Aim. A two-stage surgical strategy (debridement-negative pressure therapy (NPT) and flap coverage) with prolonged antimicrobial therapy is usually proposed in pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis but has not been widely evaluated. Method. Adult patients with pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis treated by a two-stage surgical strategy were included in a retrospective cohort study. Determinants of superinfection (i.e., additional microbiological findings at reconstruction) and treatment failure were assessed using binary logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Results. Sixty-four pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis in 61 patients (age, 47 (IQR, 36–63)) were included. Osteomyelitis was mostly plurimicrobial (73%), with a predominance of S. aureus (47%), Enterobacteriaceae (44%) and anaerobes (44%). Flap coverage was performed after 7 (IQR, 5–10) weeks of NPT, with 43 (68%) positive bone samples among which 39 (91%) were superinfections, associated with a high ASA score (OR, 5.8; p=0.022). An increased prevalence of coagulase negative Staphylococci (p=0.017) and Candida (p=0.003) was observed at time of flap coverage. An ESBL Enterobacteriaceae was found in 5 (12%) patients, associated with fluoroquinolone consumption (OR, 32.4; p=0.005). Treatment duration was as 20 (IQR, 14–27) weeks, including 11 (IQR, 8–15) after reconstruction. After a follow-up of 54 (IQR, 27–102) weeks, 15 (23%) failures were observed, associated with previous pressure ulcer (OR, 5.7; p=0.025) and Actinomyces infection (OR, 9.5; p=0.027). Conclusions. Pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis is a difficult-to-treat clinical condition, generating an important consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Carbapenem should be reserved for ESBL at-risk patients only, including those with previous fluoroquinolone use. The uncorrelation between outcome and the debridement-to-reconstruction interval argue for a short sequence to limit the total duration of treatment

Introduction. Charcot neuroarthropathy is a limb threatening condition and the optimal surgical strategy for limb salvage in gross foot deformity remains unclear. We present our experience of using fine wire frames to correct severe midfoot deformity, followed by internal beaming to maintain the correction. Materials and Methods. Nine patients underwent this treatment between 2020–2023. Initial deformity correction by Ilizarov or hexapod butt frame was followed by internal beaming with a mean follow up of 11 months. A retrospective analysis of radiographs and electronic records was performed. Meary's angle, calcaneal pitch, cuboid height, hindfoot midfoot angle and AP Meary's angle were compared throughout treatment. Complications, length of stay and the number of operations are also described. Results. Mean age was 53 years (range:40–59). Mean frame duration was 3.3 months before conversion to beaming. Prior frame-assisted deformity correction resulted in consistently improved radiological parameters. Varying degrees of subsequent collapse were universal, but 5 patients still regained mobility and a stable, plantargrade, ulcer-free foot. Complications were common, including hardware migration (N=6,66%), breakage (N=2,22%), loosening (N=3,33%), infection (N=4,44%), 1 amputation and an unscheduled reoperation rate of 55%. Mean cumulative length of stay was 42 days. Conclusions. Aggressive deformity correction and internal fixation for Charcot arthropathy requires strategic and individualised care plans. Complications are expected for each patient. Patients must understand this is a limb salvage scenario. This management strategy is resource heavy and requires timely interventions at each stage with a well-structured MDT delivering care. The departmental learning points are to be discussed

Introduction. Distal femur fracture fixation in elderly presents significant challenges due to osteoporosis and associated comorbidities. There has been an evolution in the management of these fractures with a description of various surgical techniques and fixation methods; however, currently, there is no consensus on the standard of care. Non-union rates of up to 19% and mortality rates of up to 26 % at one year have been reported in the literature. Delay in surgery and delay in mobilisation post-operatively have been identified as two main factors for high rate of mortality. As biomechanical studies have proved better stability with dual plating or nail-plate combination, a trend has been shifting for past few years towards rigid fixation to allow early mobilisation. Our study aims to compare outcomes of distal femur fractures managed with either single plate (SP), dual plating (DP) or nail-plate construct (NP). Methods. A retrospective review of patients aged above 65 years with distal femur fractures (both native and peri-prosthetic) who underwent surgical management between June 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on mode of fixation - single plate or dual plating or nail-plate construct. AO/OTA classification was used for non-periprosthetic, and Unified classification system (UCS) was used for periprosthetic fractures. Data on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, re-operation rate, radiological outcomes and mortality rate were evaluated. Primary objective was to compare re-operation rate and mortality rate between 3 groups at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 year. Results. A cohort of 32 patients with distal femur fractures were included in this study. 91% were females and mean age was 80.97 (range 68–97). 18 (53%) were non-periprosthetic fracture and 14 (47%) were periprosthetic fractures.18 patients underwent single plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 8, 33B/C – 2, UCS V3B – 5, V3C – 3),10 patients had dual plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 1, 33B/C – 4, UCS V3B – 3, V3C – 2) and 4 patients underwent nail-plate combination fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 4). 70.5% patients had surgery within 36 hours of admission and 90% within 48 hours. Analysis showed no re-operation at 30 days, 6 months in all 3 groups. At 1 year one patient had re-operation in dual-plating periprosthetic group (Distal femur replacement done for failed fixation). Three patients (16%) in single plate group had re-operation at 2 years (2 for peri-implant fracture and 1 for infection). None of the patients treated with Nail-plate combination had re-operation. Mortality rate at 30 days was 0% in among all the 3 groups. At 6 months, it was 16% in single plate group and 0% in DP and NP groups at 6 months and at 1 year mortality rate was 27% in SP group, 10% in DP and 0% in NP group. Combined mortality rate was 0% at 30 days, 9% at 6 months and 18.7% at one year. Conclusion. Our analysis provides insights into fixation methods of distal femur fractures in elderly patients. We conclude that a lower re-operation rate and mortality rate can be achieved with early surgery and rigid fixation with either dual plating or nail-plate construct to allow early mobilisation. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and guide the selection of optimal surgical strategies for these challenging fractures

