Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 268 - 268
1 Mar 2003
Dayer R Kaelin AJ
Full Access

Tibial hemimelia is a rare congenital anomaly, occurring approximately in 1 per 1million live birth and consisting of aplastic/hypoplastic tibia with relatively intact fibula. The widely used classification was proposed by Jones and based on radiological description: type I: tibia absent, type II distal tibia not seen, type III proximal tibia not seen, type IV tibio-fibular diastases. This congenital deformity can be unilateral or bilateral and isolated, or unilateral or bilateral and associated with other malformation witch raise its genetic cause. We are reporting the cases of two monozigotic twins reflecting the “intragenotic” expression variability of the syndrome of tibial aplasia and ectrodactyly. The two monozigotic female twins are born after an unremarkable first pregnancy and delivery. Family history was positive for malformations.(syndactily, split hand, phocomelia(elbow) and hip dyspasia). Twin 1: Left leg: tibial aplasia type Ia, short femur, absent patella. Right leg: tibial aplasia type IV, clubfoot, hypoplasia of the internal ray. Left hand: split hand. Twin 2: Left leg: nornal. Right leg: tibial aplasia type II, clubfoot. Left hand: split hand. Most of the cases are unilateral and sporadic. 4 autosomal dominant tibial hemimelia syndromes are described. tibial hemimelia-foot polydactyly-triphangeal thumbs syndrome,. tibial hemimelia diplopodia syndrome,. tibial hemimelia-split-hand foot syndrome,. tibial hemimelia micromelia-oigonobrachycephaly syndrome. This is the first documennted case of monozigotic twins affected by the Tibial hemimelia-split-hand foot syndrome. Their clinical presentation demonstrates that the phenotypic manifestations are highly variable


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 7 | Pages 990 - 991
1 Jul 2011
Mirzatolooei F

We report a variant of tibial hemimelia in a six-year-old boy that did not comply with recognised classification systems. The femur and knee were normal, but the fibula was displaced proximally and there was severe diastasis of the proximal and distal tibiofibular joints to the extent that a grossly deformed foot articulated with the fibula and there was separate soft-tissue cover for the distal tibia and fibula. Although it would have been preferable to create a one-bone leg, amputate the foot and use the fibula as the stump for a below-knee prosthesis, local circumstances resulted in the choice of a disarticulation through the knee. This was undertaken without complications, and six months post-operatively the child was walking comfortably with a prosthesis


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 252 - 253
1 Mar 2003
Hosny Ahmed G
Full Access

Treatment protocols of tibial hemimelia comprised joint reconstruction and amputation or knee disarticulation and prosthetic fitting. However, amputation is not acceptable in our community. Therefore we tried to treat these cases without amputation. From 1993 till 1999, 2 cases of tibial hemimelia type IA, and 4 cases type II were referred to our center. All the cases presented late as the age of patients ranged from 3 _ years to 13 years. For type IA we applied Ilizarov External Fixator on the femur, fibula and foot to centralize the fibula between the femoral candyles and talus using gradual distraction. The second step comprised a Brown procedure. Then, the fixator was reapplied to correct the knee and foot deformities using the bloodless technique. For type II, synostosis of the tibia and fibula was performed followed by differential lengthening. Then we over lengthened the femur. Results: After follow up 2 to 5 _ years all patents were satisfied with good function. The tibial lengthening ranged from 6 to 9 cm and femoral lengthening ranged from 5 to 7.5 cm. Complications:. Pin tract infection in all cases. Cutting through of the calcanean wires in 2 cases. Flexion deformity in 4 cases. Fracture of the lengthened femur in one case. Up to our knowledge this is the first report tfor treatment of complete congenital tibial absence without amputation. Our early results are encouraging, as there are marked functional improvements in these patients


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1248 - 1255
1 Sep 2020
Laufer A Frommer A Gosheger G Roedl R Broeking JN Toporowski G Rachbauer AM Vogt B

Aims

The treatment of tibial aplasia is controversial. Amputation represents the gold standard with good functional results, but is frequently refused by the families. In these patients, treatment with reconstructive limb salvage can be considered. Due to the complexity of the deformity, this remains challenging and should be staged. The present study evaluated the role of femoro-pedal distraction using a circular external fixator in reconstructive treatment of tibial aplasia. The purpose of femoro-pedal distraction is to realign the limb and achieve soft tissue lengthening to allow subsequent reconstructive surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective study involving ten patients (12 limbs) with tibial aplasia, who underwent staged reconstruction. During the first operation a circular hexapod external fixator was applied and femoro-pedal distraction was undertaken over several months. Subsequent surgery included reconstruction of the knee joint and alignment of the foot.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 7 | Pages 952 - 960
1 Jul 2016
Muderis MA Tetsworth K Khemka A Wilmot S Bosley B Lord SJ Glatt V

Aims

This study describes the Osseointegration Group of Australia’s Accelerated Protocol two-stage strategy (OGAAP-1) for the osseointegrated reconstruction of amputated limbs.

Patients and Methods

We report clinical outcomes in 50 unilateral trans-femoral amputees with a mean age of 49.4 years (24 to 73), with a minimum one-year follow-up. Outcome measures included the Questionnaire for persons with a Trans-Femoral Amputation, the health assessment questionnaire Short-Form-36 Health Survey, the Amputation Mobility Predictor scores presented as K-levels, 6 Minute Walk Test and timed up and go tests. Adverse events included soft-tissue problems, infection, fractures and failure of the implant.