Background. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is the most frequently used implant in management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. There is a known statistical relationship between a tip-apex distance (TAD) >25mm and higher rate of implant failure. Our aim was to analyse all DHS procedures performed in our trust from seventeen months and compare their TAD values to the acceptable standard of ≤25mm. Methods. All patients undergoing DHS between April 2020-August 2021 were identified from our theatre system. Additionally, those presenting to hospital with implant failures were included. Patient demographics, date of surgery, fracture classification (AO) and date/mode of failure were recorded. Intraoperative fluoroscopy images were reviewed to calculate TAD, screw location and neck shaft angles by two independent observers. Results. 215 patients were identified, five of which were excluded due to inadequate fluoroscopy. Failure was seen in 3.3% of the cohort (n=7), of which 71.4% had an unacceptable TAD. In total, 21 patients (10%) had TAD >25mm, of whom 12 had superiorly and 15 had posteriorly placed screws. There were no failures in patients with a TAD of <20mm whereas a TAD >30mm had 50% failure rate. Conclusion. This audit reinforces the importance of aiming for a low TAD (preferably <20mm) intraoperatively. It is also desirable to avoid superiorly and significantly posteriorly placed screws. Implications. Complex hip revision surgery in the elderly bears substantial financial implications to the NHS and, more importantly, causes prolonged morbidity to the patient. Adhering to established standards will ensure reduced implant failure and best patient care

Awareness that minimising tip apex distance (TAD) when inserting a sliding hip screw reduces the risk of screw cut out is important for orthopaedic trainees. The advent of the Picture Archive and Communication System (PACS) has made the accurate measurement of TAD from x-rays and image intensifier films much easier. This study was to determine whether TAD would be reduced if a surgeon knew that his performance was being continually monitored. 31 consecutive cases of sliding hip screw insertion by a single group of surgeons were identified and the TAD measured. The mean TAD was 16.11mm (8.87mm-25.47mm). The same surgeons were then re-educated as to the importance of the TAD and informed that their results would be monitored and discussed. The next 34 consecutive cases were collected prospectively. The mean TAD in these cases was 13.83mm (6.72mm-21.51mm). There was a significant difference between the TAD for the two groups using the two-tailed t-test (p=0.034). There was one implant failure in the pre education group and none in the post education group. These results suggest that awareness of surveillance improves surgical performance even if the importance of the variable being assessed is already known

Intra-operative Tip-Apex Distance (TAD) estimation optimises dynamic hip screw (DHS) placement during hip fracture fixation, reducing risk of cut-out. Thread-width of a standard DHS screw measures approximately 12.5 millimetres. We assessed the effect of introducing screw thread-width as an intra-operative distance reference to surgeons. The null hypothesis was that there were no differences between hip fracture fixation before and after this intervention. Primary outcome measure was TAD. Secondary outcome measures included position of the screw in the femoral head, quality of reduction, cut-out and surgeon accuracy of estimating TAD. 150 intra-operative DHS radiographs were assessed before and after introducing screw thread-width distance reference to surgeons. Mean TAD reduced from 19.37mm in the control group to 16.49mm in the prospective group (p=<0.001). The number of DHS with a TAD > 25mm reduced from 14% to 6%. Screw position on lateral radiographs was significantly improved (p=0.004). There were no significant differences in screw position on antero-posterior radiographs, quality of reduction, or rate of cut-out. Significant improvement in accuracy (p=0.05) and precision (p=0.005) of TAD estimation was demonstrated. Awareness and use of screw-thread width improves estimation and positioning of a DHS screw in the femoral head during fixation of hip fractures

Failure of cephalomedullary fixation for proximal femur fractures is an uncommon event associated with significant morbidity to the patient and cost to the healthcare system. This institution changed nailing system from the PFNA (DePuy Synthes) to InterTan (Smith and Nephew) in February 2020. To assess for non-inferiority, a retrospective review was performed on 247 patients treated for unstable proximal femur fractures (AO 31 A2; A3). Patients were identified through manual review of fluoroscopic images. Stable fracture patterns were excluded (AO 31 A1). Pre/post operative imaging, demographic data, operative time and ASA scores assessed. Internal/external imaging and national joint registry data were reviewed for follow up. No significant difference was found in overall failure rate of PFNA vs InterTan (4.84% vs 3.23%; p = 0.748). Overall, short nails were more likely to fail by cut-out than long nails (7.5% vs 1.2%; p = 0.015). Nails which failed by varus cut-out had a higher tip/apex distance (TAD) (26.2mm vs 17.0mm; p < 0.001). Of concern, varus cut-out occurred in two InterTan nails with TAD of <25mm. The PFNA enjoyed a shorter operative time for both the short (59.1 vs 71.8 mins; p = 0.022) and long nails (98.8 vs 114.3 mins; p = 0.016) with no difference in 120-day survival rate. Overall failure rates of the PFNA and InterTan nailing systems were comparable. However, the failure rate of short nails in this study is concerning. Using long nails with a lag screw design for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures may reduce failure rates. Cumulative frequency analysis suggests stringent tip-apex distances of less than 21mm may reduce failure rates in lag-screw design cephulomedullary nails. This dataset suggests that unstable intertrochanteric fractures may be more reliably managed with a long cephalomedullary device