Several preoperative planning tools in computer-assisted surgery in acetabular fractures have been proposed. Moreover, all these preoperative planning tools are based on geometrical repositioning with their own limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of our prototype virtual planning tool using a rigid biomechanical model to predict failure in fracture reduction. Between November of 2015 and June of 2016, 10 patients were operated by the main author for acetabular fracture in our institution. To validate our biomechanical model planning tool, biomechanical simulation was performed for each patient immediately after the surgery. Reduction quality was assessed on post-operative CT scans. A 3D model of the acetabular fracture was build out of the CT images using the non-commercial software Itksnap. Then a biomechanical model implemented within the non-commercial Artisynth framework was used to perform virtual reduction. Surgical approach and surgical strategy according to the operative report were simulated. The simulated reductions and the surgical reductions were compared. The same reductions were obtained during surgery and biomechanical simulation in the 10 cases. For 7 cases, reduction was achieved by anterior surgical approach and so was the simulation. For 3 cases, reduction was achieved by posterior surgical approach and so was the simulation. The biomechanical simulation found similar results using the same surgical strategy with 9 anatomical reductions (90%) and one imperfect reduction (10%). The mean duration to perform acetabular planning surgery was 24 +/− 9 min [16–38]. Our virtual planning tool using a rigid biomechanical model can predict success or failure in fracture reduction according to the surgical approach and the surgical strategy

Aims. Current antibiotic treatment strategies for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are based mostly on observational retrospective studies. High-quality data from prospective cohorts using identical treatment strategies may improve current clinical practice. We developed a regional network of collaborating hospitals and established a uniform treatment protocol. Data from all patients diagnosed with a PJI are prospectively registered in a an online database. With this quality registry we aim to study the outcome of antibiotic and surgical strategies while adhering to a pre-established treatment protocol. Methods. A working group of orthopaedic surgeons, infectious disease specialists and microbiologists was established. The working group reached consensus on definition of PJI and a uniform treatment protocol, based on current guidelines and expert-based clinical experience. A website was built to communicate information to colleagues and patients (. www.protheseinfectie.nl. ). In each participating hospital weekly multidisciplinary meetings were started to discuss all PJI cases. All patients are included in an online quality registry and followed for at least two years. We aim to enroll >600 patients with a knee or hip PJI. Research will focus on the duration of antibiotic treatment, antibiotic suppressive therapy and comparison of different oral antibiotic treatment strategies in relation to successful treatment outcomes. Results. Currently, four regional hospitals are included in the partnership. Multidisciplinary meetings have lowered the threshold to discuss patients, and the adherence to the PJI treatment protocol has improved steadily. Complicated cases are discussed between colleagues from collaborating centers. The collaboration has been perceived as very successful by the participating hospitals. Since 2015, over 300 patients have been included, of whom 52% were male. In 26%, PJI occurred after revision surgery. Staphylococcus aureus was involved in 25% of cases, coagulase-negative Staphylococci in 23%, Streptococci in 13% and Gram-negative micro-organisms in 15%. Conclusions. In this project, collaboration between different medical specialties through multidisciplinary meetings was the key to the improvement of patient care The regional collaborative project led to the implementation of a uniform treatment protocol for PJI. With this prospective project we aim to improve patient care by providing evidence for optimal antibiotic and surgical strategies for PJI. Ideally, countries should have hospital networks and a uniform method of data collection to make it easy to share data for scientific research

