Abstract. Objective. To assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis using both validated radiological signs and CT-angle measurements. Methods. A retrospective review of all cases involving surgical management for acute SUFE presenting to the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne were assessed from 2012–2018. Pre-operative plain radiographs were assessed for slip angle, validated radiological signs of retroversion (post wall/crossover/ischial spine sign) and standardised post-operative CT Scans were used to assess cranial and mid-acetabular version. Results. 116 SUFEs presented in 107 patients who underwent surgical intervention; 47 females and 60 boys, with an average age of 12.7 years (range 7.5–16.6 years). Complete radiological data was available for 91 patients (99 hips) with adequate axial CT imaging of both hips. 82% patients underwent pinning in situ (PIS) with subcapital realignment surgery (SRS) performed in 18% (slip angles >75°). Contralateral prophylactic hip PIS was performed in 72 patients (87%). On the slip side, 68% of patients had 1 or more radiological signs of retroversion in the slipped hip, with 60% on the contralateral side. The mean cranial and mid-acetabular version measurements were −8°(range −30 – 8°) and 10.5°(range −10 – 25°), respectively. Conclusions. Acetabular retroversion is rare in the normal population with studies reports ranging from 0–7%. This study showed an increased prevalence of 68% in SUFE patients, which is likely to be a primary anatomical abnormality, subsequently increasing the shear forces across the proximal femoral growth plate due to superior over-coverage. The resulting CAM lesion from SUFE in combination with the pincer lesion due to retroversion can lead to premature hip impingement and degeneration. Further larger studies are required to assess if acetabular retroversion is a true risk factor, and its role in helping guide management including prophylactic pinning. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The influence of rigid fixation and permanent compression on the results, the timing of fusion and rehabilitation after fractures of the femoral neck was investigated. A hip fracture is 60–80% of all fractures of the proximal femur. Despite recent advances in the treatment of this disease, the percentage of unsatisfactory outcomes as high as 25–35%. The choice of surgical treatment in femoral neck fractures in the elderly remains as controversial as it was almost 50 years ago when Speed called him as “the unsolved fracture. Hip replacement is currently the gold standard in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. But compared with the osteosynthesis operation takes more time, is accompanied by massive blood loss, sometimes the need for transfusion and a higher risk of deep wound infection. Given these facts the best is an indoor low-traumatic method of osteosynthesis locking. Compare of the results of femoral neck fractures using of osteosynthesis 3 blade nail, spongious screws and nail for permanent compression. A retrospective analysis of treatment of 252 patients from 1982 to 2015 with subcapitale and transcervical fractures of the femoral neck on the basis “RCTO named by H.J. Makazhanova”. In the research locales patients older than 40 years. All patients were divided according to the applied method of treatment: 1 group of 95 patients operated using a 3-blade-nail, in the 2nd group of 105 patients operated on spongious screws, in the 3 group of 52 patients operated nail for the permanent compression, authoring. All patients underwent x-ray examination before and after surgery. The average period from time of injury before performing the osteosynthesis amounted to 4–7 days. The follow-up period was 6–12 months. The results obtained clinically and radiographically divided into good, satisfactory, poor. Good and satisfactory results were regarded as positive, and poor results as negative. The average age of patients was 67.5 years. Among these female patients − 174 (69%), the male − 78 (31%). Traumatization more prone to elderly accounting for 206 (81.7%) cases, and only 46 (18.3%) in the middle age group. Analysis of the results of treatment showed positive results in 1 group − 69.5 %, in group 2 − 83.8 %, in group 3 − 96.2 %. In the first group of 29 (31.5 %) and in the second group of 17 (16.2 %) patients have postoperative complications: secondary displacement, nail migration, pseudarthrosis, necrosis of head. The patients of third group have postoperative complications in 2 cases (3.8 %): displacement of bone fragments according of retraumatization. Employability was restored in 1 group − 7–9 months, in group 2 - in 6–8 months, 3 group - through 6–6.5 months. 1). The method of choice for fresh fractures of the femoral neck, especially subcapital fractures in the elderly, is a minimally invasive method of closed compression osteosynthesis. 2). Comparative analysis of treatment results showed that for the consolidation and subcapital transcervical femoral neck fractures can provide rigid fixation of bone fragments. 3). The use of permanent compression is the best method, which shortens the period of consolidation

The high risk and the associated high mortality of secondary, contralateral hip fractures [1,2] could justify internal, invasive prophylactic reinforcement of the osteoporotic proximal femur to avoid these injuries in case of a low energy fall. Previous studies have demonstrated high potential of augmentation approaches [3,4,5], but to date there has no ideal solution been found. The development of optimized reinforcement strategies can be aided with validated computer simulation tools that can be used to evaluate new ideas. A validated non-linear finite element (FE) simulation tool was used here to predict the yield and fracture load of twelve osteoporotic or osteopenic proximal femora in sideways fall based on high resolution CT images. Various augmentation strategies using bone cement or novel metal implants were developed, optimized and virtually performed on the bone models. The relative strengthening compared to the non-augmented state was evaluated using case-specific FE analyses. Strengthening effect of the cement-based augmentation was linearly proportional to cement volume and was significantly affected by cement location. With the clinically acceptable 12.6 ± 1.2 ml volume and optimized location of the cement cloud, compared to the non-augmented state, 71 ± 26% (42 – 134%) and 217 ± 166% (83 – 509%) increase in yield force and energy was reached, respectively. These were significantly higher than previously published experimental results using the “central” cement location [5], which could be well predicted by our FE models. The optimized metal implant could provide even higher strengthening effect: 140 ± 39% (76 – 194%) increase in yield force and +357 ± 177% (132 – 691%) increase in yield energy. However, for metal implants, a higher risk of subcapital fractures was indicated. For both cement and metal, the originally weaker bones were strengthened exponentially more compared to the stronger ones. The ideal solution for prophylactic augmentation should provide an appropriate balance between the requirements of being clinically feasible, ethically acceptable and mechanically sufficient. Even with the optimized location, the cement-based approach may not provide enough strengthening effect and adequate reproducibility of the identified optimal cement cloud position may not be achieved clinically. While the metal implant based strategy appears to be able to deliver the required strengthening effect, the ethical acceptance of this more invasive option is questionable. Further development is therefore required to identify the ideal, clinically relevant augmentation strategy. This may involve new cement materials, less invasive metal implants, or a combination of both. The FE simulation approach presented here could help to screen the potential ideas and highlight promising candidates for experimental evaluation

Although much has been published on the causes of slipped upper femoral epiphysis and the results of treatment, little attention has been given to the mechanism of the slip. This study presents the results of the analysis of 13 adolescent femora, and the attempts to reproduce the radiological appearances of a typical slip. The mean age of the skeletons was 13 years (11 to 15). It was found that the internal bony architecture in the zone of the growth plate was such that a slip of the epiphysis on the metaphysis (in the normal meaning of the word slip) could not take place, largely relating to the presence of a tubercle of bone projecting down from the epiphysis. The only way that the appearance of a typical slipped upper femoral epiphysis could be reproduced was by rotating the epiphysis posteromedially on the metaphysis. The presence and size of this peg-like tubercle was shown radiologically by CT scanning in one pair of intact adolescent femurs.