Introduction. The posterior condylar axis of the distal femur is the common reference used to describe femoral anteversion. In the context of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), this reference can be used to define the native femoral anteversion, as well as the anteversion of the stem. However, these measurements are fixed to a femoral reference. The authors propose that the functional position of the proximal femur must be considered, as well as the functional relationship between stem and cup (combined anteversion) when considering the clinical implications of stem anteversion. This study investigates the post-operative differences between anatomically-referenced and functionally-referenced stem and combined anteversion in the supine and standing positions. Method. 18 patients undergoing pre-operative analysis with the Trinity OPS® planning (Optimized Ortho, Sydney Australia, a division of Corin, UK) were recruited for post-operative assessment. Anatomic and functional stem anteversion in both the supine and standing positions were determined. The anatomic anteversion was measured from CT and referenced to the posterior condyles. The supine functional anteversion was measured from CT and referenced to the coronal plane. The standing functional anteversion was measured to the coronal plane when standing by performing a 3D/2D registration of the implants to a weight-bearing AP X-ray. Further, functional acetabular anteversion was captured to determine combined functional anteversion in the supine and standing positions. Results. The average anatomical stem anteversion was 9.9° (6.7° to 13.0°). In all cases, the anatomical stem anteversion was different than the measured functional stem anteversion in both the supine and standing positions. The functional femoral anteversion decreased from supine to stand by an average of 7.1° (4.9°−9.2°), suggesting more internal rotation of the femurs when weight-bearing. In all patients, the pelvis rotated posteriorly in the sagittal plane from supine to standing, increasing the functional acetabular anteversion by a mean of 5.1°. Conclusions. Anatomic stem anteversion differs significantly from functional stem anteversion in both the supine and standing positions, as a consequence of the patient specific differences in internal/external rotation of the femur in the functional postures. In the same way that the Anterior Pelvic Plane is now widely recognized as an inappropriate reference for cup orientation due to variation in sagittal pelvic tilt, referencing the femoral stem anteversion to the native anatomy (distal femur) maybe also be misleading and not provide a suitable description of the functional anteversion of the stem. This has implications for determining optimal combined alignment in THA

Introduction. Accurate implantation is important for total hip arthroplasty to achieve a maximized, stable range of motion and to reduce the risk of dislocation. We had estimated total cup and stem anteversion(AV) visually during operations without navigation system. The purpose of this study is to assess the correlation between total AV estimated visually during operation and total AV evaluated with CT and X-ray postoperatively. Materials & Methods. We investigated 145 primary total hip arthroplasties performed with direct anterior approach in supine position. 17 hips were in men and 128 in women. The mean age at operation was 65.6 years. During operations “intraoperative total AV” was defined as an angle from neutral hip position to internal rotated position at a concentric circle of acetabular rim and the equator of femoral head. We also measured cup inclination with X-ray and cup anteversion and stem anteversion with computed tomography after THA. “Radiographic total AV” was defined as the sum of cup and stem anteversion measured with CT. Correlation between “intraoperative total AV” and “Radiographic total AV” was evaluated statistically. Results. The mean “intraoperative total AV” was 24.2±5.6 degree. The mean cup inclination was 44.8 ±5.4 degree. The mean cup and stem anteversion was 25.0 ±7.4 and 17.8 ±11.0 degree respectively. The mean “radiographic total AV” was 42.8 ±12.8 degree. “Intraoperative total AV” was correlated to stem anteversion and “radiographic total AV” statistically. Discussions and Conclusions. “Intraoperative total AV” was correlated to “radiographic total AV”. Therefore, this method was useful to achieve an accurate implantation in THA

Introduction. Proper femoral stem and acetabular implant orientation is critical to the initial and long-term success of THA. Post-operative determination of cup and stem anteversion is important in cases of hip instability and planning isolated component revisions. At ISTA 2010 Dubai, we introduced a novel, simple stem modification that can be added to any stem design to help assess stem, and possibly cup anteversion with plain post-operative radiographs throughout the lifespan of the implant. [Figure 1] As the stem is rotated, the visible hole pattern changes. [Figure 2] This study was performed to further validate the accuracy and potential usefulness of this design. Methods. We prospectively reviewed 100 consecutive THA cases using the stem reference hole modification on rectangular tapered Zweymuller-type stems implanted from September 2010 to May 2012. Post-operative hip/femur CT scans were obtained to determine the true cup and stem orientation to validate and quanitify the precision of the reference holes. Intra-operative estimates of stem anteversion and combined anteversion (Ranawat Sign) were recorded. Post-operative radiograph measurement of stem anteversion (AP hip x-ray with leg in neutral rotation) was obtained and compared to the CT scan measurement referencing stem rotation relative to the knee epicondylar axis. [Figure 3] In addition, we compared the modified reference hole anteversion assessment to a control group of original unmodified stems assessed using the same methods. Results. All 100 patients had post-operative CT scans and ‘neutral’ rotation AP hip radiographs. The modified reference hole design was accurate to within 4.1 degrees compared to CT measurements. Estimates of stem anteversion in the control group (original Alloclassic or SL-Plus stems) was accurate to only 19.6 degrees with wide variablity as expected. The difference was statistically significant. Residual hip flexion contracture (2 patients) made the reference holes undetectable on radiographs. Morbid obesity did not decrease accuracy but required x-ray beam intensity modification. There was no statistical difference between standing and supine x-ray ‘neutral’ rotation radiograph measurements. The Ranawat combined stem and cup anteversion value could not predict cup anteversion reliably when subtracting the stem rotation. Two patients sustained post-operative THA dislocations that required closed reduction (occuring 2 months and 15 months after index THA). Conclusion. We conclude that hip stems with this pattern of modified anteversion reference holes provides an accurate and reliable method of determining stem component orientation post-operatively by using only simple plain radiographs. Initial finite element analysis of the modified stem hole pattern predicted that the fatigue strength was actually higher than that of the original unmodified implants indicating it is safe in the square taper design. The clinical usefulness became apparent when two hips in this series suffered dislocations. Review of the ‘neutral’ rotation xrays indicated the stem was placed in the ‘safe zone’ from 15–25 degrees and the hips would not likely need stem implant revision. We will continue to test this technology and improve the measuring techniques to accurately predict implant position post-operatively