The PFNA is used routinely at the RUH for unstable peri-trochanteric and femoral fractures. Failure of operative treatment is associated with increased morbidity and financial burden. We analysed surgical and fracture factors, aiming to identify those associated with fixation failure. Retrospective analysis of 76 consecutive patients treated with a PFNA between 2009–2012 was performed. Patient demographics were assessed, along with fracture classification, adequacy of reduction, tip apex distance (TAD) and grade of surgeon. Failure was defined as metal work failure, non-union or need for repeat procedure. The mean age was 78.9 years (25.9–97.4). 21 were male and 49 female. There were 17 failures (24.3%) (7 required further surgery). 10 failures were per-trochanteric, 2 sub-trochanteric and 5 mid-shaft fractures. Complications included 4 broken and 6 backed-out distal locking screws, 2 blade cut-outs, 1 nail fracture and 4 non-unions. All per-trochanteric were adequately reduced with a TAD <25 mm. 11/17 had consultant supervision. A high rate of backed-out distal locking screws was identified. We found no concerns with adequacy of reduction, TAD or consultant supervision

The aim of this study was to establish any association between implant cut-out and a Tip Apex Distance (TAD), ≥25mm, in proximal femoral fractures, following closed reduction and stabilisation, with either a Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or Intramedullary Hip Screw (IMHS) device. Furthermore, we investigated whether any difference in cut-out rate was related to fracture configuration or implant type. WE conducted a retrospective review of the full clinical records and radiographs of 65 consecutive patients, who underwent either DHS or IMHS fixation of proximal femoral fractures. The TAD was measured in the standard fashion using the combined measured AP and lateral radiograph distances. Fractures were classified according to the Muller AO classification. 35 patients underwent DHS fixation and 30 patients had IMHS fixation. 5 in each group had a TAD≥25mm. There were no cut-outs in the DHS group and 3 in the IMHS group. 2 of the cut-outs had a TAD≥25mm. The 3 cut-outs in the IMHS group had a fracture classification of 31-A2, 31-A3 and 32-A3.1 respectively. In addition, the fractures were inadequately reduced and fixed into a varus position. A TAD<25mm would appear to be associated with a lower rate of cut-out. The cut-out rate in the IMHS group was higher than the DHS group. Contributing factors may have included an unstable fracture configuration and inadequate closed fracture reduction at the time of surgery

Introduction. The reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur are anatomically and mechanically different from most intertrochanteric fractures. These fractures are complex and very difficult to treat. To evaluate the results of the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with cephalomedullary nails. Materials and Methods. Between 2005 and 2009, 1179 extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur were treated at our institution. Retrospective review of these x-rays identified 59 patients with reverse obliquity fracture pattern. We analysed our results of cephalomedullary nailing of these complex fractures and evaluated factors responsible for failure of fixation. Results. Of the 59 patients with reverse oblique fracture pattern, one patient was treated with DHS, and two other patients didn't have post-operative x-rays and therefore were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 56 patients treated with cephalomedullary nails, forty eight were treated with gamma nails, five with PFNA and three with ATN. There were 40 females and 16 males with median age of 81.3 years (17–103 years). Six of the fifty six (10.7%) failed to heal or had failure of fixation. The failure rate was four of forty eight for the gamma nails, one of five of the PFNA and one of three of ATN. One of thirty seven (2.7%) of anatomically reduced fractures and five of nineteen (26.3%) of non-anatomically reduced fractures had failure of treatment (p = 0.01). Three of thirteen (23.1%) with femoral medialisation and three of forty three (6.9%) without femoral medialisation had failure of treatment (p = 0.13). Four of forty four (9.1%) with avulsed lesser trochanter and two of twelve (16.6%) without avulsion had failure of treatment (p = 0.59). Three of thirty seven (8.1%) with tip apex distance (TAD) of less than twenty and three of nineteen (15.7%) with TAD more than twenty had failure of treatment (p = 0.65). Conclusion. Inspite of the recent advances in the methods of internal fixation available to surgeons, reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures continue to be a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. In our study, although poor fracture reduction was observed to be the only significant factor associated with a high failure rate, femoral medialisation and tip apex distance of more than 20 had a high association with poor outcome