Introduction. Primary mechanical stability is important with uncemented THR because early migration is reduced, leading to more rapid osseointegration between the implant and bone. Such primary mechanical stability is provided by the design features of the device. The aim of this study was to compare the migration patterns of two uncemented hip stems, the Furlong Active and the Furlong HAC stem; the study was designed as a randomised control trial. The implants were the Furlong HAC, which is an established implant with good long term results, and the Furlong Active, which is a modified version of the Furlong HAC designed to minimise stress concentrations between the implant and bone, and thus to improve fixation. Materials and methods. The migration of 43 uncemented femoral components for total hip replacement was measured in a randomised control trial using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) over two years. Twenty-three Furlong HAC and twenty Furlong Active stems were implanted into 43 patients. RSA examinations were carried out post-operatively, and at six months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively. The patients stood in-front of a purpose made calibration frame which contained accurately positioned radio-opaque markers. From the obtained images, the 3-D positions of the prosthesis and the host bone were reconstructed. Geometrical algorithms were used to identify the components of the implant. These algorithms allowed the femoral component to be studied without the need to attach markers to the prosthesis. The migration was calculated relative to the femoral coordinate system representing the anterior-posterior (A-P), medial-lateral (M-L) and proximal-distal (P-D) directions respectively. Distal migration was termed subsidence. Results. Both stems subsided significantly during the first six months following surgery but almost all stems did not progressively subside thereafter. The Furlong Active stem experienced approximately three times the amount of subsidence of the Furlong HAC stem; this difference was significant (p = 0.02). There was one subsidence outlier (four standard deviations from the mean) for the Furlong Active stem between one and two years post-operatively. Both the stems migrated laterally and rotated into valgus. Lateral migration was greater for the Furlong Active stem; at 12 and 24 months there was a significant migration of the Furlong Active head laterally of 0.51 mm (p = 0.012) and 0.58 mm (p = 0.013) respectively. There was no significant difference in clinical scores between the implants at any RSA examination post-operatively. Discussion. The initial fixation of the Furlong Active stem was not as good as the established stem making it less likely to integrate effectively with the bone. In this study, the theoretical design of a hip replacement to minimise the stress concentration between the implant and bone and thus improve fixation actually resulted in worse implant fixation.
This study compared the pullout forces of the initial implantation and the “cement-in-cement” revision technique for short and standard-length (125 mm vs. 150 mm) Exeter® V40 femoral stems used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The idea that the pullout force for a double taper slip stem is relative to the force applied to the femur and that “cement-in-cement” revision provides the same reproduction of force. A total sample size of 15 femoral stems were tested (Short, n = 6 and Standard, n = 9). 3D printed fixtures for repeatable sample preparation were used to minimize variance during testing. To promote stem subsidence and to simulate an in vivo environment, the samples were placed in an incubator at 37°C at 100% humidity and experienced a constant compressive loading of 1335 N for 14 days. The samples underwent a displacement-controlled pullout test. After the initial pullout test, “cement-in-cement” revision will be performed and tested similar to the initial implantation to observe the efficacy of the revision technique. To compare the pullout forces between the two groups, a Kruskal-Wallis test using a significance level of 0.05 was conducted. The mean maximum pullout force for the short and standard-length femoral stems were 3939 ± 1178 N and 5078 ± 1168 N, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test determined no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the initial implantation (p = 0.13). The “cement-in-cement” revision pullout force will be conducted in future testing. This study demonstrated the potential use of short stem designs for THA as it provides similar levels of fixation as the standard-length femoral stem. The potential benefits for using a short stem design would be providing similar load transfer to the proximal femur, preserving proximal metaphyseal femoral bone in primary replacement, and reducing the invasiveness during revision.
