether the novel technique reduces tissue damage. The secondary aim of this study focused on the measurement technologies utilized to quantify the damage resulting from either SP or TR. Image J, BioQuant, and cellSens were the image analysis programs employed. Statistical validation and comparisons of results between all platforms were performed. Both hips of freshly frozen cadaveric specimens (n = 8) were surgically prepared for THA with random procedure performed on left or right hip. All selected specimens had no prior implantation of devices to ensure all observed muscle damage occurred from the surgical technique. Surgeons resected tissue and performed necessary procedural steps up to device implantation. No devices were implanted during the study, as the aim was to quantify the damage caused by the incision and resection. After completion of the surgery, an independent surgeon (IS), who was blinded as to which method was performed on the specimen, excised the muscles and inspected areas of interest Assessment of the tissue damage was executed using a midsubstance cross-sectional area technique, validated by prior studies. High-resolution images of demarcated muscles were used for quantitative analysis. Three blinded independent reviewers quantified damaged tissue. The results were used to detect if statistically significant differences were present between the two methods. Furthermore, an independent reviewer using SPSS statistical software also assessed inter-program and inter-rater reliability.Introduction
Methods
High complication rates and poor outcomes have been widely reported in patients undergoing revision of large head metal-on-metal arthroplasty. A previous study from our centre showed high rates of dislocation, nerve injury, early cup loosening and pseudotumor recurrence. After noting these issues, we implemented the following changes in surgical protocol in all large head MOM revisions: One: Use of highly porous shells in all cases. Two: Use of largest femoral head possible. Three: Low threshold for use of dual mobility and constrained liners when abductors affected or absent posterior capsule. Four: Use of ceramic head with titanium sleeve in all cases. Five: Partial resection of pseudotumor adjacent to sciatic and femoral nerves. The purpose of the present study is to compare the new surgical protocol above to our previously reported early complications in this group of patients We specifically looked at (1) complications including reoperations, (2) radiologic outcomes, and (3) functional outcomes. Complication rates after (Group 1), and before (Group 2) modified surgical protocol were compared using Chi-square test, assuming statistical significance p < 0 .05. Major complications occurred in 4 (8.3%) of 48 patients who had modified surgical technique, compared to 12 (38%) of 32 revisions prior to modification (p < 0 .05). Two hips of 48 (4.17%) endured dislocations in Group 1, compared to 9 of 32 (28%) in Group 2 (p < 0 .05). Four patients of 48 had repeat revision in Group 1: 2 for recurrence of pseudotumor, 1 for dislocation, and 1 for infection, compared to 6 patients who had 7 repeat revisions of 32 patients in Group 2: 3 for acetabular loosening, 3 for dislocation, and 1 for recurrence of pseudotumor (p=0.1). None of 48 revisions in Group 1 had acetabular loosening, compared to 4 of 32 in Group 2 (p=0.02). Two patients had nerve injury in Group 2, compared to none in Group 1 (p=0.16). The mean WOMAC pain score was 87.1 of 100 and the function score was 88.4 of 100 in Group 1, compared to a mean WOMAC pain score of 78 of 100 (p=0.6) and a function score of 83 of 100 in Group 2 (p=0.8). Modification of the surgical techniques described in the introduction has resulted in a significant decrease in complications in revision of large head MOM total hips. We continue to use this protocol and recommend it for these difficult cases.