Introduction

The midcortical line, the midline between the anterior and the posterior cortical walls has been reported as an intraoperative reference guide for reproducing the true femoral anteversion in cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) image study but we suspected that the version of the midcortical line on the cutting surface is different from that on the axial image. The three-dimensional (3D) CT-based preoperative planning software for THA enabled us to evaluate the cut surface of the femoral neck osteotomy. When we planned the straight non-anatomic stem placement in 20° of anteversion, we noticed that the line connecting the trochanteric fossa and the middle of the medial cortex of the femoral neck (T line) was coincident with the component torsion in almost all cases except those involving secondary osteoarthritis of the hip. Therefore we hypothesised that the T-line would provide an accurate reference guide for anteversion of the femoral component in THA. We performed this study to answer the question: which is the better intraoperative reference guide for reproducing the true femoral anteversion, the midcortical line or the T line?

Introduction. Appropriate prosthetic alignment is an important factor in maintaining stability and maximising the performance of the bearing after total hip replacement (THR). With a cementless component, the anteversion of the native femur has been shown to influence the anteversion of the prosthetic stem. However, the extent to which anteversion of a cementless stem can be adjusted from the native anteversion has seldom been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference between native and stem anteversion with two different cementless stem designs. Method. 116 patients had 3-dimensional templating as part of their routine planning for THR (Optimized Ortho, Sydney). 96 patients from 3 surgeons (AS, JB, SM) received a blade stem (TriFit TS, Corin, UK) through a posterior approach. 18 patients received a fully HA-coated stem (MetaFix, Corin, UK) through a posterior approach by a single surgeon (WB). The anteversion of the native femoral neck was measured from a 3D reconstruction of the proximal femur. All patients received a post-operative CT scan which was superimposed onto the pre-op CT scan. The difference between native and achieved stem anteversion was then measured. As surgeons had differing philosophies around target stem anteversion, the differences amongst surgeons were also investigated. Results. On average, stems were implanted in less anteversion than native. The mean deviation between native and stem anteversion of the blade stems was −3.5° (−34.8° to 13.8°). The mean deviations of the three surgeons using the blade stem were −7.9° (−34.8° to 10.4°), −3.1° (−18.1° to 12.0°) and 2.7° (−8.9° to 13.8°). These were statistically significant, and represented a difference in philosophy around target anteversion amongst surgeons. The mean deviation between native and stem anteversion of the fully HA-coated stems was −6.5° (−24.6° to 9.2°). Conclusions. Cementless stem anteversion is not dictated by the native femoral anteversion. There were differences in target anteversion philosophies amongst surgeons and this was seen in the results. Surgical approach, proximal entry point, osteotomy angle, stem design and patient anatomy will all influence the ability to dictate cementless stem anteversion. The effect of these variables are the subject of on-going work