Financial and human cost effectiveness is an increasing evident outcome measure of surgical innovation. Considering the human element, the aim is to restore the individual to their “normal” state by sparing anatomy without compromising implant performance. Gait lab studies have shown differences between different implants at top walking speed, but none to our knowledge have analysed differing total hip replacement patients through the entire range of gait speed and incline to show differences. The purpose of this gait study was to 1) determine if a new short stem femoral implant would return patients back to normal 2) compare its performance to established hip resurfacing and long stem total hip replacement (THR) implants. 110 subjects were tested on an instrumented treadmill (Kistler Gaitway, Amherst, NY), 4 groups (short-stem THR, long-stem THR, hip resurfacing and healthy controls) of 28, 29, 27, and 26 respectively. The new short femoral stem patients (Furlong Evolution, JRI) were taken from the ongoing Evolution Hip trial that have been tested on the treadmill with minimum 12months postop. The long stem total hip replacements and hip resurfacing groups were identified from out 800 patient gait database. They were only chosen if they were 12 months postop and had no other joint disease or medical comorbidities which would affect gait performance. All subjects were tested through their entire range of gait speeds and incline after having a 5 minute habituation period. Speed intervals were at 0.5kms increments until maximum walking speed achieved and inclines at 4kms for 5, 10, 15%. At all incremental intervals of speed, the vertical component of the ground reaction forces, center of pressure and temporal measurements were collected for both limbs with a sampling frequency of 100Hz. Body weight scaling was applied to correct for mass differences and a symmetry index to compare the implanted hip to the contralateral normal hip. All variables for each subject group were compared to each other using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post hoc test with significance set at α=0.05. The four experimental groups were reasonably matched for demographics and the implant groups for PROMs. Hip resurfacing had a clear top walking speed advantage, but when assessing the symmetry index on all speeds and incline, all groups were not significantly different. Push-off and step length was statistically less favourable for the short/long THR group (p=0.005–0.05) depending on speed/incline. The primary aim of this study was determine if implant design affected gait symmetry and performance. Interestingly, irrespective of implant design, symmetry with regards to weight acceptance, impulse, push-off and step length was returned to normal when comparing to healthy controls. However individual implant performance on the flat and incline, showed inferior (
Aseptic loosening of cemented femoral stems results from migration of wear particles along the bone-cement interface, producing a foreign body reaction. After cement insertion, blood back pressure can disrupt the bone-cement interface, enabling this spread of wear particles. Our study investigates whether altering timing and speed of stem insertion can reduce this risk. We inserted mock “C-Stem” femoral components (De Puy-Synthes), using Smartset HV cement (De Puy-Synthes) into artificial femora, fitted with proximal and distal pressure transducers. Cement insertion began two, three or four minutes after mixing. Cement pressures were then allowed to settle for one minute and the stems were then inserted over durations of 25, 60 or 90 seconds.Background
Methods
To compare the periprosthetic fracture mechanics between a collared and collarless fully coated cementless femoral stem in a composite femur. Two groups of six composite femurs (‘Osteoporotic femur’, SawBones, WA USA) were implanted with either a collared (collared group) or collarless (collarless group) cementless femoral stem which was otherwise identical by a single experienced surgeon. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur were simulated using a previously published technique. High speed video recording was used to identify fracture mechanism. Fracture torque and angular displacement were measured and rotational work and system stiffness were estimated for each trial. Results were compared between collared and collarless group and the comparison was evaluated against previously published work using fresh frozen femurs and the same protocol.Abstract
Objective
Methods
It has been suggested that the endurance of cemented femoral reconstructions in total hip arthroplasty is affected by the creep of acrylic cement, but it is not known to what extent cement creeps under loading conditions in vivo, or how this affects load transfer. We have simulated the long-term creep properties of acrylic cement in finite-element models of femoral stem constructs and analysed their effects. We investigated whether subsidence rates measured in vivo could be explained by creep of acrylic cement, and if polished, unbonded, stems accommodated creep better than bonded stems. Our findings showed that polished prostheses subsided only about 50 μm as a result of cement creep. The long-term prosthetic subsidence rates caused by creep of acrylic cement are therefore very small and do not explain the excessive migration rates which have sometimes been reported. Cement creep did, however, relax cement stresses and create a more favourable stress distribution at the interfaces. These trends were found around both the bonded and unbonded stems. Our results did not confirm that polished, unbonded, stems accommodated creep better than bonded stems in terms of cement and interface stress patterns.
250 words max Long polished cemented femoral stems, such as the Exeter Hip Revision stem, are one option available to the revision hip arthroplasty surgeon. When proximal bone stock is compromised, distal fixation is often relied upon for stability of the femoral component. In such circumstances, torsional forces can result in debonding and loosening. This study compared the torsional behaviour of a cemented polished and featureless (plain) stem with cemented, polished stems featuring fins or flutes. Nine torsional tests were carried out on each of these three different stem designs. The finned stem construct was significantly stiffer than the fluted stem (mean 24.5 Nm/deg v 17.5 Nm/deg). The plain stem mean stiffness was less than the featured stems (13 Nm/deg), but wide variability lead to no statistically significant difference. The maximum torque of the finned (30.5 Nm) and fluted stems (29 Nm) was significantly higher than the plain stem (10.5 Nm); with no significance to the difference between the finned and fluted stems. Distal stem features may provide a more reliable and greater resistance to torque in polished, cemented revision hip stems. Finned stem features may also increase the stiffness of the construct. Consideration should thus be given to the incorporation of distal stem features in the design of revision hip stems.
Summary. This work uses a mathematical method to correlate the forces calculated to push-on and pull off a femoral head from a stem and correlate the results of in vitro testing. Introduction. This work aimed to mathematically model the force needed to disassemble the THR unit for a given assembly load. This work then compared these results with the results of an in vitro experiment. The research presented aimed to determine the assembly forces necessary to prevent movement of the head on the stem through friction. By assessing the forces necessary to push the head onto the stem securely enough to prevent any movement of the head through friction, it is likely that the fretting and corrosion of the head taper interface will be reduced. Methods. Mathematical equations were used to define the relationship between the push-on force and the taper specification in terms of friction, contact area and taper angle. Similar relationships were determined for the pull-off force and torque-off force. Push-on loads of 1–4 kN were used to calculate the normal force and then the pull-off force and torque-off force for the combinations.