Aims. Hip fracture is a common injury in the elderly. Recent studies in orthopaedic access have demonstrated inequities affecting Māori. This study aimed to compare the demographic differences between Māori and NZ Europeans with hip fractures, identify any deficiencies in initial, surgical and post op care and in outcomes. Methods. All cases in New Zealand from 2018–2020 were included. Key outcomes included time to theatre from admission, change in walking status, residential status and survival at 120 days post fracture. Univariate analysis compared differences in demographics, surgical and management factors between ethnicities. Key outcome comparisons were conducted using multivariate analysis to assess whether ethnicity was an independent risk factor for outcomes. Results. Data from 9432 patients were analysed. 305 patients were Māori (3.2%). Māori were younger at presentation (76.2 vs 83.2 yrs, p<0.001), used less walking aids (50 vs 56%, p=0.034), were more medically comorbid and more likely to have impaired cognition (42% vs 37%, p=0.022). There were no differences in fracture types, surgical management strategy, and nerve block utilisation between ethnicities. No perioperative management differences were found. Māori had a longer delay to theatre (39 vs 35hrs, p=0.007), and were less likely to be prescribed bone protection on discharge (64% vs 71%, p=0.011). Once adjusted location and ASA, difference in time to theatre was not statistically significantly. Overall mortality was 13.1% at 120 days. 45% had a reduction in walking ability while 15% required increase level of care. Multivariate analysis found no differences were found between ethnicities for mortality, change in residential or walking status. Discussion. While younger at presentation, Māori are more co-morbid and may live in DHBs with worse theatre access, contributing to a longer time to theatre. Improving access to tertiary care and overall health of older Māori will likely improve outcomes

This review compares the outcomes and complication rates of three surgical strategies used for the management of symptomatic os acromiale. The purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations. A systematic review of nine prospective studies, seven retrospective studies, and three case studies published across ten countries between 1993 and 2018 was performed. Adult patients (i.e., ≥ 18 years of age) with a symptomatic os acromiale that failed nonoperative management were included in this review. Surgical techniques utilized within the included studies include excision, acromioplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The primary outcomes of interest included patient satisfaction and return to activity. Range of motion and several standardized outcome measurement tools were also included in the final analysis. Patient satisfaction was highest in the excision and ORIF groups, with 92% and 82% of patients reporting good to excellent postoperative results, respectively, compared to 63% in the acromioplasty group. All three patient groups experienced improved postoperative objective scores (i.e., patient-reported outcome scores and active range of motion). The excision group experienced a complication rate of 1%, while the acromioplasty group experienced a complication rate of 11% and the ORIF group a rate of 67%. This study reports on the largest sample of patients who have undergone surgical treatment for a symptomatic os acromiale. We have demonstrated that excision of the os with repair of the deltoid resulted in the best clinical outcomes with the least complications. In healthy adult patients with a large os fragment and a normal rotator cuff, surgical fixation may provide increased preservation of deltoid function while offering good patient satisfaction. Such patients should be aware that they are at increased risk of requiring a second procedure due to symptomatic hardware following ORIF

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful and effective treatments for advanced hip osteoarthritis (OA). Over the last 5 years, Canada has seen a 17.8% increase in the number of hip replacements performed annually, and that number is expected to grow along with the aging Canadian population. However, the rise in THA surgery is associated with an increased number of patients at risk for the development of an infection involving the joint prosthesis and adjacent deep tissue – periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Despite improved hygiene protocols and novel surgical strategies, PJI remains a serious complication. No previous population-based studies has investigated PJI risk factors using a time-to-event approach and none have focused exclusively on patients undergoing THA for primary hip OA. The purpose of this study is to determine risk factors for PJI after primary THA for OA using a large population-based database collected over 15 years. Our secondary objective is to determine the incidence of PJI, the time to PJI following primary THA, and if PJI rates have changed in the past 15 years. We performed a population-based cohort study using linked administrative databases in Ontario, Canada in accordance with RECORD and STROBE guidelines. All primary total hip replacements performed for osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 or older between January 1st 2002 – December 31st 2016 in Ontario, Canada were identified. Periprosthetic joint infection as the cause for revision surgery was identified with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10), Clinical Modification diagnosis code T84.53 in any component of the healthcare data set. Data were obtained from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). Demographic data and outcomes are summarized using descriptive statistics. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to analyze the effect of surgical factors and patient factors on the risk of developing PJI. Surgical factors include the approach, use of bone graft, use of cement, and the year of surgery. Patient factors include sex, age at surgery, income quintile and rurality (community vs. urban). We compared the 1,2,5 and 10 year PJI rates for patients undergoing THA each year of our cohort with the Cochran-Armitage test. Less than 0.1% of data were missing from all fields except for rurality which was lacking 0.3% of data. A total of 100,674 patients aged 55 or older received a primary total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis from 2002–2016. We identified 1034 cases of revision surgery for prosthetic joint infection for an overall PJI rate of 1.03%. When accounting for patients censored at final follow-up, the cumulative incidence for PJI is 1.44%. Our Cox proportional hazards model revealed that male sex, Type II diabetes mellitus, discharge to convalescent care, and having both hips replaced during one's lifetime were associated with increased risk of developing PJI following primary THA. Importantly, the time adjusted risk for PJI was equal for patients operated within the past 5 years, 6–10 years ago, or 11–15 years ago. The surgical approach, use of bone grafting or cement were not associated with increased risk of infection. PJI rates have not changed significantly over the past 15 years. One, two, five and ten-year PJI rates were similar for patients undergoing THA in all qualifying years. Analysis of a population-based cohort of 100,674 patients has shown that the risk of developing PJI following primary THA has not changed over 15 years. The surgical approach, use of bone grafting or cement were not associated with increased risk of infection. Male sex, Type II diabetes Mellitus and discharge to a rehab facility are associated with increased risk of PJI. As the risk of PJI has not changed in 15 years, an appropriately powered trial is warranted to determine interventions that can improve infection rate after THA

