The place of thromboprophylaxis in arthroplasty surgery remains
controversial, with a challenging requirement to balance prevention
of potentially fatal venous thrombo-embolism with minimising wound-related
complications leading to deep infection. We compared the incidence
of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing elective primary
total hip arthroplasty (THA) between those receiving aspirin, warfarin
and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for the chemical component
of a multi-modal thromboprophylaxis regime. A prospective audit database was used to identify patients who
had died within 42 and 90 days of surgery respectively between April
2000 and December 2012. A case note review was performed to ascertain
the causes of death.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. Achieving accurate implant positioning and restoring native hip biomechanics are key surgeon-controlled technical objectives in
Abstract. Objectives. Hip instability following
Aims. The primary objective of this study was to develop a validated classification system for assessing iatrogenic bone trauma and soft-tissue injury during
Aims. Iliopsoas impingement occurs in 4% to 30% of patients after undergoing
Aims. Conventional patient-reported surveys, used for patients undergoing
The objectives of our study were to compare patient reported outcome measures between manual and robotic-assisted
Aims.
Aims. In 2015, we published the results of our ceramic-on-metal (CoM)
This meta analysis address the relationship between infection developing after
Aims. This study aimed to describe practice variation in the use of
Aims. Manual impaction, with a mallet and introducer, remains the standard method of installing cementless acetabular cups during
Aims. A significant reduction in wear at five and ten years was previously reported when comparing Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene with nitrogen-sterilized Sulene polyethylene in
Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of a collarless, straight, hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem in
Aims. The aim of this study was to explore the functional results in a fitter subgroup of participants in the Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of
Aims. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common pre- and postoperative issue in
Aims. Femoral component anteversion is an important factor in the success of
Aims. Implant waste during
Surgical management of acetabular fractures in older patients remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of primary THA with outcomes after THA for acute acetabular fractures (aTHA) as well as outcomes following delayed THA (dTHA) following prior acetabular fracture. We analyzed data from a large, national administrative claims database containing diagnostic, procedural, and demographic records from over 157 million patients. We identified all patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty THA continuously enrolled in the database at least 2 years prior and after the index procedure. Patients with an initial diagnostic code for acetabular fracture occurring the same day as the THA were classified as acute acetabular fractures. Patients with an initial acetabular fracture diagnostic code occurring at least 6 months before THA were classified as chronic acetabular fractures. The comparator group was patients undergoing THA with no history of acetabular fracture. There were 426,734 patients undergoing primary THA, 235 patients undergoing aTHA and 1,255 patients undergoing dTHA. Patients with an aTHA had higher complication rates, including revisions (9.8% vs 5.6%,), dislocations (8.9% vs 6.4%), and periprosthetic fracture (5.1% vs 2.3%) compared to dTHA. After adjusting for age, sex, region, and comorbidities, receiving an aTHA increased the odds of revision (OR = 3.65 [95% CI: 2.30–5.49]), dislocation (OR = 4.09 [95% CI: 2.53–6.27]), and periprosthetic fracture (OR = 4.29 [95% CI: 2.26–7.36]) compared to primary THA. Receiving a dTHA significantly increased the odds of revision (adjusted OR = 1.80 [95% CI: 1.40–2.27]), dislocation (adjusted OR = 2.50 [95% CI: 1.97–3.13]), and periprosthetic fracture (adjusted OR = 1.99 [95% CI: 1.34–2.83]) compared to primary THA. Patients undergoing aTHA in the treatment of an acetabular fracture have significantly increased rates of revision, periprosthetic fracture, and dislocation compared to dTHA and primary THA.
Aims. The aims of this systematic review were to assess the learning curve of semi-active robotic arm-assisted