Background. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is an important salvage method for patients with complex hindfoot problems including combined arthritis of the ankle and subtalar joints, complex hindfoot deformities and failed total ankle arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to report the elective results of combined subtalar and ankle arthrodesis using one design of dynamic retrograde intramedullary compression nail-the T2 Ankle Arthrodesis Nail(Stryker). Methods. Retrospective review identified 53 consecutive patients who had 55 tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis procedures by two surgeons(ITS and NJT) using T2 Ankle nail fixation. 3 patients died of unrelated causes before follow up was complete which left 50 patients(52 nails); the largest consecutive series in the use of this device. Mean follow up was 23.5(3–72) months with the average age of patients being 61(range 22–89) years. An 84% response was achieved to a function and patient satisfaction questionnaire. Main indications for treatment were combined ankle and subtalar arthritis(63%-33/52) or complex hindfoot deformities(23%-12/52). Outcome was assessed by a combination of Clinical notes review, clinical examination, and telephone questionnaire. Results. 46 patients(83.6%) achieved union at a mean time of 3.7 months.8 patients required an allograft(femoral head) bone block procedure. 4 patients(10%) subjectively thought that the procedure was of no benefit or had a poor result whilst 35(83%) had a good or excellent result. The mean visual analog scale(VAS) score for preoperative functional pain was 7.1 compared to the mean post operative(VAS) score of 1.9(p< 0.001). Complications consisted of 2 amputations, 2 deep infections and 5 removals of broken or painful screws. The use of preoperative functional aids and orthotics dropped from 32% to 18% and 22% to 18% respectively. Conclusion. This device and technique is a safe and effective treatment of hindfoot arthrosis and deformity giving reliable compression and subsequent fusion with excellent results in terms of patient satisfaction and pain relief

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is a salvage procedure to functionally block the ankle and subtalar joints to treat severe ankle and hindfoot disease. Complication rates range between 20-40%, with below-knee amputation rate 1.5-19%. The heterogeneous patient cohort and indication(s) for surgery make post-operative outcomes difficult to predict. Consulting patients about potential pain and functional outcomes is difficult. When researching this area commonly, PROM data is used, less frequently functional objective measures like the 2-minute-walk-test (2MWT) are used. The aim was to compare the PROMs and objective outcomes between patients who underwent TTCA and BKA. Fifty-two patients underwent a TTCA using an intramedullary hindfoot nail. Indications for TTCA, post-traumatic OA, failed arthrodesis and malalignment. These patients were compared to 11 patients who underwent unilateral below knee amputation (BKA) due to trauma. Outcomes measures PROMs AOFAS ankle hindfoot scale and Shor-Form 36 (SF-36). Objective measures; 2MWT, Timed-up-and-go (TUG). Mean age TTCA 55.9, BKA 46.4. Average follow-up time 53 months. TTCA group had average 6.3 operations prior to arthrodesis (range 1-23). Of the TTCA group two ankles did not unite (7%), all complication rate 35%, 18% reported no pain. A significant negative correlation was demonstrated between the clinical outcome and the number of surgeries prior to the TTCA. TUG and 2MWT had significantly (p<0.05) better outcomes for the BKA group compared to TTCA. SF-36 BKA patients scored higher than the TTCA patients on physical functioning (p<0.01) and mental health (p<0.05) subscales as well as the mental component score (p<0.05). This study gives clinicians evidence about the natural history of hindfoot arthrodesis and functional outcomes from BKA. Hopefully this study will improve evidence to help patients and surgeons make decisions about expected surgical outcomes from TTCA and BKA procedures

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is an important salvage method for patients with complex hindfoot problems including combined arthritis of the ankle and subtalar joints, complex hindfoot deformities and failed total ankle arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to report the elective results of combined subtalar and ankle arthrodesis using one design of dynamic retrograde intramedullary compression nail-the T2 Ankle Arthrodesis Nail(Stryker). Retrospective review identified 53 consecutive patients who had 55 tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis procedures by two surgeons(ITS and NJT) using T2 Ankle nail fixation. 3 patients died of unrelated causes before follow up was complete which left 50 patients(52 nails); the largest consecutive series in the use of this device. Mean follow up was 23.5(3-72) months with the average age of patients being 61(range 22-89) years. An 84% response was achieved to a function and patient satisfaction questionnaire. Main indications for treatment were combined ankle and subtalar arthritis(63%-33/52) or complex hindfoot deformities(23%-12/52). Outcome was assessed by a combination of Clinical notes review, clinical examination, and telephone questionnaire. 46 patients(83.6%) achieved union at a mean time of 3.7 months. 8 patients required an allograft(femoral head) bone block procedure. 4 patients(10%) subjectively thought that the procedure was of no benefit or had a poor result whilst 35(83%) had a good or excellent result. The mean visual analog scale(VAS) score for preoperative functional pain was 7.1 compared to the mean post operative (VAS) score of 1.9(p<0.001). Complications consisted of 2 amputations, 2 deep infections and 5 removals of broken or painful screws. The use of preoperative functional aids and orthotics dropped from 32% to 18% and 22% to 18% respectively. This device and technique is a safe and effective treatment of hindfoot arthrosis and deformity giving reliable compression and subsequent fusion with excellent results in terms of patient satisfaction and pain relief

Worldwide, total ankle replacement is being more frequently offered as an alternative to ankle fusion. Most reports in the literature come from single centres with surgery performed by ‘high volume’ foot and ankle surgeons. We describe the New Zealand experience with the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR). Fifty-two STARs in 49 patients were implanted between September 1998 and May 2005. Eleven surgeons performed between one and thirteen of the operations. Of the 49 patients five were deceased and five refused to participate in the study. The average age at surgery was 64.9 years (range 46-80). There were 26 males and 13 females. The average follow up was 58.2 months. Of the 41 ankles available for review 11 had been revised or fused (27%) at an average of 42 months post surgery. Of the remaining 30 intact ankles recent radiographs were available on all ankles. Of the retained primary ankles, the mean Oxford ankle score was 25.6. This scale has a range from 12, for an asymptomatic ankle, to 60. The mean WOMAC score was 18.9, the SF-12 PH 42 and the SF-12 MH 54. The scores were substantially worse for the group who had been revised or arthrodesed. Perioperative x-ray findings demonstrated intraoperative malleolar fracture occurred in seven patients including one with a complete saw cut transection of the medial malleolus and one who had sustained fractures of both malleoli. The tibial component was undersised in five patients and the talus oversized in at least three patients. Of the 11 revision cases, two were bearing exchanges only. Nine involved either a major revision procedure or tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for subsidence of malaligned components usually in the presence of peri-implant fracture. Of the unrevised cases, the latest x-rays did not demonstrate any significant osteolysis or increased lucent lines. Five cases demonstrated subtle talar or tibial component subsidence when compared with earlier radiographs. Despite overall satisfactory outcomes in the majority of patients the perioperative complication rate and revision rate in infrequent users is concerning. There may be implant and instrumentation elements, which also contribute to these suboptimal outcomes. Level of evidence IV, retrospective review