Background context: Stable thoracolumbar spinal fracture is a common injury, yet there remains a relative lack of evidence that would allow reliable prediction of outcome. Variation in outcome in stable thoracolumbar spine fracture without neurological deficit could not be explained by the assessment made from x-rays and CT imaging alone, which measures mainly the bony injury severity. So far, no good classification system has been developed to assess the severity of soft tissue injury (disc). Objectives: To measure short-term outcome of stable
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and
compare the effect of short segment pedicle screw instrumentation and
an intermediate screw (SSPI+IS) on the radiological outcome of type
A
Stable
Study Design/Objectives: A pilot study to predict thoracolumbar kyphosis progression secondary to fracture in non-operatively treated patients. Summary of Background Data: Progressive saggital plane deformity can cause persistent pain after thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. Little data exists to suggest at what interval after the index injury the patient attains a low risk of developing further angular deformity in non-operatively treated patients. Methods: Supine and erect radiographs were assessed and the degree of fracture kyphosis was determined using an Oxford Cobbometer. The fracture kyphosis was recorded for each follow up appointment along with time after the fracture. A time/data analysis was performed using the Blyth-Still-Casella exact interval. Results: This study included 22 patients (13 male, 9 female) with average age 67.2 years (range, 14–87 years). The average length of follow up was 11.5 months (range, 5.3–19.9 months) and the average number of radiographs taken within this period was 4 (range, 2–6). The change in fracture kyphosis was plotted against time following fracture. Based on 15 patients with data extending to 200 days follow up, it was observed that the rate of change in fracture kyphosis between two time points of 100 and 150 days predicted the trend in kyphosis progression until the end of follow up in 14 out of the 15 patients. This observed rate of 14/15 (0.93) has a 95% confidence interval of 0.7 to 0.99 (Blyth-Still-Casella exact interval). Conclusions: The standing lateral radiograph of patients with conservatively treated
We assessed narrowing of the spinal canal in 39 burst fractures and fracture-dislocations of thoracolumbar vertebrae treated by the AO Internal Spinal Fixator, using CT preoperatively and at various stages postoperatively. Computer-aided planimetry was used to measure the narrowing, and its restoration shortly after instrumentation, or at 15 months. The mean initial reduction of canal area was to 63.7% +/- 18.8% of normal; this was restored to a mean of 95.4% +/- 21.2% of normal when measured either soon after surgery or at 15 months (p <
0.001 for both groups). There was more improvement in cases assessed later. For fractures from D12 to L3, the mean canal area was restored to 99.4% of normal; but at L4 or L5 the mean restitution was to only 60.9% (p <
0.05). We found no correlation between preoperative loss of area and amount of restoration, or severity of neurological deficit. Nor was there any correlation between the delay before surgery and the improvement achieved. The mechanism of fracture reduction appears to be a combination of distraction ligamentotaxis and forced hyperextension.
Of a total of 905 patients with fracture or fracture-dislocation of the thoracolumbar spine admitted from 1969 to 1982, a neurological deficit was present in 334 (37%). All unstable injuries were initially treated by reduction and posterior fusion. In 79 of these patients, an anterolateral decompression was undertaken later because of persistent neurological deficit and radiographic demonstration of encroachment on the spinal canal. One patient died of pulmonary embolism; 78 were reviewed after a mean period of four years. Of these 78 patients 18 made a complete neurological recovery while 53 appeared to have benefited from the procedure; 25 remained unchanged. The best results were obtained in burst
Introduction. The management of
The aim of this study was first, to determine
whether CT scans undertaken to identify serious injury to the viscera were
of use in detecting clinically unrecognised fractures of the thoracolumbar
vertebrae, and second, to identify patients at risk of ‘missed injury’. We retrospectively analysed CT scans of the chest and abdomen
performed for blunt injury to the torso in 303 patients. These proved
to be positive for thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in only
2% and 1.3% of cases, respectively. However, 51 (16.8%) showed a
fracture of the thoracolumbar vertebrae and these constituted our subset
for study. There were eight women and 43 men with mean age of 45.2
years (15 to 94). There were 29 (57%) stable and 22 (43%) unstable
fractures. Only 17 fractures (33.3%) had been anticipated after
clinical examination. Of the 22 unstable fractures, 11 (50%) were
anticipated. Thus, within the whole group of 303 patients, an unstable spinal
injury was missed in 11 patients (3.6%); no harm resulted as they
were all protected until the spine had been cleared. A subset analysis
revealed that patients with a high Injury Severity Score, a low
Glasgow Coma Scale and haemodynamic instability were most likely
to have a significant fracture in the absence of positive clinical
findings. This is the group at greatest risk. Clinical examination alone cannot detect significant fractures
of the thoracolumbar spine. It should be combined with CT imaging
to reduce the risk of missed injury.
