Introduction

Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy is an attractive surgical option for physically active patients with early osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. Unfortunately use of this surgical technique is frequently accompanied by an unintended increase in the posterior tibial slope, resulting in anterior tibial translation, and consequent altered knee kinematics and cartilage loading(1).

To address this unintended consequence, it has been recommended that the relative opening of the anteromedial and posterolateral corners of the osteotomy are calculated pre-operatively using trigonometry (1). This calculation assumes that the saw-cut is made parallel to the native posterior slope; yet given the current reliance on 2D images and the ‘surgeon's eye’ to guide the saw-cut, this assumption is questionable.

The aim of this study was to explore how accurately the native posterior tibial slope is reproduced with a traditional freehand osteotomy saw-cut, and whether novel 3D printed patient-specific guides improve this accuracy.

Introduction. Computer hexapod assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS) has previously been shown to provide a predictable and safe method for correcting multiplanar femoral deformity. We report the outcomes of tibial deformity correction using CHAOS, as well as a new cohort of femoral CHAOS procedures. Materials and Methods. Retrospective review of medical records and radiographs for patients who underwent CHAOS for lower limb deformity at our tertiary centre between 2012–2020. Results. There were 70 consecutive cases from 56 patients with no loss to follow-up. Mean age was 40 years (17 to 77); 59% male. There were 48 femoral and 22 tibial procedures. Method of fixation was intramedullary nailing in 47 cases and locking plates in 23. Multiplanar correction was required in 43 cases. The largest correction of rotation was 40 degrees, and angulation was 28 degrees. Mean mechanical axis deviation reduction per procedure was 17.2 mm, maximum 89 mm. Deformity correction was mechanically satisfactory in all patients bar one who was under-corrected, requiring revision. Complications from femoral surgery included one under-correction, two cases of non-union, and one pulmonary embolism. Complications from tibial surgery were one locking plate fatigue failure, one compartment syndrome, one pseudoaneurysm of the anterior tibial artery requiring stenting, and one transient neurapraxia of the common peroneal nerve. There were no deaths. Conclusions. CHAOS can be used for reliable correction of complex deformities of both the femur and tibia. The risk profile appears to differ between femoral and tibial surgeries

Malalignment is a common complication following tibial surgery, occurring in 10% of fractures. This is associated with prolonged healing time and non-union. It occurs due to inability to maintain a satisfactory reduction. A reduction device, such as the Staffordshire Orthopaedic Reduction Machine (STORM), permits the surgeon to manipulate the fracture and hold it reduced. A retrospective parallel case series was undertaken of all patients undergoing tibial nails over a six-year period from 2014 to 2021. Patient demographics were obtained from medical records. Operative times obtained from the theatre IT system and included the time patient entered theatre and surgical start and finish times for each case. Anteroposterior and lateral long leg post-operative radiographs were reviewed. Angulation was measured in both coronal and sagittal planes, by two separate orthopaedic surgeons. A reduction was classified to be ‘mal-aligned’ if the angle measured was greater than 5 degrees. One tailed unpaired t-test was used to compare alignment in each plane. Bony union was assessed on subsequent radiographs and was determined according to the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial Fractures. 31 patients underwent tibial nail during the time period. 8 patients were lost to follow up and were excluded. Of the remaining 23 patients, the STORM device was utilised in 11. The overall mean alignment was acceptable across all groups at 2.17° in the coronal plane and 2.56° in the saggital plane. Analysing each group individually demonstrated an improved alignment when STORM was utilised: 1.7° (1°–3°) vs 2.54° (0°–5°) for the coronal plane and 1.6° (0°–3°) vs 3.31° (0°–9°) in the saggital plane. This difference was significant in saggital alignment (p=0.03) and showed a positive trend in coronal alignment, although was not significant (p=0.08). The time in theatre was shorter in the control group with a mean of 113 minutes (65 to 219) in comparison to STORM with a mean of 140 minutes (105 to 180), an increased theatre time of 27 minutes (p=0.04). This study demonstrates that STORM can be used in the surgical treatment of tibial fractures resulting in improved fracture alignment with a modest increase in theatre time

Introduction:. Patient-specific cutting guides (PSCG) built from imaging of the extremity can improve the accuracy of bone cuts during total knee replacement (TKR). Some reports have suggested that PSCG offer only marginal improvement in the accuracy of alignment and component positioning in TKA. We compared outcomes between TKRs done with PSCG versus standard, intramedullary-based instrumentation. Methods:. Blood loss, duration of surgery, alignment of the mechanical axis of the leg, and implant position on standing, long-leg, and standard lateral digital radiographs were compared between a CT-guided, custom-built TKA implant (n = 50; ConforMIS iTotal, Boston, MA) implanted with PSCG, versus an off-shelf posterior stabilized TKA implanted with standard instrumentation (n = 50; NKII total knee, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN). The fraction of outliers (>3 degrees) was calculated for the two groups. Results:. The mean mechanical axis of iTotal was 181 degrees with a fraction of outliers of 0.2, versus 178 degrees for NKII with fraction of outliers of 0.7. For frontal plane positioning of femoral components, fraction of outliers for iTotal was 0.04, versus 0.6 for NKII. For tibial components, corresponding values were 0.1 and 0.6, respectively. Sagittal plane outliers were 0.2 and 0.9, respectively, for femoral components; and 0.2 and 0.6 for tibial components. Surgery duration was 5 minutes less and blood loss was 100 mL less for iTotal than for intramedullary-aligned NKII. Conclusion:. Patient specific instrumentation and custom-built implants showed a trend toward improved accuracy of alignment, reduction in blood loss and operating time, when compared to standard, off-the-shelf TKA implants with intramedullary alignment, with fewer radiographic outliers. Larger, randomized trials are necessary to evaluate this technology further, but the initial outcomes appear favorable, with no cost disadvantage to the custom-built implant

High tibial osteotomy is a well established joint preserving procedure for the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Of particular interest are the alterations in knee loading compartments during dynamic activities such as locomotion. Computer modelling can indirectly assess contact and muscle forces in the patient. This study aimed to develop a valid model representative of high tibial osteotomy to assess the medial joint contact force at the knee during gait. Software for Interactive Musculoskeletal Modelling (version 2, SIMM Inc, USA) was used to develop a model to replicate the effects of high tibial osteotomy surgery on tibial alignment. The program was then used to perform a detailed analysis on gait data collected from two high tibial osteotomy patients preoperatively and 6 months post operatively. Inverse dynamics simulations were conducted to investigate knee joint contact force on the medial compartment of the two patients during the stance phase of their operated limbs. Significant decreases (p<0.05) in the medial joint contact force were observed during both early and late stance for both patients. Force generated in muscles crossing the knee was found to be the major contributor to the joint contact force. Total muscle force was found to increase significantly (p<0.05) following surgery, however decreased loads were calculated for the medial compartment. The pattern and magnitude of joint reaction force was found to be consistent before and after surgery and replicated the results of previous studies. The HTO-specific model was valid and sensitive to changes in joint reaction force, medial joint contact force and muscle forces crossing the knee. High tibial osteotomy reduced the medial joint contact force at the knee as a result of the coronal realignment of the limb. Osteoarthritis symptoms were relieved in terms of knee pain and function. Finally, a difference in compensatory strategies was observed between patients. This novel technique allows non-invasive assessment of the mechanical effect of procedures such as HTO. This should allow more accurate planning and assessment of such surgical procedures