Abstract. Objectives. Review the evidence of low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) for fracture non-union treatment and the potential to treat fractures in patients with co-morbidities at risk of fracture non-union. Methods. Data was gathered from both animal and human studies of fracture repair to provide an overview of the LIPUS in bone healing applications to provide in-depth evidence to substantiate the use in treatment of non-union fractures and to propose a scientific rational to develop a clinical development programme. Results. LIPUS is an effective method for treating fracture non-union, with most studies showing heal rates in the mid 80%. In the UK NICE has published MTG-12 guidance for non-union treatment, which demonstrates that LIPUS is an effective and cost effective method as an alternative to surgery to treat non-union fractures. Basic science studies and evaluation of clinical trial data has led to the understanding that LIPUS can mitigate co-morbidities related to failure of bone healing such as diabetes, advancing age and tobacco use. Future clinical trials will evaluate the use of LIPUS in acute fractures in patients with high risk of low bone healing capacity to prevent the development of a non-union. As with all medical treatments, LIPUS for fracture repair needs to be used appropriately, with poorly fixed fractures or large fracture gaps, being unsuitable for LIPUS treatment. In addition, considerations such as targeting the fracture site in deep-seated bones and clinician / patient engagement to ensure good compliant usage are vital factors to ensure good clinical outcomes. Conclusion. Using basic science research, a thorough knowledge of the mechanism of action has been established, which has elucidated that co-morbidities related to the development of fracture non-union can be mitigated by the LIPUS technology. A pragmatic clinical trial in the United States is currently ongoing to test these hypothesises clinically. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Summary. Syndesmotic malreduction or failure to restore fibular length are the leading causes for early reoperation after ankle fracture surgery. Anatomic fracture reduction and congruent ankle mortise can be achieved in the majority of cases following revision surgery. Introduction. The goal of ankle fracture surgery is to restore anatomical congruity. However, anatomic reduction is not always achieved, and residual talar displacement and postoperative malreduction predispose a patient to post-traumatic arthritis and poor functional outcomes. The present study aimed to determine the most common surgical errors resulting in early reoperation following ankle fracture surgery. Patients & Methods. We performed a chart review to determine the most common types of malreductions that led to reoperation within the first week following ankle fracture surgery. From 2002 to 2011, we identified 5123 consecutive ankle fracture operations in 5071 patients. 79 patients (1.6%) were reoperated on due to malreduction (residual fracture displacement > 2mm) detected in postoperative radiographs. These patients were compared with an equal number of age- and sex-matched control patients. Surgical errors were classified according to the anatomical site of malreduction: fibula, medial malleolus, posterior malleolus, Chaput-Tillaux fragment, and syndesmosis. Problems related to syndesmotic reduction or fixation were further divided into four categories: malreduction of the fibula in the tibiofibular incisura due to malpositioning of a syndesmotic screw, persistent tibiofibular widening (TFCS > 6 mm), positioning of a syndesmotic screw posterior to the posterior margin of the tibia, and unnecessary use of a syndesmotic screw. Results. The mean patient age was 44 years (18 to 80), and 49% were women. There were no differences between the groups regarding diabetes, tobacco use, peripheral vascular disease, or alcohol abuse. The most common indication for reoperation was syndesmotic malreduction (47 of 79 patients; 59%). Other frequent indications for reoperation were fibular shortening and malreduction of the medial malleolus. We identified four main types of errors related to syndesmotic reduction or fixation, the most common being fibular malreduction in the tibiofibular incisura. The most commonly combined errors were malreductions of the fibula and syndesmosis, which occurred together in 16 of 79 patients (20%). Fracture-dislocation (p = 0.011), fracture type (p = 0.001), posterior malleolar fracture (p = 0.005), associated medial malleolar fracture (p = 0.001), duration of index surgery (p = 0.001), and associated medial malleolar fixation other than with two parallel screws (p = 0.045) were associated with reoperation. Correction of the malreduction was achieved in 84% of reoperated cases. Conclusion. Early reoperation after ankle fracture surgery was most commonly caused by errors related to syndesmotic reduction or failure to restore fibular length. In the majority of cases, postoperative malreduction was successfully corrected in the acute setting

Objectives

To review the systemic impact of smoking on bone healing as evidenced within the orthopaedic literature.