Introduction. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with isolated medial osteoarthritis of the knee is nowadays a standard procedure with good results, especially with the minimally-invasive approach. However, the survival rate of the unicompartmental knee prostheses is inferior to that of total knee prostheses. Therefore, further studying of UKA is still necessary. In most mobile bearing designs the femoral component has a spherical surface and therefore its positioning is not crucial. The role of the
Introduction. A tibial insert with choices in size, thickness, and posterior slope is proposed to improve ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty. However, increasing posterior slope, or the angle between the distal and proximal insert surfaces, will redistribute ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) thickness in the sagittal plane, potentially affecting wear. This study used in-vitro testing to compare wear for a standard cruciate-retaining tibial insert (STD) and a corresponding 6° sloped insert (SLP), both manufactured from direct-compression molded (DCM) UHMWPE. Our hypothesis was slope variation would have no significant effect on wear. Methods. Two of each insert (STD and SLP) were tested on an Instron-Stanmore knee simulator with a force-control regime. The gait cycle and other settings followed ISO 14243-1 and -2, except for reference positions. The STD insert was tilted 6° more than the SLP insert to level the articular surfaces. Wear was gravimetrically measured at intervals according to strict protocol. Results. No statistical difference (p=0.36) in wear rates was found for the STD (9.5 ±1.8 mg/Mc)) and SLP (11.4 ±0.5 mg/Mc) inserts. Discussion. The overall wear rate measured was higher than previously published rates for implants similar to the STD inserts. This may result from increased shear loads due to the shift in reference position and 6° slope. This is the first time the effect of
Background. Computer-assisted navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were introduced to improve implantation accuracy and to optimize ligament balancing. Several comparative studies in the literature confirmed an effect on the component position and other studies could not confirm these results. For ligament balancing most studies found no significant influence on the clinical outcome using a navigation system for TKA. In the literature there were no reports of mid-term results after navigated TKA. With our study we wanted to show if the use of a navigation system for TKA will have an influence on the component's position and on the clinical results at 5-year follow up. Methods. We enrolled 200 patients in a prospective randomized study with a minimum follow up of 5 years. 100 TKA were operated on without using a navigation system (Group A) and 100 surgeries (Group B) were done with computer assistance. Radiological investigation by standard radiographs including a long-leg X-ray was performed with a follow up rate in Group A of 86.2% versus 80.2% in Group B. We measured the mechanical axis of the leg, lateral distal femoral angel (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA),