Introduction & aims. Correct prosthetic alignment is important to the longevity and function of a total hip replacement (THR). With the growth of 3-dimensional imaging for planning and assessment of THR, the importance of restoring, not just leg length and medial offset, but anterior offset has been raised. The change in anterior offset will be influenced by femoral anteversion, but there are also other factors that will affect the overall change after THR. Consequently, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between anterior offset and stem anteversion to determine the extent to which changing anteversion influences anterior offset. Method. Sixty patients received a preoperative CT scan as part of their routine planning for THR (Optimized Ortho, Sydney). All patients received a Trinity cementless shell and a cemented TaperFit stem (Corin, UK) by the senior author through an anterolateral approach. Stem anteversion was positioned intraoperatively to align with cup anteversion via a modified Ranawat test. Postoperatively, patients received a CT scan which was superimposed onto the pre-op CT scan. The difference between native and achieved stem anteversion was measured, along with the 3-dimensional change in head centre from pre-to post-op. Finally, the relationship between change in stem anteversion and change in anterior offset was investigated. Results. Mean change in anterior offset was −2.3mm (−14.0 to 7.0mm). Mean change in anteversion from native was −3.0° (−18.8° to 10.5°). There was a strong correlation between change in anterior offset and change in anteversion, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.89. A 1° increase in anteversion equated to a 0.7mm increase in anterior offset. Conclusions. A change in the anteroposterior position of the femoral head is primarily affected by a change in stem anteversion, with a 1° increase in anteversion equating to a 0.7mm increase in anterior offset. The AP position of the stem in the canal, along with the flexion of the stem will also contribute. Given the well-recognised influence of leg length, medial offset and combined anteversion on restoring hip function, it seems reasonable to assume that anterior offset will also have a significant effect on the biomechanics of the replaced hip

INTRODUCTION. Dislocation is one of the most important complications in THA. Dual mobility cup (DMC) inserts reduce the risk for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty by increasing the oscillation angle. A lower rate of dislocation with use of a DMC insert has been reported in different studies. But there is no available research that clearly delineates the stability advantages of DMC inserts in primary THA. The aim of our study was to evaluate the area of the safe zone for a DMC insert, compared to a fixed insert for different anteversion angles of the femoral component. Material and Methods. A model of the pelvis and femur were developed from computed tomography images. We defined the coordinate system of the pelvis relative to the anterior pelvic plane and the coordinate system of the femur relative to the posterior condylar plane. In our model, we simulated a positive anteversion position of the acetabular cup. The lower border for cup inclination is 50°. The safe zone was evaluated for the following range of motion of the implant: 120° of flexion, 90° of flexion 30° of internal rotation, 30° of extension, 40° of abduction, 40° of adduction, and 30° of external rotation. (Fig.1) The safe zone was calculated for both a fixed insert and a DMC insert over a pre-determined range of three-dimensional motion, and the effect of increasing the anteversion position of the femoral component from 5° to 35° quantified. The ratio of the safe zone for a DMC insert to a fixed insert was calculated. Results. A wider safe zone was obtained for a DMC insert over all range of motion conditions. A DMC insert increased the stability of the implant between 10° and 15° along both anterior-posterior and vertical axes of the acetabular cup. (Fig.2) When stem anteversion were varied 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°, 30°, 35°, ratio of safe zone (a DMC insert / a fixed insert) were changed 8, 10.1, 6.3, 4.9, 5.2, 6.6, 10.6. (Fig.3). Discussion. The safe zone of a DMC insert is always larger than a fixed type insert. In every stem anteversion patterns, safe zones were expanded to all direction with 10° to 15°. Under 15° of stem anteversion, area of both inserts are almost stable. Area ratio is lowest with 20° of stem anteversion. Over 25° of stem anteversion, both area decreased and area ratio increased gradually. Over 30° of stem anteverison, safe zone of a fixed type are very small area. It is difficult for us to set acetabular shell in that small area. But we will get a larger area by using DMC. We performed a simulation analysis to evaluate the increase in area of the safe zone when using DMC inserts, compared to fixed inserts. To use of a DMC insert would bring in a 5–11-fold expanded area of the safe zone. In especially, DMC is a useful when stem anteversion is over 30°. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Introduction. Pelvic posterior tilt change (PPTC) after THA is caused by release of joint contracture and degenerative lumbar kyphosis. PPTC increases cup anteversion and inclination and results in a risk of prosthesis impingement (PI) and edge loading (EL). There was reportedly no component orientation of fixed bearing which can avoid PI and EL against 20°PPTC. However, dual mobility bearing (DM) has been reported to have a large oscillation angle and potential to withstand EL without increasing polyethylene (PE) wear against high cup inclination such as 60∼65°. Objective. The purpose of this study was to investigate the optimal orientation of DM-THA for avoiding PI and EL against postoperative 20°PPTC. Methods. Our study was performed with computer tomography -based three-dimensional simulation software (ZedHip. LEXI co. Japan). The CT data of hip was derived from asian typical woman with normal hips. Used prosthesises were 50mm cup and 42mm outer head of modular dual mobility system and Accolade II 127°(stryker). Femoral coordinate system was retrocondylar plane with z-axis from trochanteric fossa to intercondylar notch. Cup orientation was described as anatomical definition. The safe zone was calculated by the required hip range of motion which was defined as 130°flexion, 40°extension, 30°external rotation, and 50°internal rotation with 90°flexion and the maximum inclination of DM cup which was 60°in consideration of withstanding EL. Cup orientations withstanding 20°PPTC were defined as the primary cup orientation which changes consistently within the safe zone with the match of 20°PPTC. And among them cup orientation with lowest inclination was defined as the optimal cup orientation. result. The optimal orientations could be identified only within stem anteversion from 15°to 40°. The relationship between the optimal cup orientation and stem anteversion could be automatically identified. The correlation between stem anteversion and cup anteversion was linearly distributed and could be expressed as an approximated line of the formula that (stem anteversion)+(cup anteversion)=36.8. And likewise the relationship between stem anteversion and cup inclination was curved-linerly distributed and could be expressed as an approximated curved line of the formula that (cup inclination)=0.04(stem anteversion). 2. 2.18(stem anteversion)+74.8. Cup orientation calculated by the Widmer's combined anteversion theory is easily deviated from the safe zone by PPTC. The optimal cup orientation calculated in this study could be set more inclination and retroversion than it calculated by the Widmer's theory in contribution of large oscillation angle and admissibility of high inclination cup setting of DM. Therefore it could be possible to withstand 20°PPTC. Conclusion. Performing THA with considering postoperative PPTC is necessary for good long term outcome without dislocation and PE wear. The solution for 20°PPTC after THA is to apply dual mobility bearing and the formula of combined orientation theory calculated in this study

