Evaluate the complications and outcomes of off-hours spinal metastasis surgery. Retrospective analysis of a prospective collected data. Preoperative, operative and post-operative data were collected as well as the complications and Frankel score at all time checkpoints. Off-hours surgery was defined as surgery starting between 17:00 and 8:00 the following day or surgery during the weekend. p < 0 .05 was defined as statistical significance threshold. 376 patients were included with an incidence of off-hours surgery of 32%. There was an increase of neurologic complication in the off hours group. This was associated with a higher ASA score and older population group. Oddly, there was decreased operative time with off-hours surgery with no difference in bleeding and number of fusion levels. Nonetheless, there was a higher percentage of neurologic improvement with off hours surgery compared to in-hours surgery. Finally, there were no effect on patients' survival in this patient population. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the effect of off-hours surgery on complications and outcomes of spinal metastasis. Greater neurological compromise and higher age and ASA scores were associated with higher incidence of off-hours surgery. It is associated with decreased surgical time with higher percentage of neurological improvement. Finally, there is no effect of surgical timing on survival rates

En bloc resection for primary bone tumours and isolated metastasis are complex surgeries associated with a high rate of adverse events (AEs). The primary objective of this study was to explore the relationship between frailty/sarcopenia and major perioperative AEs following en bloc resection for primary bone tumours or isolated metastases of the spine. Secondary objectives were to report the prevalence and distribution of frailty and sarcopenia, and determine the relationship between these factors and length of stay (LOS), unplanned reoperation, and 1-year postoperative mortality in this population. This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from a single quaternary care referral center consisting of patients undergoing an elective en bloc resection for a primary bone tumour or an isolated spinal metastasis between January 1st, 2009 and February 28th, 2020. Frailty was calculated with the modified frailty index (mFI) and spine tumour frailty index (STFI). Sarcopenia, determined by the total psoas area (TPA) vertebral body (VB) ratio (TPA/VB), was measured at L3 and L4. Regression analysis produced ORs, IRRs, and HRs that quantified the association between frailty/sarcopenia and major perioperative AEs, LOS, unplanned reoperation and 1-year postoperative mortality. One hundred twelve patients met the inclusion criteria. Using the mFI, five patients (5%) were frail (mFI ³ 0.21), while the STFI identified 21 patients (19%) as frail (STFI ³ 2). The mean CT ratios were 1.45 (SD 0.05) and 1.81 (SD 0.06) at L3 and L4 respectively. Unadjusted analysis demonstrated that sarcopenia and frailty were not significant predictors of major perioperative AEs, LOS or unplanned reoperation. Sarcopenia defined by the CT L3 TPA/VB and CT L4 TPA/VB ratios significantly predicted 1-year mortality (HR of 0.32 per one unit increase, 95% CI 0.11-0.93, p=0.04 vs. HR of 0.28 per one unit increase, 95% CI 0.11-0.69, p=0.01) following unadjusted analysis. Frailty defined by an STFI score ≥ 2 predicted 1-year postoperative mortality (OR of 2.10, 95% CI 1.02-4.30, p=0.04). The mFI was not predictive of any clinical outcome in patients undergoing en bloc resection for primary bone tumours or isolated metastases of the spine. Sarcopenia defined by the CT L3 TPA/VB and L4 TPA/VB and frailty assessed with the STFI predicted 1-year postoperative mortality on univariate analysis but not major perioperative AEs, LOS or reoperation. Further investigation with a larger cohort is needed to identify the optimal measure for assessing frailty and sarcopenia in this spine population

Spinal metastases are seen in 10–30% of cancer patients. Twenty percent of these metastases occur in the lumbo-sacral spine. Lumbo-sacral spine has different mechanical properties and encloses the cauda equina. Few studies took interest in this spinal segment. The objective of this study is to evaluate prognostic factors of lumbo-sacral spinal metastasis treated in our center. We retrospectively reviewed 376 patients who were operated in our center from 2010 to 2018. Eighty-nine patients presented lumbo-sacral metastases and thus were included. Data collected included age, smoking, tumor histology, American spinal injury association (ASIA) score, modified Tokuhashi score, modified Bauer score, ambulation status and adjuvant treatment. The mean population age was 60.9 years old (35–85). The tumor histology was predominantly lung (19 patients, 21.3%), breast (13 patients, 14.6%), kidney (11 patients, 12.4%) and prostate (9 patients 10.1%). Twenty-two patients (24.7%) were unable to walk preoperatively. Seventy-nine patients (88.8%) underwent a posterior open approach with corpectomy in 65 patients (73%). Eighteen patients regained ambulation post-operatively (81.8%). The mean survival was 24.03 months (CI95% 17,38–30,67, Range 0–90) and the median of survival was 9 months (CI95% 4.38–13.62). Better preoperative ASIA score had a significant favorable effect (p=0.03) on survival. Patients who regained their ability to walk had better survival (25.1 months (CI95% 18.2–32) VS 0.5 months (CI95% 0–1.1). Postoperative radiotherapy had a benefic effect on survival (p=0.019): Survival Increased from 10.5 months (CI95% 2.4–18.7) to 27.6 months (CI95% 19.5–35.8). The modified Tokuhashi and the modified Bauer scores underestimated the survival of the patients with lumbosacral metastases. Lumbosacral spinal metastases has better survival than expected by Tokuhashi and Bauer score. Surgical procedure have an important impact on survival and the ability to walk