The optimal goal for cup positioning in hip arthroplasty in individual patients is affected by many factors including surgical exposure, femoral anteversion, and pelvic tilt. Some navigation systems ignore pelvic tilt and are based strictly on the anterior pelvic plane while others incorporate pelvic tilt, as measured in the supine position on the operating table. Neither approach incorporates knowledge of preoperative spino-pelvic flexibility or predictions of the change in spino-pelvic attitude or flexibility following surgery. While prior studies have shown little change in pelvic tilt postoperatively, one recent study based on gait analysis, suggested that changes in pelvic tilt are not predictable. The current study aims to assess changes in pelvic tilt following surgery. 24 patients, 12 male and 12 female, underwent THA using CT-based navigation. Each patient had supine and standing AP pelvis radiographs both pre-operatively and at a minimum of 1 year post-operatively. Pelvic tilt on each radiograph was measured using a noncommercial two-dimensional/three-dimensional matching application. (HipMatch; Institut for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, Bern, Switzerland). This software application uses a fully auto- mated registration procedure that can match the three- dimensional model of the preoperative CT with the projected pelvis on a postoperative radiograph. This method has been validated and for measurement of cup position for example showed a mean accuracy of 1.7° +/− 1.7° (rang-4.6° to 5.5°) in the coronal plane and 0.9° +/− 2.8° (rang-5.2° to 5.7°) in the sagittal plane compared with postoperative CT measurements. The software showed a good consistency with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inclination of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93 to 0.98) and for anteversion of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91 to 0.98). A good reproducibility and reliability for both inclination and anteversion was found with an ICC ranging from 0.95 to 0.99. No systematic errors in accuracy were detected with the Bland- Altman analysis. Using the HipMatch 2D/3D application, changes in pelvic tilt before and after surgery were assess in both the supine and standing positions.Introduction
Methods
High complication rates and poor outcomes have been widely reported in patients undergoing revision of large head metal-on-metal arthroplasty. A previous study from our center showed high rates of dislocation, nerve injury, early cup loosening and pseudotumor recurrence. After noting these issues, we implemented the following changes in surgical protocol in all large head MOM revisions: 1. Use of highly porous shells in all cases 2. Use of largest femoral head possible 3. Low threshold for use of dual mobility and constrained liners when abductors affected or absent posterior capsule 4. Use of ceramic head with titanium sleeve in all cases 5. Partial resection of pseudotumor adjacent to sciatic and femoral nerves. The purpose of the present study is to compare the new surgical protocol above to our previously reported early complications in this group of patients We specifically looked at (1) complications including reoperations; (2) radiologic outcomes; and (3) functional outcomes. Complication rates after (Group 1), and before (Group 2) modified surgical protocol were compared using Chi-square test, assuming statistical significance p<0.05.Background
Questions/purposes
This study assesses the incidence of noise in ceramic on ceramic (COC) bearings compared to metal on polyethylene (MOP) bearings. Noise after MOP implants has rarely been studied and they never been linked to squeaking. We have developed a noise characterising hip questionnaire and sent it along with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) to 1000 patients; 509 respondents, 282 COC and 227 MOP; median age 63.7 (range 45–92), median follow up 2.9 years (range 6–156 months). 47 (17%) of the COC patients reported noise compared to 19 (8%) of the MOP patients (P=0.048). 9 COC and 4 MOP patients reported their hip noise as squeaking. We found the incidence of squeaking in the COC hips to be 3.2% compared to 1.8% in the MOP hips. Overall, 27% patients with noise reported avoiding recreational activities because of it and patient's with noisy hips scored on average 4 points less in the OHS (COC: P=0.04 and MOP: P =0.007). This is the first study to report squeaking from MOP hip replacements. We therefore believe the squeaking hip phenomenon is not exclusive to hard bearings. Surprisingly, only a small proportion of patients described nose from their as a ‘squeak’. Noisy hip implants may have social implications, and patients should be aware of this. We have shown a relationship between noise and a lower OHS. However, longer follow-up and further study is needed to link noise to a poorly functioning implant.
A consecutive series of patients who underwent 113 total hip arthroplasty (THA) with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (63 one-, 50 two-incision cases) were studied. One-incision THA was performed with a posterolateral approach. For the two-incision, the first incision for cup insertion was made over the anterolateral side of the hip and intermuscular dissection was performed between the gluteus medius and the tensor fascia lata. The second incision for stem insertion was made on the posterolateral side along the fiber of the gluteus maximus and intermuscular dissection was made between the gluteus medius and the piriformis. The average length of the skin incision and standard deviation (SD) in the one- and two-incision group was 7.5 ± 0.54 cm and 12.1 ± 0.93 cm (p <
0.001). Average surgical time for the two groups (and SD) was 52 ± 8.5 minutes and 70 ± 10.2 minutes (p = 0.042) in the one and two incision groups respectively. Fluoroscopy was used in the two-incision group for an average 6.0 ± 5.3 seconds. In the one-incision group, the average time was 1.3 ± 2.1 seconds. The patients in the one-incision group could walk on crutches at postoperative 3.7 days on average, and in the two-incision group at 1.6 days on average (p = 0.000). In the one-incision group, patients used crutches for 6 weeks on average, and in the two-incision group, patients used crutches for 3 weeks on average (p = 0.042). Complications that developed within 1 month of surgery in the one-incision group were: 1 case of DVT, 1 case of intra-operative fracture and 1 case of dislocation; for the two incision group there were: 1 case of DVT, 1 case of intra-operative fracture and 1 case of femoral nerve entrapment. Before surgery, the HHS for the one-incision group was 49.8 points, and for the two-incision group it was 49.6 points (p >
0.05). At the time of the follow up review conducted postoperatively 1 year, the average HHS was not significantly different (p >
0.05). However, the average function score in HSS for the two-incision group was superior to that of the one-incision group (p = 0.045). Preoperative WOMAC scores were not different for the two groups (68.7 in one-incision group and 70.9 in two-incision group, respectively, p >
0.05). However, the average WOMAC score for the two-incision group was better, especially for the function score (p = 0.001). The other hip functions, common in oriental persons, were also better in the two-incision group compared to the one-incision group. On the radiographs, the location of the femoral prosthesis inserted in the medullary cavity was usually central in both groups; only 4 cases showed varus in the one-incision group and 2 cases in the two-incision group. The opening angle of the acetabular component was 38.1° in the one-incision group and 39.2° in the two-incision group (p >
0.05). The anteversion of the acetabular component was 21.0° in the one-incision group and 22.2° in two-incision group (p >
0.05). As compared with one-incision MIS-THA, two-incision MIS-THA, although it is a more difficult procedure, produces superior results, recovery was faster and patient satisfaction was higher due to early rehabilitation and reduced soft tissue damage without increasing the complication frequency.