Purpose:. In order to acquire good stability of an arthroplasty hip, the proper placement of the implants, which prevents impingement between the stem neck and the socket, is important. In general, the anteversion of the uncemented femoral stem depends on the relationship between the three-dimensional structure of the proximal femoral canal and the proximal stem geometry. The exact degree of the anteversion will be known just after broaching during the operation. If the stem anteversion could be forecasted, preoperative planning of the socket placement would be relatively easy. Furthermore, when a high degree of anteversion is forecasted, a special femoral stem to reduce it, such as a modular stem, could be prepared. However, we experienced that the preoperatively measured anteversion of the femoral neck using computer tomography (CT) was sometimes different from that of the stem measured during the operation. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the preoperative measurement would be helpful to predict the stem anteversion by examining the relationship between the anteversion of the femoral neck and the stem. Patients and methods:. A total of 57 primary THAs by one senior surgeon from April 2011 until March 2012 were carried out. Two THAs using a modular stem and one for the hip after previous proximal femoral osteotomy were excluded. The remaining 54 THAs were examined. The used uncemented stems were designed for proximal metaphyseal fixation. CT scans, including the distal femoral condyles as well as the hips, were carried out in all cases preoperatively. The anteversion of the femoral neck was measured as the angle of the maximum longitudinal line of the cross section of the femoral neck to the line connecting the posterior surfaces of both of the distal femoral condyles (Fig. 1). The femoral neck anteversion was measured at three levels (Fig. 1). The stem anteversion was measured just after the femoral broaching during the THA. The relationship between the anteversion angles of the femoral neck and of the stem was examined by using a regression analysis. The institutional review board approved this study. Results:. The anteversion angles of the femoral neck varied widely when they were measured at all of the levels (Table 1). The anteversion angle of the femoral neck was not always identical to that of the stem. There were 32–46% of cases in which the difference between the stem anteversion and the femoral neck anteversion was within 5 degrees. There was a significant relationship between the anteversion of the stem and that of the femoral neck measured at all three levels (Fig. 2). When it was measured just below the femoral head, it was the closest to one, and the p-value was the lowest. Discusssion and Conclusions:. The anteversion of the uncemented stem could be calculated by using the formula to show the relationship between the stem anteversion and the femoral neck antevesion measured preoperatively. The values appeared to be sufficiently correct for making clinical decisions, although a prospective study may be necessary to confirm this

Purpose. While changes in lower limb alignment and pelvic inclination after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using certain surgical approaches have been studied, the effect of preserving the joint capsule is still unclear. We retrospectively investigated changes in lower limb alignment, length and pelvic inclination before and after surgery, and the risk of postoperative dislocation in patients who underwent capsule preserving THA using the anterolateral-supine (ALS) approach. Methods. Between July 2016 and March 2018, 112 hips (non-capsule preservation group: 42 hips, and capsule preservation group: 70 hips) from patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent THA were included in this study. Patients who underwent spinal fusion and total knee arthroplasty on the same side as that of the THA were excluded. Using computed tomography, we measured lower limb elongation, external rotation of the knee, and femoral neck/stem anteversion before operation and three to five days after operation. We examined the pelvic inclination using vertical/transverse ratio of the pelvic cavity measured by X-ray of the anteroposterior pelvic region in the standing position before and six to 12 months after operation. All operations were performed using the ALS approach and taper wedge stem. Results. No dislocation was found in both groups. Lower limb elongation was 14.5±6.3 (mean±SD) mm in the non-capsule preservation group and 9.4±8.8 mm in the capsule preservation group. A significant reduction was found in the capsule preservation group (p<0.05). Changes in knee external rotation was 7.2±10.5 degrees in the non-capsule preservation group and 3.5±10.3 degrees in the capsule preservation group. A trend toward decreased knee external rotation in the capsule preservation group (p=0.07) was observed. There was no difference in femoral neck/stem anteversion and vertical/transverse ratio of the pelvic cavity between both groups. Discussion. Patients in the capsule preservation group tended to have reduced external rotation of lower limb, which might prevent postoperative anterior dislocation due to preservation of anterior structures. The capsule preservation group had significantly reduced lower limb elongation, suggesting that preservation of the hip joint capsule ligament contributes to joint stability. There was no significant difference in the pelvic inclination between both groups. Long-term changes will be assessed by regular follow up after operation