Purpose. Identifying knee osteoarthritis patient phenotypes is relevant to assessing treatment efficacy. Biomechanics have not been applied to phenotyping, yet features may be related to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes, an inherently mechanical surgery. This study aimed to identify biomechanical phenotypes among TKA candidates based on demographic and gait mechanic similarities, and compare objective gait improvements between phenotypes post-TKA. Methods. Patients scheduled for TKA underwent 3D gait analysis one-week pre (n=134) and one-year post-TKA (n=105). Principal Component Analysis was applied to frontal and sagittal knee angle and moment gait waveforms, extracting the major patterns of gait variability. Demographics (age, gender, BMI), gait speed, and frontal and sagittal pre-TKA gait angle and moment PC scores previously found to differentiate gender, osteoarthritis severity, and symptoms of TKA recipients were standardized (mean=0, SD=1). Multidimensional scaling (2D) and hierarchical clustering were applied to the feature set [134×15]. Number of clusters was assessed by silhouette coefficients, s, and stability by Adjusted Rand Indices (ARI). Clusters were validated by examining inter-cluster differences at baseline, and inter-cluster gait changes (Post. PCscore. –Pre. PCscore. , n=105) by k-way Chi-Squared, Kruskal-Wallace, ANOVA and Tukey's HSD. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Results. Four (k=4) TKA candidate groups yielded optimum clustering metrics (s=0.37, ARI=0.57). Cluster 1 was a compact (n=7) male cluster, walking with faster gait speeds (1.20.2m/s, 3<2<1,4, P<0.001) and higher adduction moment magnitudes (PC1, 3,4<2,1, P<0.001). Cluster 1 had the most dynamic kinematic (stance-phase flexion angle range PC4, 3,4,2<1, P<0.001) and kinetic (flexion moment range PC2, 3<2<4<1, P<0.001; adduction moment range PC2, 3,2<4<1, P<0.001 and PC3, 3,2<1, P=0.001) loading/un-loading range patterns among the clusters. Cluster 1 represented a higher-functioning (less “stiff-kneed”) male subset, most resembling asymptomatic patterns. Cluster 2 was also mostly males (44/47), demonstrating adduction moment magnitudes (PC1) comparable to Cluster 1. However, Cluster 2 was older (67.07.4years, 1,4<2, P=006), walking with slower gait speeds (0.80.2m/s), and less flexion moment (PC2) and adduction moment (PC2) range; representing an older, “stiff-kneed” male subset. Cluster 3 was mostly females (32/34) with the slowest gait speeds (0.70.1m/s), the lowest overall flexion angle magnitudes (PC1, 3<2,4,1, P<0.001), stance-to-swing flexion angle (PC2, 3<2,1, P=0.004) and flexion moment range (PC2). Cluster 3 captured a slow female subset, with the “stiffest-kneed” gait among the clusters. Cluster 4 was mostly females (43/46) with faster gait speeds (1.00.1m/s) and less stiff kinematic and kinetic patterns relative to Clusters 2–3, representing a higher-functioning female phenotype. Post-TKA, higher-functioning clusters demonstrated less dynamic gait improvement (flexion angle ΔPC2, 1,4,2<3, P<0.001; flexion moment ΔPC2, 4<2,3, P=0.009; adduction moment ΔPC2, 1<3, P=0.01), with some sagittal range patterns decreasing post-operatively. Conclusions. TKA candidates were characterized by four clusters, differing by demographics and biomechanical severity features. Pre-TKA, stiff-kneed clusters (2 and 3) had less dynamic loading/un-loading kinetics. Post-TKA functional gains were cluster-specific; stiff-kneed clusters experienced more improvement, while higher-functioning clusters demonstrated some functional decline. Results suggest the presence of cohorts who may not benefit functionally from TKA. Cluster profiling may aid in triaging and developing osteoarthritis management and surgical strategies that meet individual or group-level function needs