Subsidence of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with poor initial fixation and subsequent risk of aspectic loosening. There is limited literature on how subsidence of cementless, proximally porous coated, tapered wedge femoral stems impacts the patient clinically. The aim of our study was to assess whether subsidence with these stems is associated with a decline in clinical function. A review of a prospectively collected database of THAs performed by a single surgeon at one institution using two cementless, tapered wedge stem designs from January 2006 to June 2010 was performed. Radiographic analysis using Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) was used to identify patients with greater than 1.5 mm of subsidence, and to document osseointegration. Preoperative and postoperative pain and Harris hip scores were recorded; and analyzed to identify if the clinical recovery pattern of the subsidence versus no subsidence groups differed. Protected weight bearing was recommended to all patients with subsidence.Introduction:
Method:
Early rehabilitation and discharge following minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty has potential risks including the possibility that patients may become progressively anemic at home. The current study assess the use of pre-emptive autologous blood transfusion on the length of stay, readmission, and allogenous transfusion. Patients treated by primary total hip arthroplasty using the superior capsulotomy technique were studied. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 were patients who did donate autologous blood and received an intra-operative pre-emptive transfusion. There were 283 patients in Group 1. Group 2 were patients who were medically capable of donating autologous blood but did not for non-medical reasons. There were 71 patients in Group 2. Patients who did not donate autologous blood for medical reasons (preoperative Hgb less than 11.5, age over 80) were excluded. All patients received general anesthesia. Length of stay, allogenous transfusion and readmission were compared.Introduction
Methods
Pathological conditions of the hip joint may present with variable patterns of pain referral in the lower limb. Literature reports suggest that up to 35% of total hip arthroplasties are performed on patients whose primary compliant is obturator nerve referred “knee pain”. However the effect of varied pain patterns on patient outcome and satisfaction has not previously been examined. This prospective study was undertaken to determine the most common referral patterns of hip pain in patients scheduled to undergo primary total hip replacement and to examine whether initial pain referral pattern predicted ultimate patient outcome. Patients were assessed using the Harris Hip score, SF 36 and WOMAC scoring systems measured preoperatively, at 6 months, 1 and 2 years post operatively. 236 patients were identified with isolated single hip joint disease. Patients who demonstrated multi joint disease, and particularly ipsilateral knee pathology were excluded. Forty-five percent of patients with primary hip disease had pain primarily at or about the knee. There was no difference in preoperative demographics, physical function, social function, perceived general health, Harris Hip score (p=0.74), SF 36 (p=0.66) or WOMAC scores (p=0.81) between the pain pattern groups. Operator status and operative techniques were comparable. At 1 and 2 years postoperatively the groin and thigh pain groups were similar in all respects. However at 6 months, 12 months and 2 years, Harris hip scores (p=0.04, p=0.037, p=0.021) and SF 36 scores (p=0.035, p=0.027, p=0.01) were significantly lower in those patients presenting initially with knee pain. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that no other confounding variables could account for the observed differences between the groups. These results indicate that, using current outcome measures, patients with “knee pain” who undergo total hip arthroplasty, and in whom ipsilateral knee disease has been excluded, have poorer long-term physical and social function and perceived general health. We believe this is the first report of its kind and suggest that patient and surgeon expectations of the results of total hip arthroplasty should be tailored according to the individual initial pain referral pattern.