Introduction. Appropriate femoral stem anteversion is an important factor in maintaining stability and maximizing the performance of the bearing after total hip replacement (THR). The anteversion of the native femoral neck has been shown to have a significant effect on the final anteversion of the stem, particularly with a uncemented femoral component. The aim of this study was to quantify the variation in native femoral neck anteversion in a population of patients requiring total hip replacement. Methods. Pre-operatively, 1215 patients received CT scans as part of their routine planning for THR. Within the 3D planning, each patient's native femoral neck anteversion, measured in relation to the posterior condyles of the knee, was determined. Patients were separated into eight groups based upon gender and age. Males and females were divided by those under 55 years of age, those aged 55 to 64, 65 to 74 and those 75 or older. Results. The median anteversion in males was 12.7° (−27.1°–45.5°, IQR 6.0°–19.1°), compared to female anteversion of 16.0° (− 14.0°–54.5°, IQR 9.7°– 22.4°). These gender differences were statistically significant, p < 0.0001. Femoral anteversion in young males (<55) was significantly higher than in older males (>75), p=0.002. This age-related difference approached significance in females, p = 0.06. 14% of patients had extreme anteversion (<0° or >30°). Conclusions. The Native femoral neck anteversion in patients requiring THR is widely variable, with a range of over 80°. Females have more anteverted femurs than males. Femoral anteversion in young males was significantly higher than in older males. This age-related difference approached significance in females. Having an understanding of 3D patient morphology can greatly assist in pre-operative planning of THR, as post-op stem anteversion is likely influenced by the anteversion of the native femoral neck

Short stems are an option for primary THR, but these are the technical challenges. Stem anteversion is increased with short stems usually above 20 degrees so cup anteversion must be adjusted lower. Offset is better if increased up to 5 mm more because more bony neck is retained and with increased stem anteversion the greater trochanter is more posterior, and both of these increase the risk of bony impingement. Short stems are best in A bone, okay in B bone, not recommended yet in C bone. With standard stems performing so well use caution for conversion to short stems

Introduction. Dislocation is one of severe complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Direct anterior approach (DAA) is useful for muscle preservation. Therefore, it might be also effective to reduce dislocation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the ratio and factors of dislocations after THA with DAA. Materials & methods. Nine hundred fifity two primary THAs with DAA are examined. Mean age at operation was 64.9 yrs. 838 joints are in women and 114 (joints) in men. All THAs were performed under general anesthesia in supine position. We reviewed the ratio, onset and frequency of dislocations, build of the patients, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Hip scores, implant setting angles, pelvic tilt angles and diameter of inner heads. Results. The ratio of dislocation was 14 joints (1.47%). All patients were women and mean age was 67.1 yrs. Anterior dislocation was in 9 joints and posterior was in 5 joints. Primary diagnosis for THA was the following: osteoarthritis in 9 hips and rheumatoid arthritis in 5 (hips). About primary onset, 7 joints were within 3 weeks, 5 joints from 3 weeks to 3 months and 2 joints after 3 months. About frequency, 9 joins were simple and 5 joints were multiple. Revision surgery was done in 2 joints due to ceramic fracture and cup migration. About build of the patients, mean body height was 153.1cm, mean body weight (was) 55.6 kg and mean BMI (was) 23.6. Mean preoperative JOA score was 40.0 points. Implant setting angles were the following: mean cup inclination was 42.4 degree, mean cup anteversion (was) 24.8 degree and mean stem anteversion (was) 18.7 degree. Cup inclination and anteversion in the anterior dislocation group were bigger than that in no dislocation group. Stem anteversion in the posterior dislocation group was smaller than that in no dislocation group. The difference of pelvic tilt angle between supine and standing position was 6.4 degree. It was significant bigger in the posterior dislocation group. The most of used Inner head was 28mm in 375 joints. There was no significant difference of the dislocation rate among inner head size. Discussion and conclusion. DAA-THA can expect the reduction of dislocation rate due to intermusclar approach; however there are some reports of high dislocation rate because of difficult technique. In our study, dislocation ratio was 1.47%. Risk factors of dislocation after THA was rheumatoid arthritis, large cup inclination and anteversion for anterior dislocation, small stem anteversion and large difference of pelvic tilt angle between supine and standing position for posterior dislocation

