Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 3 | Pages 442 - 448
1 Mar 2021
Nikolaou VS Masouros P Floros T Chronopoulos E Skertsou M Babis GC

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that a single dose of tranexamic acid (TXA) would reduce blood loss and transfusion rates in elderly patients undergoing surgery for a subcapital or intertrochanteric (IT) fracture of the hip. Methods. In this single-centre, randomized controlled trial, elderly patients undergoing surgery for a hip fracture, either hemiarthroplasty for a subcapital fracture or intramedullary nailing for an IT fracture, were screened for inclusion. Patients were randomly allocated to a study group using a sealed envelope. The TXA group consisted of 77 patients, (35 with a subcapital fracture and 42 with an IT fracture), and the control group consisted of 88 patients (29 with a subcapital fracture and 59 with an IT fracture). One dose of 15 mg/kg of intravenous (IV) TXA diluted in 100 ml normal saline (NS,) or one dose of IV placebo 100 ml NS were administered before the incision was made. The haemoglobin (Hb) concentration was measured before surgery and daily until the fourth postoperative day. The primary outcomes were the total blood loss and the rate of transfusion from the time of surgery to the fourth postoperative day. Results. Homogeneity with respect to baseline characteristics was ensured between groups. The mean total blood loss was significantly lower in patients who received TXA (902.4 ml (-279.9 to 2,156.9) vs 1,226.3 ml (-269.7 to 3,429.7); p = 0.003), while the likelihood of requiring a transfusion of at least one unit of red blood cells was reduced by 22%. Subgroup analysis showed that these differences were larger in patients who had an IT fracture compared with those who had a subcapital fracture. Conclusion. Elderly patients who undergo intramedullary nailing for an IT fracture can benefit from a single dose of 15 mg/kg TXA before the onset of surgery. A similar tendency was identified in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for a subcapital fracture but not to a statistically significant level. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):442–448


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1053 - 1059
1 Aug 2006
Foss NB Kehlet H

Our aim was to determine the total blood loss associated with surgery for fracture of the hip and to identify risk factors for increased blood loss. We prospectively studied 546 patients with hip fracture. The total blood loss was calculated on the basis of the haemoglobin difference, the number of transfusions and the estimated blood volume. The hidden blood loss, in excess of that observed during surgery, varied from 547 ml (screws/ pins) to 1473 ml (intramedullary hip nail and screw) and was significantly associated with medical complications and increased hospital stay. The type of surgery, treatment with aspirin, intra-operative hypotension and gastro-intestinal bleeding or ulceration were all independent predictors of blood loss. We conclude that total blood loss after surgery for hip fracture is much greater than that observed intra-operatively. Frequent post-operative measurements of haemoglobin are necessary to avoid anaemia


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 581 - 581
1 Sep 2012
Ares O Macule F Popescu D Segur J Sastre S Martinez-Pastor J Lozano L Suso S Tio M Garcia R Nunez M
Full Access

Orthopedic surgery is one of the most blood-consuming surgeries. Currently there has been a radical change in transfusion policies, developing a series of therapeutic measures essentially created to minimize the use of allogeneic blood. On the one hand, the safety of our patients must be even more our main objective. On the other hand, our economic resources are more restricted and therefore we must evaluate our surgical techniques and proceedings in order to be safer and more cost-effective. The aim of this study is to report our results of the blood lost, the percentage of blood loss, the necessity of transfussions and how many blood pakages are needed. From a sample of 2400 total knee arthroplasties proceedings, we analyze some surgical proceedings such as lligament balance, patelar traking, artrotomy, ischemia, femoro-tibial axis and type of arthroplasty. We also examine the total blood lost and the percentage of total blood loss after 4 hours, after 24hours and after 48 hour of the total knee arthoplasty surgery. We made a statistical analysis with t-test or anova test when it was necesassary. The outcome of our investigation show that the blood loss when the ischemia is less than 50 minutes is 1470 cc and 1603 cc when is more than 50 minuntes (p<0.05). If we use the medial arthrotomy, the total bleeding is 1563cc, but with subvastus arthrotomy is 1294cc (p<0.05). If we use a primary rotational total knee arthroplasty the bleeding is 953cc, but if we use a PS or PCR the bleeding is 874cc (p<0.05). As a conclusion we should know that our patients have more blood loss when the ischemia is more than fifty minutes, the bleeding is higher when we make a medial arthrotomy and when we use a rotational knee primary arthroplasty


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1271 - 1278
1 Sep 2015
Märdian S Schaser KD Hinz P Wittenberg S Haas NP Schwabe P

This study compared the quality of reduction and complication rate when using a standard ilioinguinal approach and the new pararectus approach when treating acetabular fractures surgically. All acetabular fractures that underwent fixation using either approach between February 2005 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed and the demographics of the patients, the surgical details and complications were recorded.

A total of 100 patients (69 men, 31 women; mean age 57 years, 18 to 93) who were consecutively treated were included for analysis. The quality of reduction was assessed using standardised measurement of the gaps and steps in the articular surface on pre- and post-operative CT-scans.

There were no significant differences in the demographics of the patients, the surgical details or the complications between the two approaches. A significantly better reduction of the gap, however, was achieved with the pararectus approach (axial: p = 0.025, coronal: p = 0.013, sagittal: p = 0.001).

These data suggest that the pararectus approach is at least equal to, or in the case of reduction of the articular gap, superior to the ilioinguinal approach.

This approach allows direct buttressing of the dome of the acetabulum and the quadrilateral plate, which is particularly favourable in geriatric fracture patterns.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1271-8.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1073 - 1078
1 Aug 2008
Little NJ Verma V Fernando C Elliott DS Khaleel A

We compared the outcome of patients treated for an intertrochanteric fracture of the femoral neck with a locked, long intramedullary nail with those treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS) in a prospective randomised study.

Each patient who presented with an extra-capsular hip fracture was randomised to operative stabilisation with either a long intramedullary Holland nail or a DHS. We treated 92 patients with a Holland nail and 98 with a DHS. Pre-operative variables included the Mini Mental test score, patient mobility, fracture pattern and American Society of Anesthesiologists grading. Peri-operative variables were anaesthetic time, operating time, radiation time and blood loss. Post-operative variables were time to mobilising with a frame, wound infection, time to discharge, time to fracture union, and mortality.

We found no significant difference in the pre-operative variables. The mean anaesthetic and operation times were shorter in the DHS group than in the Holland nail group (29.7 vs 40.4 minutes, p < 0.001; and 40.3 vs 54 minutes, p < 0.001, respectively). There was an increased mean blood loss within the DHS group versus the Holland nail group (160 ml vs 78 ml, respectively, p < 0.001). The mean time to mobilisation with a frame was shorter in the Holland nail group (DHS 4.3 days, Holland nail 3.6 days, p = 0.012). More patients needed a post-operative blood transfusion in the DHS group (23 vs seven, p = 0.003) and the mean radiation time was shorter in this group (DHS 0.9 minutes vs Holland nail 1.56 minutes, p < 0.001). The screw of the DHS cut out in two patients, one of whom underwent revision to a Holland nail. There were no revisions in the Holland nail group. All fractures in both groups were united when followed up after one year.

We conclude that the DHS can be implanted more quickly and with less exposure to radiation than the Holland nail. However, the resultant blood loss and need for transfusion is greater. The Holland nail allows patients to mobilise faster and to a greater extent. We have therefore adopted the Holland nail as our preferred method of treating intertrochanteric fractures of the hip.