Aim. Late acute prosthetic joint infections (PJI) treated with surgical debridement and implant retention (DAIR) have a high failure rate. The aim of our study was to evaluate treatment outcome in late acute PJIs treated with DAIR versus implant removal. Method. In a large multicenter study, late acute PJIs were retrospectively evaluated. Failure was defined as: PJI related death or the need for prosthesis removal or suppressive antibiotic therapy because of persistent or recurrent signs of infection. Late acute PJI was defined as < 3 weeks of symptoms more than 3 months after the index surgery. Results. A total of 445 patients were included, comprising 340 cases treated with DAIR and 105 cases treated with implant removal (19% one-stage revision (n=20), 74.3% two-stage revision (n=78) and 6.7% definitive implant removal (n=7). Overall treatment failure was 45.0% (153/340) in the implant retention group versus 24.8% (26/105) in the implant removal group (p < 0.001). This significant difference remained after 1:1 propensity-score matching for confounding preoperative variables. No difference in failure was observed between one- and two-stage revision (25.0% (5/20) versus 24.4% (19/78), respectively (p 0.95)). DAIR was an independent predictor for failure in the multivariate analysis (OR 2.7, p 0.006). A high preoperative risk score for DAIR failure defined by a CRIME80 score ≥3 which included the exchange of the mobile components during DAIR as a protective factor, demonstrated a failure rate of 68.7% (57/83) in the DAIR group and a 16.7% failure rate (4/24) in the implant removal group (p < 0.0001). No significant difference in failure was observed with a CRIME80 score <3 (35.7% versus 23.9%, respectively (p 0.07). Conclusions. Implant removal is associated with significantly better outcomes compared to debridement and implant retention in late acute PJIs with a high CRIME80 score and this should be taken into consideration when choosing the surgical strategy

Background. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after knee arthroplasty surgery remains a serious complication. Yet, there is no international consensus on the surgical treatment of PJI. The purpose was to assess the prosthesis survival rates, risk of re-revision, and mortality rate following the different surgical strategies (1-stage or 2-stage implant revision, and irrigation and debridement (IAD) with implant retention) used to treat PJI. Methods. The study was based on 653 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) revised due to PJI in the period 1994 to 2016. Kaplan-Meier (KM) and multiple Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the survival rate of these revisions and the risk of re-revisions. We also studied the mortality rates at 90 days and 1 year after revision for PJI. Results. Of the 653 revision TKAs; 329, 81, and 243 revisions were performed with IAD, 1-stage, and 2-stage revision procedures, respectively. During the follow-up period, 19%, 12.3% and 11.5% of the IAD, 1-stage, and 2-stage revision cases were re-revised due to PJI, respectively. With any reasons of re-revision as end-point the 5 year KM survival of the index revision procedure was 76%, 82%, and 84% after IAD, 1-stage, and 2-stage revision, respectively. Similarly, the 5-year KM survival with a re-revision for infection as end-point was 79%, 88%, and 87% after IAD, 1-stage, and 2-stage revision, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between 1-stage and 2-stage revision for re-revision of any reasons (RR=1.6; 95% CI: 0.8–3.1) nor did we find a difference for re-revision due to deep infection (RR=1.4; 95% CI: 0.6–3.1) as end-point. In an age-stratified analysis, however, the risk of re-revision for any causes was 4 times increased after 1-stage revision compared to 2-stage revision in patients over 70 years of age (RR=4.2, 95% CI: 1.3–13.7) but the risk was similar for deep infection as end-point. Age had no statistically significant effect on the risk of re-revision for knees revised with the IAD procedure. The 90-days and 1-year mortality rate after revision for PJI were 2.1% and 3.6% after IAD, 1.2% and 1.2% after 1-stage revision, and 0.4% and 1.6% after 2-stage revision and there were no statistically significant differences in mortality rate according to revision procedure. Conclusion. IAD had good results compared to earlier published studies. Despite that 1-stage revisions had a 4 times higher risk for re-revision compared to 2-stage revisions in older patients, the overall outcomes after 1-stage and 2-stage revision were similar