Introduction. The posterior condylar axis of the knee is the most common reference for femoral anteversion. However, the posterior condyles, nor the transepicondylar axis, provide a functional description of femoral anteversion, and their appropriateness as the ideal reference has been questioned. In a natural standing positon, the femur can be internally or externally rotated, altering the functional anteversion of the native femoral neck or prosthetic stem. Uemura et al. found that the femur internally rotates by 0.4° as femoral anteversion increases every 1°. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between femoral anteversion and the axial rotation of the femur before and after total hip replacement (THR). Method. Fifty-nine patients had a pre-operative CT scan as part of their routine planning for THR. The patients were asked to lie in a comfortable position in the CT scanner. The internal/external rotation of the femur, described as the angle between the posterior condyles and the CT coronal plane, was measured. The native femoral neck anteversion, relative to the posterior condyles, was also determined. Identical measurements were performed at one-week post-op using the same CT methodology. The relationship between femoral IR/ER and femoral anteversion was studied pre- and post-op. Additionally, the effect of changing anteversion on the axial rotation of the femur was investigated. Results. There was a strong correlation between axial rotation of the femur and femoral anteversion, both pre-and post-operatively. Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.64 and 0.66 respectively. This supported Uemura et al.'s findings that internal rotation of the femur increases with increasing anteversion. Additionally, there was a moderate correlation, r = 0.56, between the change in axial rotation of the femur and change in anteversion. This trend suggested that external rotation of the leg would increase, if stem anteversion was decreased from the native. Conclusions. Patients with high femoral anteversion may have a natural mechanism of “correction” with femoral internal rotation. Equally, patients with femoral retroversion tend to naturally externally rotate their leg. Decreasing stem anteversion from native, trended toward an increase in external rotation of the femur. This finding is supported by the clinical observation of patients with high anteversion and compensatory in-toe, who have normal foot progression angle post-operatively after having their anteversion decreased. These findings have implications when planning implant alignment in THR

Introduction. Dislocation is a major cause of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) early failure and is highly influenced by surgical approach and component positioning. Robotic assisted arthroplasty has been developed to improve component positioning and therefore reduce post-operative complications. The purpose of this study was to assess dislocation rate in robotic total hip arthroplasty performed with three different surgical approaches. Methods. All patients undergoing Robotic Arm-Assisted THA at three centers between 2014 and 2019 were included for assessment. After exclusion, 1059 patients were considered; an anterior approach was performed in 323 patients (Center 2), lateral approach in 394 patients (Center 1 and Center 2) and posterior approach in 394 patients (Center 1 and Center 3). Episodes of THA dislocation at 6 months of follow up were recorded. Stem anteversion, Cup anteversion, Cup inclination and Combined Anteversion were collected with the use of the integrated navigation system. Cumulative incidence (CI), incidence rate (IR) and risk ratio (RR) were calculated with a confidence interval of 95%. Results. Three cases of dislocation (2 posterior approach, 1 anterior approach) were recorded, with a dislocation rate of 0.28% and an IR of 0.14%. Placement of cup in Lewinnek safe zone rate was 82.2% for posterior approach, 82.0% for lateral approach and 95.4% for anterior approach. Placement in the Combined Version safe zone rate was 98.0% for posterior approach, 73.0% for lateral approach and 47.1% for anterior approach. Despite the difference, dislocation IR was 0.30% for anterior approach, 0.34% for posterior approach and 0% for lateral approach. Conclusion. Robotic assisted technique is associated with low dislocation risk, especially in posterior approach. The Combined version technique appears to be a reliable way to reduce dislocation risk in the posterior lateral approach, but does not appear to be essential for lateral and anterior approaches

Background. Between 1999 and August 2005, we performed Direct Lateral Approach (DLA) in lateral decubitus position as the main approach for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). After August 2005, we introduced Direct Anterior Approach(DAA) in supine position. Intraoperative target orientation in primary THA was planned in 40–45°cup abduction, 10–20°cup anteversion, and 10–20° stem anteversion. Precice implant positioning has been considered to be very important for postoperative function and stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the DLA and DAA for implant positioning accuracy. Methods. From 1999 to July 2009, we performed 566 primary THAs(78 male, 488 female). The subjects were divided into two groups of 224 DLA and 342 DAA (72 in early stage and 270 in late stage) The difference of the mean age at surgery and preoperative diagnosis among the groups were not significant. We planned to set the cup anteversion at 20°in DAA early stage and 12.5°in late stage DAA due to the development of postoperative dislocation in several cases with early stage DAA. We measured the cup and stem alignment postoperatively using radiography and computed tomography, and measured the combined anteversion angle by Widmer. Statistical analysis was done using the Bartlett Statistical Test and F-test. The results were expressed as median and interquartile range, with an alpha level set at less than 0.05. Results. Cup abduction angle with DLA was 42.7±6.25 °(average±standard deviation), 42.1±4.1°with early stage DAA and 41.9±5.3°with late stage DAA. There was no significant difference between the approaches with average and standard deviation (SD) of cup abduction. The mean cup anteversion with DLA (17.3±10.0°) was significantly smaller than that with early stage DAA(26.6±8.1°) and late stage DAA(21.0±8.0°). SD of cup anteversion with DLA was significantly larger than that with both DAA groups. The mean stem anteversion was significantly smaller with DLA (18.9±14.3) and late stage DAA (16.7±11.1°) than that with early stage DAA (23.5±11.9°). SD of stem anteversion with DLA was significantly larger than that with both DAA groups. There were 9 hips of dislocation: 5 hips in DLA, 3 in early DAA and one in late DAA. SD of combined anteversion Value with DLA(30.5±13.7) was significantly larger than that with early DAA (40.3±12.2) and late DAA (32.7±11.1.∗∗∗∗∗. Conclusion. Significantly less SD for anteversion of stem and cup was demonstrated with DAA compared with DLA. Stable operative positioning with DAA could yield a more accurate and reliable implantation compared with DLA in lateral position. DAA in supine position was a superior approach for primary THA

