Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 2 - 2
1 Dec 2015
Miller R
Full Access

Introduction. Diabetes is increasing on a global scale. By 2030, 10% of the global population, ½ billon people, are predicted to have diabetes. Potentially there will be a corresponding increase in number of patients referred for surgery. Traditional surgical management of these patients is challenging. Presented is a case series utilizing Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques of percutaneous metatarsal neck osteotomies, metatarsal head debridement, mid-foot closing-wedge osteotomies and hind-foot arthrodesis, for the surgical management of diabetic foot pathology. The potential socio-economic benefits analysis with regards to reduction in out-patient and theatre time, patient length of stay and time to healing are also postulated. Methods. Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques of metatarsal neck osteotomy, metatarsal head debridement, closing wedge osteotomy, mid-fusion and hind-foot arthrodesis nailing are described. Procedures are preformed as day cases with fluoroscopic guidance. Low speed, high torque burrs and wedges, create the osteotomies, which can be held with percutaneous fixation. Comparative cost analysis of conservative treatment, including clinic visits, out-patient debridement, dressings, intravenous and oral antibiotics, versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques is presented. Results. Six patients had metatarsal osteotomies for mechanical ulceration. Five reported good outcome. One patient required revision to forefoot arthroplasty due to mal-union. Five patients had debridement of metatarsal heads, which healed on average at six to eight weeks. Eight patients had mid-foot arthrodesis. Two infected cases required removal of metalwork. Three patients had hind-foot arthrodesis for arthritis following ankle fracture with degeneration and deformity. Patients had good short and early medium term outcomes, with no reports of below-knee amputation. This technique is reproducible once the initial learning curve is mastered. Comparative cost analysis, suggests significant financial savings by reducing inpatient admissions, clinic visits and theatre time. Conclusion. Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques may provide an alternative surgical management for diabetic patient with foot and ankle pathology


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 2 | Pages 164 - 171
1 Feb 2014
Hannon CP Smyth NA Murawski CD Savage-Elliott BA Deyer TW Calder JDF Kennedy JG

Osteochondral lesions (OCLs) occur in up to 70% of sprains and fractures involving the ankle. Atraumatic aetiologies have also been described. Techniques such as microfracture, and replacement strategies such as autologous osteochondral transplantation, or autologous chondrocyte implantation are the major forms of surgical treatment. Current literature suggests that microfracture is indicated for lesions up to 15 mm in diameter, with replacement strategies indicated for larger or cystic lesions. Short- and medium-term results have been reported, where concerns over potential deterioration of fibrocartilage leads to a need for long-term evaluation. . Biological augmentation may also be used in the treatment of OCLs, as they potentially enhance the biological environment for a natural healing response. Further research is required to establish the critical size of defect, beyond which replacement strategies should be used, as well as the most appropriate use of biological augmentation. This paper reviews the current evidence for surgical management and use of biological adjuncts for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:164–71


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 28 - 28
1 Jan 2014
Bass E Sirikonda S Walker C
Full Access

Introduction:. Techniques devised for 1. st. MTPJ arthrodesis have been described since 1979 when Humbert et al published a ‘tongue and trough’ technique. Common contemporary techniques include fixation with single or crossed screws, or dorsal plates and these are suitable for a variety of indications. All three contemporary techniques have demonstrated a wide range of fusion rates. This study reports a comparison of non-union rates of the 1. st. metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) with the current Memometal Anchorage™ dorsal plate system and the previous Hallu-fix™ and Charlotte™ systems. Methods:. Between 01/2009 and 07/2012 174 consecutive 1. st. MTPJ fusions were performed for 153 patients (Mean age 62, range 42 to 83) by three surgeons at one University teaching hospital. 40 patients (23%) were male and 132 (77%) female. Patients without available radiographs were excluded from the study. 20 patients received Hallu-fix™ plates, 76 Charlotte™ plates and 76 Memometal Anchorage™. Radiographs of the feet were taken from four weeks postoperatively and reviewed for incomplete bone bridging and increased radiolucency around screws. Results:. 12 (7.0%) non-unions were identified in total during followup. A single (5.0%) Hallu-fix™ system, 9 (11.8%) Charlotte™ systems and 2 (2.6%) Memometal Anchorage™ plating systems did not develop a satisfactory fusion. Typical followup in patients in whom there were no postoperative complications and who developed satisfactory bony union was 12 weeks. Those with non-unions were followed until revision procedures were successful. Conclusion:. The total non-union rate of this centre during the period compares favourably with published literature suggesting the technique is suitable for numerous indications in 1. st. MTPJ fusion. With a non-union rate of 5.0%, the Hallu-fix™ shows favourable results when compared authors using the same system. The Charlotte™ system demonstrated an 11.8% non-union rate, comparing poorly with published literature. The Memometal Anchorage™ system, with a non-union rate of 2.6%, demonstrated promising results