The use of less invasive techniques for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has remained controversial with some studies showing a higher incidence of complications. The technique of performing total hip arthroplasty through a superior capsulotomy was developed to maximally preserve the soft tissue envelope surrounding the hip. The current study assesses the recovery and complications of hips replaced using conventional and tissue preserving techniques. 206 hips in 191 patients with a mean follow-up of 4.3 ± 1.0 (range, 3.2 – 5.9) years underwent total hip arthroplasty using the superior capsulotomy technique. The mean age at operation was 55.7 ± 12.9 (19 – 85) years and the operation was performed for 106 hips (51%) in men. The surgical technique involves exposing the superior hip joint capsule posterior to the medius and minimus, and anterior to the short external rotators. The femur is prepared with the femoral head in place and then the femoral head is excised without dislocation. These 206 hips were compared to a cohort of 279 hips replaced using the transgluteal exposure (control group). These 2 series were controlled for complexity and demographic factors. Recovery was evaluated using the Merle d'Aubigné score at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively.Introduction
Methods
uncoated implants should be abandoned; HA resurfacing does not reduce the rate of revision and can be associated with a higher rage of osteolysis; there is no advantage between screw fixed or press-fit cups as long as the cup has a quality resurfacing; there is no real difference between straight and anatomic pivots except that intraoperative fracture can be lower for the straight implants.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether an innovative
templating technique could predict the need for acetabular augmentation
during primary total hip arthroplasty for patients with dysplastic
hips. We developed a simple templating technique to estimate acetabular
component coverage at total hip arthroplasty, the True Cup: False
Cup (TC:FC) ratio. We reviewed all patients with dysplastic hips
who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between 2005 and 2012.
Traditional radiological methods of assessing the degree of acetabular dysplasia
(Sharp’s angle, Tönnis angle, centre-edge angle) as well as the
TC:FC ratio were measured from the pre-operative radiographs. A
comparison of augmented and non-augmented hips was undertaken to
determine any difference in pre-operative radiological indices between
the two cohorts. The intra- and inter-observer reliability for all
radiological indices used in the study were also calculated.Aims
Patients and Methods
Total hip replacement (THR) has been shown to
be a cost-effective procedure. However, it is not risk-free. Certain conditions,
such as diabetes mellitus, are thought to increase the risk of complications.
In this study we have evaluated the prevalence of diabetes mellitus
in patients undergoing THR and the associated risk of adverse operative
outcomes. A meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted according
to the guidelines of the meta-analysis of observational studies
in epidemiology. Inclusion criteria were observational studies reporting
the prevalence of diabetes in the study population, accompanied
by reports of at least one of the following outcomes: venous thromboembolic
events; acute coronary events; infections of the urinary tract,
lower respiratory tract or surgical site; or requirement for revision
arthroplasty. Altman and Bland’s methods were used to calculate differences
in relative risks. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was found
to be 5.0% among patients undergoing THR, and was associated with
an increased risk of established surgical site infection (odds ratio
(OR) 2.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52 to 2.76)), urinary
infection (OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.33 to 1.55)) and lower respiratory
tract infections (OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.26)). Diabetes mellitus
is a relatively common comorbidity encountered in THR. Diabetic
patients have a higher rate of developing both surgical site and
non-surgical site infections following THR. Cite this article:
Introduction:. The incidence of heterotrophic ossification after primary
Introduction. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has been introduced to decrease osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear debris generation, but there are few long-term data on revision total hip arthroplasty using highly cross-linked polyethylene liners. The purpose of this study was to report the long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner in revision total hip arthroplasty. Materials & Methods. We analyzed 63 revision
Aims. Uncemented implants are now commonly used at reimplantation of a two-stage revision
The June 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup. 360 . looks at: neuraxial anaesthesia and large joint arthroplasty; revision
Aims. Revision total hip arthroplasty is a common operation. The MP Link (Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany) system is a distally loading, modular, tapered femoral stem component for revision hip surgery. MP Link in revision
The use of total hip arthroplasty in adolescents for end-stage degenerative hip disease is controversial with few reported outcomes in the literature. The purpose of the study was to report the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in a cohort of adolescents managed by a multidisciplinary team of paediatric and adult orthopaedic surgeons from a single centre. A multidisciplinary clinic consisting of paediatric and adult hip surgeons was established in 2013 to identify, treat and prospectively follow adolescents who would potentially beneift from a