Introduction. One of the objectives of total hip arthroplasty is to restore femoral and acetabular combined anteversion. It is desirable to reproduce both femoral and acetabular antevesions to maximize the acetabular cup fixation coverage and hip joint stability. Studies investigated the resultant of implanted femoral stem anteversion in western populations showed that the implanted femoral stems had only a small portion can meet the desirable femoral anteversion angle. 1. , and anteversion angle increases after the implantation of an anatomical femoral stem with anteverted stem neck comparing to anatomical femoral neck. 2. The purpose of this study was to anatomically measure the anteversion angular difference between metaphyseal long axis and femoral neck in normal Chinese population. The metaphyseal long axis represents the coronal fixation plane of modern cementless medial-lateral cortical fitting taper stem. This angular difference or torsion Δ angle provides the estimation of how much the neck antevertion angle of femoral stem would be needed to match for desirable anatomical femoral neck version. Methods. 140 (77 male and 63 female) anonymous normal adult Chinese CT data with average age of 54.6 (male 54.6, female 54.5, P=0.95) were segmented and reconstructed to 3D models in Trauson Orthopeadic Modeling and Analytics (TOMA) program. Femoral head center, femoral neck axis and center point of diaphyseal canal 100mm bellow calcar formed the femoral neck plane. The metaphyseal stem implantation plane was determined by the center point of medial calcar, proximal canal central axis formed by femoral neck plane and the center point of diaphyseal canal 100mm bellow calcar. [Fig. 1] The angle between two planes was the torsion Δ angle between femoral placement plane and anatomical femoral neck. [Fig. 2] The torsion Δ angles were measured for all 140 cases. The traditional anteversion angle for anatomical femoral neck was also measured by Murphy's method. Student T test was perform to compare the angles for male and female. The 98% confidence level was assumed. Results. The average torsion Δ angle for whole population was 4.9°(0.04°-15.6°), SD=3.52°, male: 4.6° (0.42°-13.9°), SD=3.09°; female: 5.3° (0.04°-15.6°), SD=3.98°. There was no statistical significant difference between genders. P=0.28. All metaphyseal stem placement planes were less anteverted than anatomical femoral neck plane. [Fig. 3] The average anatomical femoral neck anteversion angle for total population was 18.6° (0.27°-42.6°), SD=7.54°; male: 18.6° (0.27°-32.9°), SD=7.37°; female: 18.7° (1.74°-42.6°), SD=7.81°. There was no statistical significance between male and female P=0.92. Only 26% of study population or 37 cases with unadjusted implant neck version had normal anteversion angle of 10°-15° (Tönnis). Discussion. The study suggested femoral stem neck anteversion angle adjustments up to 11° was necessary to match anatomical femoral neck for 94% of cases in Chinese population. And the adjustments of 0°-7° represented the 76% majority of population. This finding was in agreement with the published data in western population. 2. . Significance. Variable femoral stem neck anteversion angles up to 11° are necessary to reproduce the anatomical anteversions for 94% of normal Chinese population. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Alignment of the acetabular cup and femoral components directly affects hip joint loading and potential for impingement and dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) [1]. Changes to the lines of action and moment generating capabilities of the muscles as a result of component position may influence overall patient function. The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of component placement on hip joint contact forces (JCFs) and muscle forces during a high demand step down task and to identify important alignment parameters using a probabilistic approach. Methods. Three patients following THA (2 M: 28.3±2.8 BMI; 1 F: 25.7 BMI) performed lower extremity maximum isometric strength tests and a step down task as part of a larger IRB-approved study. Patient-specific musculoskeletal models were created by scaling a model with detailed hip musculature [2] to patient segment dimensions and mass. For each model, muscle maximum isometric strengths were optimized to minimize differences between model-predicted and measured preoperative maximum isometric joint torques at the hip and knee. Baseline simulations used patient-specific models with corresponding measured kinematics and ground reaction forces to predict hip JCFs and muscle forces using static optimization. To assess the combined effects of stem and cup position and orientation, a 1000 trial Monte Carlo simulation was performed with input variability in each degree of freedom based on the ±1 SD range in component placement relative to native geometry reported by Tsai et al. [3] (Figure 1). Maximum confidence bounds (1–99%) were predicted for the hip JCF magnitude and muscle forces for three prime muscles involved in the task (gluteus medius, gluteus minimus and psoas). HJC confidence bounds were compared to Orthoload measurements from telemetric implants from 6 patients performing the step down task. Sensitivity of hip JCF and muscle force outputs was quantified by Pearson Product-Moment correlation between the input parameter and the value of each output averaged across four points in the cycle. Results. Variation in the placement of the stem and cup produced an average maximum confidence bound (1–99%) in hip JCF of 277.7±91.1N and forces of 259.4±58.3N in the gluteus medius for all three patients (Figure 2). Sensitivity to cup and stem placement varied among the three patients; however, in general, hip JCFs were more sensitive to the position of the stem than the cup (Figure 3). Hip JCF was most sensitive to stem anteversion (0.64±0.10) and the superior/inferior stem position (0.42±0.19). Discussion. Variation in stem anteversion and medial/lateral cup position contributed the largest amount of variability in hip JCF and muscle forces during a step down task. The probabilistic analysis characterized bounds for output parameters, considering interactions between alignment parameters. Alignments that avoid increases in JCF and muscle loading during high demand tasks may lead to earlier recovery of function, by reducing muscle fatigue and the need to develop compensatory movement patterns. Acknowledgements. This research was supported in part by DePuy-Synthes

