We have compared the functional outcome after glenohumeral fusion for the sequelae of trauma to the brachial plexus between two groups of adult patients reviewed after a mean interval of 70 months. Group A (11 patients) had upper palsy with a functional hand and group B (16 patients) total palsy with a flail hand.

All 27 patients had recovered active elbow flexion against resistance before shoulder fusion. Both groups showed increased functional capabilities after glenohumeral arthrodesis and a flail hand did not influence the post-operative active range of movement. The strength of pectoralis major is a significant prognostic factor in terms of ultimate excursion of the hand and of shoulder strength. Glenohumeral arthrodesis improves function in patients who have recovered active elbow flexion after brachial plexus palsy even when the hand remains paralysed.

Purpose: Until recently, evaluation of surgical treatment for brachial plexus palsy has been purely analytic, not taking into account the patient’s overall functional capacity nor his/her quality of life. The unilateral nature of these palsies and the fact that the limb remains healthy requires a global assessment of outcome. We propose here to associate the classical analytical evaluation with a global quality of life evaluation to determine the beneficial effect of surgical treatment for partial or total brachial plexus palsy. Material and methods: Forty-four patients, mean age 30 years (17–60) were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 34 months. These patients were divided into two groups: C5–C6 ± C7 palsy (n=18), C5-T1 palsy (n=26). In each group, we recorded a complete muscle analysis, a visual analogue scale test of pain, and results of three quality of life questionnaires (DASH, Abilhand, MOS SF-36). We studied for each group the influence of recovered elbow flexion (biceps ≥ M3+), recovered shoulder function (abduction ≥ M3+), and residual pain on quality of life. Results: The overall analysis did not demonstrate any difference in quality of life between partial and complete palsy. The three questionnaires were correlated with each other (p< 0.03). Residual pain (visual analogue scale ≥ 4 in 59% of the patients) was correlated with quality of life (p< 0.05) while involvement of the dominant side did not have any influence. In the partial palsy group, recovery of shoulder function (61%, n=11) improved significantly all the quality of life scores (p< 0.01). Conversely, recovery of elbow flexion (72%, n=13) did not improve quality of life in patients with a functional shoulder (p< 0.02). In the group with total palsy, recovery of shoulder function (77%, n=20) appeared to be as least as important as elbow flexion on quality of life (p ≤ 0.05). Discussion: Unlike generally accepted notions, postoperative assessment of quality of life in these brachial plexus palsy patients demonstrates the importance of shoulder function which appears to be as least as important as recovery of elbow flexion. Furthermore, persistent pain appeared as one of the main negative factors affecting quality of life. Appropriate management is necessary

Aims

Between 2002 and 2011, 81 patients with a traumatic total brachial plexus injury underwent reconstruction by double free muscle transfer (DFMT, 47 cases), single muscle transfer (SMT, 16 cases) or nerve transfers (NT, 18 cases).