Background. Spinal deformity has a known deleterious effect upon the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty and acetabular component positioning. This study sought to evaluate the relationship between severity of spinal deformity parameters and acetabular cup position, rate of dislocation, and rate of revision among patients with total hip arthroplasties and concomitant spinal deformity. Methods. A prospectively collected database of patients with spinal deformity was reviewed and patients with total hip arthroplasty were identified. The full body standing stereoradiographic images (EOS) were reviewed for each patient. From these images, spinal deformity parameters and acetabular cup anteversion and inclination were measured. A chart review was performed on all patients to determine dislocation and revision arthroplasty events. Statistical analysis was performed to determine correlation of deformity with acetabular cup position. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with spinal fusion, dislocation events, and revision THA. Results. One-hundred and seven spinal deformity patients were identified, with 139 hips for analysis. The rate of THA dislocation in this cohort was 8.0%, with a revision rate of 5.8% for instability. Patients who sustained dislocations had significantly higher spinopelvic tilt, T1-pelvic angle, and mismatch of lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence. Among all patients, only 68.8% met the radiographic “safe zone” for anteversion in the standing position (Figure 1). A comparison of radiographic cup position on supine x-ray with standing EOS imaging demonstrated an increase in anteversion of 6.2 degrees. Standing decreased rate of safe zone anteversion of the cup by 20%. Conclusions. In this cohort, patients with THA and concomitant spinal deformity have a particularly high rate of dislocation. This dislocation risk may be driven by the degree of spinal deformity and by spinopelvic compensation, which is suggested by our findings. Arthroplasty surgeons should be aware of the elevated dislocation rate and consider a surgical strategy for maintaining hip stability in this population

Aim. To see what surgical strategy was used in treating infected total hip arthroplasties (THA), relative to bacterial findings, level of inflammation, length of antibiotic treatment (AB) and re-revisions. Further, to assess the results of treatment after three months and one year. Method. We used our national arthroplasty register (NAR) to identify THA revised for deep infection from 2004–2015 reported from our hospital. We identified the strategy of revision, i.e. one-stage exchange (one-stage), two-stage exchange (two-stage), debridement and implant retention (DAIR), or Girdlestone, and reported re-revisions for infection. We defined cure as no AB, no need for further surgery and joint with prosthesis (not Girdlestone). From the hospitals’ medical records we retrieved bacterial findings from the revisions, level of C-reactive protein (CRP), type of antibiotics given, duration of antibiotic therapy and clinical data regarding the patients. The information reported to the NAR was also validated. Results. We found 69 patients reported to the NAR for first revision for infection after primary THA. Most patients were treated with DAIR or two-stage. DAIR was used for infections with short period of symptoms, two-stage for longer lasting infections. In the DAIR-group, three patients needed another DAIR. Six patients were converted to two-stage exchange. Four patients had Girdlestone as strategy from primary revision due to co-morbidity. No patients treated with other strategies ended up with Girdlestone. 60 % and 90 % were cured for the infection after three and twelve months respectively. Conclusions. Infected THAs were treated according to duration of symptoms. After one year about 90 % were cured

INTRODUCTION. The diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection may be difficult. But this diagnosis can guide antibiotic prophylaxis and implementation of intraoperative bacteriological samples. The hypothesis of this study was that a composite score using clinical, radiological and biological data could be used for positive and negative diagnostic of infection before reoperation on prosthetic hip or knee. MATERIAL. 200 reoperations on hip and knee arthroplasty for any cause were analyzed retrospectively. 100 cases concerned infected cases, while the diagnosis of infection was excluded in the other 100 cases. METHODS. Different criteria were collected: previous surgery of the operated joint, clinical, biological and radiological signs. Univariate analysis investigated the discriminating factors of infected and non infected cases. Multivariate analysis integrated concomitantly these factors. A composite score was defined, and its diagnostic efficacy was assessed by the percentage of the total variance explained by the score, by the percentage of correctly classified cases and by the sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS. The univariate and multivariate analyzes have isolated the following significant factors: body mass index, diabetes, prosthetic mechanical complication, fever, existence of a wound defect. The composite score so defined allows separating the infected and non infected patients accurately in 78% of cases, with a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 93%. DISCUSSION. The composite score defined predicts infection or no infection in the prosthetic joint before reoperation with good efficiency. This score could be a significant help to define the medical and surgical strategy in a prosthetic hip or knee reoperation for whatever reason. CONCLUSION. A prospective study is needed to confirm definitively the contribution of this score