Introduction. Total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most widely used and most successful orthopedic procedures performed in developed countries. The burden of revision surgery, however, has become a major issue in terms of both volume and cost. Technical errors at the time of the index operation are known to be associated with an increased rate of revision. Statistical methods, such as the CUSUM test, which have been developed for the manufacturing industry to monitor the quality of products, have come to the attention of health-care workers as a result of centers with protracted periods of inadequate performance. In orthopedics, these methods have been used to monitor the quality of total hip replacement in a tertiary care department using conventional imaging techniques. Biplane low-dose X-ray imaging (EOS) may allow an easy, patient-friendly, way to retrieve data on the position of implants immediately postoperatively. Therefore real-time feedback is provided to surgeons and performance adjusted accordingly. Objectives. To assess the usefullness of EOS imaging in providing the position of implants immediately postoperatively. Methods. Thirty-six patients who underwent a primary hip replacement at a tertiary care department had a standing EOS acquisition before discharge (around day 5). The following parameters were collected: cup abduction, cup anteversion, leg length, stem anteversion, stem inclination. Cup inclination was considered inadequate if more than 55 degrees or less than 35 degrees; cup abduction was considered inadequate if more than 30 degrees or less than 0 degrees; leg length was considered inadequate if more than 1cm; stem anteversion was considered inadequate if more than 30 degrees of less than 0 degrees; stem inclination was considered inadequate if more than 4 degrees varus or valgus. A procedure was considered inadequate if any criterion was outside the appropriate range. A CUSUM test was used to detect inadequate performance for each criterion and for the whole procedure (more than 20% of the implants poorly positioned). Results. On this preliminary sample of 36 patients only cup inclination demonstrated to be inadequate. Other parameters were within the expected limits. The acquisition of images proved to be easy, without interrupting the flow of patient care and physician work. Conclusions. Biplane low-dose X-ray imaging (EOS) provides an easy way to continuously evaluate the quality of THR implant positioning at a tertiary care department

Introduction & aims. Apparently well-orientated total hip replacements (THR) can still fail due to functional component malalignment. Previously defined “safe zones” are not appropriate for all patients as they do not consider an individual's spinopelvic mobility. The Optimized Positioning System, OPS. TM. (Corin, UK), comprises preoperative planning based on a patient-specific dynamic analysis, and patient-specific instrumentation for delivery of the target component alignment. The aim of this study was to determine the early revision rate from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) for THRs implanted using OPS. TM. . Method. Between January 4. th. 2016 and December 20. st. 2017, a consecutive series of 841 OPS. TM. cementless total hip replacements were implanted using a Trinity acetabular cup (Corin, UK) with either a TriFit TS stem (98%) or a non-collared MetaFix stem (2%). 502 (59%) procedures were performed through a posterior approach, and 355 (41%) using the direct superior approach. Mean age was 64 (range; 27 to 92) and 51% were female. At a mean follow-up of 15 months (range; 3 to 27), the complete list of 857 patients was sent to the AOANJRR for analysis. Results. There were 5 revisions: . a periprosthetic femoral fracture at 1-month post-op in a 70F. a ceramic head fracture at 12-months post-op in a 59M. a femoral stem loosening at 7-months post-op in a 58M. a femoral stem loosening at 16-months post-op in a 64M. an anterior dislocation in a 53M, that was revised 9 days after the primary procedure. CT analysis, prior to revision surgery, revealed acetabular cup orientation of 46°/31° (inclination/anteversion) and femoral stem anteversion of 38°. Conclusions. These preliminary findings suggest the OPS. TM. dynamic planning and delivery system provides good early results, with a low rate of revision for dislocation. Limitations of the study will be discussed