Many authors recommend surgery to remove retropulsed bone fragments from the canal in burst fractures to 'decompress' the spinal canal. We believe, however, that neurological damage occurs at the moment of injury when the anatomy is most distorted, and is not due to impingement in the resting positions observed afterwards. We studied 20 consecutive patients admitted to our spinal injuries unit over a two-year period with a T12 or L1 burst fracture. There was no correlation between bony or canal disruption and the degree of neurological compromise sustained but there was a significant correlation between the energy of the injury (as gauged by the Injury Severity Score) and the neurological status (p <
0.001). This suggests that neurological injury occurs at the time of trauma rather than being a result of pressure from fragments in the canal afterwards and questions the need to operate simply to remove these fragments.
In 139 patients with burst fractures of the thoracic, thoracolumbar or lumbar spine, the least sagittal diameter of the spinal canal at the level of injury was measured by computerised tomography. By multiple logistic regression we investigated the joint correlation of the level of the burst fracture and the percentage of spinal canal stenosis with the probability of an associated neurological deficit. There was a very significant correlation between neurological deficit and the percentage of spinal canal stenosis; the higher the level of injury the greater was the probability. The severity of neurological deficit could not be predicted.
Study design. Retrospective study. Objectives. To identify patient outcomes, in particular employment, >5-years following traumatic
Objectives. This presentation discusses the experience at our Centre with treating traumatic
Thoracolumbar injury classification systems are not used or researched extensively in paediatric population yet. This systematic review aims to explore the validity and reliability of the two main thoracolumbar injury classification systems in the paediatric population (age ≤ 18). It also aims to explore the transferability of adult classification systems to paediatrics. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System (TLICS) published in 2005 and the AO Spine published in 2013 were assessed in this paper because they both provide guidance for the assessment of the severity of an injury and recommend management strategies. A literature search was conducted on the following databases: Medline, EMBASE, Ovid during the period November 2020 to December 2020 for studies looking at the reliability and validity of the TLICS and AO Spine classification systems in paediatric population. Data on validity (to what extent TLICS/ AO Spine recommended treatment matched the actual treatment) and reliability (inter-rater and intra-rater reliability) was extracted. There is an “almost perfect validity” for TLICS. There is a “strong association” between the validity of TLICS and AO Spine. The intra-rater reliability is “moderate” for TLICS and “substantial” for AO Spine. The intra-rater reliability is “substantial” for TLICS and “almost perfect” for AO Spine. The six studies show a good overall validity and reliability for the application of TLICS and AO Spine in pediatric
Introduction:. Most of the published papers on AI based diagnosis have focused on the algorithm's diagnostic performance in a ‘binary’ setting (i.e. disease vs no disease). However, no study evaluated the actual value for the clinicians of an AI based approach in diagnostic. Detection of Traumatic
Study design: retrospective clinical study . Objective: To study radiological late results after posterior stabilization of
Background: Thoraco-lumbar fractures without a neurological deficit are usually suitable for non-operative treatment. The main area of clinical interest is the deformity at the injured levels. The deformity may be evident at the time of presentation, though could be expected to progress in time. Objective: Accurate assessment of the temporal behaviour in the geometry of the injured segments in non-operatively treated
Introduction: Spinal fractures are associated with pain, disability, neurological dysfunction and mortality. Osteoporosis and risky leisure time activities are increasing in the population. New treatment options have been introduced. However, only a few international studies have reported its descriptive epidemiology. There are no clear consensuses regarding the choice of operative interventions versus non-operative treatment in patients with