The use of cervical pedicle screws as anchors in posterior reconstruction surgery has not been widely accepted due to the neurological or vascular injury. We thus sought to investigate the accuracy of free-handed pedicle screw placement in the cervical and upper thoracic spine at the early stage of clinical application. Eight patients (five males and three females) were included in this study. Mean age was 63 years (31 to 78 years). There were three patients with rheumatoid arthritis, three with cervical fracture-dislocation, and two with spinal metastasis. Twenty-four pedicle screws (3.5 mm diameter: Vertex, Medtronic Sofamordanek) were placed into the pedicle from C2 to T2 level by free-handed technique2). Grade of breaching of pedicle cortex was divided into four groups (Grade 0–3). In addition, screw axis angle (SAA) were calculated from the horizontal and sagittal CT images and compared with pedicle transverse angle (PTA). Furthermore, perioperative complications were also examined. Our free-handed pedicle screw placement with carving technique is as follows: A longitudinal gutter was created at the lamina-lateral mass junction and then transverse gutter perpendicular to the longitudinal gutter was made at the lateral notch of lateral mass. The entry point of the pedicle screw was on the midline of lateral mass. Medial pedicle cortex through the ventral lamina was identified using the probes to create the hole within the pedicle. The hole was tapped and the screw was gently introduced into the pedicle to ensure the sagittal trajectory using fluoroscopy. In the transverse direction, 22 out of 24 screws (92%) were entirely contained within the pedicle (Grade 0). In contrast, only teo screws (8%) produced breaches less than half the screw diameter (Grade 1). In the sagittal direction, all screws were within the pedicle (Grade 0). Screw trajectories were not consistent with anatomical pedicle axis angle; the mean SAA were smaller than the mean PTA at all levels. The pedicle diameter ranged from 3.9 to 9.2 mm. The mean value gradually increased toward the caudal level. There were no neurological and vascular complications related to screw placement

Purpose. Maintenance of vertebral mechanical stability is of paramount importance to prevent pathologic fractures and resultant neurologic compromise in individuals with spinal metastases. Current non-surgical treatments for vertebral metastases (i.e. chemotherapy, bisphophonates (BP) and radiation) yield variable responses in the tumour and surrounding bone. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a novel, minimally-invasive technology that utilizes a drug activated by light at a specific non-thermal wavelength to locally destroy tumour cells. Previously, we observed that PDT can ablate cancer cells within bone and yield short-term (1-week) improvements in vertebral architecture and biomechanical strength, particularly when combined with BP therapy. This study aims to evaluate the effects of PDT in vertebral bone over a longer (6-week) time period, alone and combined with previous BP treatment, to determine if improvements in skeletal architecture and strength are maintained. Method. Fourty healthy rnu/rnu rats were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: (i) untreated control, (ii) BP only, (iii) PDT only and (iv) PDT following BP. BP treatments were administered on day 0 via subcutaneous injection of zoledronic acid. PDT was administered on day 7 via an intravenous injection of BPD-MA photosensitizer. A flat-cut optical fiber was inserted percutaneously adjacent to lumbar vertebra L2. After a 15-minute drug-light interval, 75J of light energy was delivered from a 690nm laser. Six weeks later, animals were euthanized. Structural properties of excised L2 vertebral bodies were quantified through semi-automated analysis of micro-CT images. In of the specimens, mechanical properties were evaluated by loading the L2 vertebral body to failure in axial compression. The remaining L2 vertebrae were analyzed for morphology, osteoid formation and osteoclast activity using histological methods. Results. Combined PDT+BP treatment yielded the largest increases in bone volume fraction (31%), trabecular thickness (45%) and vBMD (37%) and decreases in trabecular number (14%) and separation (26%) compared to untreated controls (n=10, all p<0.05). The cortical shell mass fraction was significantly lower than that of controls (24%) indicating increases in bone structure were primarily due to trabecular changes. Mechanically, PDT+BP treatment demonstrated a trend towards an increase in ultimate force compared to controls (n=5, p=0.176). BP-only and PDT-only treatments demonstrated similar trends to the combined treatment, but with a lower magnitude of effect. Qualitatively, histological analysis suggested more osteoid formation in groups receiving PDT, and a higher proportion of bone in BP-treated groups. Conclusion. PDT has a sustained positive effect on the mechanical and structural integrity of bone, particularly in combination with BP treatment. By ablating tumour tissue and strengthening bone, combined PDT+BP treatment presents as an attractive adjuvant minimally-invasive therapy for spinal metastasis