The Hill-Sachs lesion is a bony defect of the humeral head that occurs in association with anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. Hill-Sachs lesions are common, with an incidence approaching nearly 100% in the setting of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. However, the indications for surgical management are very limited, with less than 10% of anterior instability patients considered for treatment of the Hill-Sachs lesion. Of utmost importance is addressing bone loss on the anterior-inferior glenoid, which is highly successful at preventing recurrence of instability even with humeral bone loss. In the rare situation where the Hill-Sachs lesion may continue to engage the glenoid, surgical management is indicated. Surgical strategies are variable, including debridement, arthroscopic remplissage, allograft transplantation, surface replacement, and arthroplasty. Given that the population with these defects is typically comprised of young and athletic patients, biologic solutions are most likely to be associated with decades of sustainable joint preservation, function, and stability. The first priority is maximizing the treatment of anterior instability on the glenoid side. Then, small lesions of less than 10% are ignored without consequence. Lesions involving 10–20% of the humeral head are treated with arthroscopic remplissage (defect filled with repair of capsule and infraspinatus). Lesions greater than 20% that extend beyond the glenoid tract are managed with fresh osteochondral allografts to biologically restore the humeral head. Lesions great than 40% are most commonly associated with advanced arthritis and deformity of the humeral articular surface and are therefore treated with a humeral head replacement. This treatment algorithm maximises our ability to stabilise and preserve the glenohumeral joint

In spite of its incidence decreasing to 1% nowadays, prosthesis-related infections remain a research, diagnostic, therapeutic and cost-related problem. Early diagnosis, selection of an appropriate surgical strategy, accurate identification of the responsible microorganisms and construction of an appropriate antibiotic regimen are essential elements of any management strategy. Our study aim was firstly to compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional periprosthetic tissue culture and culture of fluid derived from vortexing and bath sonication of the explanted hardware and secondly to investigate the role of possible metabolic factors affecting the sensitivity of the sonication method. We investigated 70 patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty because of loosening of the prostheses, at our institution, between October 2011 and November 2013. Patients’ medical history and demographic characteristics were recorded. We compared the culture of samples obtained by sonication of explanted hip and knee prostheses with conventional culture of periprosthetic tissue for the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Guidelines were used for the definition of prosthetic-joint infection. Thirty-two patients had septic loosening and 38 aseptic loosening (48 hip prostheses and 22 knee prostheses). The sensitivity of sonication fluid culture was 81.25% and the sensitivity of conventional tissue cultures was 56.25% (p-value = 0.043). The sensitivity of the sonication method was statistically higher in obese, diabetic patients, with age above 60, in uncemented arthroplasties and in arthroplasties because of primary osteoarthritis (p-values < 0.05). The sonication method represents a reliable test for the diagnosis of prosthetic – joint infections with a greater sensitivity than the conventional periprosthetic tissue cultures, especially in obese, diabetic patients, with age above 60, in uncemented arthroplasties and in arthroplasties because of primary osteoarthritis

Multiple organ failure (MOF) is a major cause of trauma mortality and morbidity. The role of surgical procedures in precipitating MOF remains unclear. Data on timing and duration of surgery was collated on 491 consecutive patients admitted to a Major Trauma Centre, who survived more than 48 hours and required Intensive Care Unit admission. MOF was defined according to the Denver Post Injury MOF Score, where MOF can occur only later than 48 hours after injury to exclude physiological derangements resulting from inadequate resuscitation. Overall, 268 patients (54.6%) underwent surgery within 48 hours of injury, with 110 (22.4%) requiring surgery within 6 hours of injury. Total mean intra-operative time (p=0.067) nor the need for an operation within the first 6 (p=0.069) or 48 hours (p=0.124) were associated with MOF development. Multivariate predictive modelling of MOF showed timing and duration of surgery had no significant predictive power for MOF development (Odds Ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.47–1.10). Despite previous indication that early surgical intervention can precipitate MOF, current surgical strategy does not appear to impact MOF development

The Hill-Sachs lesion is a bony defect of the humeral head that occurs in association with anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. Hill-Sachs lesions are common, with an incidence approaching nearly 100% in the setting of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. However, the indications for surgical management are very limited, with less than 10% of anterior instability patients considered for treatment of the Hill-Sachs lesion. Of utmost importance is addressing bone loss on the anterior-inferior glenoid, which is highly successful at preventing recurrence of instability even with humeral bone loss. In the rare situation where the Hill-Sachs lesion may continue to engage the glenoid, surgical management is indicated. Surgical strategies are variable, including debridement, arthroscopic remplissage, allograft transplantation, surface replacement, and arthroplasty. Given that the population with these defects is typically comprised of young and athletic patients, biologic solutions are most likely to be associated with decades of sustainable joint preservation, function, and stability. The first priority is maximising the treatment of anterior instability on the glenoid side. Then, small lesions of less than 10% are ignored without consequence. Lesions involving 10–20% of the humeral head are treated with arthroscopic remplissage (defect filled with repair of capsule and infraspinatus). Lesions greater than 20% that extend beyond the glenoid tract are managed with fresh osteochondral allografts to biologically restore the humeral head. Lesions great than 40% are most commonly associated with advanced arthritis and deformity of the humeral articular surface and are therefore treated with a humeral head replacement. This treatment algorithm maximises our ability to stabilise and preserve the glenohumeral joint

