Introduction. The management of
Many authors recommend surgery to remove retropulsed bone fragments from the canal in burst fractures to 'decompress' the spinal canal. We believe, however, that neurological damage occurs at the moment of injury when the anatomy is most distorted, and is not due to impingement in the resting positions observed afterwards. We studied 20 consecutive patients admitted to our spinal injuries unit over a two-year period with a T12 or L1 burst fracture. There was no correlation between bony or canal disruption and the degree of neurological compromise sustained but there was a significant correlation between the energy of the injury (as gauged by the Injury Severity Score) and the neurological status (p <
0.001). This suggests that neurological injury occurs at the time of trauma rather than being a result of pressure from fragments in the canal afterwards and questions the need to operate simply to remove these fragments.
In 139 patients with burst fractures of the thoracic, thoracolumbar or lumbar spine, the least sagittal diameter of the spinal canal at the level of injury was measured by computerised tomography. By multiple logistic regression we investigated the joint correlation of the level of the burst fracture and the percentage of spinal canal stenosis with the probability of an associated neurological deficit. There was a very significant correlation between neurological deficit and the percentage of spinal canal stenosis; the higher the level of injury the greater was the probability. The severity of neurological deficit could not be predicted.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether
patients with a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine treated
by short segment pedicle screw fixation fared better clinically
and radiologically if the affected segment was fused at the same
time. A total of 50 patients were enrolled in a prospective study
and assigned to one of two groups. After the exclusion of three
patients, there were 23 patients in the fusion group and 24 in the
non-fusion group. Follow-up was at a mean of 23.9 months (18 to
30). Functional outcome was evaluated using the Greenough Low Back
Outcome Score. Neurological function was graded using the American
Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale. Peri-operative blood transfusion requirements and duration of
surgery were significantly higher in the fusion group (p = 0.029
and p <
0.001, respectively). There were no clinical or radiological
differences in outcome between the groups (all outcomes p >
0.05).
The results of this study suggest that adjunctive fusion is unnecessary
when managing patients with a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar
spine with short segment pedicle screw fixation.
Decision-making regarding operative versus non-operative treatment of patients with
The progressive kyphosis and pain in patients with acute
Background: It has been reported that there is poor correlation between neurological injury and degree of bony retropulsion in
Introduction: The management of patients with
Purpose of study: There is a controversy in the surgical treatment of unstable
The evaluation of early results of combined percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and kyphoplasty for the management of thoraco-lumbar burst fractures. Between October 2008 and April 2009, 9 patients with
The October 2012 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: a Japanese questionnaire at work in Iran; curve progression in degenerative lumbar scoliosis; the cause of foot drop; the issue of avoiding the spinal cord at scoliosis surgery; ballistic injuries to the cervical spine; minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion; readmission rates after spinal surgery; clinical complications and the severely injured cervical spine; and stabilising the
We hypothesised whether MIS techniques confer any benefit when treating
Introduction: The optimal treatment for acute
INTRODUCTION: The optimal treatment for acute
Introduction: The poor correlation between neurological injury and degree of retropulsion in
Introduction: The management of thoraco-lumbar burst fractures remains controversial. Different authors have advocated immobilisation, external bracing or internal fixation by either anterior or posterior approaches. Advocates of posterior fixation have in general performed stabilisation one level above and one level below the site of the fracture, resulting in fixation of two motion segments. It is known that multi-segmental spinal fusion produces undesirable biomechanics. To stabilise the site of the fracture and avoid unnecessary fixation of an uninjured segment the senior author (T.S.) for selected patients has been using a novel technique of monosegmental fixation with placement of pedicle screws directly into the fractured vertebral body. Methods: All patients with thoraco-lumbar burst fractures admitted to St Vincents and Concord Hospitals between January 2001 and October 2003 were considered for monosegmental fixation. Patients with severe osteoporosis or complete loss of vertebral body height (“vertebra plana”) were excluded. All patients underwent surgical decompression and fixation within 10 days of injury. Fixation was obtained with 4 titanium pedicle screws and a single transverse connector (Xia System Stryker Spine). Reduction of kyphotic deformity was carried out in selected patients. Average blood loss for the procedure was 250 ml with no patients requiring transfusion. All patients had a minimum of 6 months radiological and clinical follow-up. Results: Since January 2001, 18 patients with
Objective. To evaluate the outcomes of the treatment of acute