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXII | Pages 17 - 17
1 May 2012
Haddad S
Full Access

Arthrodesis of both the ankle and the hindfoot has been discussed in the literature since the early part of the last century. Techniques have been modified substantially since these early discussions, though complications remain a frustrating element in patient management. Early procedures relied on molded plaster casts to hold fixation in corrected positions. Successful outcomes were hampered by loss of reduction in these casts and subsequent malunions. In addition, motion within these casts lead to a high rate of nonunion between the opposed bony surfaces. The era of internal fixation allowed compression across arthrodesis sites, enhancing union but creating a host of technical errors leading to unsatisfying results. Malunion is also seen in post-traumatic situations. In particular, non-operative management of calcaneus fracture (or other hindfoot fractures) leads to not only arthritis of the involved joint surfaces, but malunion complicating successful fusion. Fusion in-situ leads to a high level of patient dissatisfaction, leading surgeons to challenging deformity correction while trying to achieve successful arthrodesis in compromised joints. This lecture will focus on two types of malunion, one iatrogenic, one acquired. Revision triple arthrodesis (iatrogenic) can range from simple to challenging. A variety of studies document patient dissatisfaction following correction via this technique, ranging from Graves and Mann (1993) where the highest dissatisfaction rate was in highest in valgus malunion, to Sangeorzan and Hansen (1993), who found a 9% failure rate, most with varus malunion. The precarious balance required to create a plantigrade foot via triple arthrodesis with pre-existing deformity leaves even the most skilled surgeon challenged. As such, this component of the lecture will focus on recognition and correction of malunion based on a structured algorithmic approach we first presented in 1997. This algorithm is based on recognition of the apex of the deformity, and creating osteotomies to achieve balance. We reviewed 28 patients who returned for follow-up examination who received treatment through this algorithm and found a statistically significant improvement in pre- and postoperative AOFAS ankle/hindfoot score, from an average of 31 points preoperatively to 59 postoperatively (p<0.01). All patients united, and all stated they would undergo the revision procedure again. Comparisons of pre- and postoperative shoe wear modification demonstrated a statistically significant improvement (p=0.01). Preoperatively, 20 patients required restrictive devices such as ankle foot orthoses and orthopaedic shoes. Postoperatively, only 1 patient required such a restrictive device. In fact, 17 patients required no modifications to their shoe wear at all. The second component to this lecture will assess acquired hindfoot deformity, from malunion created by calcaneus fractures. A 2005 JBJS study by Brauer, et.al. found operative management resulted in a lower rate of subtalar arthrodesis with a shorter time off work compared to non-operative management. Removing the expense of time off work still netted a $2800 savings for operative management over non-operative management. Sanders echoed these thoughts in a JBJS 2006 paper, suggesting patients with displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures may benefit from acute operative treatment given the difficulty encountered in restoring the calcaneal height and the talo-calcaneal relationship in symptomatic calcaneal fracture malunion. Thus, with these challenges in mind, the goal of this component of the lecture is to introduce methods to achieve balance and union with calcaneus fracture malunion. Vertically oriented multiplanar calcaneal osteotomy may assist the surgeon in avoiding the higher non-union rate associated with bone-block arthrodesis procedures. In this vein, the challenges associated with bone block subtalar arthrodesis will be explored