The treatment of orthopedic implant infections is often difficult and complex, although the chances of successful treatment with a properly selected diagnostic, surgical and antibiotic treatment protocol have recently increased significantly. Surgical treatment is a key factor in the treatment of infections of orthopedic implants, and any errors in this respect often lead to worse clinical outcomes. Surgical errors. The most important and frequent surgical errors include:. - conservative treatment of periprosthetic infections with antibiotics alone: successful treatment requires adequate surgical procedure combined with long-term antimicrobial Th that is active against biofilm microorganism. Without adequate surgical procedure just the suppression of symptoms is usually achieved, rather than eradication of the infection. - delayed surgical revision: in acute infections, early surgical intervention plays a critical role, especially by patients where retention of the prosthesis is expected. Early evacuation of postop haemathoma after primary or revision surgery is important in order to prevent the possibility of infection. It is important to take into consideration, that a postop apparently superficial surgical site infection may be indicative of deeper infection involoving the implant. - insufficient debridement during surgical revision: thorough and extensive debridement is the most critical predictor of success (removal of the haemathoma, abscess formations, fibrous membranes, sinus tracts, devitalized bone and soft tissue, removal of all cement, cement restrictors, foreign and prosthetic material; eventual exchange of modular components and liners). Finally meticulous irrigation of the op region is obligatory. - inadequate intraoperative sampling for bacteriological and histological analysis: tissue samples from the areas with the most florid inflammatory changes have to be taken and sent for bacteriological and histological examination (3–6 samples). Removed implants or parts of them have to be sent to sonication. Swab cultures have low sensitivity and should be avoided. - the importance of selecting the appropriate surgical strategy for the individual patient cannot be overemphasized: not having, following and treating patients with PJI accordingly to an algorithm that is proven and successful one usually leads to unsuccessful clinical results. We present illustrative cases with each common surcical error combined with proper solution. Treatment of PJI is a demanding procedure, the goal is a long-term pain-free functional joint, that can be achieved by eradication of the infection. For a successful clinical outcome an appropriate diagnostic, surgical and antimicrobial procedure for the individual patient has to be selected

Introduction. Coronal misalignment of the lower limbs is closely related to the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. In cases of severe genu varus or valgus, evaluating this alignment can assist in choosing specific surgical strategies. Furthermore, restoring satisfactory alignment after total knee replacement promotes longevity of the implant and better functional results. Knee coronal alignment is typically evaluated with the Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle. It is generally measured on standing AP long-leg radiographs (LLR). However, patient positioning influences the accuracy of this 2D measurement. A new 3D method to measure coronal lower limb alignment using low-dose EOS images has recently been developed and validated. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relevance of this technique when determining knee coronal alignment in a referral population, and more specifically to evaluate how the HKA angle measured with this 3D method differs from conventional 2D methods. Materials and methods. 70 patients (140 lower extremities) were studied for 2D and 3D lower limb alignment measurements. Each patient received AP monoplane and biplane acquisition of their entire lower extremities on the EOS system according the classical protocols for LLR. For each patient, the HKA angle was measured on this AP X-ray with a 2D viewer. The biplane acquisition was used to perform stereoradiographic 3D modeling. Valgus angulation was considered positive, varus angulation negative. Student's T-test was used to determine if there was a bias in the HKA angle measurement between these two methods and to assess the effect of flexion/hyperextension, femoral rotation and tibial rotation on the 2D measurements. One operator did measurements 2 times. Results. The average total dose for both acquisitions was 0.75mGy (± 0.11mGy). The 2D and 3D measurements are reported in table 1. Intraoperator reliability was >0,99 for all measurements. In the whole series, 2D–3D HKA differences were >2° in 34% of cases, >3° in 22% of cases, >5° in 9% of cases and >10° in 3% of cases >10°. We compared 2D and 3D measurements according to the degree of flessum/recurvatum (> or <5° and > or <10°). The results are reported in table 2. The statistical analysis of parameters influencing 2D/3D measurements is reported in table 3. Discussion and conclusion. The HKA angle is typically assessed from 2D long-leg radiographs. However, several studies highlighted that 2D assessment of this angle may be affected by patient's positioning. Radtke showed that lower limb rotation during imaging significantly affected measurements of coronal plane knee alignment. Brouwer showed that axial rotation had an even greater effect on the apparent limb alignment on AP radiographs when the knee was flexed. This last finding is particularly relevant as many lower extremities present some amount of flexion or hyperextension, especially in aging subjects. This low dose biplanar EOS acquisitions provide a more accurate evaluation of coronal alignment compared to 2D, eliminating bias due to wrong knee positioning. This study points out the interest of EOS in outliers patients and opens new perspectives for preoperative planning and postoperative control of deformity correction or knee joint replacement