Aim. The demand for a synthetic bone substitute that can build bone and at the same time kill bacteria is high. The aim of this study was to compare the elution of gentamicin from a new synthetic bone substitute in vitro with the performance in clinical applications. Method. Gentamicin release was measured from a synthetic bone graft substitute, comparing in vitro and clinical conditions:. 1). elution in Ringers solution. The bone graft substitute contained 175mg gentamicin per 10mL. The material was introduced either as paste or as pre-set beads with a high or low surface areas, >100cm. 2. and 24cm. 2. respectively. The gentamycin release was measured by daily collection of samples. 2). elution in patients treated for trochanteric hip fractures(n=6) or uncemented hip revisions(n=5) 7,3±1,1mL of substitute was implanted and drainage was collected at 6h,12h,24h,30h,36h post-op. Blood serum was collected every hour for the first 6h and thereafter every 6h until 4 days post-op, urine – daily for the first 7 days post-op. 3). elution in patients treated after bone tumor resection(n=8), 12,1±5,5mL of substitute was implanted and both drainage and blood serum were collected daily until 2 days post-op. Gentamicin concentrations were analyzed using antibody technique. Results. In the in vitro study, there was an initial peak in the gentamicin concentration (GC) for all the samples and at a level above 4mg/L, which is the MIC break point, during the whole test period of 28 days. All gentamicin was released during the test period and more than 95 % had been released after 2–4 days independently of the surface area of the material, or if it was pre-set or paste. In the clinical studies similar results were found. Gentamicin was detected in the drainage until 2 days post-op. and the hip patients 40% less GC – compared to the tumor patients. In the blood serum with higher GC in the tumor patients and non-detectable levels after 2 days post-op for the hip patients. The GC was significantly lower than maximum systemic level recommended of 12 mg/L. In the urine, GC was above the MIC of 4mg/L for the first seven days post-op. Conclusions. A reliable in vitro test method has been identified for the future development of additional new and effective antibiotic containing bone substitutes. The new bone regenerating carrier gives very high local antibiotic release for a controlled short time after surgery and high systemic serum concentrations are avoided

Endoprosthetic reconstruction for pathologic acetabular fractures is associated with a high risk of periprosthetic joint infection. In this setting, bone defect reconstruction utilising co-delivery of a synthetic bone substitute with an antibiotic, is an attractive treatment option from both, therapeutic and prophylactic perspective. We wished to address some concerns that remain regarding the possible presence of potentially wear inducing particles in the periprosthetic joint space subsequent to this procedure. We analysed a drain fluid sample from an endoprosthetic reconstruction of a pathologic acetabular fracture with implantation of a gentamicin eluting, biphasic bone graft substitute, consisting of 40% hydroxyapatite (HA) and 60% calcium sulphate (CERAMENT G), into the residual peri-acetabular bone defect. This sample was divided into two 1.5ml subsamples, to one of which 100mg HA particles were added as control before burning off all organic substance at very high temperature. These heat treated samples were then examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDAX) and compared to a reference sample consisting of HA particles only. On SEM, hydroxyapatite particles were readily recognisable in the control and reference samples, whereas only very few particles over 2μm were apparent in the ”pure” drain sample. EDAX revealed that very large amounts of salts were present in both drainage samples. The pure drainage sample however, contained markedly lower amounts of calcium and phosphate compared to reference and control samples. No HA particles as such, were seen in the pure sample, however their presence cannot be excluded with absolute certainty, as some particles might have been hidden within the large salt conglomerates. We could not find clear evidence that the drain fluid really contained HA particles. More thorough investigations are needed and future analyses with prior removal of the high salt content would likely yield more conclusive results

Fresh-frozen allograft bone is frequently used in orthopaedic surgery. We investigated the incidence of allograft-related infection and analysed the outcomes of recipients of bacterial culture-positive allografts from our single-institute bone bank during bone transplantation. The fresh-frozen allografts were harvested in a strict sterile environment during total joint arthroplasty surgery and immediately stored in a freezer at -78º to -68º C after packing. Between January 2007 and December 2012, 2024 patients received 2083 allografts with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. The overall allograft-associated infection rate was 1.2% (24/2024). Swab cultures of 2083 allografts taken before implantation revealed 21 (1.0%) positive findings. The 21 recipients were given various antibiotics at the individual orthopaedic surgeon’s discretion. At the latest follow-up, none of these 21 recipients displayed clinical signs of infection following treatment. Based on these findings, we conclude that an incidental positive culture finding for allografts does not correlate with subsequent surgical site infection. Additional prolonged post-operative antibiotic therapy may not be necessary for recipients of fresh-frozen bone allograft with positive culture findings.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:427–31.